Blackhawks vs Mammoth Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS NHL Lines & Props (Mar 12)
Updated: 2026-03-10T03:31:50.923562ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The Chicago Blackhawks (24–29–11) travel to Salt Lake City to face the Utah Mammoth (34–26–5) on March 12, 2026 at the Delta Center, concluding their season series with one final Central Division clash. Chicago has already beaten Utah three times this season but faces a Mammoth club that sits comfortably in the Western Conference wild‑card picture and features solid overall metrics on both ends of the ice.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Mar 12, 2026
Start Time: 9:00 PM EST
Venue: Delta Center
Mammoth Record: (34-26)
Blackhawks Record: (24-29)
OPENING ODDS
CHI Moneyline: 190
UTA Moneyline: -233
CHI Spread: +1.5
UTA Spread: -1.5
Over/Under: 6
CHI
Betting Trends
- The Blackhawks have been uneven against the spread of late, with their recent performances producing mixed covers and reflective of a team that can play close games but hasn’t consistently met the expectations of oddsmakers, especially on the road.
UTA
Betting Trends
- Utah has a stronger recent performance trend — 6–3–1 over its last ten — and while ATS specifics fluctuate with line movement, the Mammoth’s home success and goal differential have helped them be a respectable cover option in many of their Delta Center outings this season.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- Oddsmakers list Utah as favorites with spreads around Mammoth –1.5 and a moneyline edge, while totals hover near 6–6.5 goals. Head‑to‑head trends favor Chicago this season (3–0 against Utah), but Utah’s stronger overall record and scoring differential — they average about 3.12 goals and allow roughly 2.79 compared to Chicago’s 2.64 goals for and 3.16 against — add nuance to betting perspectives.
CHI vs. UTA
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: S. Rinzel over 1.5 Shots on Goal.
LIVE NHL ODDS
NHL ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
471-392
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+883.3
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$88,327
VS. SPREAD
2039-1653
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+610
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$60,995
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Chicago vs Utah Prediction & Odds:
Free NHL Betting Insights for 3/12/26
The March 12, 2026 showdown between the Chicago Blackhawks and the Utah Mammoth at the Delta Center in Salt Lake City caps a season series that has tilted toward Chicago in head‑to‑head results but highlights two teams on divergent tracks overall. Chicago’s three wins over Utah this season — including a 3‑2 overtime decision as recently as their March 10 matchup where Frank Nazar scored the game‑winner — underscore that the Blackhawks have been able to exploit certain matchups and generate enough offense against a Mammoth defense that can be vulnerable in key moments. The Blackhawks’ newcomers and core scorers like Connor Bedard contributed to those wins, but Chicago’s overall record — 24‑29‑11 — shows they’ve been inconsistent, particularly in maintaining offensive pressure and defensive structure against deeper teams. Utah comes into this game with a solid 34–26–5 record and sits within or close to a wild‑card spot in the Western Conference, buoyed by a positive scoring differential and reliable performances from a roster led by Clayton Keller and Dylan Guenther. Utah’s defense has been effective overall, allowing around 2.79 goals per game, and its goaltending has provided quality starts that keep the team competitive even when its offense stalls, while Chicago’s 3.16 goals allowed per game and lower scoring output reflect why they’ve trailed Utah in the standings. This clash pits Chicago’s opportunistic style — they’ve found ways to win and cover in this matchup specifically — against Utah’s more balanced approach that leans on home ice and structured play.
Tactically, Chicago will look to use its physical forecheck and secondary scoring depth to create turnovers and generate odd‑man rushes, while Utah will aim to control the neutral zone, sustain offensive zone pressure through disciplined puck movement, and exploit its special teams opportunities. The Blackhawks’ penalty kill has been a strength, often limiting opponent power plays and disrupting momentum swings, but against Utah’s attack that isn’t always enough; conversely, Utah’s power play, while not elite, has produced enough timely conversions to tilt close games in their favor. Goaltending looms large here: Chicago’s netminder has posted solid save percentages in this series, but Utah’s keeper has shown a knack for calm composure when the Mammoth defense executes properly. Betting implications are layered — Utah’s home favorite status and spread edge suggest confidence from oddsmakers, yet Chicago’s head‑to‑head success this season complicates matters for bettors evaluating moneyline or puck line plays. The over/under near six goals reflects both teams’ recent scoring and defensive trends, making totals a compelling angle if either club jumps out early or defensive intensities increase. Ultimately, this series finale is a test of consistency versus matchup familiarity: Chicago knows how to beat Utah, but Utah’s overall strength and home advantage set the stage for a competitive, tightly contested game where execution in the third period and special teams could swing the outcome late.
Get live NHL odds and precise AI NHL picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
we have assigned Drew Commesso to @goicehogs.
— Chicago Blackhawks (@NHLBlackhawks) March 11, 2026
📰 ➡︎ https://t.co/5K6UnCyfQr pic.twitter.com/jhnOfVn8qH
Chicago Blackhawks NHL Preview
The Chicago Blackhawks make the trip to Salt Lake City on March 12, 2026 looking to cap their season series with the Utah Mammoth on a high note, carrying the confidence of three victories against them this season but confronting the broader challenges that have defined their 2025–26 campaign. Chicago’s 24‑29‑11 record reflects a club that has battled inconsistency but possessed moments of promise, particularly against particular rivals like Utah. In their most recent meeting, the Blackhawks earned a 3‑2 overtime win thanks to a clutch power‑play goal by Frank Nazar and contributions from Andre Burakovsky and Andrew Mangiapane, illustrating Chicago’s ability to find timely offense when needed. That kind of clutch scoring — especially in tight games — has been a hallmark for Chicago in this head‑to‑head matchup, but over the entire season, generating consistent offense has proven a more significant challenge. Chicago averages around 2.64 goals per game, which ranks near the bottom of the league’s scoring outputs, and while they possess skilled forwards capable of changing a game, the team as a whole has often struggled to sustain pressure for all three periods. Nonetheless, there are positives in Chicago’s 2025‑26 season that suggest they can remain competitive in this road contest. Connor Bedard, one of the league’s brightest young stars, continues to drive play and create scoring chances, often finding linemates with precise passes and maintaining strong possession metrics. Bedard’s presence on the ice has elevated Chicago’s attack when he’s at his best, as his vision and speed can turn defensive breaks into odd‑man rushes and high‑danger opportunities against “transition‑heavy” teams like Utah. In addition to Bedard, the contributions of veterans such as Teuvo Teravainen — who has logged points in multiple straight road games — and other supporting forwards mean Chicago can piece together lines capable of challenging defensive coverage, generating shots from the slot, and beating goaltenders in tight spaces.
Chicago’s penalty kill has also been a bright spot, ranking among the league’s most effective units and consistently shutting down opponent power plays, including a perfect penalty kill against Utah in this season’s matchups — 7‑for‑7 — which has prevented Utah from taking momentum via man advantage. Defensively, Chicago has had stretches where its back end limits quality chances against, and when combined with timely saves from their netminder, the Blackhawks can keep games within reach even if scoring is scarce. This combination of opportunistic offense and disciplined defense is a blueprint for Chicago to stay competitive on the road, but it does require near‑flawless execution for a full 60 minutes to counter Utah’s depth and structured scoring. Chicago’s road results have been mixed; while they’ve earned points in three straight road games and in many of their recent away contests, their scoring differential and overall Central Division standing speak to the uphill battle they face against favorites like the Mammoth. To succeed in this matchup, Chicago will need to maintain aggressive forechecking, win puck battles in the neutral zone, and capitalize on transition speed to generate odd‑man rushes that force Utah’s defense into quick recovery. Winning key draws, limiting turnovers, and staying out of the penalty box will also be critical to keeping puck possession and avoiding fatigue in their defensive zone. If Chicago can squeeze goals from their depth lines and control rebounds on defense, they can make this contest tighter than expected and potentially secure a fourth victory against Utah this season — a storyline that underscores their competitive potential despite the broader challenges of their 2025–26 campaign.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Utah Mammoth NHL Preview
The Utah Mammoth enter their March 12, 2026 matchup against the Chicago Blackhawks with a blend of offensive talent, a strong overall record, and a home‑ice edge that makes them one of the more intriguing wild‑card contenders in the Western Conference. At 34‑26‑5, Utah has shown it can compete with many of the league’s better teams and integrates contributions from both its forwards and defensemen. The Mammoth’s scoring is balanced; they average around 3.12 goals per game, with key figures like Clayton Keller — who leads the club in points with 64 — and Dylan Guenther, who has reached the 30‑goal mark this season, providing secondary scoring that prevents opposing teams from zeroing in on a single offensive threat. Behind that, Utah’s defense and goaltending have been strengths, allowing roughly 2.79 goals per game and enabling the team to stay in control during critical stretches of games; this reliability has translated to solid performances at the Delta Center, where the Mammoth boast a strong home record and haven’t lost back‑to‑back games at home in quite some time. Special teams offer further depth to Utah’s profile: while the power play has been middling relative to elite units, they’ve converted just enough opportunities to tilt close contests, and the penalty kill, with competent zone coverage and disciplined work in the defensive end, has thwarted several opponent man‑advantage pushes. Unlike some teams that rely heavily on one or two stars for offense, Utah’s depth allows for scoring across lines, which in turn mitigates scoring droughts. Clayton Keller’s ability to drive possession and create playmaking opportunities, combined with Guenther’s finishing touch, forces defenses to account for multiple scoring threats simultaneously, opening ice for Logan Cooley and others to generate secondary shots and high‑danger chances.
Additionally, Utah’s defensive corps — reinforced at midseason by the acquisition of veteran blueliner MacKenzie Weegar — has bolstered the team’s ability to control the defensive zone, limit odd‑man rushes, and help their goaltender make clean saves without giving up rebounds in traffic. Head coach Andre Tourigny has emphasized a disciplined neutral‑zone structure that funnels opponents to less dangerous shots while encouraging quick transitions for Utah’s speed‑oriented forwards; this tactic has proven effective against structured teams and is a key reason Utah remains competitive deep into the regular season. In this matchup against Chicago, the Mammoth’s home‑ice advantage extends beyond crowd support — the team’s familiarity with puck bounces, line matchups, and altitude conditioning adds an intangible edge that can wear on visiting teams over the course of 60 minutes. If Utah can jump out to an early lead by executing crisp breakout passes and sustaining time in the offensive zone, they can force Chicago into reactive play, which plays into Utah’s strengths. Given the Mammoth’s recent results and overall metrics, they enter this contest as favorites, but they must remain focused defensively and capitalize on scoring opportunities to avoid the pitfalls that have occasionally slowed their momentum this season.
8️⃣ more years for #8️⃣!
— Utah Mammoth (@utahmammoth) March 11, 2026
Schmaltzy is staying in Utah. pic.twitter.com/k1AC7n94ip
Chicago vs Utah Prop Picks (AI)
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through loads of datapoints on each team. In fact, anytime the Blackhawks and Mammoth play there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at Delta Center in Mar seemingly never follow normal, predictable betting trends.
Chicago vs Utah Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports wizard, has been pouring over tons of data from every facet between the Blackhawks and Mammoth and using recursive machine learning and cutting-edge AI to boil down the data to a single cover probability.
The Algorithm has been most watching on the growing weight human bettors tend to put on coaching factors between a Blackhawks team going up against a possibly unhealthy Mammoth team. We’ve found the true game analytics might reflect a strong lean against one Vegas line specifically.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our NHL AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI Chicago vs Utah picks, computer picks Blackhawks vs Mammoth, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW | ||||||
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full NHL schedule.
Chicago Betting Trends
The Blackhawks have been uneven against the spread of late, with their recent performances producing mixed covers and reflective of a team that can play close games but hasn’t consistently met the expectations of oddsmakers, especially on the road.
Utah Betting Trends
Utah has a stronger recent performance trend — 6–3–1 over its last ten — and while ATS specifics fluctuate with line movement, the Mammoth’s home success and goal differential have helped them be a respectable cover option in many of their Delta Center outings this season.
Blackhawks vs. Mammoth Matchup Trends
Oddsmakers list Utah as favorites with spreads around Mammoth –1.5 and a moneyline edge, while totals hover near 6–6.5 goals. Head‑to‑head trends favor Chicago this season (3–0 against Utah), but Utah’s stronger overall record and scoring differential — they average about 3.12 goals and allow roughly 2.79 compared to Chicago’s 2.64 goals for and 3.16 against — add nuance to betting perspectives.
Chicago vs. Utah Game Info
Chicago vs Utah starts on March 12, 2026 at 9:00 PM EST.
Venue: Delta Center.
Spread: Utah -1.5
Moneyline: Chicago 190, Utah -233
Over/Under: 6
Chicago: (24-29) | Utah: (34-26)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: S. Rinzel over 1.5 Shots on Goal.. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
Oddsmakers list Utah as favorites with spreads around Mammoth –1.5 and a moneyline edge, while totals hover near 6–6.5 goals. Head‑to‑head trends favor Chicago this season (3–0 against Utah), but Utah’s stronger overall record and scoring differential — they average about 3.12 goals and allow roughly 2.79 compared to Chicago’s 2.64 goals for and 3.16 against — add nuance to betting perspectives.
CHI trend: The Blackhawks have been uneven against the spread of late, with their recent performances producing mixed covers and reflective of a team that can play close games but hasn’t consistently met the expectations of oddsmakers, especially on the road.
UTA trend: Utah has a stronger recent performance trend — 6–3–1 over its last ten — and while ATS specifics fluctuate with line movement, the Mammoth’s home success and goal differential have helped them be a respectable cover option in many of their Delta Center outings this season.
See our latest NHL picks and odds pages for 2026 to compare prices before you bet.
Chicago vs. Utah Odds
Remi is pouring through loads of data on each line. In fact, anytime the Chicago vs Utah trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme travel distance seemingly never follow normal, predictable patterns.
| CHI Moneyline | 190 |
|---|---|
| UTA Moneyline | -233 |
| CHI Spread | +1.5 |
| UTA Spread | -1.5 |
| Over / Under | 6 |
Chicago vs Utah Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mar 14, 2026 1:00PM EDT
Anaheim Ducks
Ottawa Senators
3/14/26 1PM
Ducks
Senators
|
–
–
|
+136
-162
|
+1.5 (-192)
-1.5 (+160)
|
O 6.5 (-105)
U 6.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2026 3:00PM EDT
Boston Bruins
Washington Capitals
3/14/26 3PM
Bruins
Capitals
|
–
–
|
+114
-135
|
+1.5 (-225)
-1.5 (+185)
|
O 6.5 (+110)
U 6.5 (-130)
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2026 4:00PM EDT
Colorado Avalanche
Winnipeg Jets
3/14/26 4PM
Avalanche
Jets
|
–
–
|
-185
+154
|
-1.5 (+136)
+1.5 (-162)
|
O 6.5 (+110)
U 6.5 (-130)
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2026 6:00PM EDT
New York Rangers
Minnesota Wild
3/14/26 6PM
Rangers
Wild
|
–
–
|
+190
-230
|
+1.5 (-135)
-1.5 (+114)
|
O 6.5 (+110)
U 6.5 (-130)
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2026 7:00PM EDT
Toronto Maple Leafs
Buffalo Sabres
3/14/26 7PM
Maple Leafs
Sabres
|
–
–
|
+190
-230
|
+1.5 (-122)
-1.5 (+102)
|
O 6.5 (-115)
U 6.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2026 7:00PM EDT
Carolina Hurricanes
Tampa Bay Lightning
3/14/26 7PM
Hurricanes
Lightning
|
–
–
|
+114
-135
|
+1.5 (-218)
-1.5 (+180)
|
O 6.5 (+100)
U 6.5 (-120)
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2026 7:00PM EDT
Calgary Flames
New York Islanders
3/14/26 7PM
Flames
Islanders
|
–
–
|
+140
-166
|
+1.5 (-185)
-1.5 (+154)
|
O 5.5 (-120)
U 5.5 (+100)
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2026 7:00PM EDT
Los Angeles Kings
New Jersey Devils
3/14/26 7PM
Kings
Devils
|
–
–
|
+124
-148
|
+1.5 (-218)
-1.5 (+180)
|
O 5.5 (-110)
U 5.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2026 7:00PM EDT
San Jose Sharks
Montreal Canadiens
3/14/26 7PM
Sharks
Canadiens
|
–
–
|
+154
|
+1.5 (-162)
|
O 6.5 (-122)
U 6.5 (+102)
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2026 7:30PM EDT
Columbus Blue Jackets
Philadelphia Flyers
3/14/26 7:30PM
Blue Jackets
Flyers
|
–
–
|
-125
+105
|
-1.5 (+200)
+1.5 (-245)
|
O 6.5 (+110)
U 6.5 (-130)
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2026 8:00PM EDT
Detroit Red Wings
Dallas Stars
3/14/26 8PM
Red Wings
Stars
|
–
–
|
+142
-170
|
+1.5 (-185)
-1.5 (+154)
|
O 5.5 (-115)
U 5.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2026 10:00PM EDT
Chicago Blackhawks
Las Vegas Golden Knights
3/14/26 10PM
Blackhawks
Golden Knights
|
–
–
|
+195
|
+1.5 (-125)
|
O 6.5 (+114)
U 6.5 (-135)
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2026 10:00PM EDT
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
3/14/26 10PM
Kraken
Canucks
|
–
–
|
-130
+110
|
-1.5 (+195)
+1.5 (-238)
|
O 6.5 (+114)
U 6.5 (-135)
|
NHL Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers Chicago Blackhawks vs. Utah Mammoth on March 12, 2026 at Delta Center.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our NHL odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
|
|
|
|
RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLA@NYI | NYI +127 | 48.9% | 1 | WIN |
| WPG@NJ | WPG +110 | 49.3% | 1 | WIN |
| NJ@SEA | NJ -120 | 54.9% | 2 | WIN |
| FLA@CHI | OVER 5.5 | 57.1% | 3 | WIN |
| NJ@EDM | NJ +151 | 44.0% | 1 | WIN |
| CLB@PIT | PIT -120 | 54.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| MIN@BUF | BUF -120 | 55.6% | 4 | LOSS |
| ANA@LA | ANA +128 | 47.6% | 1 | WIN |
| NSH@COL | UNDER 6.5 | 53.8% | 3 | LOSS |
| CGY@CHI | CHI -118 | 54.8% | 3 | LOSS |
| EDM@NSH | NSH +115 | 51.0% | 1 | WIN |
| DAL@ANA | DAL -116 | 54.0% | 3 | LOSS |
| FLA@BUF | BUF -115 | 55.8% | 4 | LOSS |
| NJ@WPG | WPG -122 | 55.5% | 4 | WIN |
| SEA@CGY | SEA +137 | 46.5% | 1 | WIN |
| NSH@CGY | CGY -118 | 57.5% | 4 | LOSS |
| BUF@CLB | BUF -108 | 59.7% | 4 | LOSS |
| WPG@TOR | TOR -133 | 58.8% | 4 | WIN |
| MIN@SJ | SJ +150 | 47.4% | 1 | WIN |
| WAS@FLA | FLA -118 | 56.6% | 3 | WIN |
| MIN@WPG | MIN -113 | 55.1% | 4 | WIN |
| PHI@CHI | PHI -125 | 56.1% | 4 | WIN |
| DAL@DET | DAL -125 | 58.0% | 6 | LOSS |
| ANA@CLB | ZACH WERENSKI OVER 1.5 BLOCKS | 54.4% | 4 | LOSS |
| NSH@STL | NSH -105 | 53.3% | 3 | WIN |
| OTT@WPG | OVER 5.5 | 54.0% | 3 | LOSS |
| TB@NYI | TB -130 | 60.9% | 6 | LOSS |
| LV@NYI | NYI +120 | 46.1% | 1 | WIN |
| BUF@CGY | OVER 5.5 | 52.2% | 1 | WIN |
| MIN@CGY | MIN -115 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
| PIT@TB | UNDER 6.5 | 54.8% | 3 | LOSS |
| TOR@FLA | OVER 6 | 53.8% | 3 | PUSH |
| MON@LV | OVER 6 | 54.4% | 4 | LOSS |
| PHI@FLA | SAM BENNETT UNDER 2.5 SHOTS ON GOAL | 54.1% | 4 | LOSS |
| BOS@NYI | MATHEW BARZAL OVER 0.5 ASSTS | 54.4% | 4 | LOSS |
| CLB@WAS | OVER 6.5 | 54.2% | 3 | LOSS |
| CLB@DET | DET -135 | 67.0% | 6 | WIN |
| STL@PHI | UNDER 5.5 | 54.6% | 4 | WIN |
| CAR@MIN | OVER 6 | 56.4% | 4 | WIN |
| PHI@STL | JORDAN BINNINGTON UNDER 22.5 SAVES | 54.4% | 4 | LOSS |
| CLB@SEA | CLB +110 | 44.6% | 1 | WIN |
| MIN@NYI | MATHEW BARZAL OVER 0.5 PTS | 56.6% | 6 | WIN |
| PHI@NSH | NSH -122 | 55.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| SJ@SEA | JORDAN EBERLE OVER 0.5 ASSTS | 53.3% | 3 | LOSS |
| CAR@NYR | OVER 5.5 | 53.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| PIT@TOR | OVER 6.5 | 53.5% | 3 | WIN |
| VAN@NSH | OVER 5.5 | 53.9% | 3 | WIN |
| NJ@ANA | ANA +110 | 44.8% | 1 | WIN |
| DET@ANA | DET -100 | 51.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| NYI@CAR | UNDER 6.5 | 54.1% | 4 | LOSS |
| WPG@MIN | WPG -115 | 56.4% | 4 | WIN |