New Hampshire vs Ball State Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CFB Lines & Props (Sep 13)
Updated: 2025-09-06T02:28:40.156150ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
New Hampshire heads to Scheumann Stadium on Saturday, September 13, 2025, for a regional FBS/FCS showdown with Ball State, a tune-up in name only given the Cardinals’ urgency after an 0–2 start and the Wildcats’ confidence at 2–0. Markets list Ball State as the home favorite with a modest total, framing a possessions-and-field-position game where red-zone sequencing and turnover margin loom large.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Sep 13, 2025
Start Time: 2:00 PM EST
Venue: Scheumann Stadium
Cardinals Record: (0-2)
Wildcats Record: (2-0)
OPENING ODDS
NH Moneyline: ODDS COMING SOON
BALLST Moneyline: ODDS COMING SOON
NH Spread: ODDS COMING SOON
BALLST Spread: ODDS COMING SOON
Over/Under: ODDS COMING SOON
NH
Betting Trends
- Trend boards show the Wildcats trending to the over in five of their last six overall, but they’ve struggled outright away from home in historical samples. They step up here as a road underdog versus an FBS opponent.
BALLST
Betting Trends
- Ball State is 14–6 ATS across its last 20 and an eye-popping 8–1 ATS in its last nine at home, suggesting market underrating in Muncie despite early-season losses to Purdue (31–0) and at Auburn (42–3).
MATCHUP TRENDS
- With Ball State favored at home in a low-to-mid total environment, two red-zone trades of TD→FG approximate an eight-point ATS swing; favorite/under dynamics increase late backdoor risk if drives stall. Computer and odds dashboards have the listing live with UNH 2–0 and Ball State 0–2 on the board.
NH vs. BALLST
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: REMI'S STILL ANALYZING MARKETS
LIVE CFB ODDS
CFB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
469-391
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+890.5
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$89,052
VS. SPREAD
2036-1647
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+622.1
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$62,212
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
New Hampshire vs Ball State Prediction & Odds:
Free CFB Betting Insights for 9/13/25
The September 13, 2025 contest between Ball State and New Hampshire at Scheumann Stadium in Muncie is the kind of matchup that, while billed as an FBS vs. FCS test, carries plenty of intrigue when you look at the context surrounding both programs. Ball State enters at 0–2, coming off a brutal start against Purdue and Auburn in which the Cardinals were shut out in one and managed only a field goal in the other, so the sense of urgency is high to stabilize their season and prove they can execute cleanly against a more manageable opponent. New Hampshire, on the other hand, arrives with momentum after opening 2–0, and though the Wildcats face a steep step up in competition here, their unbeaten start gives them belief and a sense of freedom—nothing to lose in a game where the spread and depth favor their opponent. The betting markets reflect that duality: Ball State is favored at home, buoyed by a strong ATS history in Muncie (14–6 ATS in their last 20 and 8–1 ATS in their last nine at home), while New Hampshire trends toward high-scoring games and overs in five of their last six, which hints at volatility that could keep things interesting if they can sustain offense for stretches. From a matchup standpoint, the focus falls on first-down efficiency and red-zone finishing. For Ball State, the blueprint is textbook: establish the run early with inside zone and duo to keep themselves in second-and-medium, then build rhythm for the quarterback with quick-game concepts before taking calculated shots when safeties creep up.
The Cardinals must convert at least 60 percent of their red-zone trips into touchdowns to insulate against late backdoor scenarios in a modest total environment, because settling for threes instead of sevens creates variance. Defensively, they need to apply lessons from facing Power Four opponents by squeezing early downs, fitting gaps, and tackling in space so that New Hampshire has to earn everything in 10–12-play drives rather than hitting chunk plays. For New Hampshire, the path is narrower but attainable if they execute with discipline: keep their early-down success rate near 45–50 percent with a mix of quick passes and efficient runs, manufacture at least two explosive plays of 20-plus yards to flip field position, and, above all, protect the football. Red-zone resistance is their defensive lifeline; forcing Ball State to settle for field goals twice could amount to an eight-point ATS swing. Special teams will likely play an outsized role in shaping hidden yardage, as boundary punts, penalty-free returns, and confidence from the kicker on 40–45-yard field goals can be the subtle edges that extend their cover chances. The “middle eight” minutes around halftime loom as the pivotal sequence—if Ball State lands a two-for-one score there, the game could quickly tilt to three scores and erase UNH’s chance of making it competitive. Conversely, if the Wildcats can end the first half with points or a stop and open the third quarter strong, they can apply real pressure on a Cardinals team already dealing with early-season adversity. Ultimately, Ball State’s roster depth and home-field advantage make them deserving favorites, but their ability to justify that status hinges on executing the fundamentals: no more than one turnover, fewer than 50 penalty yards, and dominance on standard downs. If they hit those marks, this should be the kind of bounce-back win that resets their season. If they don’t, New Hampshire has just enough momentum and discipline to turn a supposedly routine tune-up into a nervy one-possession contest late.
Get live CFB odds and precise AI CFB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
Cats’ finished the job. #CAT2CLU6 #BuiltEachDay pic.twitter.com/n7Q65TC4nD
— New Hampshire Football (@UNH_Football) September 7, 2025
New Hampshire Wildcats CFB Preview
For New Hampshire, the September 13 trip to Muncie to face Ball State is more than just an FCS vs. FBS challenge; it is a chance to validate a 2–0 start and prove that their formula of efficiency, opportunism, and belief can hold up against a program with more scholarships and depth. The Wildcats know they can’t match the Cardinals in raw size and roster depth, but their strength lies in execution—minimizing mistakes, capitalizing on opponents’ lapses, and forcing the game into a possession-to-possession grind. Offensively, New Hampshire must prioritize early-down rhythm, aiming for around a 45–50 percent success rate so they can avoid obvious passing downs where Ball State’s defensive line can tee off. The game plan likely leans on inside zone and split-zone runs mixed with quick-game throws such as slants, outs, and hitches to keep the quarterback comfortable and the chains moving. To have a realistic chance of covering, the Wildcats must manufacture at least two explosives of 20-plus yards, whether through play-action shots or well-timed vertical throws, because they can’t afford to rely exclusively on grinding 12-play drives against deeper athletes. Protecting the football is the non-negotiable core of their strategy—giving Ball State short fields via turnovers would collapse any underdog equity.
Defensively, the Wildcats’ best shot is a bend-but-don’t-break structure: keep safeties deep to prevent vertical shots, rally-tackle to limit yards after catch, and force the Cardinals to settle for field goals inside the red zone, as even two of those stands equate to roughly an eight-point ATS swing. Disguising coverage on third downs can generate hesitation, giving their pass rush just enough time to create pressure and perhaps steal a takeaway. Special teams is another equalizer—hidden yardage matters even more when margins are slim. Directional punting to the boundary, penalty-free coverage units, and hitting field goals from the 40–45 yard range could be the difference between hanging inside the spread and getting buried by momentum. The Wildcats must also manage the “middle eight” minutes around halftime, where favorites typically try to double up with scores before and after the break; if New Hampshire can hold serve there, they’ll give themselves a chance to keep the game competitive deep into the second half. The danger zones are obvious: pre-snap penalties that turn manageable downs into must-pass situations, blown protection that leads to sacks or strip turnovers, and missed tackles that convert short gains into backbreaking explosives. But the cover path is tangible and achievable if UNH hits its checkpoints: win turnover margin by at least +1, generate a pair of explosive plays to flip field position, and hold Ball State’s red-zone touchdown rate below 60 percent. If they manage that formula, the Wildcats can force the Cardinals into a nervy late-game scenario and put themselves in position for a backdoor cover or even an upset bid that would reverberate well beyond the FCS ranks.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Ball State Cardinals CFB Preview
For Ball State, the September 13 home tilt against New Hampshire is a much-needed opportunity to reset after an 0–2 start that included humbling losses to Purdue and Auburn, and the Cardinals must seize it in front of their own crowd at Scheumann Stadium by showing not only that they can win but also that they can impose their will against an opponent from the FCS ranks. The formula is straightforward but not automatic: Ball State must control the line of scrimmage, dictate tempo through efficient first-down execution, and above all, finish drives with touchdowns instead of settling for field goals. Having been shut out once and held to a single score in another outing, the offense badly needs rhythm, which can come through leaning on inside zone runs and quick passing concepts to get the quarterback comfortable before opening up vertical shots when the defense starts cheating up. If the Cardinals can keep early-down success rates above 50 percent, they will live in second-and-medium and force the Wildcats to defend both run and pass, an advantage that should accumulate across four quarters. Defensively, Ball State’s job is to take away New Hampshire’s comfort zone by winning first down, tackling cleanly in space, and forcing the Wildcats into third-and-long situations where simulated pressure and late-rotating coverages can bait mistakes. The defense has already been stress-tested by elite Power Four athletes, and if that experience translates into sound gap fits and disciplined pursuit, it should create a significant yardage differential against an FCS line.
Special teams represent an overlooked but vital factor for a favorite—directional punting to pin UNH deep, penalty-free coverage to eliminate hidden yardage, and reliable field goal kicking from 40–45 yards out will all help keep the math in Ball State’s favor. The “middle eight” minutes around halftime stand as the Cardinals’ best chance to put the game away, because a score before the break followed by another on the opening drive of the third quarter can swing the game into a three-score margin and erase any upset hopes. Ball State’s recent ATS history at home is excellent—8–1 in their last nine—which suggests that in front of their own fans they tend to separate late, and that trend can repeat if they minimize turnovers and penalties. The pitfalls are familiar for favorites in this spot: stalling in the red zone, turnovers in plus territory, and defensive breakdowns that allow cheap explosive plays, each of which would extend the game and potentially open the backdoor to a cover for New Hampshire. But if Ball State executes their fundamentals—limit penalties to under 50 yards, commit no more than one turnover, maintain at least a 60 percent red-zone touchdown rate, and control time of possession around 32 minutes—they should validate the market’s expectations. This is not about proving they can survive against top competition, but rather about proving they can handle business when favored, and doing so convincingly to restore confidence before the grind of MAC play begins.
Week 2️⃣ Captains‼️ pic.twitter.com/B9DJXba6uV
— Ball State Football (@BallStateFB) September 6, 2025
New Hampshire vs Ball State Prop Picks (AI)
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through mountains of data on each team. In fact, anytime the Wildcats and Cardinals play there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at Scheumann Stadium in Sep rarely follow normal, predictable patterns.
New Hampshire vs Ball State Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports wizard, has been pouring over mountains of data from every facet between the Wildcats and Cardinals and using recursive machine learning and impressive AI to crunch the data to a single cover probability.
Interestingly enough, the data has been most keyed in on the trending factor human bettors often put on Ball State’s strength factors between a Wildcats team going up against a possibly improved Cardinals team. We’ve found the true game analytics might reflect a slight lean against one Vegas line in particular.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CFB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI New Hampshire vs Ball State picks, computer picks Wildcats vs Cardinals, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW | ||||||
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CFB schedule.
New Hampshire Betting Trends
Trend boards show the Wildcats trending to the over in five of their last six overall, but they’ve struggled outright away from home in historical samples. They step up here as a road underdog versus an FBS opponent.
Ball State Betting Trends
Ball State is 14–6 ATS across its last 20 and an eye-popping 8–1 ATS in its last nine at home, suggesting market underrating in Muncie despite early-season losses to Purdue (31–0) and at Auburn (42–3).
Wildcats vs. Cardinals Matchup Trends
With Ball State favored at home in a low-to-mid total environment, two red-zone trades of TD→FG approximate an eight-point ATS swing; favorite/under dynamics increase late backdoor risk if drives stall. Computer and odds dashboards have the listing live with UNH 2–0 and Ball State 0–2 on the board.
New Hampshire vs. Ball State Game Info
New Hampshire vs Ball State starts on September 13, 2025 at 2:00 PM EST.
Venue: Scheumann Stadium.
Spread: Ball State ODDS COMING SOON
Moneyline: New Hampshire ODDS COMING SOON, Ball State ODDS COMING SOON
Over/Under: ODDS COMING SOON
New Hampshire: (2-0) | Ball State: (0-2)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: REMI'S STILL ANALYZING MARKETS. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
With Ball State favored at home in a low-to-mid total environment, two red-zone trades of TD→FG approximate an eight-point ATS swing; favorite/under dynamics increase late backdoor risk if drives stall. Computer and odds dashboards have the listing live with UNH 2–0 and Ball State 0–2 on the board.
NH trend: Trend boards show the Wildcats trending to the over in five of their last six overall, but they’ve struggled outright away from home in historical samples. They step up here as a road underdog versus an FBS opponent.
BALLST trend: Ball State is 14–6 ATS across its last 20 and an eye-popping 8–1 ATS in its last nine at home, suggesting market underrating in Muncie despite early-season losses to Purdue (31–0) and at Auburn (42–3).
See our latest CFB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
New Hampshire vs. Ball State Odds
Remi is pouring through tons of data on each line. In fact, anytime the New Hampshire vs Ball State trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme hostile environments rarely follow normal, predictable patterns.
| NH Moneyline | ODDS COMING SOON |
|---|---|
| BALLST Moneyline | ODDS COMING SOON |
| NH Spread | ODDS COMING SOON |
| BALLST Spread | ODDS COMING SOON |
| Over / Under | ODDS COMING SOON |
New Hampshire vs Ball State Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Aug 29, 2026 12:00PM EDT
NC State Wolfpack
Virginia Cavaliers
8/29/26 12PM
NCST
UVA
|
–
–
|
+146
-176
|
+3.5 (-105)
-3.5 (-115)
|
O 54.5 (-105)
U 54.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Aug 29, 2026 12:00PM EDT
North Carolina Tar Heels
TCU Horned Frogs
8/29/26 12PM
UNC
TCU
|
–
–
|
+245
-310
|
+7.5 (-110)
-7.5 (-110)
|
O 50.5 (-105)
U 50.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Clemson Tigers
LSU Tigers
9/5/26 12PM
CLEM
LSU
|
–
–
|
+350
-465
|
+11.5 (-110)
-11.5 (-110)
|
O 51.5 (-110)
U 51.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
UCLA Bruins
California Golden Bears
9/5/26 12PM
UCLA
CAL
|
–
–
|
+140
-170
|
+3.5 (-112)
-3.5 (-108)
|
O 53.5 (-110)
U 53.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Baylor Bears
Auburn Tigers
9/5/26 12PM
BAYLOR
AUBURN
|
–
–
|
+235
-295
|
+7.5 (-114)
-7.5 (-106)
|
O 58.5 (-110)
U 58.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Louisville Cardinals
Ole Miss Rebels
9/5/26 12PM
LVILLE
OLEMISS
|
–
–
|
+275
-350
|
+8.5 (-110)
-8.5 (-110)
|
O 52.5 (-115)
U 52.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 6, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Wisconsin Badgers
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
9/6/26 12PM
WISC
ND
|
–
–
|
+660
-1050
|
+16.5 (-105)
-16.5 (-115)
|
O 46.5 (-115)
U 46.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Ohio State Buckeyes
Texas Longhorns
9/12/26 12PM
OHIOST
TEXAS
|
–
–
|
+114
-137
|
+2.5 (-105)
-2.5 (-115)
|
O 47.5 (-115)
U 47.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Oklahoma Sooners
Michigan Wolverines
9/12/26 12PM
OKLA
MICH
|
–
–
|
-102
-118
|
+1.5 (-110)
-1.5 (-110)
|
O 45.5 (-110)
U 45.5 (-110)
|
CFB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers New Hampshire Wildcats vs. Ball State Cardinals on September 13, 2025 at Scheumann Stadium.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CFB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
|
|
|
|
RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OREG@IND | IND -3 | 53.4% | 2 | WIN |
| OLEMISS@GEORGIA | KEWAN LACY ANYTIME TD | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
| BAMA@IND | FERNANDO MENDOZA UNDER 26.5 PASS ATT | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@TXTECH | OREG -126 | 58.9% | 6 | WIN |
| MICH@TEXAS | TEXAS -6 | 53.3% | 1 | WIN |
| MIAMI@OHIOST | UNDER 40.5 | 53.6% | 2 | WIN |
| NEB@UTAH | DEVON DAMPIER UNDER 185.5 PASS YDS | 53.4% | 3 | LOSS |
| IOWA@VANDY | IOWA +4.5 | 53.1% | 2 | WIN |
| NOTEX@SDGST | NOTEX -7 | 54.2% | 4 | LOSS |
| TULANE@OLEMISS | OLEMISS -16.5 | 53.4% | 1 | WIN |
| MIAMI@TEXA&M | TEXA&M -3 | 54.1% | 3 | LOSS |
| BAMA@OKLA | BAMA +1.5 | 52.1% | 1 | WIN |
| BAMA@OKLA | ISAIAH SATEGNA III ANYTIME TD | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| BYU@TTU | PARKER KINGSTON OVER 20.5 LONGEST RECEPTION | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| UNLV@BOISE | BOISE -4.5 | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | UNDER 44 | 52.8% | 2 | WIN |
| ECU@FAU | FAU +7 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| OREG@WASH | WASH +7 | 54.9% | 4 | LOSS |
| WYO@HAWAII | WYO +7.5 | 55.1% | 5 | LOSS |
| COLO@KSTATE | COLO +17.5 | 54.0% | 4 | WIN |
| PSU@RUT | RUT +14 | 52.8% | 1 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | MICH +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| VATECH@UVA | VATECH +8 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| NWEST@ILL | LUKE ALTMYER UNDER 19.5 PASS COMP | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| ORE@WAS | DEMOND WILLIAMS JR UNDER 43.5 RUSH YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| MIAMI@VATECH | VATECH +18.5 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| GAST@TROY | TROY -9.5 | 55.7% | 5 | WIN |
| DEL@WAKE | DEL +18 | 56.7% | 6 | LOSS |
| NMEX@AF | NMEX -3.5 | 56.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WASHST@JMAD | WASHST +14.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| ILL@WISC | WISC +9 | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WKY@LSU | WKY +23.5 | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| WASH@UCLA | DEMOND WILLIAMS UNDER 27.5 PASS ATT | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| TCU@HOU | AMARE THOMAS OVER 69.5 RECV YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| TEX@UGA | NATE FRAZIER UNDER 65.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 55.5% | 5 | WIN |
| PUR@WASH | ANTONIO HARRIS UNDER 73.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 54.1% | 4 | WIN |
| OKLA@BAMA | UNDER 46 | 52.4% | 2 | WIN |
| UVA@DUKE | DUKE -3.5 | 54.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| OKLA@BAMA | BAMA -6 | 54.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| OREGST@TULSA | OREGST -120 | 55.6% | 5 | LOSS |
| UTEP@MIZZST | MIZZST -5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| COLOST@NMEX | NMEX -14 | 57.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| PSU@MICHST | MICHST +7.5 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
| MISSST@MIZZOU | MISSST +7.5 | 57.2% | 7 | LOSS |
| FAU@TULANE | FAU +17.5 | 56.0% | 6 | WIN |
| NCST@MIAMI | NCST +15.5 | 57.1% | 7 | LOSS |
| KENTST@AKRON | AKRON -6.5 | 55.4% | 5 | LOSS |
| JAXST@UTEP | JAXST -105 | 57.0% | 7 | WIN |
| FSU@CLEM | CLEM -118 | 57.1% | 5 | WIN |
| UNLV@COLOST | UNLV -4 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@IOWA | IOWA +6.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |