Texas A&M vs Arkansas Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CBB Lines & Props (Feb 26)
Updated: 2026-02-24T03:31:50.923562ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The Texas A&M Aggies (19‑8, 9‑5 SEC) travel to face the Arkansas Razorbacks (20‑7, 10‑4 SEC) on February 26, 2026 at Bud Walton Arena in Fayetteville, Arkansas in a key late‑season SEC showdown with implications for both a double‑bye in the SEC Tournament and NCAA bracket positioning. Arkansas enters as a top‑20 team with an elite home record and offensive efficiency, while Texas A&M has momentum after consecutive wins and looks to further bolster its tournament résumé.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Feb 26, 2026
Start Time: 10:00 PM EST
Venue: Bud Walton Arena
Razorbacks Record: (20-7)
Aggies Record: (19-8)
OPENING ODDS
TEXAM Moneyline: ODDS COMING SOON
ARK Moneyline: ODDS COMING SOON
TEXAM Spread: ODDS COMING SOON
ARK Spread: ODDS COMING SOON
Over/Under: ODDS COMING SOON
TEXAM
Betting Trends
- Texas A&M’s recent ATS trend has been mixed, with the Aggies struggling to consistently cover in recent outings and trending under expectations as the road team — recent community consensus data showed A&M with few spread covers in its last five games, including losses.
ARK
Betting Trends
- Arkansas boasts one of the better ATS performances nationally this season, with an approximately 67.9 % cover rate against the spread, indicating they’ve outperformed expectations as favorites and covers far more often than most teams.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- Sportsbooks generally listed Arkansas as a significant favorite (around an 8.5‑point spread), reflecting their strong home performance, while many books set game totals near 171.5 points, pointing to the potential for a high‑scoring affair given both teams’ offensive profiles (Texas A&M averaging near 89ppg and Arkansas scoring near 89ppg in recent games).
TEXAM vs. ARK
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: REMI'S STILL ANALYZING MARKETS
LIVE CBB ODDS
CBB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
469-391
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+890.5
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$89,052
VS. SPREAD
2036-1647
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+622.1
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$62,212
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Texas A&M vs Arkansas Prediction & Odds:
Free CBB Betting Insights for 2/26/26
The Feb. 26 matchup between the Texas A&M Aggies and the Arkansas Razorbacks represents one of the most compelling Southeastern Conference battles of the regular season, with both teams jockeying for position ahead of the SEC Tournament and NCAA seeding. Arkansas holds a slight edge in both record and ranking, sporting a 20‑7 overall mark and 10‑4 conference record, and has been particularly dominant at home with a noted 14‑1 record at Bud Walton Arena. Their offensive efficiency has been elite — Arkansas makes over 50 % of its shots from the field — and that efficiency, combined with strong assist‑to‑turnover ratios and offensive rebounding, makes them a difficult team to contain in half‑court sets as well as in transition. Arizona’s offense is often spearheaded by standout guard Darius Acuff Jr., who leads the team with over 22 points per game while also contributing significantly in assists, forcing opponents to pay attention to both his scoring and playmaking. Complementing Acuff, players like Meleek Thomas and Billy Richmond III provide balanced scoring, stretching defenses and creating open looks both inside and outside the arc. Arkansas also has an experienced head coach in John Calipari, now in his second year, who has installed an up‑tempo, high‑efficiency offense that thrives on spacing and quick decision‑making. This season, the Razorbacks’ capability to score in bunches and sustain offensive pressure has kept them competitive even when opponents vary their defensive strategies. Their defensive performance, while not the strength of the team, is competent enough to limit opponents’ efficiency when executed with discipline, particularly with active help defense and rotation timing. Texas A&M arrives in Fayetteville after a pair of confidence‑boosting wins over Ole Miss and Oklahoma, giving the Aggies an opportunity to solidify their case for an NCAA Tournament bid under first‑year head coach Bucky McMillan. Texas A&M’s offensive profile ranks among the SEC’s best — they average near 89 points per game — led by forward Rashaun Agee, who provides both scoring in the paint and rebounding presence, and guard Rylan Griffen, offering versatility and secondary scoring when needed.
Over the last 10 games, the Aggies have shown a balanced statistical profile, averaging nearly 82 points while chipping in solid assist and rebound numbers. Their defense is opportunistic, forcing turnovers and attempting to disrupt opponents’ rhythm, but they have at times struggled to consistently limit high‑efficiency shooting teams. Already this season, matchups against top‑tier SEC offenses have exposed Texas A&M’s defensive lapses under sustained pressure. Furthermore, how the Aggies handle ball security against Arkansas — a team that usually excels at forcing contested shots and grading the speed of possessions — could prove decisive. Arkansas’s efficient field goal percentage notably exceeds the percentage that Texas A&M typically allows, suggesting that A&M’s defense might face its stiffest challenge yet. That said, Texas A&M’s high scoring capacity means they are always capable of keeping games close or trading baskets, particularly if they can get strong contributions from their depth beyond their go‑to scorers. Historically in this series, the teams have had competitive games and even saw Texas A&M pull out a win in a previous SEC matchup last season, a reminder that these programs match up effectively when the Aggies execute their game plan. From a broader standpoint, this matchup pits two SEC teams with momentum — Arkansas riding strong home success and Texas A&M entering with recent quality wins — and while sportsbooks have underscored Arkansas as the favorite, the versatility of both teams’ offenses and the importance of tempo control make this a fascinating contest. Strategic adjustments, rebounding battles, and late‑game execution will likely dictate the outcome in a game where both teams are capable of scoring in high volumes but must navigate defensive inconsistencies. Whether Arkansas continues to assert dominance at home or Texas A&M leverages its balanced attack and depth to make a statement on the road, this Feb. 26 showdown promises to be a marquee game in SEC play as both teams press for postseason positioning.
Get live CBB odds and precise AI CBB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
Clemence Clutch 👍 pic.twitter.com/oa9a2VhOE6
— Texas A&M Basketball (@aggiembk) February 26, 2026
Texas A&M Aggies CBB Preview
The Texas A&M Aggies arrive in Fayetteville riding a mix of offensive prowess and recent momentum, sporting a 19‑8 overall record and a 9‑5 mark in SEC play that places them in the thick of the conference race. Under first‑year head coach Bucky McMillan, the Aggies have developed into one of the SEC’s most entertaining and efficient offenses, averaging close to 89 points per game while generating strong assist numbers and attacking defenses both inside and beyond the arc. Forward Rashaun Agee anchors that attack with his scoring and rebounding strength — averaging around 14 points and nearly nine rebounds per contest — giving A&M a reliable presence in the paint and on the boards. Behind Agee, guards like Rylan Griffen and Zach Clemence have provided scoring punch and versatility in recent games, with Clemence delivering a career‑high scoring outburst in their last matchup against Arkansas that highlighted A&M’s depth and scoring range. That depth allows Texas A&M to adapt scoring to different opponents and avoid stalling offensively even when primary options are well‑defended. The Aggies’ offensive system emphasizes pace, ball movement, and high‑percentage shot creation, and when those elements click, they can outscore even elite defensive squads. Their recent victories — including solid road performances against Ole Miss and Oklahoma — have boosted confidence and improved their tournament outlook, pushing them closer to lock‑in status ahead of March. That said, Texas A&M’s defensive profile is less consistent; while opportunistic in forcing turnovers, they have sometimes struggled to contain high‑efficiency offenses, particularly against teams with multiple quality shot creators.
Against a fast‑paced team like Arkansas — which shoots over 50 % from the field — Texas A&M’s defense will be tested in both transition and in half‑court sets. Limiting second‑chance points and forcing contested shots without fouling will be keys to keeping the game within reach. Ball security is another factor that could influence the Aggies’ success on the road. In their recent matchup, A&M’s turnovers led to transition points for Arkansas, and against a Razorbacks squad comfortable in open‑court offense, avoiding careless possessions will be paramount. If Texas A&M can curb turnovers early and convert on offensive rebounds, they have the capacity to keep this game competitive throughout, particularly with their versatile scorers capable of hitting timely shots from beyond the arc or finishing strong inside. Mentally, playing on the road against a top‑ranked SEC opponent poses a challenge, but the Aggies have shown resilience in hostile environments this season. Their balanced roster allows multiple players to contribute meaningfully on any given night, which can offset scoring droughts or defensive lapses. From a betting perspective, Texas A&M’s ability to cover spreads as an away underdog in certain matchups reflects their capability to stay in games and outperform expectations when they execute soundly. For this showdown, the Aggies must emphasize disciplined defense, efficient ball handling, and attacking Arkansas’ weaknesses — such as contested perimeter defense or rebounding mismatches — to bolster their tournament résumé with a statement road performance.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Arkansas Razorbacks CBB Preview
The Arkansas Razorbacks enter this late‑season SEC matchup as one of the conference’s most dynamic and efficient offensive teams, riding a strong 20‑7 overall record and a dominant 14‑1 home mark at Bud Walton Arena this season. Under head coach John Calipari’s direction in his second year, Arkansas has transformed into an elite scoring group with a versatile backcourt led by freshman guard Darius Acuff Jr., who averages over 22 points per game while adding playmaking with more than six assists per game. Acuff’s ability to create his own shot and distribute effectively makes Arkansas difficult to guard in transition and half‑court sets alike, and his recent high‑scoring outputs — including a massive 49‑point explosion in one game — highlight his potential to take over contests when opponents struggle to contain him. Complementing Acuff’s scoring is Billy Richmond III, a consistent scorer who recently notched 21 and 23‑point games in SEC play, providing Arkansas with reliable secondary scoring that keeps defenses honest and open up driving and kick‑out opportunities. Meleek Thomas adds another layer of offensive creativity with mid‑range proficiency and rebounding activity that helps sustain possessions and convert second‑chance opportunities. As a result, Arkansas regularly posts high assist numbers and shoots over 50 % from the field, ranking among the most efficient offenses in the SEC. Defensively, the Razorbacks have had mixed results at times, but they have shown the ability to contest shots, control the glass, and limit opponents’ second‑chance points when rotations are crisp and defensive communication is sharp. Their pressure on ball handlers and active hands often force contested attempts and turnovers that lead to transition scoring — a valuable asset against high‑tempo teams like Texas A&M. Arkansas’ overall rebounding numbers — particularly on the defensive glass — give them a slight edge in limiting extra possessions and dictating pace, making them difficult to overrun on consecutive possessions.
Coach Calipari typically employs a short but highly disciplined rotation, meaning that starters absorb heavy minutes, but that familiarity and cohesion tend to benefit Arkansas in tight games because the group functions with excellent chemistry and shared understanding of offensive spacing and defensive rotations. One of the Razorbacks’ most compelling attributes this season has been their home crowd advantage, where Bud Walton Arena becomes an intimidating environment for visiting teams. Arkansas thrives off early energy and has often taken control in the first half at home, forcing opponents into early turnovers or contested shots that snowball into larger leads. This has been particularly evident in their ability to outscore teams in sequences and deliver high‑efficiency shooting performances — such as hitting near 70 % of second‑half shots in a recent win — that reflect their fluid offensive execution. Their strong home performance not only boosts team confidence, but also places psychological pressure on opposing teams to match intensity right out of the gate. In terms of betting tendencies, Arkansas’ strong ATS record — approaching a near 68 % cover rate — reflects that the Razorbacks often outperform expectations, particularly when they are installed as favorites. Their ability to control tempo, execute offensively, and leverage crowd energy gives them an edge in both spread and total outcomes when they play with focus. However, Arkansas is not immune to adversity — long scoring droughts or defensive lapses have occasionally allowed opponents to stay in games longer than anticipated, making timely adjustments and late‑game execution essential. Against Texas A&M, maintaining disciplined defense on the perimeter and preventing easy transition buckets will be crucial in preserving their home dominance and continuing their push for a double‑bye in the SEC Tournament and a strong seed in March‑Madness.
He only had 5 points in the first half...
— Arkansas Razorbacks Men’s Basketball 🐗 (@RazorbackMBB) February 26, 2026
22 points | 7 assists | 5 rebounds pic.twitter.com/klWLvVrr0L
Texas A&M vs Arkansas Prop Picks (AI)
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through mountains of stats on each team. In fact, anytime the Aggies and Razorbacks play there’s always several intriguing observations to key in on. Not to mention games played at Bud Walton Arena in Feb can often follow normal, predictable patterns.
Texas A&M vs Arkansas Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports algorithm, has been pouring over millions of data from every facet between the Aggies and Razorbacks and using recursive machine learning and kick-ass AI to analyze the data to a single cover probability.
Remi has been most watching on the trending factor knucklehead sportsbettors regularly put on Texas A&M’s strength factors between a Aggies team going up against a possibly healthy Razorbacks team. Trends look to say the true game analytics appear to reflect a strong lean against one Vegas line specifically.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CBB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI Texas A&M vs Arkansas picks, computer picks Aggies vs Razorbacks, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBB | 3/11 | BYU@WVU | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 6 |
VAULT v2
|
|
| CBB | 3/11 | UCSB@UCDAV | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 3/11 | TEMPLE@FAU | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 3/11 | BU@LEHIGH | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 3/11 | TULANE@MEMP | GET FREE PICK NOW | 3 | – | |
| CBB | 3/11 | XAVIER@MARQET | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 1 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/11 | NWEST@IND | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/11 | WAKE@CLEM | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/11 | RUT@MINN | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/11 | OLEMISS@TEXAS | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/11 | CAL@FSU | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 1 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/11 | SJST@BOISE | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 0 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/11 | SC@OKLA | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 0 |
INTEL
|
|
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CBB schedule.
Texas A&M Betting Trends
Texas A&M’s recent ATS trend has been mixed, with the Aggies struggling to consistently cover in recent outings and trending under expectations as the road team — recent community consensus data showed A&M with few spread covers in its last five games, including losses.
Arkansas Betting Trends
Arkansas boasts one of the better ATS performances nationally this season, with an approximately 67.9 % cover rate against the spread, indicating they’ve outperformed expectations as favorites and covers far more often than most teams.
Aggies vs. Razorbacks Matchup Trends
Sportsbooks generally listed Arkansas as a significant favorite (around an 8.5‑point spread), reflecting their strong home performance, while many books set game totals near 171.5 points, pointing to the potential for a high‑scoring affair given both teams’ offensive profiles (Texas A&M averaging near 89ppg and Arkansas scoring near 89ppg in recent games).
Texas A&M vs. Arkansas Game Info
Texas A&M vs Arkansas starts on February 26, 2026 at 10:00 PM EST.
Venue: Bud Walton Arena.
Spread: Arkansas ODDS COMING SOON
Moneyline: Texas A&M ODDS COMING SOON, Arkansas ODDS COMING SOON
Over/Under: ODDS COMING SOON
Texas A&M: (19-8) | Arkansas: (20-7)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: REMI'S STILL ANALYZING MARKETS. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
Sportsbooks generally listed Arkansas as a significant favorite (around an 8.5‑point spread), reflecting their strong home performance, while many books set game totals near 171.5 points, pointing to the potential for a high‑scoring affair given both teams’ offensive profiles (Texas A&M averaging near 89ppg and Arkansas scoring near 89ppg in recent games).
TEXAM trend: Texas A&M’s recent ATS trend has been mixed, with the Aggies struggling to consistently cover in recent outings and trending under expectations as the road team — recent community consensus data showed A&M with few spread covers in its last five games, including losses.
ARK trend: Arkansas boasts one of the better ATS performances nationally this season, with an approximately 67.9 % cover rate against the spread, indicating they’ve outperformed expectations as favorites and covers far more often than most teams.
See our latest CBB picks and odds pages for 2026 to compare prices before you bet.
Texas A&M vs. Arkansas Odds
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through mountains of data on each player. In fact, anytime the Texas A&M vs Arkansas trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing angles to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme temps almost always follow normal, predictable patterns.
| TEXAM Moneyline | ODDS COMING SOON |
|---|---|
| ARK Moneyline | ODDS COMING SOON |
| TEXAM Spread | ODDS COMING SOON |
| ARK Spread | ODDS COMING SOON |
| Over / Under | ODDS COMING SOON |
Texas A&M vs Arkansas Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
In Progress
Xavier Musketeers
Marquette Golden Eagles
In Progress
XAVIER
MARQ
|
60
50
|
-260
+195
|
-3.5 (-115)
+3.5 (-115)
|
O 164.5 (-120)
U 164.5 (-110)
|
|
|
In Progress
Northwestern Wildcats
Indiana Hoosiers
In Progress
NWEST
IND
|
55
47
|
-315
+230
|
-4.5 (-120)
+4.5 (-110)
|
O 143.5 (-120)
U 143.5 (-110)
|
|
|
In Progress
Ole Miss Rebels
Texas Longhorns
In Progress
OLEMISS
TEXAS
|
41
30
|
-260
+195
|
-4.5 (-120)
+4.5 (-110)
|
O 151.5 (-115)
U 151.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
Delaware State Hornets
Morgan State Bears
In Progress
DELST
MORGAN
|
64
62
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 139.5 (+105)
U 139.5 (-140)
|
|
|
In Progress
Missouri State Bears
Liberty Flames
In Progress
MIZZST
LIB
|
63
57
|
+300
|
+3.5 (-115)
|
O 141.5 (-125)
U 141.5 (-105)
|
|
|
In Progress
Tulane Green Wave
Memphis Tigers
In Progress
TULANE
MEMP
|
39
31
|
-200
+154
|
-3.5 (-115)
+3.5 (-115)
|
O 149.5 (-110)
U 149.5 (-120)
|
|
|
In Progress
BYU Cougars
West Virginia Mountaineers
In Progress
BYU
WVU
|
31
25
|
-720
+450
|
-8.5 (-120)
+8.5 (-110)
|
O 128.5 (-115)
U 128.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
California Golden Bears
Florida State Seminoles
In Progress
CAL
FSU
|
32
46
|
+600
|
+11.5 (-125)
|
O 159.5 (-110)
U 159.5 (-120)
|
|
|
In Progress
Boston University Terriers
Lehigh Mountain Hawks
In Progress
BOSTON
LEHGH
|
30
41
|
-375
|
-6.5 (-110)
|
O 144.5 (-120)
U 144.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 8:30PM EDT
Tarleton State Texans
Abilene Christian Wildcats
3/11/26 8:30PM
TARL
ABIL
|
–
–
|
-130
+110
|
+1.5 (-125)
-1.5 (+105)
|
O 135.5 (-108)
U 135.5 (-112)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 8:30PM EDT
Jackson State Tigers
Florida A&M Rattlers
3/11/26 8:30PM
JACKST
FLAAM
|
–
–
|
-285
|
-6.5 (-105)
|
O 141.5 (-110)
U 141.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 9:00PM EDT
Cal Poly Mustangs
UC San Diego Tritons
3/11/26 9PM
CALPLY
UCSD
|
–
–
|
+170
-205
|
+4.5 (-108)
-4.5 (-112)
|
O 162.5 (-112)
U 162.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 9:00PM EDT
Rutgers Scarlet Knights
Minnesota Golden Gophers
3/11/26 9PM
RUT
MINN
|
–
–
|
+215
-265
|
+6.5 (-110)
-6.5 (-110)
|
O 135.5 (-112)
U 135.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 9:00PM EDT
Fresno State Bulldogs
Colorado State Rams
3/11/26 9PM
FRESNO
COLOST
|
–
–
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 144.5 (-110)
U 144.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 9:00PM EDT
Georgetown Hoyas
DePaul Blue Demons
3/11/26 9PM
GTOWN
DEPAUL
|
–
–
|
+100
-120
|
+1.5 (-120)
-1.5 (+100)
|
O 136.5 (-105)
U 136.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 9:00PM EDT
New Mexico State Aggies
Sam Houston State Bearkats
3/11/26 9PM
NMEXST
SAMST
|
–
–
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 154.5 (-110)
U 154.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 9:30PM EDT
Wake Forest Demon Deacons
Clemson Tigers
3/11/26 9:30PM
WAKE
CLEM
|
–
–
|
+195
-238
|
+5.5 (-108)
-5.5 (-112)
|
O 142.5 (-108)
U 142.5 (-112)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 9:30PM EDT
Oklahoma State Cowboys
TCU Horned Frogs
3/11/26 9:30PM
OKLAST
TCU
|
–
–
|
-290
|
-7.5 (-105)
|
O 157.5 (-115)
U 157.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 9:30PM EDT
Temple Owls
Florida Atlantic Owls
3/11/26 9:30PM
TEMPLE
FAU
|
–
–
|
+110
-130
|
-1.5 (+110)
+1.5 (-130)
|
O 144.5 (-112)
U 144.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 9:30PM EDT
South Carolina Gamecocks
Oklahoma Sooners
3/11/26 9:30PM
SC
OKLA
|
–
–
|
+285
-360
|
+7.5 (-108)
-7.5 (-112)
|
O 149.5 (-110)
U 149.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 11:30PM EDT
UC Santa Barbara Gauchos
UC Davis Aggies
3/11/26 11:30PM
UCSB
UCDAV
|
–
–
|
-205
+170
|
-4.5 (-112)
+4.5 (-108)
|
O 140.5 (-110)
U 140.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 11:30PM EDT
San Jose State Spartans
Boise State Broncos
3/11/26 11:30PM
SJST
BOISE
|
–
–
|
-1600
|
-14.5 (-110)
|
O 146.5 (-115)
U 146.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 11:30PM EDT
Idaho Vandals
Montana Grizzlies
3/11/26 11:30PM
IDAHO
MONT
|
–
–
|
-180
+150
|
-3.5 (-115)
+3.5 (-105)
|
O 146.5 (-112)
U 146.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 11:00AM EDT
Umass Minutemen
Miami Ohio Redhawks
3/12/26 11AM
UMASS
MIAOH
|
–
–
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 163.5 (-115)
U 163.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 11:30AM EDT
GW Revolutionaries
Fordham Rams
3/12/26 11:30AM
GWASH
FORD
|
–
–
|
-250
+200
|
-6 (-110)
+6 (-110)
|
O 140.5 (-110)
U 140.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
NC State Wolfpack
Virginia Cavaliers
3/12/26 12PM
NCST
UVA
|
–
–
|
+170
-205
|
+5.5 (-110)
-5.5 (-110)
|
O 148.5 (-105)
U 148.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Iowa Hawkeyes
Ohio State Buckeyes
3/12/26 12PM
IOWA
OHIOST
|
–
–
|
-118
-102
|
-1.5 (+105)
+1.5 (-125)
|
O 139.5 (-105)
U 139.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Providence Friars
St. John's Red Storm
3/12/26 12PM
PROV
STJOHN
|
–
–
|
+385
-520
|
+10.5 (-110)
-10.5 (-110)
|
O 158.5 (-110)
U 158.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 12:30PM EDT
Kentucky Wildcats
Missouri Tigers
3/12/26 12:30PM
UK
MIZZOU
|
–
–
|
-165
+135
|
-3.5 (-110)
+3.5 (-110)
|
O 148.5 (-110)
U 148.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 12:30PM EDT
Iowa State Cyclones
Texas Tech Red Raiders
3/12/26 12:30PM
IOWAST
TXTECH
|
–
–
|
-230
+190
|
-5.5 (-112)
+5.5 (-108)
|
O 143.5 (-105)
U 143.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 1:30PM EDT
Bowling Green Falcons
Toledo Rockets
3/12/26 1:30PM
BGREEN
TOLEDO
|
–
–
|
-105
-115
|
+1.5 (-110)
-1.5 (-110)
|
O 152.5 (-110)
U 152.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 2:00PM EDT
St. Bonaventure Bonnies
George Mason Patriots
3/12/26 2PM
STBON
GMASON
|
–
–
|
+140
-170
|
+3 (-110)
-3 (-110)
|
O 142.5 (-110)
U 142.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 2:00PM EDT
Alabama A&M Bulldogs
Texas Southern Tigers
3/12/26 2PM
ALA&M
TEXSO
|
–
–
|
-120
+100
|
-1.5 (+100)
+1.5 (-120)
|
O 144.5 (-108)
U 144.5 (-112)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 2:00PM EDT
Arkansas Pine Bluff Golden Lions
Southern Jaguars
3/12/26 2PM
ARKPB
STHRN
|
–
–
|
-192
|
-4.5 (-112)
|
O 154.5 (-110)
U 154.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 2:30PM EDT
Louisville Cardinals
Miami Hurricanes
3/12/26 2:30PM
LVILLE
MIAMI
|
–
–
|
-142
+120
|
-1.5 (-118)
+1.5 (-102)
|
O 153.5 (-110)
U 153.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 2:30PM EDT
Washington Huskies
Wisconsin Badgers
3/12/26 2:30PM
WASH
WISC
|
–
–
|
+240
-298
|
+6.5 (-105)
-6.5 (-115)
|
O 156.5 (-110)
U 156.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 2:30PM EDT
Creighton Bluejays
Seton Hall Pirates
3/12/26 2:30PM
CREIGH
SETON
|
–
–
|
+130
-155
|
+2.5 (-108)
-2.5 (-112)
|
O 133.5 (-112)
U 133.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 3:00PM EDT
Auburn Tigers
Tennessee Volunteers
3/12/26 3PM
AUBURN
TENN
|
–
–
|
+205
-250
|
+5.5 (-105)
-5.5 (-115)
|
O 149.5 (-105)
U 149.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 3:00PM EDT
UCF Knights
Arizona Wildcats
3/12/26 3PM
UCF
ARIZ
|
–
–
|
+1500
-3600
|
+16.5 (-110)
-16.5 (-110)
|
O 161.5 (-108)
U 161.5 (-112)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 3:00PM EDT
UNLV Rebels
Utah State Aggies
3/12/26 3PM
UNLV
UTAHST
|
–
–
|
+225
-278
|
+6.5 (-105)
-6.5 (-115)
|
O 158.5 (-110)
U 158.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 4:00PM EDT
Buffalo Bulls
Akron Zips
3/12/26 4PM
BUFF
AKRON
|
–
–
|
+700
-1100
|
+13.5 (-110)
-13.5 (-110)
|
O 159.5 (-110)
U 159.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 5:00PM EDT
Rhode Island Rams
Duquesne Dukes
3/12/26 5PM
RI
DUQ
|
–
–
|
+105
-125
|
+2.5 (-115)
-2.5 (-105)
|
O 138.5 (-105)
U 138.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 5:30PM EDT
Nevada Wolf Pack
Grand Canyon Antelopes
3/12/26 5:30PM
NEVADA
GCU
|
–
–
|
|
+2 (-106)
-2 (-106)
|
O 139.5 (-108)
U 139.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 6:00PM EDT
South Carolina State Bulldogs
Norfolk State Spartans
3/12/26 6PM
SCST
NORFLK
|
–
–
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 145.5 (-112)
U 145.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 6:30PM EDT
MTSU Blue Raiders
Louisiana Tech Bulldogs
3/12/26 6:30PM
MTSU
LATECH
|
–
–
|
+110
|
+1.5 (-108)
|
O 130.5 (-115)
U 130.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 6:30PM EDT
Ohio Bobcats
Kent State Golden Flashes
3/12/26 6:30PM
OHIO
KENT
|
–
–
|
+130
-155
|
+3.5 (-118)
-3.5 (-102)
|
O 159.5 (-108)
U 159.5 (-112)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 7:30PM EDT
Loyola Chicago Ramblers
Davidson Wildcats
3/12/26 7:30PM
LOYCHI
DAVID
|
–
–
|
-285
|
-6.5 (-110)
|
O 132.5 (-112)
U 132.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 8:30PM EDT
Maryland Eastern Shore Hawks
North Carolina Central Eagles
3/12/26 8:30PM
UMES
NCCENT
|
–
–
|
-120
|
-1.5 (-110)
|
O 132.5 (-112)
U 132.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 9:00PM EDT
Southern Utah Thunderbirds
UT Arlington Mavericks
3/12/26 9PM
SUTAH
UTARL
|
–
–
|
+164
|
+5.5 (-115)
|
O 140.5 (-115)
U 140.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 9:00PM EDT
Kennesaw State Owls
Western Kentucky Hilltoppers
3/12/26 9PM
KENSAW
WKY
|
–
–
|
-122
|
-1.5 (-112)
|
O 157.5 (-115)
U 157.5 (-105)
|
CBB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers Texas A&M Aggies vs. Arkansas Razorbacks on February 26, 2026 at Bud Walton Arena.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CBB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
|
|
|
|
RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NKY@WISCGB | NKY -2.5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| NIOWA@UIC | NIOWA -3.5 | 54.5% | 4 | WIN |
| ARK@MIZZOU | ARK +130 | 45.7% | 1 | WIN |
| SMU@FSU | SMU +110 | 46.9% | 1 | LOSS |
| LVILLE@MIAMI | LVILLE +114 | 49.2% | 1 | WIN |
| TXTECH@BYU | BYU -125 | 55.6% | 3 | WIN |
| UNC@DUKE | UNDER 147.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |
| VANDY@TENN | TENN -3.5 | 53.3% | 3 | LOSS |
| NDAK@STTOM-MN | NDAK +12.5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| GWASH@LOYCHI | LOYCHI +10.5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| ALBANY@UMASSLO | UMASSLO -2.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| PORT@SANFRAN | PORT +7.5 | 53.6% | 3 | LOSS |
| UNC@DUKE | DUKE -17 | 57.3% | 7 | LOSS |
| NIOWA@BRAD | NIOWA -4.5 | 56.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| QUEENS@PEAY | QUEENS +1.5 | 56.5% | 6 | WIN |
| CLMBIA@HARV | CLMBIA +4.5 | 53.3% | 3 | LOSS |
| LONGWD@NCASH | LONGWD -1 | 53.2% | 3 | LOSS |
| VMI@NCGRN | NCGRN -7.5 | 52.7% | 2 | WIN |
| LATECH@LIB | LATECH +9.5 | 54.1% | 4 | WIN |
| MVSU@JACKST | MVSU +10.5 | 56.1% | 6 | WIN |
| STETSON@EKTY | EKTY -4 | 55.7% | 5 | LOSS |
| DUQ@RI | RI -2 | 53.7% | 2 | WIN |
| OREG@ILL | ILL -18 | 53.8% | 3 | WIN |
| BRYANT@NH | BRYANT +1 | 57.3% | 7 | LOSS |
| MISSST@FLA | FLA -21.5 | 53.9% | 3 | WIN |
| LAMAR@HOUBP | LAMAR -114 | 55.1% | 4 | LOSS |
| IOWAST@ARIZ | ARIZ -7 | 53.1% | 1 | WIN |
| RIDER@SIENA | SIENA -15.5 | 53.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| CHARLO@FAU | CHARLO +7.5 | 58.6% | 8 | WIN |
| NOTEX@UAB | UAB -5.5 | 54.8% | 3 | LOSS |
| NIOWA@DRAKE | NIOWA -4 | 54.8% | 4 | WIN |
| SCARST@MDESHORE | SCARST +7.5 | 56.2% | 6 | WIN |
| YALE@CLMBIA | YALE -5.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| SFAUSTIN@HOUBP | SFAUSTIN -8 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| TXTECH@IOWAST | TXTECH +10.5 | 52.3% | 2 | WIN |
| PITT@CAL | PITT +8.5 | 57.3% | 7 | WIN |
| KANSAS@ARIZ | ARIZ -9.5 | 53.6% | 3 | WIN |
| EILL@SIUE | EILL +5.5 | 55.7% | 5 | LOSS |
| UVA@DUKE | DUKE -10 | 53.9% | 3 | WIN |
| BUCK@LEHIGH | BUCK +5.5 | 54.6% | 4 | LOSS |
| IOWA@PSU | IOWA -9.5 | 54.5% | 4 | LOSS |
| ARK@FLA | FLA -10.5 | 54.0% | 3 | WIN |
| CALPOLY@UCSD | CALPOLY +6.5 | 56.2% | 6 | LOSS |
| NAU@EWASH | NAU +9.5 | 57.3% | 7 | LOSS |
| VANDY@UK | UK -0.5 | 53.9% | 3 | WIN |
| DEL@KENSAW | DEL +11.5 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| BAMA@TENN | AMARI ALLEN UNDER 6.5 REB | 54.8% | 4 | WIN |
| GONZAG@MARYCA | PAULIUS MURAUSKAS UNDER 23.5 PTS + REB | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| QUINN@NIAGARA | NIAGARA +9 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| MICH@ILL | ILL +1 | 57.7% | 7 | LOSS |
| BROWN@CLMBIA | BROWN +4.5 | 55.3% | 5 | LOSS |