REMI'S LIVE SCORECARD
Read more on our Data Methodology here.
![]() |
W-L (VS. SPREAD) |
WIN PCT (VS. SPREAD) |
NET UNITS (INCL. VIG) |
NET PROFIT $100/UNIT (INCL. VIG) |
---|---|---|---|---|
v2-v3 | v2-v3 | v2-v3 | v2-v3 | |
NFL | 85-60 | 58.6% | 137.2 | $13,716 |
MLB | 68-45 | 60.2% | 95.6 | $9,565 |
NBA | 53-37 | 58.9% | 76.7 | $7,668 |
CFB | 45-32 | 58.4% | 67.7 | $6,766 |
CBB | 38-29 | 56.7% | 48.1 | $4,814 |
NHL | 13-10 | 56.5% | 9 | $898 |
ALL | 302-213 | 58.2% | 434.3 | $43,427 |
![]() |
W-L (VS. SPREAD) |
WIN PCT (VS. SPREAD) |
NET UNITS (INCL. VIG) |
NET PROFIT $100/UNIT (INCL. VIG) |
---|---|---|---|---|
v2-v3 | v2-v3 | v2-v3 | v2-v3 | |
NBA | 278-222 | 55.6% | 134.8 | $13,482 |
CBB | 352-304 | 53.7% | 89.9 | $8,989 |
NFL | 160-131 | 55.0% | 64.4 | $6,439 |
CFB | 117-100 | 53.9% | 41.6 | $4,164 |
MLB | 358-311 | 53.5% | 38.8 | $3,880 |
NHL | 272-253 | 51.8% | -16.2 | $-1,617 |
ALL | 1537-1321 | 53.9% | 353.4 | $35,337 |
historical profit estimator
An estimation of past profit including a flat -110 vigorish on every win, and using a $$/unit correlation depicted.
Please note, this is an estimation using historical data and is not a guarantee or prediction of future performance, nor a recommendation as to whether or how anyone should use Remi's data in their own strategies.
![]() |
W-L (VS. SPREAD) |
NET PROFIT $50/UNIT (INCL. VIGORISH) |
NET PROFIT $100/UNIT (INCL. VIGORISH) |
---|---|---|---|
v2-v3 | v2-v3 | v2-v3 | |
NFL | 85-60 | $6,858 | $13,716 |
MLB | 68-45 | $4,782 | $9,565 |
NBA | 53-37 | $3,834 | $7,668 |
CFB | 45-32 | $3,383 | $6,766 |
CBB | 38-29 | $2,407 | $4,814 |
NHL | 13-10 | $449 | $898 |
ALL | 302-213 | $21,714 | $43,427 |
![]() |
W-L (VS. SPREAD) |
NET PROFIT $50/UNIT (INCL. VIGORISH) |
NET PROFIT $100/UNIT (INCL. VIGORISH) |
---|---|---|---|
v2-v3 | v2-v3 | v2-v3 | |
NBA | 278-222 | $6,741 | $13,482 |
CBB | 352-304 | $4,494 | $8,989 |
NFL | 160-131 | $3,220 | $6,439 |
CFB | 117-100 | $2,082 | $4,164 |
MLB | 358-311 | $1,940 | $3,880 |
NHL | 272-253 | $-809 | $-1,617 |
ALL | 1537-1321 | $17,669 | $35,337 |
HISTORICAL UNIT PERFORMANCE
Aggregate statistics for every pick released of a certain unit value.
For example, every ‘5’ unit pick released historically has won XX.X% of the time over YY number of picks.
UNIT BAND | EXPECTED WIN PCT |
ACTUAL WIN PCT
v2-v3 |
PICKS RELEASED
v2-v3 |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 52.0% | 49.2% | 112 |
3 | 53.0% | 52.9% | 1039 |
4 | 54.0% | 53.8% | 1329 |
5 | 55.0% | 57.7% | 378 |
6 | 56.0% | 56.6% | 343 |
7 | 57.0% | 57% | 86 |
8 | 58.0% | 75.5% | 61 |
9 | 59.0% | 44.5% | 18 |
10+ | 60.0% | 71.5% | 7 |
HISTORICAL UNIT RANGE PERFORMANCE
Floor calculation for a unit value and every unit value higher.
For example, 7+ means every ‘7’, ‘8’, ‘9’, and ’10’ or higher unit pick is accounted for. Read more on Net Units After Vig here.
UNIT RANGE |
ACTUAL WIN PCT |
NET UNITS (INCL. VIGORISH) |
PICKS RELEASED |
---|---|---|---|
v2-v3 | v2-v3 | v2-v3 | |
2+ | 54.6% | 787.6 | 3373 |
3+ | 54.8% | 801.5 | 3261 |
4+ | 55.6% | 772.8 | 2222 |
5+ | 58.3% | 626.2 | 893 |
6+ | 58.7% | 434.3 | 515 |
7+ | 62.8% | 269 | 172 |
8+ | 68.7% | 215.9 | 86 |
9+ | 52.1% | 1 | 25 |
10+ | 71.5% | 25.5 | 7 |
Check out REMI'S RECENT AI PICKS to see which teams Remi found with a STRONG LEAN. Keep in mind Remi is designed on LONG TERM analytical trends, so the Live Scorecard is a much better gauge of Remi's performance than the last 20 games in each sport below.
Remi's Recent AI Picks
- ALL
- CFB
- NFL
- CBB
- NBA
- MLB
- NHL
- FAQ
![]() |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
---|---|---|---|---|
ARK@OLEMISS | MISS -225 | 72.0% | 9 | WIN |
DUKE@TULANE | TULANE -120 | 56.5% | 4 | WIN |
ARK@OLEMISS | MISS -6.5 | 53.9% | 3 | LOSS |
AKRON@UAB | UAB -11 | 54.7% | 4 | LOSS |
UCONN@DEL | DEL +9.5 | 55.0% | 5 | WIN |
APLST@USM | USM +4 | 55.3% | 6 | WIN |
MERIMK@KENSAW | KENSAW -13.5 | 56.2% | 7 | WIN |
UMASS@IOWA | IOWA -34.5 | 56.4% | 7 | WIN |
UMASS@IOWA | JAZIUN PATTERSON UNDER 0.5 RUSH TDS | 54.8% | 4 | WIN |
NMEX@UCLA | NICO IAMALEAVA UNDER 31.5 PASS ATT | 53.4% | 3 | LOSS |
KSTATE@ARIZ | ARIZ +1.5 | 56.1% | 6 | WIN |
BC@MICHST | NICK MARSH OVER 47.5 RCV YDS | 53.6% | 3 | WIN |
ARIZST@MISSST | MISSST +7 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
TULSA@NMEXST | NMEXST +3.5 | 56.9% | 6 | WIN |
UCLA@UNLV | OVER 54.5 | 56.2% | 6 | LOSS |
FRESNO@OREGST | FRESNO +1.5 | 54.7% | 4 | WIN |
VANDY@VATECH | VANDY +2.5 | 55.8% | 5 | WIN |
JMAD@LVILLE | LVILLE -14.5 | 54.0% | 3 | LOSS |
TCU@UNC | JOSEPH MANJACK OVER 37.5 RECV YDS | 53.8% | 3 | LOSS |
ND@MIAMI | MIAMI +3 | 55.2% | 6 | WIN |
MISSST@USM | USM +14.5 | 56.0% | 6 | LOSS |
![]() |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
---|---|---|---|---|
LAC@LV | LAC -3 | 54.9% | 4 | WIN |
TB@HOU | BAKER MAYFIELD OVER 1.5 PASS TDS | 54.4% | 4 | WIN |
CHI@DET | DET -6.5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
DEN@IND | DEN -118 | 60.1% | 10 | LOSS |
PHI@KC | PHI -115 | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
SF@NO | SF -3 | 58.8% | 8 | WIN |
SEA@PIT | OVER 40 | 54.9% | 4 | WIN |
CAR@ARI | BRYCE YOUNG INTERCEPTIONS UNDER 0.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
DEN@IND | JOSH DOWNS RECEPTIONS OVER 3.5 | 54.7% | 4 | WIN |
ATL@MIN | BIJAN ROBINSON RUSH + REC YDS OVER 94.5 | 53.4% | 3 | WIN |
WAS@GB | WAS +3.5 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
WAS@GB | JORDAN LOVE OVER 5.5 RUSH YDS | 54.7% | 4 | WIN |
MIN@CHI | CALEB WILLIAMS OVER 219.5 PASS YDS | 53.4% | 3 | LOSS |
TEN@DEN | DEN -8.5 | 55.3% | 5 | LOSS |
SF@SEA | SF -115 | 54.6% | 4 | WIN |
SF@SEA | KENNETH WALKER III UNDER 79.5 RUSH+REC YDS | 54.6% | 4 | WIN |
CAR@JAC | TANK BIGSBY OVER 10.5 RUSH ATT | 56.1% | 6 | LOSS |
KC@LAC | JUSTIN HERBERT UNDER 0.5 INT | 54.1% | 3 | WIN |
DAL@PHI | GEORGE PICKENS LONGEST RECEPTION OVER 22.5 YDS | 54.1% | 4 | LOSS |
KC@PHI | JUJU SMITH-SCHUSTER UNDER 16.5 RECV YDS | 53.90% | 5 | WIN |
KC@PHI | DEVONTA SMITH LONGEST RECEPTION OVER 20.5 YDS | 54.40% | 6 | WIN |
![]() |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
---|---|---|---|---|
DRAKE@MIZZOU | DRAKE +6.5 | 53.50% | 2 | WIN |
XAVIER@TEXAS | XAVIER -2.5 | 53.40% | 2 | WIN |
UAB@MEMP | MEMP -3.5 | 54.00% | 2 | WIN |
LVILLE@DUKE | LVILLE +6.5 | 53.10% | 2 | LOSS |
ECU@UAB | UAB -5 | 53.60% | 2 | WIN |
PURDUE@MICH | MICH +3 | 54.60% | 3 | WIN |
CLEM@LVILLE | CLEM -120 | 56.10% | 3 | LOSS |
COL@HOU | ANDREJ JAKIMOVSKI PTS + REB + AST - UNDER 15.5 | 53.70% | 2 | LOSS |
FORD@GWASH | FORD +7 | 53.80% | 2 | WIN |
SEATTLE@ABIL | ABIL +6 | 54.50% | 3 | WIN |
BAMAST@TEXSOU | BAMAST -110 | 55.40% | 4 | WIN |
OHIO@TOLEDO | TOLEDO +3 | 56.70% | 4 | WIN |
UVA@GATECH | GATECH +1.5 | 53.70% | 2 | WIN |
COLO@WVU | COLO +7.5 | 53.20% | 2 | WIN |
USC@RUT | USC -115 | 54.00% | 2 | WIN |
TEXAS@VANDY | VANDY -130 | 56.50% | 3 | LOSS |
BUTLER@PROV | BUTLER -115 | 55.20% | 3 | WIN |
IDAHO@MONTANA | MONTANA -6 | 53.50% | 2 | WIN |
TROY@JMAD | TROY -125 | 55.60% | 2 | WIN |
BELMONT@DRAKE | DRAKE -7.5 | 53.50% | 2 | LOSS |
UCSD@UCDAV | UCSD -12.5 | 53.40% | 2 | LOSS |
![]() |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
---|---|---|---|---|
IND@OKC | PASCAL SIAKAM OVER 2.5 PERSONAL FOULS | 54.20% | 4 | WIN |
IND@OKC | IND +10 | 54.00% | 3 | WIN |
IND@OKC | BENNEDICT MATHURIN OVER 2.5 FREE THROW ATT | 54.90% | 4 | WIN |
NY@IND | MYLES TURNER OVER 6 REBOUNDS + ASSTS | 54.40% | 4 | LOSS |
IND@NY | IND +5 | 55.60% | 5 | LOSS |
NY@IND | JALEN BRUNSON UNDER 22 FIELD GOAL ATT | 54.70% | 4 | WIN |
OKC@MIN | RUDY GOBERT OVER 1.5 FREE THROWS MADE | 54.00% | 4 | WIN |
OKC@MIN | OKC -2.5 | 56.70% | 6 | LOSS |
NY@IND | KARL ANTHONY TOWNS OVER 32.5 POINTS + REBOUNDS | 54.00% | 4 | WIN |
OKC@MIN | NAZ REID OVER 9.0 FIELD GOAL ATT | 54.60% | 4 | LOSS |
IND@NY | MYLES TURNER OVER 5 MADE FIELD GOALS | 53.60% | 3 | WIN |
IND@NY | NY -5.5 | 55.00% | 4 | LOSS |
MIN@OKC | ISAIAH HARTENSTEIN UNDER 7.5 REBOUNDS | 53.00% | 3 | LOSS |
MIN@OKC | MIN +7.5 | 54.70% | 4 | LOSS |
IND@NY | TYRESE HALIBURTON ASSTS - UNDER 8.5 | 54.10% | 4 | LOSS |
IND@NY | IND +4.5 | 54.80% | 4 | WIN |
MIN@OKC | ALEX CARUSO UNDER 2.5 ASSTS | 54.10% | 4 | WIN |
DEN@OKC | MICHAEL PORTER UNDER 7.5 REBS + AST | 54.80% | 4 | WIN |
BOS@NY | NY -2.5 | 55.60% | 5 | WIN |
GS@MIN | DONTE DIVINCENZO OVER 1.5 TURNOVERS | 54.80% | 4 | LOSS |
GS@MIN | GS +10.5 | 54.70% | 4 | LOSS |
![]() |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
---|---|---|---|---|
NYY@MIN | OVER 9 | 55.1% | 4 | WIN |
MIA@COL | OVER 10.5 | 55.0% | 4 | WIN |
MIA@COL | AGUSTIN RAMIREZ OVER 1.5 HITS+RUNS+RBIS | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
SEA@KC | BOBBY WITT UNDER 0.5 SINGLES | 54.4% | 4 | LOSS |
PHI@LAD | LAD -113 | 54.7% | 4 | LOSS |
NYY@BOS | OVER 7.5 | 54.3% | 3 | WIN |
KC@PHI | PHI -130 | 58.3% | 4 | WIN |
LAD@SF | OVER 7.5 | 54.7% | 4 | LOSS |
NYM@PHI | PHI -122 | 55.6% | 4 | WIN |
KC@CLE | KC -104 | 52.0% | 3 | WIN |
CIN@SD | JAKE CRONEWORTH OVER 0.5 HITS | 53.1% | 3 | WIN |
WAS@MIA | MIA -123 | 55.2% | 4 | LOSS |
LAA@KC | UNDER 9.5 | 54.9% | 3 | WIN |
TEX@ARI | UNDER 9 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
SF@COL | UNDER 11.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
SF@COL | RAFAEL DEVERS OVER 1.5 BASES | 56.1% | 6 | WIN |
MIA@WAS | WAS -110 | 54.4% | 4 | WIN |
NYM@DET | OVER 8.5 | 54.5% | 4 | WIN |
TEX@ARI | UNDER 9.5 | 56.4% | 6 | WIN |
TEX@ARI | ALEJANDRO OSUNA UNDER 1.5 BASES | 54.1% | 4 | LOSS |
ATL@CHC | CHC -116 | 55.1% | 3 | WIN |
![]() |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
---|---|---|---|---|
CAR@WAS | WAS +140 | 47.70% | 3 | WIN |
WPG@STL | STL -110 | 54.80% | 4 | WIN |
WPG@STL | UNDER 5.5 | 55.70% | 4 | LOSS |
CGY@LA | MACKENZIE WEEGAR OVER 2.5 BLOCKS | 53.10% | 3 | WIN |
TB@NYR | TB +110 | 49.80% | 3 | LOSS |
SJ@VAN | ALEXANDER GEORGIEV UNDER 24.5 SAVES | 54.50% | 4 | LOSS |
BUF@TB | OVER 6.5 | 53.90% | 3 | WIN |
NYI@PHI | PHI -110 | 54.00% | 3 | WIN |
LV@EDM | RYAN NUGENT-HOPKINS OVER 1.5 SHOTS ON GOAL | 53.00% | 3 | WIN |
EDM@ANA | OVER 6 | 54.20% | 3 | LOSS |
CAR@BOS | OVER 5.5 | 54.00% | 3 | WIN |
NYR@NJ | NJ -125 | 57.30% | 4 | WIN |
COL@CLB | OVER 6.5 | 53.80% | 3 | WIN |
LA@UTA | LA -125 | 54.70% | 3 | WIN |
WPG@LV | LV -120 | 54.80% | 3 | LOSS |
MIN@NJ | UNDER 5.5 | 53.80% | 3 | WIN |
NSH@PHI | PHI -120 | 55.00% | 3 | WIN |
OTT@BUF | OVER 6 | 54.00% | 3 | LOSS |
CHI@SJ | CHI +105 | 51.60% | 3 | LOSS |
WAS@LA | WAS +105 | 51.20% | 3 | LOSS |
TB@CAR | CAR -130 | 56.40% | 3 | WIN |
![]() |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
---|---|---|---|---|
ARK@OLEMISS | MISS -225 | 72.0% | 9 | WIN |
DUKE@TULANE | TULANE -120 | 56.5% | 4 | WIN |
ARK@OLEMISS | MISS -6.5 | 53.9% | 3 | LOSS |
AKRON@UAB | UAB -11 | 54.7% | 4 | LOSS |
UCONN@DEL | DEL +9.5 | 55.0% | 5 | WIN |
APLST@USM | USM +4 | 55.3% | 6 | WIN |
MERIMK@KENSAW | KENSAW -13.5 | 56.2% | 7 | WIN |
UMASS@IOWA | IOWA -34.5 | 56.4% | 7 | WIN |
UMASS@IOWA | JAZIUN PATTERSON UNDER 0.5 RUSH TDS | 54.8% | 4 | WIN |
NMEX@UCLA | NICO IAMALEAVA UNDER 31.5 PASS ATT | 53.4% | 3 | LOSS |
KSTATE@ARIZ | ARIZ +1.5 | 56.1% | 6 | WIN |
BC@MICHST | NICK MARSH OVER 47.5 RCV YDS | 53.6% | 3 | WIN |
ARIZST@MISSST | MISSST +7 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
TULSA@NMEXST | NMEXST +3.5 | 56.9% | 6 | WIN |
UCLA@UNLV | OVER 54.5 | 56.2% | 6 | LOSS |
FRESNO@OREGST | FRESNO +1.5 | 54.7% | 4 | WIN |
VANDY@VATECH | VANDY +2.5 | 55.8% | 5 | WIN |
JMAD@LVILLE | LVILLE -14.5 | 54.0% | 3 | LOSS |
TCU@UNC | JOSEPH MANJACK OVER 37.5 RECV YDS | 53.8% | 3 | LOSS |
ND@MIAMI | MIAMI +3 | 55.2% | 6 | WIN |
MISSST@USM | USM +14.5 | 56.0% | 6 | LOSS |
![]() |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
---|---|---|---|---|
LAC@LV | LAC -3 | 54.9% | 4 | WIN |
TB@HOU | BAKER MAYFIELD OVER 1.5 PASS TDS | 54.4% | 4 | WIN |
CHI@DET | DET -6.5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
DEN@IND | DEN -118 | 60.1% | 10 | LOSS |
PHI@KC | PHI -115 | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
SF@NO | SF -3 | 58.8% | 8 | WIN |
SEA@PIT | OVER 40 | 54.9% | 4 | WIN |
CAR@ARI | BRYCE YOUNG INTERCEPTIONS UNDER 0.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
DEN@IND | JOSH DOWNS RECEPTIONS OVER 3.5 | 54.7% | 4 | WIN |
ATL@MIN | BIJAN ROBINSON RUSH + REC YDS OVER 94.5 | 53.4% | 3 | WIN |
WAS@GB | WAS +3.5 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
WAS@GB | JORDAN LOVE OVER 5.5 RUSH YDS | 54.7% | 4 | WIN |
MIN@CHI | CALEB WILLIAMS OVER 219.5 PASS YDS | 53.4% | 3 | LOSS |
TEN@DEN | DEN -8.5 | 55.3% | 5 | LOSS |
SF@SEA | SF -115 | 54.6% | 4 | WIN |
SF@SEA | KENNETH WALKER III UNDER 79.5 RUSH+REC YDS | 54.6% | 4 | WIN |
CAR@JAC | TANK BIGSBY OVER 10.5 RUSH ATT | 56.1% | 6 | LOSS |
KC@LAC | JUSTIN HERBERT UNDER 0.5 INT | 54.1% | 3 | WIN |
DAL@PHI | GEORGE PICKENS LONGEST RECEPTION OVER 22.5 YDS | 54.1% | 4 | LOSS |
KC@PHI | JUJU SMITH-SCHUSTER UNDER 16.5 RECV YDS | 53.90% | 5 | WIN |
KC@PHI | DEVONTA SMITH LONGEST RECEPTION OVER 20.5 YDS | 54.40% | 6 | WIN |
![]() |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
---|---|---|---|---|
DRAKE@MIZZOU | DRAKE +6.5 | 53.50% | 2 | WIN |
XAVIER@TEXAS | XAVIER -2.5 | 53.40% | 2 | WIN |
UAB@MEMP | MEMP -3.5 | 54.00% | 2 | WIN |
LVILLE@DUKE | LVILLE +6.5 | 53.10% | 2 | LOSS |
ECU@UAB | UAB -5 | 53.60% | 2 | WIN |
PURDUE@MICH | MICH +3 | 54.60% | 3 | WIN |
CLEM@LVILLE | CLEM -120 | 56.10% | 3 | LOSS |
COL@HOU | ANDREJ JAKIMOVSKI PTS + REB + AST - UNDER 15.5 | 53.70% | 2 | LOSS |
FORD@GWASH | FORD +7 | 53.80% | 2 | WIN |
SEATTLE@ABIL | ABIL +6 | 54.50% | 3 | WIN |
BAMAST@TEXSOU | BAMAST -110 | 55.40% | 4 | WIN |
OHIO@TOLEDO | TOLEDO +3 | 56.70% | 4 | WIN |
UVA@GATECH | GATECH +1.5 | 53.70% | 2 | WIN |
COLO@WVU | COLO +7.5 | 53.20% | 2 | WIN |
USC@RUT | USC -115 | 54.00% | 2 | WIN |
TEXAS@VANDY | VANDY -130 | 56.50% | 3 | LOSS |
BUTLER@PROV | BUTLER -115 | 55.20% | 3 | WIN |
IDAHO@MONTANA | MONTANA -6 | 53.50% | 2 | WIN |
TROY@JMAD | TROY -125 | 55.60% | 2 | WIN |
BELMONT@DRAKE | DRAKE -7.5 | 53.50% | 2 | LOSS |
UCSD@UCDAV | UCSD -12.5 | 53.40% | 2 | LOSS |
![]() |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
---|---|---|---|---|
IND@OKC | PASCAL SIAKAM OVER 2.5 PERSONAL FOULS | 54.20% | 4 | WIN |
IND@OKC | IND +10 | 54.00% | 3 | WIN |
IND@OKC | BENNEDICT MATHURIN OVER 2.5 FREE THROW ATT | 54.90% | 4 | WIN |
NY@IND | MYLES TURNER OVER 6 REBOUNDS + ASSTS | 54.40% | 4 | LOSS |
IND@NY | IND +5 | 55.60% | 5 | LOSS |
NY@IND | JALEN BRUNSON UNDER 22 FIELD GOAL ATT | 54.70% | 4 | WIN |
OKC@MIN | RUDY GOBERT OVER 1.5 FREE THROWS MADE | 54.00% | 4 | WIN |
OKC@MIN | OKC -2.5 | 56.70% | 6 | LOSS |
NY@IND | KARL ANTHONY TOWNS OVER 32.5 POINTS + REBOUNDS | 54.00% | 4 | WIN |
OKC@MIN | NAZ REID OVER 9.0 FIELD GOAL ATT | 54.60% | 4 | LOSS |
IND@NY | MYLES TURNER OVER 5 MADE FIELD GOALS | 53.60% | 3 | WIN |
IND@NY | NY -5.5 | 55.00% | 4 | LOSS |
MIN@OKC | ISAIAH HARTENSTEIN UNDER 7.5 REBOUNDS | 53.00% | 3 | LOSS |
MIN@OKC | MIN +7.5 | 54.70% | 4 | LOSS |
IND@NY | TYRESE HALIBURTON ASSTS - UNDER 8.5 | 54.10% | 4 | LOSS |
IND@NY | IND +4.5 | 54.80% | 4 | WIN |
MIN@OKC | ALEX CARUSO UNDER 2.5 ASSTS | 54.10% | 4 | WIN |
DEN@OKC | MICHAEL PORTER UNDER 7.5 REBS + AST | 54.80% | 4 | WIN |
BOS@NY | NY -2.5 | 55.60% | 5 | WIN |
GS@MIN | DONTE DIVINCENZO OVER 1.5 TURNOVERS | 54.80% | 4 | LOSS |
GS@MIN | GS +10.5 | 54.70% | 4 | LOSS |
![]() |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
---|---|---|---|---|
NYY@MIN | OVER 9 | 55.1% | 4 | WIN |
MIA@COL | OVER 10.5 | 55.0% | 4 | WIN |
MIA@COL | AGUSTIN RAMIREZ OVER 1.5 HITS+RUNS+RBIS | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
SEA@KC | BOBBY WITT UNDER 0.5 SINGLES | 54.4% | 4 | LOSS |
PHI@LAD | LAD -113 | 54.7% | 4 | LOSS |
NYY@BOS | OVER 7.5 | 54.3% | 3 | WIN |
KC@PHI | PHI -130 | 58.3% | 4 | WIN |
LAD@SF | OVER 7.5 | 54.7% | 4 | LOSS |
NYM@PHI | PHI -122 | 55.6% | 4 | WIN |
KC@CLE | KC -104 | 52.0% | 3 | WIN |
CIN@SD | JAKE CRONEWORTH OVER 0.5 HITS | 53.1% | 3 | WIN |
WAS@MIA | MIA -123 | 55.2% | 4 | LOSS |
LAA@KC | UNDER 9.5 | 54.9% | 3 | WIN |
TEX@ARI | UNDER 9 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
SF@COL | UNDER 11.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
SF@COL | RAFAEL DEVERS OVER 1.5 BASES | 56.1% | 6 | WIN |
MIA@WAS | WAS -110 | 54.4% | 4 | WIN |
NYM@DET | OVER 8.5 | 54.5% | 4 | WIN |
TEX@ARI | UNDER 9.5 | 56.4% | 6 | WIN |
TEX@ARI | ALEJANDRO OSUNA UNDER 1.5 BASES | 54.1% | 4 | LOSS |
ATL@CHC | CHC -116 | 55.1% | 3 | WIN |
![]() |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
---|---|---|---|---|
CAR@WAS | WAS +140 | 47.70% | 3 | WIN |
WPG@STL | STL -110 | 54.80% | 4 | WIN |
WPG@STL | UNDER 5.5 | 55.70% | 4 | LOSS |
CGY@LA | MACKENZIE WEEGAR OVER 2.5 BLOCKS | 53.10% | 3 | WIN |
TB@NYR | TB +110 | 49.80% | 3 | LOSS |
SJ@VAN | ALEXANDER GEORGIEV UNDER 24.5 SAVES | 54.50% | 4 | LOSS |
BUF@TB | OVER 6.5 | 53.90% | 3 | WIN |
NYI@PHI | PHI -110 | 54.00% | 3 | WIN |
LV@EDM | RYAN NUGENT-HOPKINS OVER 1.5 SHOTS ON GOAL | 53.00% | 3 | WIN |
EDM@ANA | OVER 6 | 54.20% | 3 | LOSS |
CAR@BOS | OVER 5.5 | 54.00% | 3 | WIN |
NYR@NJ | NJ -125 | 57.30% | 4 | WIN |
COL@CLB | OVER 6.5 | 53.80% | 3 | WIN |
LA@UTA | LA -125 | 54.70% | 3 | WIN |
WPG@LV | LV -120 | 54.80% | 3 | LOSS |
MIN@NJ | UNDER 5.5 | 53.80% | 3 | WIN |
NSH@PHI | PHI -120 | 55.00% | 3 | WIN |
OTT@BUF | OVER 6 | 54.00% | 3 | LOSS |
CHI@SJ | CHI +105 | 51.60% | 3 | LOSS |
WAS@LA | WAS +105 | 51.20% | 3 | LOSS |
TB@CAR | CAR -130 | 56.40% | 3 | WIN |
When Are New Picks Released?
New picks from Remi are released on weekdays from 1 PM to 4 PM Eastern Time and on weekends from 9 AM to 1 PM Eastern Time. You’ll receive an email notification each time a new pick is issued.
Why Isn't My Game Listed?
Remi calculates probabilities on every game in NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB, CFB, and CBB, but only releases a few Top AI Sports Picks each day. If Remi doesn’t release a pick on a game you’re interested in, assume Remi see’s the game as a toss-up.
What Is The Vault?
The Vault is Remi’s most exclusive tier—built for high-stakes and the most serious players. It delivers elite 6+ unit plays, early market signals, and experimental model access from the most advanced AI in sports betting. With strict membership limits, real-time alerts, and high-conviction picks from versions like v4 “Nightfall,” this is the most protected and powerful sports betting intelligence available anywhere.
What Is The Executive Level?
The Executive Level is Remi’s premium daily service—designed for serious, data-driven bettors who want consistent, high-quality picks without the exclusivity barriers of the Vault. It includes spread, total, and prop picks (up to 5 units), all graded with Remi’s internal confidence metrics. Backed by the powerful AI models, it delivers 10–25 curated plays per week, real-time email alerts, and full access to historical performance tools. Perfect for users who value speed, precision, and disciplined volume—without needing an NDA to get in.
What Is The Intel Level?
The Intel Level is Remi’s fast, high-upside feed—perfect for users who want sharp picks without the deep dive. It delivers daily parlays, underdog sleepers, and marquee game insights in a clean, digestible format. No heavy jargon—just smart, surface-level edge you can act on quickly. With 1–3 curated picks per day and daily email/push alerts, it’s ideal for casual to intermediate users looking for smart plays without the analytics overload.
What Is A Unit?
We calculate units using the Kelly Criterion, which combines each pick’s win probability and payout odds. By default, one unit represents 1% of your total bankroll, though many users prefer a more conservative “Quarter Kelly” approach (0.25% per unit). These unit recommendations are provided strictly for informational purposes only and do not constitute advice or a recommendation on whether—or how—to wager. For full details, please see our Terms of Service.
Do Net Units Include Vigorish?
Yes, our Net Unit calculations do include vigorish—the built-in cut that sportsbooks take on bets. Many competitors exclude this in their reporting because it would push their units into negative territory. They also tend to avoid offering free trials for the same reason. We believe in full transparency, even if it means showing the real edge is smaller (or harder) than others might claim.
What Is The -110/+115 Notation?
Moneyline picks are shown using American odds (e.g., -110 or +115).
Spread picks are displayed as point spreads (e.g., +2.5 or -2.5).
Over/Under picks are listed as either OVER or UNDER a specific total (e.g., OVER 205 or UNDER 205).
What Is %Win?
%Win represents the probability that Remi projects the pick will win against the line or spread.
For SPREAD and OVER/UNDER picks, %Win is the chance the team will cover the spread or the total will go Over or Under the given line.
For MONEYLINE picks, %Win reflects the probability that the team will win the game outright.
Example:
Pick: LA +3
%Win: 54.4%
This means Remi projects a 54.4% chance that LA will cover the +3 spread—i.e., they will either win the game or lose by fewer than 3 points.
What Does Against The Spread Mean?
Remi specializes in picks against the spread, including spread-line picks, over/under totals, and moneyline plays—typically with American odds around -110 or better. Occasionally, Remi will recommend a moneyline pick with a strong edge, but never at odds worse than -150.
This disciplined approach is a key reason why Remi’s long-term performance stands out. While some competitors may advertise similar win rates, they often rely on heavy favorites (e.g., -200 or worse) where the payout doesn’t justify the risk. Remi’s picks are grounded in mathematical value, not inflated numbers, and avoid situations where the sportsbook retains too much edge.
What Do The Recent Picks Show?
A sample of Remi’s recent picks for the selected sport. These examples showcase the type of game and prop picks Remi typically releases but may not reflect all available models, versions, or product tiers. Note: This sample does not include Marquee, Underdog, or Parlay Builder picks.
What Does The Scorecard Show?
Remi’s performance metrics span all the sports analyzed, covering key stats like win/loss records, win probability, net units, and estimated historical profit. These insights reflect only game and prop picks from v2 and v3 model versions. Note: Marquee, Underdog, and Parlay Builder picks are not included.
In August 2025, Remi underwent a significant upgrade with a fully refreshed metrics system. Legacy data from v1 and v2_pre_release—covering over 1,058 games—was retired, and the new v3 metrics were introduced (invite-only until Fall 2025). To streamline comparisons, all unit values have been standardized to a 0–10 scale, replacing older ranges like 0–15 for college and 0–5 for NFL props. Metrics are now organized under two product tiers—Vault and Executive Level—allowing users to select the level of access that best suits their strategy and goals.
Ever wonder what a term means or how a number is calculated? Find answers in Remi's Data Methodology.
The data presented in tables and past record are TRAILING INDICATORS and NOT PREDICTIVE INDICATORS. Remi is a machine learning algorithm that is constantly changing and learning for better or for worse, so past performance and profit estimations are in no way indicative or predictive of future results.
Past profit metrics are ESTIMATIONS ONLY using a hypothetical dollar to unit amount and a flat -110 vigorish approximation. In no way does the platform, Leans.AI, or the picks generated by Leans.AI constitute financial advice. The data presented is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation as to whether or how anyone should wager.
Remi’s data is tracked back to September 1, 2022. While the tech that feeds Remi has been in development for years, this is when we started tracking Remi’s performance.
In December of 2022 we conducted a data migration effort between two web servers. During this process, several small segments of picks between Sept 1, 2022 and Dec 15, 2022 were lost for certain sports, and as a result we decided to part ways with our web migration vendor.