Blackhawks vs Mammoth Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS NHL Lines & Props (Mar 01)
Updated: 2026-02-27T03:31:50.923562ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The Chicago Blackhawks travel to Salt Lake City to take on the Utah Mammoth at the Delta Center on March 1, 2026 in a Western Conference matchup with playoff positioning implications. Chicago enters struggling to gain traction in the standings, while the Mammoth have been trending upward and fighting for a wild‑card spot as March begins.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Mar 01, 2026
Start Time: 5:00 PM EST
Venue: Delta Center
Mammoth Record: (31-24)
Blackhawks Record: (22-28)
OPENING ODDS
CHI Moneyline: +242
UTA Moneyline: -305
CHI Spread: +1.5
UTA Spread: -1.5
Over/Under: 6
CHI
Betting Trends
- Chicago’s recent ATS performance shows the Blackhawks have covered at a solid rate overall this season despite their inconsistent results and are near the top of the league in covering games.
UTA
Betting Trends
- Utah has been under .500 ATS this season overall, though they have covered at times when favored at home, especially against road teams with lower winning percentages.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- Recent trends show the Mammoth go Over the total frequently when favored at home, and Chicago has historically struggled as a heavy underdog, but in matchups like this the over has hit consistently in several of Utah’s last home victories.
CHI vs. UTA
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: C. Keller over 0.5 Points.
LIVE NHL ODDS
NHL ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
NET UNITS (INCL VIG & EXEC)
NET PROFIT (INCL VIG & EXEC) $100/UNIT
NET UNITS (INCL VIG)
NET PROFIT (INCL VIG) $100/UNIT
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Chicago vs Utah Prediction & Odds:
Free NHL Betting Insights for 3/1/26
The March 1 clash between the Chicago Blackhawks and Utah Mammoth is a compelling late‑season Western Conference game that pits a struggling historical franchise against an emerging wild‑card contender. Chicago enters with a 22‑27‑9 record, hovering around .500 but enduring stretches of inconsistency and difficulty scoring, averaging roughly 2.64 goals per game while allowing about 3.17, leaving them toward the lower end of league offensive and defensive efficiency. Their road record sits around 10‑12‑4, reflecting challenges away from home, and their recent form shows a couple of losses that underscore the difficulty of sustaining momentum. Led by young talents like Connor Bedard—who has been the Blackhawks’ most consistent point producer—and supported by veteran contributors such as Tyler Bertuzzi and Nick Schmaltz, Chicago tries to create offense through pace and individual skill but often finds itself behind the scoring pace of more balanced teams. Goaltending from Spencer Knight has been solid at times — with a save percentage around .910 and a goals‑against average near 2.60 — but he’s been left to face significant pressure when the defense gives up sustained offense.
The Mammoth enter this matchup with a 30‑23‑4 record and sit around the fourth spot in the Central Division, pushing for a playoff berth. Utah’s average of about 3.22 goals per game and a goals‑against mark near 2.75 reveal a well‑rounded club with scoring balance and defensive discipline. The Mammoth have been particularly effective at home (18‑9‑2), winning more often and generating strong offensive outputs, including multi‑goal nights from Dylan Guenther and secondary scoring from depth players. Their penalty kill ranks among the best in the NHL, helping stem opponent power play opportunities, while goaltender Karel Vejmelka has provided consistent starts between the pipes. Head‑to‑head history between the teams is competitive — Chicago won their first meeting this season, but Utah has had success in recent years, and their home crowd energizes their effort in crucial late periods. For Chicago to compete, they’ll need disciplined defensive coverage, increased shot generation, and strong goaltending support; Utah will look to exploit home ice, convert on the power play, and maintain their offensive tempo to close out periods with leads.
Get live NHL odds and precise AI NHL picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
heading to frame no. 3!🔜 pic.twitter.com/0zF1Gi9B8d
— Chicago Blackhawks (@NHLBlackhawks) March 1, 2026
Chicago Blackhawks NHL Preview
The Chicago Blackhawks enter this road matchup against the Utah Mammoth with a 22‑27‑9 record that reflects a season of rebuilding, inconsistency, and flashes of scoring talent. Their offense averages about 2.64 goals per game, a figure that places them toward the lower end of the league scoring charts, and they have struggled to generate consistent offense on the road (10‑12‑4 away record), often finding themselves outpaced by more balanced scoring clubs. Chicago’s attack centers on rising star Connor Bedard, who leads the team in points and provides a dynamic scoring and playmaking presence night in and night out. Bedard’s ability to create offense off the rush and in tight spaces gives Chicago a chance in most games, but supporting scoring beyond him has been uneven, forcing role players like Tyler Bertuzzi and Nick Schmaltz to shoulder more responsibility than their consistency suggests.
Chicago’s power play ranks low in efficiency, making it difficult to convert opportunities when opponents buckle down on special teams; however, their penalty kill has improved at times, limiting opponent man‑advantage conversion. Defensively, the Blackhawks have allowed around 3.17 goals per game, placing pressure on goaltender Spencer Knight to make timely saves and keep them competitive. Knight’s numbers — including a save percentage near .910 and goals‑against average near 2.60 — reflect solid performance, but he often faces a high volume of shots that can wear down even the best netminders. Chicago’s depth defense is still developing, with younger players being integrated into bigger roles and veterans trying to provide stability in difficult minutes. On the road in Salt Lake City, Chicago will need disciplined defensive coverage, increased shot generation through traffic and net‑front presence, and strong first‑period execution to keep pace with Utah’s scoring tempo. Turnovers and neutral‑zone giveaways must be minimized, as the Mammoth excel at turning miscues into offensive chances. If Chicago can protect the puck, win battles along the boards, and force sustained pressure in Utah’s defensive zone, they have a path to keep this game close and potentially steal a road victory — though it will demand sharp execution and goaltending excellence from Knight and disciplined team defense on all four lines.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Utah Mammoth NHL Preview
The Utah Mammoth enter this March 1 game at the Delta Center with playoff aspirations and a balanced roster that has helped them assert themselves as a legitimate contender in the Western Conference. Sitting around 30‑23‑4, Utah has crafted a competitive season built on a scoring attack that produces roughly 3.22 goals per game and a defense that limits high‑danger chances, holding opponents to about 2.75 goals against. At home, the Mammoth have been particularly effective, posting a strong record (18‑9‑2) that reflects both offensive efficiency and defensive discipline. Their depth scoring has been a major asset, with players like Dylan Guenther pushing the pace offensively, Logan Cooley providing creative playmaking, and Lawson Crouse contributing timely goals, including multi‑goal nights that have swung momentum in close games. Utah’s power play has its moments, generating opportunities when opponents take penalties, and their penalty kill operates with disciplined positioning and quick sticks that disrupt opponent setups. Goaltender Karel Vejmelka has been a reliable presence in net, making key saves when sustained pressure mounts and giving the Mammoth a chance to stay close or take leads in tight contests.
Utah has also shown resilience in bouncing back from losses, extending its form with wins over quality opponents and maintaining a push for postseason positioning. Recent news indicates the Mammoth have extended hot stretches and sharpened their home‑ice results, giving them confidence heading into March. Against Chicago, limiting turnovers and converting offensive chances early will be critical; Utah must also prevent second‑chance rebounds and control puck possession to keep sustained pressure on opposing defenders. The home crowd and energy at the Delta Center often amplify defensive effort and transition scoring, with Utah seeking to exploit favorable matchups in special teams and even‑strength situations. If they maintain their balanced attack and disciplined defense, the Mammoth can dictate tempo, press for early offense, and close out tight third periods to secure a key home victory en route to a playoff push.
What a night at the @deltacenter 😌 pic.twitter.com/7WrTQY28ha
— Utah Mammoth (@utahmammoth) February 28, 2026
Chicago vs Utah Prop Picks (AI)
Remi is pouring through loads of data on each player. In fact, anytime the Blackhawks and Mammoth play there’s always several intriguing angles to key in on. Not to mention games played at Delta Center in Mar rarely follow normal, predictable betting trends.
Chicago vs Utah Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports genius, has been pouring over tons of data from every angle between the Blackhawks and Mammoth and using recursive machine learning and cutting-edge AI to examine the data to a single cover probability.
Remi has been most focused on the trending factor human bettors often put on player performance factors between a Blackhawks team going up against a possibly healthy Mammoth team. It appears the true game analytics might reflect a strong lean against one Vegas line specifically.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our NHL AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI Chicago vs Utah picks, computer picks Blackhawks vs Mammoth, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
|
DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW | ||||||
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full NHL schedule.
Chicago Betting Trends
Chicago’s recent ATS performance shows the Blackhawks have covered at a solid rate overall this season despite their inconsistent results and are near the top of the league in covering games.
Utah Betting Trends
Utah has been under .500 ATS this season overall, though they have covered at times when favored at home, especially against road teams with lower winning percentages.
Blackhawks vs. Mammoth Matchup Trends
Recent trends show the Mammoth go Over the total frequently when favored at home, and Chicago has historically struggled as a heavy underdog, but in matchups like this the over has hit consistently in several of Utah’s last home victories.
Chicago vs. Utah Game Info
Chicago vs Utah starts on March 01, 2026 at 5:00 PM EST.
Venue: Delta Center.
Spread: Utah -1.5
Moneyline: Chicago +242, Utah -305
Over/Under: 6
Chicago: (22-28) | Utah: (31-24)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: C. Keller over 0.5 Points.. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
Recent trends show the Mammoth go Over the total frequently when favored at home, and Chicago has historically struggled as a heavy underdog, but in matchups like this the over has hit consistently in several of Utah’s last home victories.
CHI trend: Chicago’s recent ATS performance shows the Blackhawks have covered at a solid rate overall this season despite their inconsistent results and are near the top of the league in covering games.
UTA trend: Utah has been under .500 ATS this season overall, though they have covered at times when favored at home, especially against road teams with lower winning percentages.
See our latest NHL picks and odds pages for 2026 to compare prices before you bet.
Chicago vs. Utah Odds
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through mountains of data on each line. In fact, anytime the Chicago vs Utah trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing angles to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme temps almost always follow normal, predictable betting trends.
| CHI Moneyline | +242 |
|---|---|
| UTA Moneyline | -305 |
| CHI Spread | +1.5 |
| UTA Spread | -1.5 |
| Over / Under | 6 |
Chicago vs Utah Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
In Progress
Chicago Blackhawks
Winnipeg Jets
In Progress
Blackhawks
Jets
|
2
1
|
-350
+250
|
-1.5 (+155)
+1.5 (-205)
|
O 5 (+135)
U 5 (-175)
|
|
|
In Progress
Ottawa Senators
Edmonton Oilers
In Progress
Senators
Oilers
|
2
2
|
-105
-125
|
+1.5 (-300)
-1.5 (+220)
|
O 8.5 (-135)
U 8.5 (+105)
|
|
|
In Progress
Dallas Stars
Calgary Flames
In Progress
Stars
Flames
|
2
1
|
-285
+210
|
-1.5 (+105)
+1.5 (-135)
|
O 7 (+100)
U 7 (-130)
|
|
|
In Progress
Tampa Bay Lightning
Minnesota Wild
In Progress
Lightning
Wild
|
0
1
|
+135
-175
|
+1.5 (-190)
-1.5 (+145)
|
O 6 (-125)
U 6 (-105)
|
|
|
In Progress
Montreal Canadiens
San Jose Sharks
In Progress
Canadiens
Sharks
|
–
–
|
+115
|
+1.5 (-220)
|
O 6.5 (-125)
U 6.5 (+105)
|
|
|
In Progress
Colorado Avalanche
Anaheim Ducks
In Progress
Avalanche
Ducks
|
–
–
|
-145
+125
|
-1.5 (+163)
+1.5 (-190)
|
O 6.5 (-135)
U 6.5 (+115)
|
|
|
Mar 4, 2026 7:00PM EST
Toronto Maple Leafs
New Jersey Devils
3/4/26 7PM
Maple Leafs
Devils
|
–
–
|
-105
-115
|
+1.5 (-260)
-1.5 (+215)
|
O 5.5 (-128)
U 5.5 (+107)
|
|
|
Mar 4, 2026 7:00PM EST
Las Vegas Golden Knights
Detroit Red Wings
3/4/26 7PM
Golden Knights
Red Wings
|
–
–
|
-135
|
-1.5 (+180)
|
O 5.5 (-135)
U 5.5 (+115)
|
|
|
Mar 4, 2026 10:00PM EST
St Louis Blues
Seattle Kraken
3/4/26 10PM
Blues
Kraken
|
–
–
|
+120
-140
|
+1.5 (-220)
-1.5 (+180)
|
O 5.5 (-120)
U 5.5 (+100)
|
|
|
Mar 4, 2026 10:00PM EST
Carolina Hurricanes
Vancouver Canucks
3/4/26 10PM
Hurricanes
Canucks
|
–
–
|
-260
+215
|
-1.5 (-103)
+1.5 (-117)
|
O 6 (-117)
U 6 (-103)
|
|
|
Mar 4, 2026 10:00PM EST
New York Islanders
Anaheim Ducks
3/4/26 10PM
Islanders
Ducks
|
–
–
|
-110
-110
|
-1.5 (+215)
+1.5 (-260)
|
O 6.5 (-110)
U 6.5 (-110)
|
NHL Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers Chicago Blackhawks vs. Utah Mammoth on March 01, 2026 at Delta Center.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our NHL odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
|
NHL |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLA@NYI | NYI +127 | 48.9% | 1 | WIN |
| WPG@NJ | WPG +110 | 49.3% | 1 | WIN |
| NJ@SEA | NJ -120 | 54.9% | 2 | WIN |
| FLA@CHI | OVER 5.5 | 57.1% | 3 | WIN |
| NJ@EDM | NJ +151 | 44.0% | 1 | WIN |
| CLB@PIT | PIT -120 | 54.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| MIN@BUF | BUF -120 | 55.6% | 4 | LOSS |
| ANA@LA | ANA +128 | 47.6% | 1 | WIN |
| NSH@COL | UNDER 6.5 | 53.8% | 3 | LOSS |
| CGY@CHI | CHI -118 | 54.8% | 3 | LOSS |
| EDM@NSH | NSH +115 | 51.0% | 1 | WIN |
| DAL@ANA | DAL -116 | 54.0% | 3 | LOSS |
| FLA@BUF | BUF -115 | 55.8% | 4 | LOSS |
| NJ@WPG | WPG -122 | 55.5% | 4 | WIN |
| SEA@CGY | SEA +137 | 46.5% | 1 | WIN |
| NSH@CGY | CGY -118 | 57.5% | 4 | LOSS |
| BUF@CLB | BUF -108 | 59.7% | 4 | LOSS |
| WPG@TOR | TOR -133 | 58.8% | 4 | WIN |
| MIN@SJ | SJ +150 | 47.4% | 1 | WIN |
| WAS@FLA | FLA -118 | 56.6% | 3 | WIN |
| MIN@WPG | MIN -113 | 55.1% | 4 | WIN |
| PHI@CHI | PHI -125 | 56.1% | 4 | WIN |
| DAL@DET | DAL -125 | 58.0% | 6 | LOSS |
| ANA@CLB | ZACH WERENSKI OVER 1.5 BLOCKS | 54.4% | 4 | LOSS |
| NSH@STL | NSH -105 | 53.3% | 3 | WIN |
| OTT@WPG | OVER 5.5 | 54.0% | 3 | LOSS |
| TB@NYI | TB -130 | 60.9% | 6 | LOSS |
| LV@NYI | NYI +120 | 46.1% | 1 | WIN |
| BUF@CGY | OVER 5.5 | 52.2% | 1 | WIN |
| MIN@CGY | MIN -115 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
| PIT@TB | UNDER 6.5 | 54.8% | 3 | LOSS |
| TOR@FLA | OVER 6 | 53.8% | 3 | PUSH |
| MON@LV | OVER 6 | 54.4% | 4 | LOSS |
| PHI@FLA | SAM BENNETT UNDER 2.5 SHOTS ON GOAL | 54.1% | 4 | LOSS |
| BOS@NYI | MATHEW BARZAL OVER 0.5 ASSTS | 54.4% | 4 | LOSS |
| CLB@WAS | OVER 6.5 | 54.2% | 3 | LOSS |
| CLB@DET | DET -135 | 67.0% | 6 | WIN |
| STL@PHI | UNDER 5.5 | 54.6% | 4 | WIN |
| CAR@MIN | OVER 6 | 56.4% | 4 | WIN |
| PHI@STL | JORDAN BINNINGTON UNDER 22.5 SAVES | 54.4% | 4 | LOSS |
| CLB@SEA | CLB +110 | 44.6% | 1 | WIN |
| MIN@NYI | MATHEW BARZAL OVER 0.5 PTS | 56.6% | 6 | WIN |
| PHI@NSH | NSH -122 | 55.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| SJ@SEA | JORDAN EBERLE OVER 0.5 ASSTS | 53.3% | 3 | LOSS |
| CAR@NYR | OVER 5.5 | 53.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| PIT@TOR | OVER 6.5 | 53.5% | 3 | WIN |
| VAN@NSH | OVER 5.5 | 53.9% | 3 | WIN |
| NJ@ANA | ANA +110 | 44.8% | 1 | WIN |
| DET@ANA | DET -100 | 51.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| NYI@CAR | UNDER 6.5 | 54.1% | 4 | LOSS |
| WPG@MIN | WPG -115 | 56.4% | 4 | WIN |
