Timberwolves vs Trail Blazers Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS NBA Lines & Props (Feb 25)
Updated: 2026-02-23T03:31:50.923562ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
Minnesota travels to Portland for this Northwest Division clash, seeking to rebound from a tough loss and keep pace in the Western Conference playoff picture. The Trail Blazers, dealing with significant injuries to key playmakers, will look to defend Moda Center and extend their modest recent momentum.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Feb 25, 2026
Start Time: 10:00 PM EST
Venue: Moda Center
Trail Blazers Record: (28-30)
Timberwolves Record: (35-23)
OPENING ODDS
MIN Moneyline: ODDS COMING SOON
POR Moneyline: ODDS COMING SOON
MIN Spread: ODDS COMING SOON
POR Spread: ODDS COMING SOON
Over/Under: ODDS COMING SOON
MIN
Betting Trends
- The Timberwolves are around 26–32 ATS this season, including sub-.500 results as a road favorite, indicating inconsistency in covering games despite solid overall performance.
POR
Betting Trends
- Portland holds a slightly better ATS profile at about 31–27 this season, with stronger performance covering the spread at home than on the road.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- In this head-to-head set, totals have tended toward the Over recently — several past meetings and trends at the Moda Center show high scoring, and both teams’ games have gone Over the total at notable rates.
MIN vs. POR
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: REMI'S STILL ANALYZING MARKETS
LIVE NBA ODDS
NBA ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
469-389
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+923.7
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$92,370
VS. SPREAD
2035-1641
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+643.3
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$64,330
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Minnesota vs Portland Prediction & Odds:
Free NBA Betting Insights for 2/25/26
The Timberwolves vs. Trail Blazers game on February 25, 2026 is shaping up as a fascinating Western Conference divisional tilt with playoff positioning implications for both teams. Minnesota enters with a 35–23 record and a top-level offensive attack led by Anthony Edwards, while Portland comes in at 28–30, clinging to relevance in the playoff chase. This matchup highlights a clash in roster health and talent depth that could influence both the basketball outcome and how bettors view the number. The Timberwolves have been a strong offense overall, with Edwards scoring at an elite level and Rudy Gobert returning to patrol the paint and anchor the defense, providing rebounding and rim protection that few teams can match. Minnesota’s wings and forwards offer balanced scoring, while bench contributions have helped the Wolves stay afloat when opponents go on runs. However, recent inconsistency — a blowout home loss to the Philadelphia 76ers that snapped a winning streak — underscores that they’re not invulnerable. For Portland, the opposing narrative has been one of resilience through adversity: key contributors like Deni Avdija and Shaedon Sharpe remain out due to injury, and franchise guard Damian Lillard continues his recovery from a torn Achilles, meaning the Blazers are missing multiple veterans who would ordinarily shoulder offensive responsibilities. Despite these setbacks, Portland has posted some surprising results recently, including a convincing win over a shorthanded Phoenix Suns team, showing how even depleted this roster can compete when role players elevate their play. From a stylistic standpoint, Minnesota’s strengths — aggressive scoring, physical interior play, and transition offense — test the Blazers’ ability to match pace and defensive discipline. The Wolves have a history of controlling games in the paint and generating high-efficiency shots from their core scorers, forcing opposing defenses to scramble early in possessions. Edwards’ scoring versatility, coupled with the second and third scoring options making plays without the ball, gives Minnesota a diversified offensive attack that can adapt when Portland loads defensive pressure on the perimeter.
Meanwhile, the Trail Blazers, missing key creators, have leaned more heavily on ball movement and opportunistic scoring from veterans like Jrue Holiday and frontline contributors like Donovan Clingan. Their offensive approach this season has been effective at times but inconsistent; the lack of reliable All-Star production means that when Portland’s shooters are cold, the roster can struggle to manufacture offense against disciplined defenses like Minnesota’s. Defensively, the Wolves have struggled at times to contain quick ball movement and deep perimeter threats, though Gobert’s presence inside limits second-chance points and deters easy rim access. Portland’s scoring dips due to injuries make Minnesota’s defensive assignments more manageable than usual, but the Blazers have still shown an ability to contest shots and force turnovers when they’re locked in. This tactical interplay — Wolves controlling tempo and interior touches, Blazers trying to resist with scrappy defense and opportunistic offense — should make this a rich chess match for coaches and players alike. Betting trends add another layer: Minnesota has been inconsistent ATS, particularly when favored by larger spreads, while Portland’s home ATS record is healthier, reflecting that they’ve been competitive against expectations in Moda Center even when underdogs. Furthermore, the Over has been a recurring theme for both teams’ games, with high combined scoring and fast possessions often outpacing projections. In past Wolves-Blazers matchups, this pattern of high totals has shown up repeatedly, especially at Portland’s arena. All told, this game is more than a simple favorite vs. underdog narrative — it’s a meeting of two teams with stylistic contrasts, roster challenges, and playoff stakes that could easily produce scoring runs, tactical pivots, and highlight individual performances that shift momentum in either direction.
Get live NBA odds and precise AI NBA picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
but we got...
— Minnesota Timberwolves (@Timberwolves) February 25, 2026
Jaden.
McDaniels. pic.twitter.com/cQpV86Gu15
Minnesota Timberwolves NBA Preview
The Minnesota Timberwolves arrive in Portland as one of the more intriguing squads in the Western Conference heading into late-February action. Minnesota’s 35–23 record reflects both its competitive ceiling and occasional inconsistencies, but at its core lies a potent offensive engine led by Anthony Edwards, who is among the NBA’s premier scoring talents this season. Edwards regularly makes difficult shots, creates opportunities off the dribble, and pulls defenses out of position with his shooting range and athleticism. When Edwards is in rhythm, Minnesota’s offense flows with a balance of ball movement, spacing, and aggressive scoring that few defenses can completely neutralize. Complimenting Edwards are reliable secondary scorers and versatile forwards who can stretch the floor while providing interior physicality. Rudy Gobert’s presence in the paint anchors the defense and rebounding effort, limiting second-chance points for opponents and giving Minnesota an edge in time of possession battles on both ends. Yet the Wolves’ narrative this season has been one of spectacular highs and frustrating lows. Their offense can generate significant point totals, but defensive lapses and turnovers at inopportune moments have undermined some strong offensive outputs. A recent 135–108 blowout loss to the Philadelphia 76ers illustrates how Minnesota’s defense can be exposed if rotations falter or opponents get hot from deep. That said, Minnesota has also shown an ability to bounce back, as evidenced by dominant wins earlier in the season and convincing performances against Portland in head-to-head matchups. In two recent games against the Blazers this season, the Timberwolves have emerged victorious — including a decisive 133–109 win at home where Julius Randle erupted for 41 points, showcasing Minnesota’s ability to diversify scoring threats and dominate when executing at high efficiency.
From a strategic perspective, Minnesota aims to dictate pace and space. The threat of Edwards’ scoring creates defensive dilemmas — double teams or help rotations often lead to open looks for shooters or cuts to the basket. When Minnesota pushes transition and moves the ball with discipline in the half court, they can open up easy scoring opportunities that force opposing defenses to react rather than initiate. The Wolves also benefit from bench players who can inject energy and scoring without disrupting overall continuity, a valuable trait on the road where momentum swings can come quickly. Defensively, Gobert’s rim protection and interior intelligence give Minnesota a distinct advantage against teams that rely on paint penetration or second-chance points. In betting terms, Minnesota’s ATS record this season suggests they’ve struggled at times to meet spread expectations, especially when favored by larger margins or in road environments like Portland. Yet the public betting trends indicate strong support for Minnesota covering as road favorites, reflecting confidence among bettors in the Wolves’ talent advantage and offensive firepower. Additionally, recent divisional trends and scoring totals — including a consistent pattern of Overs in this matchup’s previous meetings — suggest that when Minnesota’s offense clicks, games can extend into high-scoring territory, appealing to fans of offensive spectacle. Ultimately, Minnesota’s success in this road test hinges on consistency — limiting turnovers, maintaining defensive focus, and ensuring Edwards and his supporting cast sustain scoring pressure throughout all four quarters. If the Wolves control pace, neutralize Portland’s spot-up shooting, and use Gobert’s defensive presence to dictate interior play, they have a clear pathway to not only win but possibly cover the spread and keep pace in the Western Conference standings.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Portland Trail Blazers NBA Preview
The Portland Trail Blazers host the Timberwolves on February 25, 2026 keen to defend their home court and build some momentum despite a challenging injury landscape and uneven results this season. Portland enters this game with a 28–30 overall record and a slightly above-.500 ATS mark at home, suggesting the team has managed to stay fairly competitive against expectations in Moda Center, even while missing key contributors. The Blazers’ offensive identity has been shaped by necessity and adaptation: with All-Star forward Deni Avdija out again due to a persistent back injury and sharpshooter Shaedon Sharpe sidelined with a stress reaction in his fibula, Portland lacks two of its top scoring threats, forcing role players and veterans to assume heavier loads on both ends of the floor. The absence of long-time franchise centerpiece Damian Lillard (torn Achilles) further amplifies this challenge, as Portland has had to pivot to a more collective scoring approach rather than relying on individual star creation. Despite this adversity, Portland has shown flashes of potential this season. The team’s recent victory over the Phoenix Suns illustrates how contributions from players like Donovan Clingan and Jerami Grant can help the Blazers overcome talent deficits and compete at a high level. Clingan’s recent performance, combining scoring with rebounding and rim protection, represents the kind of all-around effort Portland needs to thrive in tighter matchups. Meanwhile, the Blazers’ ball movement and assist numbers reflect a willingness to share offensive responsibilities and seek high-percentage shots through coordinated action rather than isolation play. This collaborative approach can be effective against teams that over-commit defensively, opening up open-look opportunities from beyond the arc or quick drives to the basket. Still, inconsistency remains a theme: Portland’s turnover rates and lapses in defensive rotations have been exploited in several recent losses, including a lopsided defeat to the Denver Nuggets where they surrendered 157 points in a single night before rebounding with a strong defensive showing against Phoenix.
On the defensive side, the Blazers have had to adapt schemes and rotations to compensate for personnel absences. This often means keeping hands active, contesting shots aggressively, and relying on communication and effort to make up for athletic or matchup disadvantages. When this disciplined defensive identity clicks, Portland can limit opponents’ fast break opportunities and force more contested shots in the half-court, helping keep games competitive. However, sustained defensive focus becomes harder as rotations fatigue, and missing key defenders makes switch coverage more challenging, particularly against teams with multiple scoring threats like Minnesota. Portland’s fans and betting supporters can look to the team’s comparatively stronger home ATS record as evidence that this squad still finds ways to compete in familiar surroundings. Playing at Moda Center with crowd support often energizes the Blazers, especially in close games where momentum swings can shift rapidly. Portland’s trend of hitting the Over in a significant portion of home games further suggests that when they score and defend effectively, games can become high-scoring affairs that appeal to offensive bettors. That said, the absence of primary scorers means Portland’s upside has constraints; the team’s ability to sustain scoring runs and respond to opponent bursts will be critical. In summary, the Blazers’ home preview centers on adaptability and resilience. With a collective offensive approach and a defense that relies on effort and communication, Portland can contend with stronger opponents. But the team’s success hinges on minimizing turnovers, maximizing contributions from role players, and maintaining defensive discipline throughout all four quarters. If these elements align, the Blazers can make this an entertaining contest at Moda Center and potentially improve both their win and ATS records.
that's tough Scoot 😮💨 pic.twitter.com/0R0E2b8NKR
— Portland Trail Blazers (@trailblazers) February 25, 2026
Minnesota vs Portland Prop Picks (AI)
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through tons of datapoints on each line. In fact, anytime the Timberwolves and Trail Blazers play there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at Moda Center in Feb can often follow normal, predictable betting trends.
Minnesota vs Portland Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports algorithm, has been pouring over millions of data from every past game between the Timberwolves and Trail Blazers and using recursive machine learning and impressive AI to boil down the data to a single cover probability.
Oddly enough, we’ve seen the AI has been most fixated on the unproportionally assigned weight knucklehead sportsbettors regularly put on Minnesota’s strength factors between a Timberwolves team going up against a possibly unhealthy Trail Blazers team. We’ve found the true game analytics might reflect a moderate lean against one Vegas line specifically.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our NBA AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI Minnesota vs Portland picks, computer picks Timberwolves vs Trail Blazers, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBA | 3/10 | MEM@PHI | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 6 |
VAULT v2
|
|
| NBA | 3/10 | PHX@MIL | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 5 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| NBA | 3/10 | BOS@SA | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| NBA | 3/10 | DAL@ATL | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 3 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| NBA | 3/10 | PHX@MIL | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 3 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| NBA | 3/10 | TOR@HOU | GET FREE PICK NOW | 2 | – | |
| NBA | 3/10 | TOR@HOU | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| NBA | 3/10 | DAL@ATL | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 0 |
INTEL
|
|
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full NBA schedule.
Minnesota Betting Trends
The Timberwolves are around 26–32 ATS this season, including sub-.500 results as a road favorite, indicating inconsistency in covering games despite solid overall performance.
Portland Betting Trends
Portland holds a slightly better ATS profile at about 31–27 this season, with stronger performance covering the spread at home than on the road.
Timberwolves vs. Trail Blazers Matchup Trends
In this head-to-head set, totals have tended toward the Over recently — several past meetings and trends at the Moda Center show high scoring, and both teams’ games have gone Over the total at notable rates.
Minnesota vs. Portland Game Info
Minnesota vs Portland starts on February 25, 2026 at 10:00 PM EST.
Venue: Moda Center.
Spread: Portland ODDS COMING SOON
Moneyline: Minnesota ODDS COMING SOON, Portland ODDS COMING SOON
Over/Under: ODDS COMING SOON
Minnesota: (35-23) | Portland: (28-30)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: REMI'S STILL ANALYZING MARKETS. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
In this head-to-head set, totals have tended toward the Over recently — several past meetings and trends at the Moda Center show high scoring, and both teams’ games have gone Over the total at notable rates.
MIN trend: The Timberwolves are around 26–32 ATS this season, including sub-.500 results as a road favorite, indicating inconsistency in covering games despite solid overall performance.
POR trend: Portland holds a slightly better ATS profile at about 31–27 this season, with stronger performance covering the spread at home than on the road.
See our latest NBA picks and odds pages for 2026 to compare prices before you bet.
Minnesota vs. Portland Odds
Remi is pouring through tons of stats on each team. In fact, anytime the Minnesota vs Portland trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing observations to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme altitude can often follow normal, predictable patterns.
| MIN Moneyline | ODDS COMING SOON |
|---|---|
| POR Moneyline | ODDS COMING SOON |
| MIN Spread | ODDS COMING SOON |
| POR Spread | ODDS COMING SOON |
| Over / Under | ODDS COMING SOON |
Minnesota vs Portland Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
In Progress
Memphis Grizzlies
Philadelphia 76ers
In Progress
Grizzlies
76ers
|
83
76
|
-145
+114
|
-2.5 (-105)
+2.5 (-125)
|
O 245.5 (-120)
U 245.5 (-110)
|
|
|
In Progress
Washington Wizards
Miami Heat
In Progress
Wizards
Heat
|
55
67
|
+2200
-10000
|
+18.5 (-120)
-18.5 (-110)
|
O 248.5 (-110)
U 248.5 (-120)
|
|
|
In Progress
Detroit Pistons
Brooklyn Nets
In Progress
Pistons
Nets
|
53
32
|
-10000
+1200
|
-27.5 (-110)
+27.5 (-120)
|
O 220.5 (-115)
U 220.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
Dallas Mavericks
Atlanta Hawks
In Progress
Mavericks
Hawks
|
55
64
|
+650
-1150
|
+11.5 (-110)
-11.5 (-120)
|
O 235.5 (-110)
U 235.5 (-120)
|
|
|
In Progress
Phoenix Suns
Milwaukee Bucks
In Progress
Suns
Bucks
|
35
29
|
-210
+160
|
-5.5 (-110)
+5.5 (-120)
|
O 233.5 (-110)
U 233.5 (-120)
|
|
|
In Progress
Toronto Raptors
Houston Rockets
In Progress
Raptors
Rockets
|
29
29
|
+124
-160
|
+3.5 (-115)
-3.5 (-115)
|
O 224.5 (-110)
U 224.5 (-120)
|
|
|
In Progress
Boston Celtics
San Antonio Spurs
In Progress
Celtics
Spurs
|
21
18
|
-120
-110
|
-1.5 (-105)
+1.5 (-125)
|
O 219.5 (-115)
U 219.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2026 10:10PM EDT
Charlotte Hornets
Portland Trail Blazers
3/10/26 10:10PM
Hornets
Trail Blazers
|
–
–
|
-155
+134
|
-3.5 (-110)
+3.5 (-110)
|
O 228 (-110)
U 228 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2026 10:10PM EDT
Chicago Bulls
Golden State Warriors
3/10/26 10:10PM
Bulls
Warriors
|
–
–
|
+205
-245
|
+6 (-110)
-6 (-110)
|
O 227.5 (-110)
U 227.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2026 10:10PM EDT
Indiana Pacers
Sacramento Kings
3/10/26 10:10PM
Pacers
Kings
|
–
–
|
+138
-160
|
+3.5 (-115)
-3.5 (-105)
|
O 237 (-110)
U 237 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2026 11:10PM EDT
Minnesota Timberwolves
Los Angeles Lakers
3/10/26 11:10PM
Timberwolves
Lakers
|
–
–
|
-130
+110
|
-2.5 (-110)
+2.5 (-110)
|
O 230.5 (-110)
U 230.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 7:40PM EDT
Cleveland Cavaliers
Orlando Magic
3/11/26 7:40PM
Cavaliers
Magic
|
–
–
|
-142
+120
|
-2.5 (-110)
+2.5 (-110)
|
O 225.5 (-110)
U 225.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 10:10PM EDT
Houston Rockets
Denver Nuggets
3/11/26 10:10PM
Rockets
Nuggets
|
–
–
|
+166
-198
|
+5 (-110)
-5 (-110)
|
O 228.5 (-106)
U 228.5 (-114)
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2026 10:40PM EDT
Minnesota Timberwolves
Los Angeles Clippers
3/11/26 10:40PM
Timberwolves
Clippers
|
–
–
|
+100
-118
|
+1.5 (-114)
-1.5 (-106)
|
O 226.5 (-115)
U 226.5 (-105)
|
NBA Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers Minnesota Timberwolves vs. Portland Trail Blazers on February 25, 2026 at Moda Center.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our NBA odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
|
|
|
|
RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GS@UTA | BRANDIN PODZIEMSKI OVER 1.5 STEALS & BLOCKS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| MEM@BKN | BKN +2 | 53.1% | 3 | WIN |
| DEN@OKC | DEN +6.5 | 54.6% | 4 | WIN |
| CHI@SAC | SAC +2 | 54.0% | 4 | WIN |
| HOU@SA | HOU +5.5 | 56.2% | 6 | LOSS |
| NY@LAL | LAL +2.5 | 56.6% | 6 | WIN |
| DET@MIA | DUNCAN ROBINSON OVER 14.5 PTS + REB | 55.1% | 5 | LOSS |
| ORL@MIL | RYAN ROLLINS UNDER 10.5 REB + ASST | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WAS@NO | ALEX SARR OVER 8.5 REB + ASST | 53.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| ORL@MIN | PAOLO BANCHERO UNDER 7.5 FIELD GOALS MADE | 56.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| UTA@MIL | KYLE KUZMA OVER 2.5 ASST | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| PHI@ATL | PHI +6.5 | 54.8% | 4 | LOSS |
| NO@PHX | NO +4.5 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| NY@DEN | DEN +1.5 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| MIA@CHA | GRANT WILLIAMS OVER 3.5 REB | 54.5% | 4 | WIN |
| DAL@BOS | JAYSON TATUM OVER 6.5 REB + ASST | 56.2% | 6 | WIN |
| TOR@MIN | TOR +4.5 | 54.5% | 4 | LOSS |
| NO@SAC | SAC +6.5 | 54.7% | 4 | LOSS |
| DET@SA | DET +3.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| CHI@PHX | GRAYSON ALLEN OVER 5.5 FIELD GOALS MADE | 53.5% | 3 | WIN |
| LAL@DEN | LEBRON JAMES UNDER 5.5 REB | 55.7% | 5 | WIN |
| CHA@BOS | CHA +6.5 | 55.9% | 5 | WIN |
| POR@MEM | MEM +10 | 54.6% | 4 | WIN |
| UTA@PHI | ACE BAILEY OVER 22.5 PTS + REB + ASST | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| ATL@MIL | MYLES TURNER OVER 4.5 REB | 55.3% | 5 | LOSS |
| OKC@CHI | CHI +9.5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| NY@TOR | TOR +2.5 | 57.0% | 6 | LOSS |
| PHX@SAC | SAC +9.5 | 54.0% | 3 | LOSS |
| NO@LAL | LEBRON JAMES OVER 7.5 FIELD GOALS MADE | 57.4% | 7 | WIN |
| HOU@WAS | ALPEREN SENGUN OVER 5.5 ASST | 54.7% | 4 | LOSS |
| LAC@GS | AL HORFORD OVER 1.5 STEALS + BLOCKS | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| BOS@MIL | BOS -7.5 | 54.4% | 4 | WIN |
| MEM@IND | IND +1 | 54.3% | 4 | LOSS |
| OKC@DAL | ISAIAH HARTENSTEIN OVER 12.5 REB + ASST | 55.2% | 5 | LOSS |
| PHI@BOS | DERRICK WHITE OVER 5.5 ASST | 56.6% | 6 | WIN |
| POR@CHA | POR +7.5 | 56.2% | 6 | LOSS |
| DEN@OKC | DEN +7.5 | 54.5% | 4 | WIN |
| MEM@DAL | MAX CHRISTIE OVER 5.5 REB + ASST | 53.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| DEN@OKC | CHET HOLMGREN UNDER 8.5 REB | 55.1% | 5 | LOSS |
| SAC@DAL | SAC +7 | 54.5% | 4 | WIN |
| HOU@ORL | JABARI SMITH JR. OVER 4.5 FIELD GOALS MADE | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| SA@TOR | TOR +7.5 | 53.3% | 3 | WIN |
| BOS@DEN | BOS +3.5 | 53.4% | 3 | LOSS |
| SAC@HOU | TARI EASON OVER 23.5 PTS + REB + ASST | 56.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| SA@TOR | DEAARON FOX UNDER 19.5 PTS + REB | 54.4% | 4 | LOSS |
| DAL@BKN | BKN +2.5 | 53.6% | 3 | LOSS |
| GS@NO | NO +1.5 | 54.8% | 4 | WIN |
| ORL@LAL | ANTHONY BLACK OVER 3.5 ASST | 56.8% | 6 | WIN |
| SAC@MEM | SCOTTY PIPPEN JR. OVER 3.5 ASST | 53.5% | 3 | WIN |
| UTA@HOU | AMEN THOMPSON OVER 6.5 FIELD GOALS MADE | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| DEN@GS | DEN -6 | 54.6% | 4 | LOSS |