Central Michigan vs Kent State Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CFB Lines & Props (Nov 19)
Updated: 2025-11-12T02:28:40.156150ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The Central Michigan Chippewas (6-4) travel to face the Kent State Golden Flashes (4-6) on November 19, 2025 in a pivotal Mid-American Conference showdown where CMU’s defensive disruption and turnaround momentum clash with Kent State’s home-field energy and improving moments on offense. With both teams still fighting for MAC positioning, the key factors will be turnover margin, red-zone efficiency and which squad can impose its style early.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Nov 19, 2025
Start Time: 8:00 PM EST
Venue: Dix Stadium
Golden Flashes Record: (4-6)
Chippewas Record: (6-4)
OPENING ODDS
CMICH Moneyline: -360
KENTST Moneyline: +284
CMICH Spread: -9.5
KENTST Spread: +9.5
Over/Under: 48.5
CMICH
Betting Trends
- Central Michigan holds an ATS record of approximately 6-3-0 this season, showing that they cover a strong majority of games regardless of matchup.
KENTST
Betting Trends
- Kent State has posted a roughly even ATS record this year at 5-5-0, but their performance at home has been less reliable, which raises questions about consistency in favored or higher-stakes settings.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- This matchup presents a compelling ATS scenario: Central Michigan has strong cover trends especially away and against similar MAC competition, while Kent State at home has been more vulnerable than typical home teams—a combination that may give CMU considerable betting value as the road side. Moreover, the turnover-based identity of CMU versus the high-variance offense of Kent State suggests the game may tilt toward the disciplined team if key plays lean their way.
CMICH vs. KENTST
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: L. Lewis under 52.5 Receiving Yards.
LIVE CFB ODDS
CFB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
374-287
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+829.4
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$82,943
VS. SPREAD
1680-1416
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+450.6
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$45,057
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Central Michigan vs Kent State Prediction & Odds:
Free CFB Betting Insights for 11/19/25
The upcoming matchup between the Central Michigan Chippewas and the Kent State Golden Flashes on November 19, 2025 shapes up as a late-season MAC showdown defined by contrasting identities, evolving confidence levels, and the kind of situational factors that often determine which program can finish stronger down the stretch, with Central Michigan entering as the more structurally sound and defensively reliable team while Kent State counters with home-field urgency and a desire to convert flashes of offensive potential into sustained production. Central Michigan’s season has been marked by steady improvement, particularly on defense where their front has become increasingly disruptive, generating pressure with disciplined gap integrity, well-timed stunts, and physical tackling that forces opponents into long-yardage situations and mistakes that tilt field position in CMU’s favor; that defensive identity pairs perfectly with their ball-control offense, which relies on manageable down-and-distance, inside running, and strategic play-action that exploits overcommitment without requiring high-risk vertical shots. Kent State, meanwhile, has spent the season stabilizing under a young coaching staff while attempting to rebuild its offensive rhythm behind a developing quarterback and a skilled but inconsistent supporting cast, making this game a true test of whether their incremental growth can translate into execution against a well-organized opponent. The Golden Flashes must generate efficiency early, as falling behind forces them into predictable passing situations where Central Michigan’s defense thrives, so Kent will need to emphasize quick reads, early-down success, and the occasional explosive play to prevent CMU from shrinking the field.
The battle in the trenches becomes a defining layer, with CMU seeking to dictate tempo through physicality and Kent needing its offensive line to rise above season-long inconsistency to protect the quarterback and maintain continuity in drives. Turnover margin stands as the game’s most influential metric, with Central Michigan building its identity on opportunistic defense and Kent State struggling at times with ball security and drive-killing mistakes; whichever team wins that battle will gain the upper hand in both field position and momentum. Special teams could quietly swing the contest, as CMU’s more reliable kicking and coverage units give them an edge in hidden yardage while Kent must avoid penalties, blocks, or short kicks that surrender easy advantage. Emotionally, Kent State carries the burden and boost of playing at home, requiring them to transform crowd energy into early rhythm while preventing setbacks from creating frustration, whereas Central Michigan benefits from the freedom of a road underdog with a clear and repeatable blueprint built on discipline and patience. Ultimately, this matchup comes down to identity imposition: if Central Michigan controls possession, limits mistakes, and forces Kent into disadvantageous downs, the Chippewas can turn the game into the slow, physical contest they excel in; but if Kent State hits on early explosive plays, protects the football, and uses home-field energy to maintain offensive rhythm, the Golden Flashes can push CMU out of its comfort zone and keep the contest competitive deep into the fourth quarter.
Get live CFB odds and precise AI CFB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
Hittin’ the road #FireUpChips pic.twitter.com/tXz5YsvE6G
— Central Michigan Football (@CMU_Football) November 18, 2025
Central Michigan Chippewas CFB Preview
The Central Michigan Chippewas enter this road matchup against the Kent State Golden Flashes with a clearly defined identity built on defensive discipline, physicality, and a methodical offensive structure that has allowed them to thrive in hostile environments, making them one of the MAC’s more reliable travel teams as the season progresses. Their defensive front has become the centerpiece of their success, using gap integrity, well-executed stunts, and strong pursuit speed to collapse pockets, disrupt the rhythm of opposing quarterbacks, and limit explosive plays that could otherwise swing momentum toward the home team. This defensive stability gives Central Michigan a built-in advantage on the road, as they can quiet a crowd early by forcing three-and-outs, winning the line of scrimmage, and consistently putting their offense in favorable field-position situations. Their secondary complements this strength with physical coverage, strong ball skills, and the ability to capitalize on inaccurate throws created by front-seven pressure, making turnovers a consistent part of their winning formula. Offensively, the Chippewas operate with patience and situational awareness, emphasizing early-down efficiency through a balanced rushing attack and short-to-intermediate passing designed to keep the chains moving and prevent their offense from falling into predictable third-and-long scenarios. On the road, these fundamentals become even more essential, as avoiding negative plays, turnovers, and unnecessary risks is key to keeping control of tempo and preventing Kent State from generating home-crowd momentum. Central Michigan’s offensive line must deliver a steady, physical performance, creating rushing lanes that allow the Chippewas to control possession while also providing enough protection for play-action concepts that can stretch Kent’s defense horizontally.
Special teams are another area where CMU holds a potential edge, especially in the punting game and in coverage discipline, which can give their defense long fields to work with and force Kent State’s inconsistent offense to drive the entire length of the field against a structured unit. The Chippewas’ emotional approach is equally important—this team plays with a calm, controlled demeanor that translates well on the road, avoiding panic in tight moments and leaning on their identity to navigate adversity. Their coaching staff’s emphasis on detail, clean execution, and situational control has made them a team capable of grinding opponents down over four quarters. Against Kent State, the formula remains clear: win the trenches, protect the football, limit explosive plays from the Golden Flashes’ skill players, and turn defensive stops into manageable offensive possessions. If Central Michigan can maintain balance, avoid penalties, exploit field-position advantages, and force Kent into late-down passing situations where their defense excels, the Chippewas can impose their preferred game style and steadily wear down the home team. Road games in the MAC often hinge on discipline and consistency, and those are precisely the strengths that Central Michigan brings into this matchup, giving them a strong foundation to dictate tempo, frustrate Kent State’s offense, and position themselves for another methodical and composed road performance.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Kent State Golden Flashes CFB Preview
The Kent State Golden Flashes enter this home matchup against the Central Michigan Chippewas with a clear understanding that protecting their own field requires elevated execution, early rhythm, and a level of consistency that has eluded them at times throughout the season, making this game both a test of growth and an opportunity to demonstrate tangible progress under their developing program. Playing at Dix Stadium gives Kent State an emotional boost, but the challenge lies in translating crowd energy into sustained offensive drives and avoiding the self-inflicted setbacks—turnovers, penalties, missed assignments—that have too often stalled their momentum. Offensively, the Golden Flashes must prioritize quick, rhythm-based plays that allow their quarterback to settle in, reduce exposure to Central Michigan’s disruptive pass rush, and attack the edges of the defense where short-area speed and well-designed spacing concepts can create mismatches. Establishing the run early will be essential, not only for balance but for keeping CMU’s linebackers from collapsing downhill and dictating the tempo; Kent State’s running backs must hit lanes decisively, while the offensive line must deliver one of its cleaner performances of the season by sustaining blocks, avoiding false starts, and preventing central penetration that leads to drive-killing negative plays. The passing game will require both precision and creativity—quick outs, mesh concepts, and layered intermediate routes can challenge CMU’s disciplined secondary if executed cleanly, but Kent must avoid forcing deep shots into well-covered windows that play directly into Central Michigan’s turnover-oriented defensive identity.
Defensively, the Golden Flashes must tighten their fundamentals, especially in run fits, tackling efficiency, and red-zone discipline, as Central Michigan’s offense thrives when it can stay ahead of the chains, grind through long possessions, and slowly demoralize opponents by winning time of possession. Kent State’s defensive front must play with leverage, shedding blocks and preventing the Chippewas from dictating physicality at the line of scrimmage, while the secondary must remain assignment-sound against play-action that CMU uses to exploit overcommitment. Special teams will be another critical area, as Kent cannot afford to give Central Michigan short fields or momentum swings through missed kicks, return breakdowns, or penalties—clean operation in the kicking game is essential to keeping the contest within reach. Emotionally, the Golden Flashes must embrace the opportunity while avoiding the pressure—their pathway to victory lies in maintaining composure, responding to adversity calmly, and feeding off home-field energy without allowing frustration to derail execution if CMU forces early stops. If Kent State can eliminate mistakes, start drives with tempo, protect the football, and create at least a handful of explosive plays to challenge CMU’s defense vertically or horizontally, they can keep the game competitive late and potentially tilt momentum in their favor. For a program striving to take the next step, a polished, disciplined performance at home against a structured opponent like Central Michigan would not only boost confidence but also signal meaningful progress as Kent State looks to close their season on a stronger, more defined trajectory.
🚨 𝗪𝗲𝗲𝗸 𝟭𝟮 𝗗𝗮𝘃𝗲𝘆 𝗢'𝗕𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻 𝗚𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝟴 🚨
— Kent State Football (@KentStFootball) November 17, 2025
Dru DeShields is named to the week 12 Davey O'Brien Great 8 after his five touchdown performance in the 42-35 win at TSDTR. #GoFlashes⚡️ | #HAB1TS pic.twitter.com/qE10Ojruaa
Central Michigan vs Kent State Prop Picks (AI)
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through tons of data on each line. In fact, anytime the Chippewas and Golden Flashes play there’s always several intriguing angles to key in on. Not to mention games played at Dix Stadium in Nov can often follow normal, predictable betting trends.
Central Michigan vs Kent State Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports genius, has been pouring over tons of data from every angle between the Chippewas and Golden Flashes and using recursive machine learning and cutting-edge AI to boil down the data to a single cover probability.
Interestingly enough, the data has been most fixated on the linear correlation of emphasis knucklehead sportsbettors often put on Kent State’s strength factors between a Chippewas team going up against a possibly unhealthy Golden Flashes team. In reality, the true game analytics appear to reflect a slight lean against one Vegas line specifically.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CFB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI Central Michigan vs Kent State picks, computer picks Chippewas vs Golden Flashes, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW | ||||||
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CFB schedule.
Central Michigan Betting Trends
Central Michigan holds an ATS record of approximately 6-3-0 this season, showing that they cover a strong majority of games regardless of matchup.
Kent State Betting Trends
Kent State has posted a roughly even ATS record this year at 5-5-0, but their performance at home has been less reliable, which raises questions about consistency in favored or higher-stakes settings.
Chippewas vs. Golden Flashes Matchup Trends
This matchup presents a compelling ATS scenario: Central Michigan has strong cover trends especially away and against similar MAC competition, while Kent State at home has been more vulnerable than typical home teams—a combination that may give CMU considerable betting value as the road side. Moreover, the turnover-based identity of CMU versus the high-variance offense of Kent State suggests the game may tilt toward the disciplined team if key plays lean their way.
Central Michigan vs. Kent State Game Info
Central Michigan vs Kent State starts on November 19, 2025 at 8:00 PM EST.
Venue: Dix Stadium.
Spread: Kent State +9.5
Moneyline: Central Michigan -360, Kent State +284
Over/Under: 48.5
Central Michigan: (6-4) | Kent State: (4-6)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: L. Lewis under 52.5 Receiving Yards.. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
This matchup presents a compelling ATS scenario: Central Michigan has strong cover trends especially away and against similar MAC competition, while Kent State at home has been more vulnerable than typical home teams—a combination that may give CMU considerable betting value as the road side. Moreover, the turnover-based identity of CMU versus the high-variance offense of Kent State suggests the game may tilt toward the disciplined team if key plays lean their way.
CMICH trend: Central Michigan holds an ATS record of approximately 6-3-0 this season, showing that they cover a strong majority of games regardless of matchup.
KENTST trend: Kent State has posted a roughly even ATS record this year at 5-5-0, but their performance at home has been less reliable, which raises questions about consistency in favored or higher-stakes settings.
See our latest CFB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
Central Michigan vs. Kent State Odds
Remi is pouring through mountains of data points on each team. In fact, anytime the Central Michigan vs Kent State trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme travel distance rarely follow normal, predictable betting trends.
| CMICH Moneyline | -360 |
|---|---|
| KENTST Moneyline | +284 |
| CMICH Spread | -9.5 |
| KENTST Spread | +9.5 |
| Over / Under | 48.5 |
Central Michigan vs Kent State Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dec 5, 2025 7:00PM EST
Troy Trojans
James Madison Dukes
12/5/25 7PM
TROY
JMAD
|
–
–
|
+1196
-2700
|
+23 (-108)
-23 (-112)
|
O 47 (-112)
U 47 (-108)
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2025 7:00PM EST
Kennesaw State Owls
Jacksonville State Gamecocks
12/5/25 7PM
KENSAW
JAXST
|
–
–
|
-130
+110
|
-2.5 (-105)
+2.5 (-115)
|
O 60.5 (-110)
U 60.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2025 8:00PM EST
North Texas Mean Green
Tulane Green Wave
12/5/25 8PM
NOTEX
TULANE
|
–
–
|
-142
+122
|
-2.5 (-118)
+2.5 (-102)
|
O 66.5 (-110)
U 66.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2025 8:01PM EST
UNLV Rebels
Boise State Broncos
12/5/25 8:01PM
UNLV
BOISE
|
–
–
|
+174
-200
|
+4.5 (-103)
-4.5 (-117)
|
O 59.5 (-110)
U 59.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 12:00PM EST
Miami Ohio Redhawks
Western Michigan Broncos
12/6/25 12PM
MIAOH
WMICH
|
–
–
|
-125
|
-1.5 (-112)
|
O 43 (-110)
U 43 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 12:00PM EST
BYU Cougars
Texas Tech Red Raiders
12/6/25 12PM
BYU
TXTECH
|
–
–
|
+390
-510
|
+12.5 (-113)
-12.5 (-107)
|
O 49.5 (-110)
U 49.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 4:00PM EST
Georgia Bulldogs
Alabama Crimson Tide
12/6/25 4PM
UGA
BAMA
|
–
–
|
-135
+115
|
-2.5 (-110)
+2.5 (-110)
|
O 47.5 (-115)
U 47.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 8:00PM EST
Duke Blue Devils
Virginia Cavaliers
12/6/25 8PM
DUKE
UVA
|
–
–
|
+161
-185
|
+4 (-110)
-4 (-110)
|
O 57.5 (-115)
U 57.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 8:01PM EST
Indiana Hoosiers
Ohio State Buckeyes
12/6/25 8:01PM
IND
OHIOST
|
–
–
|
+168
-193
|
+4 (-110)
-4 (-110)
|
O 48 (-110)
U 48 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 13, 2025 3:00PM EST
Army Black Knights
Navy Midshipmen
12/13/25 3PM
ARMY
NAVY
|
–
–
|
+177
-205
|
+5 (-110)
-5 (-110)
|
O 38 (-110)
U 38 (-110)
|
CFB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers Central Michigan Chippewas vs. Kent State Golden Flashes on November 19, 2025 at Dix Stadium.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CFB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
| LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLO@KSTATE | COLO +17.5 | 54.0% | 4 | WIN |
| PSU@RUT | RUT +14 | 52.8% | 1 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | MICH +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| VATECH@UVA | VATECH +8 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| NWEST@ILL | LUKE ALTMYER UNDER 19.5 PASS COMP | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| ORE@WAS | DEMOND WILLIAMS JR UNDER 43.5 RUSH YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| MIAMI@VATECH | VATECH +18.5 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| GAST@TROY | TROY -9.5 | 55.7% | 5 | WIN |
| DEL@WAKE | DEL +18 | 56.7% | 6 | LOSS |
| NMEX@AF | NMEX -3.5 | 56.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WASHST@JMAD | WASHST +14.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| ILL@WISC | WISC +9 | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WKY@LSU | WKY +23.5 | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| WASH@UCLA | DEMOND WILLIAMS UNDER 27.5 PASS ATT | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| TCU@HOU | AMARE THOMAS OVER 69.5 RECV YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| TEX@UGA | NATE FRAZIER UNDER 65.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 55.5% | 5 | WIN |
| PUR@WASH | ANTONIO HARRIS UNDER 73.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 54.1% | 4 | WIN |
| OKLA@BAMA | UNDER 46 | 52.4% | 2 | WIN |
| UVA@DUKE | DUKE -3.5 | 54.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| OKLA@BAMA | BAMA -6 | 54.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| OREGST@TULSA | OREGST -120 | 55.6% | 5 | LOSS |
| UTEP@MIZZST | MIZZST -5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| COLOST@NMEX | NMEX -14 | 57.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| PSU@MICHST | MICHST +7.5 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
| MISSST@MIZZOU | MISSST +7.5 | 57.2% | 7 | LOSS |
| FAU@TULANE | FAU +17.5 | 56.0% | 6 | WIN |
| NCST@MIAMI | NCST +15.5 | 57.1% | 7 | LOSS |
| KENTST@AKRON | AKRON -6.5 | 55.4% | 5 | LOSS |
| JAXST@UTEP | JAXST -105 | 57.0% | 7 | WIN |
| FSU@CLEM | CLEM -118 | 57.1% | 5 | WIN |
| UNLV@COLOST | UNLV -4 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@IOWA | IOWA +6.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |
| NEB@UCLA | NEB +1.5 | 55.8% | 5 | WIN |
| KENSAW@NMEXST | NMEXST +10 | 56.5% | 6 | WIN |
| STNFRD@UNC | STNFRD +7.5 | 53.8% | 3 | WIN |
| DUKE@UCONN | UCONN +8.5 | 57.9% | 7 | WIN |
| NEVADA@UTAHST | NEVADA +9.5 | 55.9% | 5 | LOSS |
| SAMST@OREGST | SAMST +21 | 57.7% | 7 | WIN |
| NEB@UCLA | NICO IAMALEAVA UNDER 180.5 PASS YDS | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| HOU@UCF | HOU -112 | 58.0% | 6 | WIN |
| GASTHRN@APPST | GASTHRN +180 | 36.5% | 2 | WIN |
| KENTST@BALLST | BALLST -2.5 | 54.5% | 4 | WIN |
| WAKE@FSU | WAKE +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| WYO@SDGST | SDGST -10.5 | 56.7% | 7 | WIN |
| OKLA@TENN | TENN -130 | 58.3% | 5 | LOSS |
| GATECH@NCST | GATECH -5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| MIAMI@SMU | MIAMI -10 | 54.3% | 4 | LOSS |
| IND@MD | MD +21.5 | 54.6% | 4 | LOSS |
| CINCY@UTAH | CINCY +11 | 57.6% | 7 | LOSS |
| OLDDOM@LAMON | LAMON +17 | 58.4% | 8 | LOSS |
| VANDY@TEXAS | OVER 46.5 | 53.7% | 2 | WIN |