UAB vs Rice Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CFB Lines & Props (Nov 08)
Updated: 2025-11-01T02:28:40.156150ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The UAB Blazers travel to face the Rice Owls on November 8, 2025 in an American Athletic Conference matchup where UAB looks to rebound after a tough defensive season and Rice aims to leverage home field for a key pick-up. Both teams present contrasting narratives—UAB showing flashes of offensive upside, Rice still searching for consistency on both sides of the ball.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Nov 08, 2025
Start Time: 3:00 PM EST
Venue: Rice Stadium
Owls Record: (4-5)
Blazers Record: (3-5)
OPENING ODDS
UAB Moneyline: +117
RICE Moneyline: -141
UAB Spread: +2.5
RICE Spread: -2.5
Over/Under: 53.5
UAB
Betting Trends
- UAB has played poorly this season, surrendering nearly 39 points per game and ranking among the lowest defenses in FBS, making them a risky cover especially as an underdog or favorite.
RICE
Betting Trends
- Rice has been inconsistent offensively, averaging just 21.6 points per game and allowing 28.0, which suggests that while they may outperform modest expectations, covering large spreads has been a challenge.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- The betting angle here hinges on UAB’s defensive weakness and Rice’s modest offensive output; bettors may find value in Rice at home with a manageable spread given UAB’s vulnerability, or in UAB if their offense can exploit Rice’s weaker defensive moments.
UAB vs. RICE
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: REMI'S STILL ANALYZING MARKETS
LIVE CFB ODDS
CFB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
374-287
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+829.4
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$82,943
VS. SPREAD
1680-1416
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+450.6
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$45,057
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
UAB vs Rice Prediction & Odds:
Free CFB Betting Insights for 11/8/25
The November 8, 2025 matchup between the UAB Blazers and the Rice Owls in Houston features two American Athletic Conference programs searching for stability and a much-needed win to salvage their seasons. Both teams have shown flashes of potential but remain plagued by inconsistency—UAB by its porous defense and turnover issues, and Rice by an offense that struggles to find rhythm for four quarters. The Blazers enter the contest averaging around 28 points per game but surrendering nearly 39, making them one of the worst defensive units in the nation. Their games have frequently devolved into shootouts, and their inability to get consistent stops on third down has forced the offense to play catch-up far too often. Head coach Trent Dilfer has leaned heavily on quarterback Jacob Zeno, who has thrown for over 2,200 yards this season and provides UAB with legitimate passing firepower. Zeno’s ability to extend plays and find receivers downfield has been the lone constant, with wideouts Tejhaun Palmer and Amare Thomas serving as reliable targets capable of stretching defenses vertically. Running back Lee Beebe has contributed balance, but the run game has often been abandoned due to early deficits. UAB’s offensive line remains a work in progress, allowing too much pressure and struggling to control tempo against stronger defensive fronts. Defensively, the Blazers have been plagued by missed tackles and coverage breakdowns, ranking near the bottom of the AAC in yards allowed per play and red-zone defense. Their linebackers have been overextended, and the secondary’s lack of depth has been exposed repeatedly by teams with competent passing attacks.
On the other side, Rice has also had its share of frustrations but enters the game with a more stable defensive identity. Head coach Mike Bloomgren’s team plays with discipline and effort, allowing about 28 points per game—hardly elite, but more respectable considering the limitations of their offense. Quarterback EJ Warner, the son of NFL legend Kurt Warner, has been the centerpiece of Rice’s passing attack, displaying accuracy and pocket awareness even under pressure. His connection with standout wide receiver Luke McCaffrey has been the Owls’ most reliable offensive weapon, with McCaffrey’s route running and elusiveness creating matchup problems for opposing secondaries. Running back Dean Connors adds versatility, providing solid production as both a runner and a receiver out of the backfield. The Owls’ offensive line, however, has struggled in pass protection, which could invite opportunities for UAB’s defensive front to find some long-awaited success. Defensively, Rice relies on a disciplined front seven led by linebacker Andrew Awe, who has been a tackling machine and emotional leader for the unit. Their secondary has improved in communication but remains susceptible to deep plays—something Zeno and UAB’s receivers will look to exploit. For Rice to succeed, they must win time of possession, keep the ball out of UAB’s hands, and sustain long drives that limit possessions. UAB, conversely, needs to start fast, protect the football, and avoid letting Rice dictate tempo. From a betting standpoint, this game profiles as one of the more unpredictable matchups on the AAC slate, given both teams’ volatility. UAB’s explosive offense makes them a live underdog in almost any game, but their defense makes them equally likely to collapse in the second half. Rice’s steadiness at home gives them a slight edge, particularly if Warner can avoid turnovers and convert red-zone opportunities into touchdowns instead of field goals. Expect an entertaining game defined by offensive spurts, defensive miscues, and momentum swings, with both teams fighting to outlast the other in what could easily turn into a high-scoring fourth-quarter battle.
Get live CFB odds and precise AI CFB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
The Blazers return to @American_Conf play this Saturday with a road game at Rice.
— UAB Football (@UAB_FB) November 3, 2025
IHC Alex Mortensen previewed the game on Monday morning at his press conference.
🔗: https://t.co/xnxh2uCah6#WinAsOne pic.twitter.com/0O51r2To2u
UAB Blazers CFB Preview
The UAB Blazers enter their November 8, 2025 road matchup against Rice as one of the most unpredictable teams in the American Athletic Conference—a group capable of lighting up the scoreboard yet equally prone to defensive collapses that erase any offensive progress. Head coach Trent Dilfer’s squad has embodied a feast-or-famine identity all season, driven by an offense that can strike quickly but hampered by a defense that has yet to find consistent footing. UAB’s offensive engine is quarterback Jacob Zeno, who has quietly put together one of the better statistical seasons in the AAC, surpassing 2,200 passing yards with impressive efficiency when protected. Zeno thrives on tempo and rhythm throws, using his mobility to extend plays and give his receivers time to create separation downfield. His connection with wideouts Tejhaun Palmer and Amare Thomas has been the team’s most reliable offensive asset, as both receivers bring size and speed that stress opposing secondaries. The Blazers’ passing game has averaged over 250 yards per contest, and when combined with the bruising running of Lee Beebe and Isaiah Jacobs, the offense is capable of producing explosive plays in bunches. However, sustaining drives has been an issue, largely due to inconsistent offensive line play and penalties that stall momentum. On the ground, UAB averages just over four yards per carry, a respectable mark, but their inability to run effectively in short-yardage situations has forced Zeno into high-pressure passing downs far too often. Defensively, UAB’s struggles have been glaring—they rank near the bottom of the FBS in scoring defense, giving up nearly 39 points per game. The defensive front has struggled to generate pressure without blitzing, and missed tackles in open space have repeatedly turned manageable plays into explosive gains.
Linebacker Jackson Bratton has been one of the few bright spots, leading the team in tackles, but the secondary has been a revolving door, allowing over 270 passing yards per game. Against a Rice team that likes to control tempo and sustain long drives, UAB’s defensive issues could be exploited if they cannot force turnovers or three-and-outs early. The Blazers’ best chance for success lies in turning this game into a shootout—something they’ve shown the ability to win when Zeno and his playmakers get into rhythm. Special teams will also play a crucial role; kicker Matt Quinn has been reliable from midrange, but coverage breakdowns have cost the Blazers in key moments. From a betting perspective, UAB has been a mixed bag—profitable as an underdog when their offense clicks but unreliable when favored, as their defensive lapses often lead to late backdoor covers for opponents. For Dilfer’s group, the formula for victory is simple yet demanding: start fast, build a lead, and rely on the offense to keep pressure on Rice. If Zeno can continue his efficient passing form, avoid turnovers, and the defense can deliver even moderate resistance, UAB has the tools to win outright. But if the Blazers fall behind early or fail to contain Rice’s balanced attack, their defensive vulnerabilities could once again undo their offensive firepower. With their season teetering between disappointment and redemption, this road game represents a chance for UAB to prove that their offensive talent can finally overcome their defensive flaws and close out games away from home—a challenge that will test their resilience as much as their execution.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Rice Owls CFB Preview
The Rice Owls return home to Houston on November 8, 2025, to host the UAB Blazers in a matchup that feels like a crossroads for their season and a chance to reestablish consistency after weeks of uneven performances. Head coach Mike Bloomgren’s team enters the contest sitting in the middle of the AAC standings, a program built on discipline and balance but still searching for the spark that can turn close games into victories. The Owls’ season has been defined by flashes of efficiency followed by frustrating lapses, particularly on offense, where execution has often faltered in key moments. Quarterback EJ Warner has been the centerpiece of the offense, showcasing accuracy, leadership, and poise that reflect his NFL pedigree as the son of Kurt Warner. He has thrown for over 2,000 yards this season, utilizing his quick release and vision to compensate for an offensive line that has struggled to consistently protect him. Warner’s chemistry with wide receiver Luke McCaffrey has been the heart of Rice’s aerial attack, with McCaffrey’s route-running and ability to create separation making him one of the most reliable playmakers in the conference. Complementing the passing game is running back Dean Connors, whose versatility as both a runner and pass-catcher provides a steady outlet when the passing lanes tighten. The offense as a whole averages about 22 points per game—a modest figure that underscores both the unit’s efficiency and its lack of explosiveness.
The key for Rice will be establishing rhythm early; when Warner is comfortable and the ground game complements his passing, the Owls can sustain long, time-consuming drives that keep their defense rested and in control of field position. Defensively, Rice has been resilient but inconsistent, allowing around 28 points per game while excelling in spurts but struggling to close out halves. Linebacker Andrew Awe leads the team in tackles and serves as the emotional core of the defense, while the secondary, led by safety Gabe Taylor, has improved in communication but remains vulnerable against deep passing attacks—an area that UAB’s big-armed quarterback Jacob Zeno will look to exploit. The Owls’ defensive front must prioritize gap control and containment to neutralize UAB’s explosive plays, forcing the Blazers into sustained drives instead of quick strikes. Rice’s defensive scheme is built on bending but not breaking; success will hinge on their ability to win third down and tighten coverage in the red zone. On special teams, kicker Tim Horn has provided consistency in the kicking game, while the return unit has been steady if unspectacular. Playing at home offers Rice a crucial advantage—under Bloomgren, the Owls have traditionally played more disciplined football at Rice Stadium, often elevating their defensive intensity and limiting mistakes. From a betting perspective, Rice has been a decent home underdog, covering more often than not in games where they’re able to slow tempo and dictate pace. To pull out a win or cover against UAB, the Owls must control time of possession, keep Warner upright, and turn red-zone trips into touchdowns rather than field goals. The formula isn’t complicated: limit turnovers, tackle soundly, and force UAB’s defense—one of the worst in the AAC—to stay on the field. If the Owls can establish an early lead and let their defense play with confidence, this could be a statement game that keeps their bowl hopes alive and reinforces their identity as a team capable of winning gritty, disciplined battles on their home field.
Show your support for Alex to be the Guy this week!
— Rice Football (@RiceFootball) November 3, 2025
Fan vote is open at https://t.co/AG48GNEBMp #RayGuyAward | #RGA | #WE pic.twitter.com/tG5Zv8Iwqe
UAB vs Rice Prop Picks (AI)
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through mountains of data on each team. In fact, anytime the Blazers and Owls play there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at Rice Stadium in Nov almost always follow normal, predictable patterns.
UAB vs Rice Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports genius, has been pouring over mountains of data from every past game between the Blazers and Owls and using recursive machine learning and industry leading AI to examine the data to a single cover probability.
Oddly enough, we’ve seen the AI has been most focused on the linear correlation of weight knucklehead sportsbettors often put on UAB’s strength factors between a Blazers team going up against a possibly unhealthy Owls team. Trends look to say the true game analytics might reflect a slight lean against one Vegas line in particular.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CFB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI UAB vs Rice picks, computer picks Blazers vs Owls, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW | ||||||
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CFB schedule.
UAB Betting Trends
UAB has played poorly this season, surrendering nearly 39 points per game and ranking among the lowest defenses in FBS, making them a risky cover especially as an underdog or favorite.
Rice Betting Trends
Rice has been inconsistent offensively, averaging just 21.6 points per game and allowing 28.0, which suggests that while they may outperform modest expectations, covering large spreads has been a challenge.
Blazers vs. Owls Matchup Trends
The betting angle here hinges on UAB’s defensive weakness and Rice’s modest offensive output; bettors may find value in Rice at home with a manageable spread given UAB’s vulnerability, or in UAB if their offense can exploit Rice’s weaker defensive moments.
UAB vs. Rice Game Info
UAB vs Rice starts on November 08, 2025 at 3:00 PM EST.
Venue: Rice Stadium.
Spread: Rice -2.5
Moneyline: UAB +117, Rice -141
Over/Under: 53.5
UAB: (3-5) | Rice: (4-5)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: REMI'S STILL ANALYZING MARKETS. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
The betting angle here hinges on UAB’s defensive weakness and Rice’s modest offensive output; bettors may find value in Rice at home with a manageable spread given UAB’s vulnerability, or in UAB if their offense can exploit Rice’s weaker defensive moments.
UAB trend: UAB has played poorly this season, surrendering nearly 39 points per game and ranking among the lowest defenses in FBS, making them a risky cover especially as an underdog or favorite.
RICE trend: Rice has been inconsistent offensively, averaging just 21.6 points per game and allowing 28.0, which suggests that while they may outperform modest expectations, covering large spreads has been a challenge.
See our latest CFB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
UAB vs. Rice Odds
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through loads of data on each team. In fact, anytime the UAB vs Rice trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme temps seemingly never follow normal, predictable betting trends.
| UAB Moneyline | +117 |
|---|---|
| RICE Moneyline | -141 |
| UAB Spread | +2.5 |
| RICE Spread | -2.5 |
| Over / Under | 53.5 |
UAB vs Rice Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dec 5, 2025 7:00PM EST
Troy Trojans
James Madison Dukes
12/5/25 7PM
TROY
JMAD
|
–
–
|
+1258
-5049
|
+23.5 (-110)
-23.5 (-110)
|
O 47 (-110)
U 47 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2025 7:00PM EST
Kennesaw State Owls
Jacksonville State Gamecocks
12/5/25 7PM
KENSAW
JAXST
|
–
–
|
-135
+110
|
-2.5 (-110)
+2.5 (-110)
|
O 60.5 (-110)
U 60.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2025 8:00PM EST
North Texas Mean Green
Tulane Green Wave
12/5/25 8PM
NOTEX
TULANE
|
–
–
|
-136
+111
|
-2.5 (-110)
+2.5 (-110)
|
O 66.5 (-110)
U 66.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2025 8:01PM EST
UNLV Rebels
Boise State Broncos
12/5/25 8:01PM
UNLV
BOISE
|
–
–
|
+170
-212
|
+5 (-110)
-5 (-110)
|
O 59 (-110)
U 59 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 12:00PM EST
Miami Ohio Redhawks
Western Michigan Broncos
12/6/25 12PM
MIAOH
WMICH
|
–
–
|
-128
|
-2 (-110)
|
O 43.5 (-110)
U 43.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 12:00PM EST
BYU Cougars
Texas Tech Red Raiders
12/6/25 12PM
BYU
TXTECH
|
–
–
|
+380
-526
|
+12.5 (-110)
-12.5 (-110)
|
O 49.5 (-110)
U 49.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 4:00PM EST
Georgia Bulldogs
Alabama Crimson Tide
12/6/25 4PM
UGA
BAMA
|
–
–
|
-130
+106
|
-2 (-110)
+2 (-110)
|
O 48 (-110)
U 48 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 8:00PM EST
Duke Blue Devils
Virginia Cavaliers
12/6/25 8PM
DUKE
UVA
|
–
–
|
+151
-187
|
+4 (-110)
-4 (-110)
|
O 58 (-110)
U 58 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 8:01PM EST
Indiana Hoosiers
Ohio State Buckeyes
12/6/25 8:01PM
IND
OHIOST
|
–
–
|
+165
-200
|
+4 (-105)
-4 (-115)
|
O 47.5 (-115)
U 47.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Dec 13, 2025 3:00PM EST
Army Black Knights
Navy Midshipmen
12/13/25 3PM
ARMY
NAVY
|
–
–
|
+172
-216
|
+4.5 (-105)
-4.5 (-115)
|
O 38 (-110)
U 38 (-110)
|
CFB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers UAB Blazers vs. Rice Owls on November 08, 2025 at Rice Stadium.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CFB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
| LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLO@KSTATE | COLO +17.5 | 54.0% | 4 | WIN |
| PSU@RUT | RUT +14 | 52.8% | 1 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | MICH +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| VATECH@UVA | VATECH +8 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| NWEST@ILL | LUKE ALTMYER UNDER 19.5 PASS COMP | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| ORE@WAS | DEMOND WILLIAMS JR UNDER 43.5 RUSH YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| MIAMI@VATECH | VATECH +18.5 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| GAST@TROY | TROY -9.5 | 55.7% | 5 | WIN |
| DEL@WAKE | DEL +18 | 56.7% | 6 | LOSS |
| NMEX@AF | NMEX -3.5 | 56.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WASHST@JMAD | WASHST +14.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| ILL@WISC | WISC +9 | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WKY@LSU | WKY +23.5 | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| WASH@UCLA | DEMOND WILLIAMS UNDER 27.5 PASS ATT | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| TCU@HOU | AMARE THOMAS OVER 69.5 RECV YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| TEX@UGA | NATE FRAZIER UNDER 65.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 55.5% | 5 | WIN |
| PUR@WASH | ANTONIO HARRIS UNDER 73.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 54.1% | 4 | WIN |
| OKLA@BAMA | UNDER 46 | 52.4% | 2 | WIN |
| UVA@DUKE | DUKE -3.5 | 54.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| OKLA@BAMA | BAMA -6 | 54.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| OREGST@TULSA | OREGST -120 | 55.6% | 5 | LOSS |
| UTEP@MIZZST | MIZZST -5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| COLOST@NMEX | NMEX -14 | 57.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| PSU@MICHST | MICHST +7.5 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
| MISSST@MIZZOU | MISSST +7.5 | 57.2% | 7 | LOSS |
| FAU@TULANE | FAU +17.5 | 56.0% | 6 | WIN |
| NCST@MIAMI | NCST +15.5 | 57.1% | 7 | LOSS |
| KENTST@AKRON | AKRON -6.5 | 55.4% | 5 | LOSS |
| JAXST@UTEP | JAXST -105 | 57.0% | 7 | WIN |
| FSU@CLEM | CLEM -118 | 57.1% | 5 | WIN |
| UNLV@COLOST | UNLV -4 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@IOWA | IOWA +6.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |
| NEB@UCLA | NEB +1.5 | 55.8% | 5 | WIN |
| KENSAW@NMEXST | NMEXST +10 | 56.5% | 6 | WIN |
| STNFRD@UNC | STNFRD +7.5 | 53.8% | 3 | WIN |
| DUKE@UCONN | UCONN +8.5 | 57.9% | 7 | WIN |
| NEVADA@UTAHST | NEVADA +9.5 | 55.9% | 5 | LOSS |
| SAMST@OREGST | SAMST +21 | 57.7% | 7 | WIN |
| NEB@UCLA | NICO IAMALEAVA UNDER 180.5 PASS YDS | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| HOU@UCF | HOU -112 | 58.0% | 6 | WIN |
| GASTHRN@APPST | GASTHRN +180 | 36.5% | 2 | WIN |
| KENTST@BALLST | BALLST -2.5 | 54.5% | 4 | WIN |
| WAKE@FSU | WAKE +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| WYO@SDGST | SDGST -10.5 | 56.7% | 7 | WIN |
| OKLA@TENN | TENN -130 | 58.3% | 5 | LOSS |
| GATECH@NCST | GATECH -5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| MIAMI@SMU | MIAMI -10 | 54.3% | 4 | LOSS |
| IND@MD | MD +21.5 | 54.6% | 4 | LOSS |
| CINCY@UTAH | CINCY +11 | 57.6% | 7 | LOSS |
| OLDDOM@LAMON | LAMON +17 | 58.4% | 8 | LOSS |
| VANDY@TEXAS | OVER 46.5 | 53.7% | 2 | WIN |