James Madison vs Marshall Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CFB Lines & Props (Nov 08)
Updated: 2025-11-01T02:28:40.156150ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The James Madison Dukes travel to face the Marshall Thundering Herd on November 8, 2025 in a Sun Belt Conference East Division matchup where James Madison looks to cement its contender status and Marshall fights to regain consistency. Both teams bring contrasting trajectories—James Madison riding impressive defense and efficiency, Marshall splashing offensively but leaking points.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Nov 08, 2025
Start Time: 1:00 PM EST
Venue: Joan C. Edwards Stadium
Thundering Herd Record: (4-4)
Dukes Record: (7-1)
OPENING ODDS
JMAD Moneyline: -538
MARSH Moneyline: +394
JMAD Spread: -13.5
MARSH Spread: +13.5
Over/Under: 55.5
JMAD
Betting Trends
- James Madison has posted a strong points-for/against profile in 2025 (34.8 points scored per game, just 16.1 points allowed) suggesting a team that wins convincingly and may meet or exceed spread expectations.
MARSH
Betting Trends
- Marshall has scored 34.1 points per game this season but allowed 32.5 points per game, indicating a defense that struggles and raises concerns for covering spreads when favorites.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- The matchup offers a clear edge in favor of James Madison from a statistical standpoint—they dominate defensively and control tempo—while Marshall’s high-scoring offense is offset by vulnerability on defense. For bettors, this suggests James Madison might be a strong ATS play on the road, whereas backing Marshall entails more risk given their defensive profile and inconsistent margins.
JMAD vs. MARSH
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: J. Barbie over 0.5 Total Touchdowns.
LIVE CFB ODDS
CFB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
374-287
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+829.4
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$82,943
VS. SPREAD
1680-1416
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+450.6
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$45,057
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
James Madison vs Marshall Prediction & Odds:
Free CFB Betting Insights for 11/8/25
The November 8, 2025 matchup between the James Madison Dukes and the Marshall Thundering Herd at Joan C. Edwards Stadium in Huntington, West Virginia, promises to be a physical and strategically complex Sun Belt showdown between two programs that have developed one of the conference’s most competitive rivalries. James Madison enters this contest as one of the most balanced and complete teams in the Sun Belt, boasting a 7–1 record and a reputation built on suffocating defense and mistake-free offense. Under head coach Bob Chesney, the Dukes have maintained the disciplined, physical identity that made their FBS transition seamless, averaging 34.8 points per game while holding opponents to just 16.1—a differential that ranks among the top 15 in the nation. Quarterback Alonza Barnett III has developed into an efficient passer and capable scrambler, managing games with precision and minimizing turnovers. His chemistry with receivers Elijah Sarratt and Reggie Brown gives the Dukes a reliable downfield threat, while the ground game, led by running backs Kaelon Black and Ty Son Lawton, provides balance and clock control. The offensive line, anchored by Nick Kidwell, has been dominant in both run blocking and pass protection, a critical advantage against Marshall’s aggressive front seven. Defensively, James Madison remains the benchmark of the Sun Belt, allowing fewer than 270 yards per game and excelling in both run-stopping and red-zone efficiency. Linebacker Jailin Walker and safety Francis Meehan headline a unit that thrives on communication, gap integrity, and physical tackling. They’ll face a challenge from a Marshall offense that ranks among the top half of the conference in scoring but has been prone to turnovers and inconsistent execution.
The Thundering Herd, under head coach Charles Huff, enter at 4–4 with an offense that averages 34.1 points per game but concedes nearly as much at 32.5. Quarterback Cam Fancher has shown flashes of brilliance but also inconsistency, alternating between efficient outings and error-prone stretches. His dual-threat ability makes him dangerous when plays break down, but his decision-making under pressure will be tested against JMU’s relentless pass rush. Running back Rasheen Ali remains Marshall’s most dangerous weapon—one of the best backs in the Group of Five—averaging over 100 yards per game and providing the offensive identity the Herd rely on. However, Marshall’s defense has been their undoing, particularly against balanced offenses capable of exploiting mismatches through play-action and misdirection. Against a disciplined JMU team that rarely beats itself, Marshall must find a way to generate early momentum and avoid giving the Dukes short fields. On the other hand, JMU’s path to victory will center on establishing tempo early, forcing Marshall into predictable passing situations, and leaning on its defensive front to contain Ali. The matchup will also hinge on third-down efficiency—JMU ranks near the top nationally in third-down conversions, while Marshall’s defense ranks near the bottom in preventing them. Special teams could play a subtle role as well; JMU’s punting and coverage units have been exceptional, while Marshall has struggled with field position. From a betting standpoint, James Madison has been a model of consistency, covering in roughly 70% of their games thanks to their dominance in time of possession and turnover margin. Marshall, conversely, has covered in fewer than half of its contests, largely because its defense has failed to close out leads and prevent late scoring drives. Expect the Dukes to control the flow of this game with methodical drives, strong tackling, and mistake-free execution, while Marshall will try to inject chaos through big plays and tempo shifts. If JMU maintains its typical composure and forces Marshall into a one-dimensional attack, the Dukes’ discipline, defensive depth, and offensive efficiency should prevail in what may be a hard-fought but ultimately decisive road win for one of the Sun Belt’s premier programs.
Get live CFB odds and precise AI CFB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
QB1 is a ⭐️ of the Week@alonzabiii earns a spot on the Manning Award's Stars of the Week for the 2nd time after 362 yards and five TDs in the win at Texas State.
— JMU Football (@JMUFootball) November 3, 2025
📰 https://t.co/iRVbtmCWl4 pic.twitter.com/GlMR99I0eT
James Madison Dukes CFB Preview
The James Madison Dukes travel to Huntington, West Virginia, on November 8, 2025, carrying the confidence and consistency of a program that has firmly established itself as one of the premier forces in the Sun Belt Conference. Under head coach Bob Chesney, the Dukes have continued to embody the disciplined, physical, and well-balanced identity that defined their rapid rise from FCS powerhouse to FBS contender. Entering the matchup with a 7–1 record, James Madison has been dominant on both sides of the ball, averaging 34.8 points per game while allowing just 16.1—numbers that reflect their ability to win with efficiency, control, and poise. Offensively, the Dukes have relied on the steady hand of quarterback Alonza Barnett III, who has matured into an efficient leader capable of managing tempo and executing with precision. Barnett has thrown for over 1,800 yards and 16 touchdowns with minimal turnovers, often distributing the ball to a deep receiving corps that includes dynamic playmakers like Elijah Sarratt and Reggie Brown. Their combination of route-running savvy and yards-after-catch ability has allowed JMU to stretch the field and create mismatches against slower secondaries. Complementing the passing game is a rugged ground attack led by running backs Kaelon Black and Ty Son Lawton, who have combined for nearly 1,200 yards on the season. Both backs bring contrasting styles—Black’s quickness and vision pair well with Lawton’s power and contact balance—giving the Dukes an unpredictable element that keeps defenses guessing.
The offensive line, anchored by veterans Nick Kidwell and Tanner Morris, has been among the most reliable in the conference, excelling in both pass protection and short-yardage run blocking. Against a Marshall defense that has surrendered 32.5 points per game, JMU’s offensive line will look to establish dominance early, opening holes for the run game while keeping Barnett upright and comfortable in the pocket. Defensively, James Madison’s excellence remains their calling card. The Dukes lead the Sun Belt in total defense, allowing opponents fewer than 270 yards per game, and have held every opponent under 24 points this season. Their front seven, spearheaded by linebacker Jailin Walker and lineman James Carpenter, has been relentless in generating pressure and stuffing the run, while the secondary, led by cornerback Jordan White, has thrived in zone coverage and limited explosive plays. Against Marshall’s offense—which leans heavily on star running back Rasheen Ali and the dual-threat ability of quarterback Cam Fancher—the Dukes will emphasize gap integrity and force the Herd to sustain long, mistake-free drives. JMU’s defense excels at bending without breaking, and its ability to capitalize on turnovers could prove decisive against a Marshall team that has struggled with giveaways in key moments. The Dukes also hold an advantage on special teams, where kicker Camden Wise and punter Ryan Hanson have provided consistency and field-position control all season. From a betting perspective, JMU has been one of the most reliable teams in the nation, covering in roughly 70% of their games due to their defensive dominance and low-variance play style. Their ability to travel well and maintain focus on the road makes them a trustworthy favorite in this spot. For the Dukes, the formula for success remains simple: control the line of scrimmage, sustain drives, and avoid costly turnovers. If they execute to their usual standard, JMU’s physical defense and balanced offense should overwhelm a Marshall team that lacks the consistency to keep pace for four quarters. Expect the Dukes to play methodical, controlled football—building a lead through efficiency rather than flash—and once again demonstrate why they’ve become one of the most respected and dependable programs in the Group of Five.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Marshall Thundering Herd CFB Preview
The Marshall Thundering Herd return to the friendly confines of Joan C. Edwards Stadium on November 8, 2025, looking to deliver a signature win against one of the Sun Belt’s most consistent powers in James Madison. At 4–4 on the season, the Herd’s campaign under head coach Charles Huff has been marked by offensive potential offset by defensive inconsistency, as they’ve averaged 34.1 points per game but allowed nearly the same number at 32.5. That duality has made Marshall both exciting and unpredictable—capable of explosive scoring runs yet vulnerable to momentum shifts and breakdowns in coverage. Quarterback Cam Fancher remains the focal point of the offense, providing a dual-threat dimension that can frustrate even elite defenses. His arm strength allows him to stretch the field, while his mobility gives Marshall a counterpunch against aggressive fronts. Fancher has thrown for over 1,700 yards this season and added another 300-plus on the ground, but his decision-making under pressure has been a mixed bag, with turnovers often halting promising drives. The engine of Marshall’s offense, however, continues to be star running back Rasheen Ali, one of the premier rushers in the Group of Five. Ali has amassed more than 900 yards and 10 touchdowns this season, using his vision, patience, and acceleration to exploit gaps and punish defenses at the second level. The offensive line, though inconsistent in pass protection, has generally opened running lanes effectively, especially when paired with misdirection and RPO looks. Against a James Madison defense allowing just 16.1 points per game, establishing Ali early will be essential—Marshall must control time of possession and stay ahead of the chains to avoid exposing Fancher to JMU’s relentless pass rush. On the perimeter, receivers Caleb Coombs and Demarcus Harris have provided reliable production, though creating separation against JMU’s disciplined secondary will be a tall order. Expect the Herd to incorporate motion and screen passes to create space and test the Dukes’ linebackers laterally.
Defensively, Marshall’s challenges have been glaring, as the team has struggled to get off the field and allowed opponents to convert over 40% of their third downs. Linebackers Eli Neal and Owen Porter remain the heart of the defense, combining leadership with physical play, but the unit has lacked cohesion at times, especially against high-tempo offenses. The defensive front must find ways to pressure JMU quarterback Alonza Barnett III without overcommitting, as his composure and mobility can neutralize the blitz. The key matchup will be how well Marshall’s front seven can limit JMU’s ground game, led by Kaelon Black and Ty Son Lawton, because once the Dukes establish balance, they become nearly impossible to contain. In the secondary, defensive back Micah Abraham will likely shadow JMU’s top receiver Elijah Sarratt, and his ability to disrupt timing routes could be critical to keeping the game within reach. Special teams may also play a pivotal role for Marshall—kicker Rece Verhoff has been dependable from inside 45 yards, and the return game has occasionally provided sparks that swing field position. From a betting standpoint, Marshall’s 4–4 ATS record mirrors their overall inconsistency—they’ve covered in games where their offense clicks early but have failed to do so when their defense gets overwhelmed. At home, though, the Herd have historically thrived off the energy of one of the loudest crowds in the Group of Five, and that edge could help them stay competitive deep into the second half. For Marshall to pull off the upset or at least cover the spread, they’ll need to limit turnovers, sustain drives with Ali, and force JMU into third-and-long situations that disrupt their rhythm. If they can generate a takeaway or two and capitalize on short fields, the Thundering Herd have the weapons to make this a tighter contest than many expect. But to do so, they’ll have to play their most complete and disciplined game of the season against a James Madison team that rarely makes mistakes—a daunting but not impossible challenge for a team hungry to reassert itself as a contender in the Sun Belt East.
𝐒𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐥𝐞 𝐔𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞: 𝐆𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝟏𝟎 - 𝐍𝐨𝐯. 𝟏𝟓
— Marshall Football (@HerdFB) November 3, 2025
🏈: at Georgia State
📍: Atlanta, Ga.
🕑: 2 p.m. ET
📺: ESPN+#LLTB pic.twitter.com/xNO21t9q7A
James Madison vs Marshall Prop Picks (AI)
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through mountains of datapoints on each line. In fact, anytime the Dukes and Thundering Herd play there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at Joan C. Edwards Stadium in Nov rarely follow normal, predictable betting trends.
James Madison vs Marshall Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports genius, has been pouring over mountains of data from every past game between the Dukes and Thundering Herd and using recursive machine learning and kick-ass AI to boil down the data to a single cover probability.
Remi has been most fixated on the trending factor human bettors tend to put on player performance factors between a Dukes team going up against a possibly unhealthy Thundering Herd team. Trends look to say the true game analytics appear to reflect a strong lean against one Vegas line specifically.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CFB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI James Madison vs Marshall picks, computer picks Dukes vs Thundering Herd, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW | ||||||
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CFB schedule.
James Madison Betting Trends
James Madison has posted a strong points-for/against profile in 2025 (34.8 points scored per game, just 16.1 points allowed) suggesting a team that wins convincingly and may meet or exceed spread expectations.
Marshall Betting Trends
Marshall has scored 34.1 points per game this season but allowed 32.5 points per game, indicating a defense that struggles and raises concerns for covering spreads when favorites.
Dukes vs. Thundering Herd Matchup Trends
The matchup offers a clear edge in favor of James Madison from a statistical standpoint—they dominate defensively and control tempo—while Marshall’s high-scoring offense is offset by vulnerability on defense. For bettors, this suggests James Madison might be a strong ATS play on the road, whereas backing Marshall entails more risk given their defensive profile and inconsistent margins.
James Madison vs. Marshall Game Info
James Madison vs Marshall starts on November 08, 2025 at 1:00 PM EST.
Venue: Joan C. Edwards Stadium.
Spread: Marshall +13.5
Moneyline: James Madison -538, Marshall +394
Over/Under: 55.5
James Madison: (7-1) | Marshall: (4-4)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: J. Barbie over 0.5 Total Touchdowns.. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
The matchup offers a clear edge in favor of James Madison from a statistical standpoint—they dominate defensively and control tempo—while Marshall’s high-scoring offense is offset by vulnerability on defense. For bettors, this suggests James Madison might be a strong ATS play on the road, whereas backing Marshall entails more risk given their defensive profile and inconsistent margins.
JMAD trend: James Madison has posted a strong points-for/against profile in 2025 (34.8 points scored per game, just 16.1 points allowed) suggesting a team that wins convincingly and may meet or exceed spread expectations.
MARSH trend: Marshall has scored 34.1 points per game this season but allowed 32.5 points per game, indicating a defense that struggles and raises concerns for covering spreads when favorites.
See our latest CFB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
James Madison vs. Marshall Odds
Remi is pouring through tons of data points on each line. In fact, anytime the James Madison vs Marshall trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing angles to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme temps seemingly never follow normal, predictable patterns.
| JMAD Moneyline | -538 |
|---|---|
| MARSH Moneyline | +394 |
| JMAD Spread | -13.5 |
| MARSH Spread | +13.5 |
| Over / Under | 55.5 |
James Madison vs Marshall Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dec 5, 2025 7:00PM EST
Troy Trojans
James Madison Dukes
12/5/25 7PM
TROY
JMAD
|
–
–
|
+1196
-2700
|
+23 (-108)
-23 (-112)
|
O 47 (-112)
U 47 (-108)
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2025 7:00PM EST
Kennesaw State Owls
Jacksonville State Gamecocks
12/5/25 7PM
KENSAW
JAXST
|
–
–
|
-130
+110
|
-2.5 (-105)
+2.5 (-115)
|
O 60.5 (-110)
U 60.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2025 8:00PM EST
North Texas Mean Green
Tulane Green Wave
12/5/25 8PM
NOTEX
TULANE
|
–
–
|
-142
+122
|
-2.5 (-118)
+2.5 (-102)
|
O 66.5 (-110)
U 66.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2025 8:01PM EST
UNLV Rebels
Boise State Broncos
12/5/25 8:01PM
UNLV
BOISE
|
–
–
|
+174
-200
|
+4.5 (-103)
-4.5 (-117)
|
O 59.5 (-110)
U 59.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 12:00PM EST
Miami Ohio Redhawks
Western Michigan Broncos
12/6/25 12PM
MIAOH
WMICH
|
–
–
|
-125
|
-1.5 (-112)
|
O 43 (-110)
U 43 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 12:00PM EST
BYU Cougars
Texas Tech Red Raiders
12/6/25 12PM
BYU
TXTECH
|
–
–
|
+390
-510
|
+12.5 (-113)
-12.5 (-107)
|
O 49.5 (-110)
U 49.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 4:00PM EST
Georgia Bulldogs
Alabama Crimson Tide
12/6/25 4PM
UGA
BAMA
|
–
–
|
-135
+115
|
-2.5 (-110)
+2.5 (-110)
|
O 47.5 (-115)
U 47.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 8:00PM EST
Duke Blue Devils
Virginia Cavaliers
12/6/25 8PM
DUKE
UVA
|
–
–
|
+161
-185
|
+4 (-110)
-4 (-110)
|
O 57.5 (-115)
U 57.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 8:01PM EST
Indiana Hoosiers
Ohio State Buckeyes
12/6/25 8:01PM
IND
OHIOST
|
–
–
|
+168
-193
|
+4 (-110)
-4 (-110)
|
O 48 (-110)
U 48 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 13, 2025 3:00PM EST
Army Black Knights
Navy Midshipmen
12/13/25 3PM
ARMY
NAVY
|
–
–
|
+177
-205
|
+5 (-110)
-5 (-110)
|
O 38 (-110)
U 38 (-110)
|
CFB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers James Madison Dukes vs. Marshall Thundering Herd on November 08, 2025 at Joan C. Edwards Stadium.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CFB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
| LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLO@KSTATE | COLO +17.5 | 54.0% | 4 | WIN |
| PSU@RUT | RUT +14 | 52.8% | 1 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | MICH +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| VATECH@UVA | VATECH +8 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| NWEST@ILL | LUKE ALTMYER UNDER 19.5 PASS COMP | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| ORE@WAS | DEMOND WILLIAMS JR UNDER 43.5 RUSH YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| MIAMI@VATECH | VATECH +18.5 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| GAST@TROY | TROY -9.5 | 55.7% | 5 | WIN |
| DEL@WAKE | DEL +18 | 56.7% | 6 | LOSS |
| NMEX@AF | NMEX -3.5 | 56.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WASHST@JMAD | WASHST +14.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| ILL@WISC | WISC +9 | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WKY@LSU | WKY +23.5 | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| WASH@UCLA | DEMOND WILLIAMS UNDER 27.5 PASS ATT | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| TCU@HOU | AMARE THOMAS OVER 69.5 RECV YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| TEX@UGA | NATE FRAZIER UNDER 65.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 55.5% | 5 | WIN |
| PUR@WASH | ANTONIO HARRIS UNDER 73.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 54.1% | 4 | WIN |
| OKLA@BAMA | UNDER 46 | 52.4% | 2 | WIN |
| UVA@DUKE | DUKE -3.5 | 54.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| OKLA@BAMA | BAMA -6 | 54.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| OREGST@TULSA | OREGST -120 | 55.6% | 5 | LOSS |
| UTEP@MIZZST | MIZZST -5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| COLOST@NMEX | NMEX -14 | 57.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| PSU@MICHST | MICHST +7.5 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
| MISSST@MIZZOU | MISSST +7.5 | 57.2% | 7 | LOSS |
| FAU@TULANE | FAU +17.5 | 56.0% | 6 | WIN |
| NCST@MIAMI | NCST +15.5 | 57.1% | 7 | LOSS |
| KENTST@AKRON | AKRON -6.5 | 55.4% | 5 | LOSS |
| JAXST@UTEP | JAXST -105 | 57.0% | 7 | WIN |
| FSU@CLEM | CLEM -118 | 57.1% | 5 | WIN |
| UNLV@COLOST | UNLV -4 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@IOWA | IOWA +6.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |
| NEB@UCLA | NEB +1.5 | 55.8% | 5 | WIN |
| KENSAW@NMEXST | NMEXST +10 | 56.5% | 6 | WIN |
| STNFRD@UNC | STNFRD +7.5 | 53.8% | 3 | WIN |
| DUKE@UCONN | UCONN +8.5 | 57.9% | 7 | WIN |
| NEVADA@UTAHST | NEVADA +9.5 | 55.9% | 5 | LOSS |
| SAMST@OREGST | SAMST +21 | 57.7% | 7 | WIN |
| NEB@UCLA | NICO IAMALEAVA UNDER 180.5 PASS YDS | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| HOU@UCF | HOU -112 | 58.0% | 6 | WIN |
| GASTHRN@APPST | GASTHRN +180 | 36.5% | 2 | WIN |
| KENTST@BALLST | BALLST -2.5 | 54.5% | 4 | WIN |
| WAKE@FSU | WAKE +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| WYO@SDGST | SDGST -10.5 | 56.7% | 7 | WIN |
| OKLA@TENN | TENN -130 | 58.3% | 5 | LOSS |
| GATECH@NCST | GATECH -5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| MIAMI@SMU | MIAMI -10 | 54.3% | 4 | LOSS |
| IND@MD | MD +21.5 | 54.6% | 4 | LOSS |
| CINCY@UTAH | CINCY +11 | 57.6% | 7 | LOSS |
| OLDDOM@LAMON | LAMON +17 | 58.4% | 8 | LOSS |
| VANDY@TEXAS | OVER 46.5 | 53.7% | 2 | WIN |