Duke vs Clemson Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CFB Lines & Props (Nov 01)
Updated: 2025-10-25T02:28:40.156150ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The Duke Blue Devils visit the Clemson Tigers on November 1, 2025 in an ACC showdown where Duke looks to build momentum and Clemson seeks to revive its season at home. Clemson opens as a small favorite, but Duke’s recent uptick means the Tigers can’t take the game for granted.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Nov 01, 2025
Start Time: 12:00 PM EST
Venue: Memorial Stadium
Tigers Record: (3-4)
Blue Devils Record: (4-3)
OPENING ODDS
DUKE Moneyline: +133
CLEM Moneyline: -159
DUKE Spread: +3.5
CLEM Spread: -3.5
Over/Under: 55.5
DUKE
Betting Trends
- Duke’s ATS (against the spread) performance this season shows improvement, with bettors taking notice that the Blue Devils have covered more often in recent favorable matchups.
CLEM
Betting Trends
- Clemson, despite being home favorites in this game, has struggled to cover consistently—posting an ATS record of just 2-5 as favorites this season.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- Oddsmakers opened the line with Clemson favored by about 3.5 points, according to early reports. The total for the game suggests expectations of moderate scoring given both teams’ recent trends: Duke averaging about 463 yards per game on offense vs. Clemson’s roughly 401 yards per game, though Duke’s defense has allowed about 376 yards per game and Clemson’s about 338 yards per game. These numbers hint at a matchup where tempo, execution, and turnovers may matter more than sheer explosiveness—betting could lean toward the under if both teams struggle to sustain drives, or toward the spread if Clemson fails to cover at home again.
DUKE vs. CLEM
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: C. Barkate over 72.5 Receiving Yards.
LIVE CFB ODDS
CFB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
374-287
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+829.4
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$82,943
VS. SPREAD
1680-1416
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+450.6
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$45,057
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Duke vs Clemson Prediction & Odds:
Free CFB Betting Insights for 11/1/25
The November 1, 2025 matchup between the Duke Blue Devils and the Clemson Tigers at Memorial Stadium in Clemson carries significant weight for both programs as they navigate critical turning points in their ACC seasons. For Duke, this game represents an opportunity to validate its growth and prove it can compete with one of the league’s traditional powerhouses on the road. For Clemson, it’s a chance to reassert control and stabilize a season that has fallen below expectations. The Tigers enter this contest with a 3–4 record, struggling to find consistency on both sides of the ball after a string of frustrating performances that exposed offensive inefficiency and defensive lapses. Under head coach Dabo Swinney, Clemson has long been known for its physicality, elite defense, and depth of talent, but this season has tested all three elements. The offense, averaging roughly 400 yards and 27 points per game, has been inconsistent under quarterback Cade Klubnik, who has shown flashes of brilliance but has been undone by turnovers and stalled drives in key moments. Klubnik’s connection with wideouts Antonio Williams and Tyler Brown remains promising, yet protection issues and an unreliable run game have limited the Tigers’ ability to sustain rhythm. Running back Phil Mafah has carried the load with over 600 rushing yards this season, but Clemson’s offensive line has struggled to open consistent running lanes against top defenses. The Tigers’ defense, traditionally their anchor, still ranks among the ACC’s better units, allowing just 338 yards per game, but it has struggled to maintain intensity for four quarters due to the offense’s inconsistency. Linebacker Barrett Carter and edge rusher T.J. Parker headline a front seven capable of dominating the trenches, and the secondary, led by Nate Wiggins and Andrew Mukuba, has the athleticism to challenge Duke’s passing attack. However, Clemson’s Achilles’ heel this year has been giving up explosive plays on third downs, an area Duke will aim to exploit with its versatile offensive approach. Duke, meanwhile, arrives at 4–3 under head coach Manny Diaz, who has quickly instilled a more aggressive and disciplined identity since taking over.
The Blue Devils’ offense has been one of the ACC’s most efficient, averaging 463 yards per game with an impressive balance between run and pass. Quarterback Riley Leonard has returned to form as a dual-threat weapon, combining 1,700 passing yards with 400 rushing yards, and his poise under pressure has elevated the offense’s ceiling. Running backs Jordan Waters and Jaquez Moore form a dependable backfield duo, giving Duke the flexibility to attack multiple fronts, while wideout Jalon Calhoun continues to serve as Leonard’s most reliable target in the intermediate passing game. Defensively, Duke has been solid if not spectacular, allowing 376 yards per game but excelling at creating takeaways and tightening in the red zone. The Blue Devils’ front, led by DeWayne Carter, has been disruptive, and their linebackers have shown improved gap discipline. The key battle in this game will come down to tempo and turnovers: Duke thrives when it can dictate pace with its balanced attack, while Clemson will try to grind the game down and lean on its defense to wear the Blue Devils out. From a betting perspective, Clemson opened as a 3.5-point favorite with a total near 50 points, reflecting both respect for their home advantage and skepticism about their ability to cover. Clemson has failed to meet ATS expectations at home this season, while Duke has been profitable on the road, covering in three of its last four games. If Duke can control possession, limit mistakes, and keep Leonard upright, an upset is not out of reach. Clemson, however, remains dangerous in Death Valley, where crowd energy and defensive pride often elevate performance. Expect a physical, hard-fought game defined by field position and execution, where Clemson’s desperation to reclaim its identity collides with Duke’s confidence and composure. The Tigers’ home-field edge makes them slight favorites, but Duke’s efficiency and discipline give them a legitimate chance to spoil the party in a matchup that could go down to the final possession.
Get live CFB odds and precise AI CFB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
Always gotta celebrate National Tight Ends Day 🫡 pic.twitter.com/cPexI2hmEX
— Duke Football (@DukeFOOTBALL) October 26, 2025
Duke Blue Devils CFB Preview
The Duke Blue Devils enter their November 1, 2025 road matchup against the Clemson Tigers with quiet confidence and renewed purpose, aiming to prove that their resurgence under head coach Manny Diaz is no fluke. Sitting at 4–3, Duke has shown measurable improvement in all three phases of the game, playing with more toughness, balance, and composure than in recent years. The Blue Devils have built their success on a disciplined offensive approach led by quarterback Riley Leonard, whose dual-threat ability continues to anchor the unit’s versatility. Leonard has thrown for more than 1,700 yards and 12 touchdowns while adding nearly 400 yards on the ground, giving Duke a reliable playmaker who can extend drives and create mismatches against aggressive defenses. His poise under pressure and improved decision-making have allowed the Blue Devils to sustain longer possessions, a critical factor as they face one of the ACC’s most talented defensive fronts. Duke’s offense averages 463 total yards per game, fueled by a balanced attack that mixes power running and quick passing concepts. Running backs Jordan Waters and Jaquez Moore have combined for nearly 1,000 rushing yards, providing the physicality and consistency that allow Duke to control tempo and keep defenses honest. The offensive line, long a weakness for the program, has matured into a cohesive unit that protects Leonard effectively and opens running lanes with efficiency. Against Clemson’s aggressive front seven—anchored by Barrett Carter and T.J. Parker—this group will need to maintain its composure and avoid pre-snap penalties that stall drives. In the passing game, Leonard’s chemistry with Jalon Calhoun and Jordan Moore has been the backbone of Duke’s success, with both receivers excelling in finding soft zones and winning 50-50 balls. Duke’s ability to convert third downs (just over 46% this season) will be key to neutralizing Clemson’s crowd and keeping the Tigers’ offense off the field.
Defensively, the Blue Devils allow 376 yards per game but excel in the red zone and force timely turnovers. Led by defensive tackle DeWayne Carter and linebacker Tre Freeman, the front seven has shown both discipline and grit, consistently getting pressure without sacrificing containment. The secondary, featuring cornerbacks Myles Jones and Jeremiah Lewis, will be tasked with limiting Clemson’s explosive passing plays while keeping everything in front of them. Manny Diaz’s defense has emphasized situational awareness, and that will be critical against an inconsistent Clemson offense that has struggled to sustain momentum. The Blue Devils’ plan will likely involve mixing coverages, forcing Cade Klubnik to make quick reads, and taking away the short passing game that Clemson relies on. From a betting standpoint, Duke has quietly been a solid team against the spread this year, covering in three of its last four games, while Clemson’s home ATS struggles (2–5 as favorites) suggest vulnerability. The key for Duke to pull off the upset lies in controlling pace, protecting the football, and turning long drives into touchdowns rather than field goals. If Leonard can stay poised under pressure and Duke’s defense can continue its knack for forcing turnovers, the Blue Devils have the tools to make this contest a four-quarter fight. While winning at Memorial Stadium is no easy feat, Duke’s steady play, balance, and mental toughness make them a legitimate threat to cover the spread—and possibly steal a signature road victory that would cement their place among the ACC’s most improved teams in 2025.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Clemson Tigers CFB Preview
The Clemson Tigers return to Memorial Stadium on November 1, 2025, for a pivotal home matchup against the Duke Blue Devils, seeking to reestablish their footing in the ACC and reclaim some of the dominance that once defined their program. At 3–4, the Tigers have endured one of their most inconsistent seasons under head coach Dabo Swinney, marked by offensive inefficiency, defensive lapses, and missed opportunities in key moments. Despite the rocky record, Clemson remains a team loaded with talent and capable of turning things around quickly, especially at home in Death Valley, where the Tigers’ defense feeds off the crowd and intensity often elevates their play. Offensively, Clemson has struggled to find rhythm, averaging just over 27 points and 400 total yards per game. Quarterback Cade Klubnik, still developing into a reliable field general, has flashed brilliance with his arm talent and mobility but has been plagued by turnovers and inconsistency in high-pressure moments. When at his best, Klubnik commands the offense with confidence—his chemistry with wideouts Antonio Williams and Tyler Brown providing the explosive plays that Clemson’s scheme relies on—but too often drives have stalled due to miscommunication or protection breakdowns. Running back Phil Mafah has been the most dependable element of the Tigers’ offense, leading the team with more than 600 rushing yards and five touchdowns, running with a blend of power and patience that helps Clemson control tempo when the offensive line wins at the point of attack. That line, however, has been a mixed bag, allowing pressure on key downs and forcing the offense into predictable third-and-long situations that limit their versatility. Swinney and offensive coordinator Garrett Riley must find a way to simplify the passing game, lean more heavily on play-action, and maximize short-yardage efficiency against a Duke defense that thrives on forcing mistakes. Defensively, Clemson has remained the heart of the team, even as its offense has faltered.
Allowing just 338 yards per game, the Tigers’ defense continues to rank among the ACC’s best, particularly in the front seven. Linebackers Barrett Carter and Jeremiah Trotter Jr. have been tackling machines, while edge rushers T.J. Parker and Justin Mascoll have consistently applied pressure to opposing quarterbacks. In the secondary, cornerback Nate Wiggins and safety Andrew Mukuba bring athleticism and leadership, forming a unit that has held opponents to under 200 passing yards per game. Still, the defense has occasionally worn down late in contests due to the offense’s inability to sustain drives—a pattern Clemson must break if they hope to control Duke’s dual-threat quarterback Riley Leonard and his dynamic offensive attack. The Tigers’ strategy at home will center on defensive aggression, dictating tempo, and forcing Duke into uncomfortable situations by collapsing the pocket and stopping the run early. Special teams, long a Clemson strength, could also prove pivotal, especially if the game remains close in the fourth quarter. From a betting standpoint, Clemson has been unreliable as a home favorite, covering just two of their last seven games at Memorial Stadium, a trend reflecting both public overvaluation and their recent underperformance in tight spreads. However, the home atmosphere, desperation to rebound, and veteran leadership give the Tigers an edge in intangibles that statistics can’t quantify. To prevail, Clemson must limit turnovers, control field position, and convert red-zone chances into touchdowns rather than field goals. If Klubnik plays within himself, Mafah sets the tone on the ground, and the defense can force Duke’s offense into long drives without big plays, Clemson should have enough to protect home turf. This matchup represents a defining moment for Swinney’s 2025 squad—either a stepping stone back toward stability or another stumble in a season that’s tested the program’s patience. Expect an emotional and physical contest in Death Valley, where Clemson’s pride and urgency will be on full display.
Homecoming in The Valley. See y’all Saturday. 🐅🏠 pic.twitter.com/GLFCrOfn2V
— Clemson Football (@ClemsonFB) October 27, 2025
Duke vs Clemson Prop Picks (AI)
Remi is pouring through tons of data on each team. In fact, anytime the Blue Devils and Tigers play there’s always several intriguing observations to key in on. Not to mention games played at Memorial Stadium in Nov seemingly never follow normal, predictable betting trends.
Duke vs Clemson Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports algorithm, has been pouring over exorbitant amounts of data from every simulation between the Blue Devils and Tigers and using recursive machine learning and cutting-edge AI to analyze the data to a single cover probability.
Oddly enough, we’ve seen the AI has been most focused on the growing emphasis knucklehead sportsbettors regularly put on player performance factors between a Blue Devils team going up against a possibly improved Tigers team. We’ve found the true game analytics appear to reflect a slight lean against one Vegas line in particular.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CFB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI Duke vs Clemson picks, computer picks Blue Devils vs Tigers, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW | ||||||
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CFB schedule.
Duke Betting Trends
Duke’s ATS (against the spread) performance this season shows improvement, with bettors taking notice that the Blue Devils have covered more often in recent favorable matchups.
Clemson Betting Trends
Clemson, despite being home favorites in this game, has struggled to cover consistently—posting an ATS record of just 2-5 as favorites this season.
Blue Devils vs. Tigers Matchup Trends
Oddsmakers opened the line with Clemson favored by about 3.5 points, according to early reports. The total for the game suggests expectations of moderate scoring given both teams’ recent trends: Duke averaging about 463 yards per game on offense vs. Clemson’s roughly 401 yards per game, though Duke’s defense has allowed about 376 yards per game and Clemson’s about 338 yards per game. These numbers hint at a matchup where tempo, execution, and turnovers may matter more than sheer explosiveness—betting could lean toward the under if both teams struggle to sustain drives, or toward the spread if Clemson fails to cover at home again.
Duke vs. Clemson Game Info
Duke vs Clemson starts on November 01, 2025 at 12:00 PM EST.
Venue: Memorial Stadium.
Spread: Clemson -3.5
Moneyline: Duke +133, Clemson -159
Over/Under: 55.5
Duke: (4-3) | Clemson: (3-4)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: C. Barkate over 72.5 Receiving Yards.. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
Oddsmakers opened the line with Clemson favored by about 3.5 points, according to early reports. The total for the game suggests expectations of moderate scoring given both teams’ recent trends: Duke averaging about 463 yards per game on offense vs. Clemson’s roughly 401 yards per game, though Duke’s defense has allowed about 376 yards per game and Clemson’s about 338 yards per game. These numbers hint at a matchup where tempo, execution, and turnovers may matter more than sheer explosiveness—betting could lean toward the under if both teams struggle to sustain drives, or toward the spread if Clemson fails to cover at home again.
DUKE trend: Duke’s ATS (against the spread) performance this season shows improvement, with bettors taking notice that the Blue Devils have covered more often in recent favorable matchups.
CLEM trend: Clemson, despite being home favorites in this game, has struggled to cover consistently—posting an ATS record of just 2-5 as favorites this season.
See our latest CFB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
Duke vs. Clemson Odds
Remi is pouring through loads of data on each player. In fact, anytime the Duke vs Clemson trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme altitude seemingly never follow normal, predictable patterns.
| DUKE Moneyline | +133 |
|---|---|
| CLEM Moneyline | -159 |
| DUKE Spread | +3.5 |
| CLEM Spread | -3.5 |
| Over / Under | 55.5 |
Duke vs Clemson Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dec 5, 2025 7:00PM EST
Troy Trojans
James Madison Dukes
12/5/25 7PM
TROY
JMAD
|
–
–
|
+1258
-5049
|
+23.5 (-110)
-23.5 (-110)
|
O 47 (-110)
U 47 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2025 7:00PM EST
Kennesaw State Owls
Jacksonville State Gamecocks
12/5/25 7PM
KENSAW
JAXST
|
–
–
|
-135
+110
|
-2.5 (-110)
+2.5 (-110)
|
O 60.5 (-110)
U 60.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2025 8:00PM EST
North Texas Mean Green
Tulane Green Wave
12/5/25 8PM
NOTEX
TULANE
|
–
–
|
-136
+111
|
-2.5 (-110)
+2.5 (-110)
|
O 66.5 (-110)
U 66.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2025 8:01PM EST
UNLV Rebels
Boise State Broncos
12/5/25 8:01PM
UNLV
BOISE
|
–
–
|
+170
-212
|
+5 (-110)
-5 (-110)
|
O 59 (-110)
U 59 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 12:00PM EST
Miami Ohio Redhawks
Western Michigan Broncos
12/6/25 12PM
MIAOH
WMICH
|
–
–
|
-128
|
-2 (-110)
|
O 43.5 (-110)
U 43.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 12:00PM EST
BYU Cougars
Texas Tech Red Raiders
12/6/25 12PM
BYU
TXTECH
|
–
–
|
+380
-526
|
+12.5 (-110)
-12.5 (-110)
|
O 49.5 (-110)
U 49.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 4:00PM EST
Georgia Bulldogs
Alabama Crimson Tide
12/6/25 4PM
UGA
BAMA
|
–
–
|
-130
+106
|
-2 (-110)
+2 (-110)
|
O 48 (-110)
U 48 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 8:00PM EST
Duke Blue Devils
Virginia Cavaliers
12/6/25 8PM
DUKE
UVA
|
–
–
|
+151
-187
|
+4 (-110)
-4 (-110)
|
O 58 (-110)
U 58 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 8:01PM EST
Indiana Hoosiers
Ohio State Buckeyes
12/6/25 8:01PM
IND
OHIOST
|
–
–
|
+165
-200
|
+4 (-105)
-4 (-115)
|
O 47.5 (-115)
U 47.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Dec 13, 2025 3:00PM EST
Army Black Knights
Navy Midshipmen
12/13/25 3PM
ARMY
NAVY
|
–
–
|
+172
-216
|
+4.5 (-105)
-4.5 (-115)
|
O 38 (-110)
U 38 (-110)
|
CFB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers Duke Blue Devils vs. Clemson Tigers on November 01, 2025 at Memorial Stadium.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CFB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
| LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLO@KSTATE | COLO +17.5 | 54.0% | 4 | WIN |
| PSU@RUT | RUT +14 | 52.8% | 1 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | MICH +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| VATECH@UVA | VATECH +8 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| NWEST@ILL | LUKE ALTMYER UNDER 19.5 PASS COMP | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| ORE@WAS | DEMOND WILLIAMS JR UNDER 43.5 RUSH YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| MIAMI@VATECH | VATECH +18.5 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| GAST@TROY | TROY -9.5 | 55.7% | 5 | WIN |
| DEL@WAKE | DEL +18 | 56.7% | 6 | LOSS |
| NMEX@AF | NMEX -3.5 | 56.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WASHST@JMAD | WASHST +14.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| ILL@WISC | WISC +9 | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WKY@LSU | WKY +23.5 | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| WASH@UCLA | DEMOND WILLIAMS UNDER 27.5 PASS ATT | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| TCU@HOU | AMARE THOMAS OVER 69.5 RECV YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| TEX@UGA | NATE FRAZIER UNDER 65.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 55.5% | 5 | WIN |
| PUR@WASH | ANTONIO HARRIS UNDER 73.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 54.1% | 4 | WIN |
| OKLA@BAMA | UNDER 46 | 52.4% | 2 | WIN |
| UVA@DUKE | DUKE -3.5 | 54.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| OKLA@BAMA | BAMA -6 | 54.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| OREGST@TULSA | OREGST -120 | 55.6% | 5 | LOSS |
| UTEP@MIZZST | MIZZST -5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| COLOST@NMEX | NMEX -14 | 57.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| PSU@MICHST | MICHST +7.5 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
| MISSST@MIZZOU | MISSST +7.5 | 57.2% | 7 | LOSS |
| FAU@TULANE | FAU +17.5 | 56.0% | 6 | WIN |
| NCST@MIAMI | NCST +15.5 | 57.1% | 7 | LOSS |
| KENTST@AKRON | AKRON -6.5 | 55.4% | 5 | LOSS |
| JAXST@UTEP | JAXST -105 | 57.0% | 7 | WIN |
| FSU@CLEM | CLEM -118 | 57.1% | 5 | WIN |
| UNLV@COLOST | UNLV -4 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@IOWA | IOWA +6.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |
| NEB@UCLA | NEB +1.5 | 55.8% | 5 | WIN |
| KENSAW@NMEXST | NMEXST +10 | 56.5% | 6 | WIN |
| STNFRD@UNC | STNFRD +7.5 | 53.8% | 3 | WIN |
| DUKE@UCONN | UCONN +8.5 | 57.9% | 7 | WIN |
| NEVADA@UTAHST | NEVADA +9.5 | 55.9% | 5 | LOSS |
| SAMST@OREGST | SAMST +21 | 57.7% | 7 | WIN |
| NEB@UCLA | NICO IAMALEAVA UNDER 180.5 PASS YDS | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| HOU@UCF | HOU -112 | 58.0% | 6 | WIN |
| GASTHRN@APPST | GASTHRN +180 | 36.5% | 2 | WIN |
| KENTST@BALLST | BALLST -2.5 | 54.5% | 4 | WIN |
| WAKE@FSU | WAKE +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| WYO@SDGST | SDGST -10.5 | 56.7% | 7 | WIN |
| OKLA@TENN | TENN -130 | 58.3% | 5 | LOSS |
| GATECH@NCST | GATECH -5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| MIAMI@SMU | MIAMI -10 | 54.3% | 4 | LOSS |
| IND@MD | MD +21.5 | 54.6% | 4 | LOSS |
| CINCY@UTAH | CINCY +11 | 57.6% | 7 | LOSS |
| OLDDOM@LAMON | LAMON +17 | 58.4% | 8 | LOSS |
| VANDY@TEXAS | OVER 46.5 | 53.7% | 2 | WIN |