Stanford vs Miami Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CFB Lines & Props (Oct 25)
Updated: 2025-10-18T02:28:40.156150ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The Stanford Cardinal visit the Miami Hurricanes on October 25, 2025, as Stanford looks to climb back from a difficult start and Miami strives to maintain its positioning in the ACC. Miami enters the game as a confident favorite with home-field advantage and superior metrics, while Stanford remains a work in progress on both offense and defense.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Oct 25, 2025
Start Time: 7:00 PM EST
Venue: Hard Rock Stadium
Hurricanes Record: (5-1)
Cardinal Record: (3-4)
OPENING ODDS
STNFRD Moneyline: +2400
MIAMI Moneyline: -10000
STNFRD Spread: +30.5
MIAMI Spread: -30.5
Over/Under: 48.5
STNFRD
Betting Trends
- Stanford has struggled this season, and while a precise ATS cover rate isn’t readily available, their record (2-4) and performance metrics suggest they have covered less frequently than average.
MIAMI
Betting Trends
- Miami, though dominant in many respects, has shown vulnerability in covering as heavy favorites—despite strong on-field stats, recent losses and turnovers have impacted their ATS trend.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- Stanford’s weak on-field performance and likely poor ATS cover rate make them a potential value underdog, while Miami, although favored heavily, has recent ATS misfires that create caution about expecting a blowout. The big spread anticipated for this game suggests the market is expecting dominance by Miami; if Stanford plays with discipline, limits mistakes, and forces Miami into discomfort, the value might lie in the underdog or in a tighter-than-expected finish. Conversely, if Miami executes cleanly and plays to its metrics (strong offense, efficient passing, solid red-zone performance), they should win—and perhaps cover—comfortably. The key for bettors will be toggling between Stanford’s upside as a rebound spot and Miami’s track record of covering when they’re efficient.
STNFRD vs. MIAMI
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: B. Gulbranson over 138.5 Passing Yards.
LIVE CFB ODDS
CFB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
374-287
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+829.4
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$82,943
VS. SPREAD
1680-1416
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+450.6
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$45,057
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Stanford vs Miami Prediction & Odds:
Free CFB Betting Insights for 10/25/25
The October 25, 2025 matchup between the Stanford Cardinal and the Miami Hurricanes at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens presents a fascinating interconference clash between two programs heading in opposite directions. Stanford, under head coach Troy Taylor, continues to rebuild in the rugged Big Ten after transitioning from the Pac-12, struggling to find consistency on both sides of the ball. Meanwhile, Miami, rejuvenated under Mario Cristobal, is asserting itself as a legitimate ACC contender, boasting one of the conference’s top defenses and a balanced offense that’s finally living up to its potential. The Hurricanes enter at 5-1, averaging just under 33 points per game while allowing a stingy 15 per contest, showcasing a combination of physical dominance and improved quarterback play. Stanford, sitting at 2-4, has managed occasional flashes of competitiveness but continues to grapple with inefficiency, particularly on offense, where they’re averaging only 18.8 points per game and fewer than five yards per play. The Cardinal’s offensive line, once the program’s hallmark, has struggled in both run blocking and pass protection, contributing to their offensive inconsistency. Quarterback Ashton Daniels has shown flashes of athleticism and leadership but remains inconsistent, completing roughly 60% of his passes for around 1,200 yards with eight touchdowns and six interceptions. His chemistry with wideout Elic Ayomanor, however, gives Stanford a legitimate big-play threat, and the duo’s ability to connect downfield could be the team’s best chance to challenge Miami’s elite secondary. Running back Sedrick Irvin Jr. leads the ground game with modest production, averaging 4.1 yards per carry, though the Cardinal often find themselves abandoning the run when trailing early. Defensively, Stanford has been a mixed bag—tough against the run at times but vulnerable through the air, surrendering roughly 30 points per game and struggling to generate consistent pressure.
Against a Miami offense that thrives on balance and tempo, that weakness could be costly. The Hurricanes’ attack is powered by quarterback Cam Ward, whose transfer from Washington State has elevated the entire unit. Ward has thrown for over 1,800 yards and 15 touchdowns while completing nearly 70% of his passes, directing an offense that averages 6.25 yards per play. Miami’s ground game, led by Mark Fletcher Jr. and Ajay Allen, adds balance and power, contributing over 180 rushing yards per game at 4.2 yards per carry. The offensive line has been among the ACC’s most improved, giving Ward ample time to scan defenses and make plays. Defensively, Miami remains elite under coordinator Lance Guidry, holding opponents under 100 rushing yards per game and ranking near the top nationally in sacks and takeaways. Linebacker Francisco Mauigoa and defensive end Rueben Bain Jr. headline a front seven that disrupts nearly every opponent’s rhythm, while the secondary, led by Kamren Kinchens, punishes mistakes with ball-hawking precision. From a betting perspective, Miami’s dominance on the field hasn’t always translated to ATS success, as they’ve covered inconsistently when heavily favored. Stanford, conversely, has often been undervalued, giving bettors potential reason to back them as sizable underdogs. The key for the Cardinal to stay competitive will be minimizing turnovers, controlling tempo, and finding success on early downs to avoid predictable passing situations. Miami will look to start fast, apply defensive pressure early, and exploit Stanford’s soft coverage schemes with quick strikes. If Miami maintains focus and plays to its strengths, the Hurricanes should control this game comfortably from start to finish. Still, Stanford’s disciplined approach and opportunistic passing game could make this contest closer than the spread implies early before Miami’s depth and physical edge likely wear the Cardinal down late, securing a decisive home victory and reaffirming their status as one of the ACC’s most complete teams.
Get live CFB odds and precise AI CFB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
CMC UNREAL 🤯
— Stanford Football (@StanfordFball) October 20, 2025
NFL Sunday Ticket On YouTube https://t.co/Q0dG7ShqZjpic.twitter.com/egYuvO21nx
Stanford Cardinal CFB Preview
The Stanford Cardinal travel across the country to face the Miami Hurricanes on October 25, 2025, in a matchup that serves as both a measuring stick and a potential statement opportunity for a rebuilding program under head coach Troy Taylor. Stanford enters the contest at 2-4, still trying to carve out an identity in its new Big Ten environment while facing one of the ACC’s most balanced and physical teams. The Cardinal have endured a challenging start to the season, plagued by offensive inconsistency and defensive lapses, but there are glimpses of potential within their young roster. Offensively, Stanford averages just under 19 points per game, a reflection of an attack that has struggled to establish rhythm or explosiveness for four full quarters. Quarterback Ashton Daniels has shown flashes of maturity and athleticism, throwing for over 1,200 yards and eight touchdowns while adding versatility with his legs. However, turnovers and uneven accuracy have prevented the offense from sustaining drives. His connection with breakout wide receiver Elic Ayomanor has been the team’s offensive highlight, with Ayomanor’s size, body control, and route precision giving the Cardinal a legitimate deep threat who can stretch defenses. Running back Sedrick Irvin Jr. anchors the ground game, averaging about 4.1 yards per carry, but Stanford’s offensive line—once a point of pride—has struggled to create consistent push against stronger defensive fronts.
Facing Miami’s physical front seven, led by Rueben Bain Jr. and Francisco Mauigoa, Stanford’s protection and execution will be tested from the first snap. The Cardinal must rely on quick throws, play-action concepts, and misdirection to neutralize Miami’s relentless pass rush and prevent Daniels from being pressured into mistakes. Defensively, Stanford’s issues have centered around inconsistency and depth. They’ve allowed just over 30 points per game, often starting strong but fading late as opposing offenses wear them down. The front line, led by Tobin Phillips and David Bailey, has shown flashes of toughness against the run, but the secondary has struggled against efficient passing attacks—an alarming trend against a Miami offense averaging over 6.2 yards per play. For Stanford to remain competitive, the defense must tighten its coverage discipline and capitalize on turnover opportunities, areas that have cost them in earlier losses. They cannot afford missed tackles or blown assignments against Miami’s precision offense led by quarterback Cam Ward, who thrives on exploiting defensive mistakes. Special teams could also play a pivotal role; Stanford’s kicking game has been steady, but field position will be critical in limiting Miami’s short fields. From a betting perspective, Stanford enters with one of the weaker ATS records in the Power Five, having covered in only a minority of games this season. However, as a large underdog, they offer potential value if their defense can contain Miami’s tempo and their offense avoids self-inflicted mistakes. To pull off the upset—or even cover—Stanford must dictate the pace early, win the turnover battle, and find a way to convert in the red zone, an area where they’ve underperformed all year. This game will reveal whether Stanford’s young core can rise to the occasion against a superior opponent or if the physicality and depth of Miami will overwhelm them. Either way, it’s an important test for a program trying to rebuild its toughness and credibility, and the Cardinal will need their best, most disciplined performance of the season to stay within striking distance of a Miami team firing on all cylinders at home.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Miami Hurricanes CFB Preview
The Miami Hurricanes return to Hard Rock Stadium on October 25, 2025, with confidence and momentum as they prepare to host the Stanford Cardinal in a nonconference clash that showcases two programs on very different trajectories. Under head coach Mario Cristobal, Miami has reestablished its identity as one of the most physical and well-balanced teams in the ACC, entering the matchup at 5-1 with aspirations of not just a conference title but national recognition. The Hurricanes have become known for their dominant defense and efficient, balanced offense that thrives on both tempo and power. Quarterback Cam Ward, the transfer from Washington State, has completely transformed Miami’s offensive ceiling with his dynamic dual-threat skill set and leadership. Through six games, Ward has thrown for over 1,800 yards and 15 touchdowns while completing nearly 70% of his passes, giving the Hurricanes the consistent quarterback play they’ve lacked in recent years. His ability to make quick decisions and extend plays outside the pocket has opened up Miami’s playbook, allowing offensive coordinator Shannon Dawson to mix in both deep vertical attacks and high-efficiency short passes. Wide receivers Xavier Restrepo and Jacolby George have become Ward’s primary targets, combining for over 1,000 receiving yards and serving as the explosive heartbeat of the passing game. On the ground, the Hurricanes continue to pound defenses with a deep backfield led by Mark Fletcher Jr. and Ajay Allen, who have combined for over 900 rushing yards at roughly 4.2 yards per carry. The offensive line, anchored by stalwarts Jalen Rivers and Anez Cooper, has been one of the best in the country at both pass protection and run blocking, giving Miami a consistent edge in time of possession and red-zone efficiency. Defensively, Miami has emerged as one of the nation’s elite units, allowing just over 15 points per game and less than 100 rushing yards per contest.
The front seven is led by defensive end Rueben Bain Jr., a disruptive force who has already tallied six sacks and double-digit tackles for loss, while linebacker Francisco Mauigoa has been the tone-setter in the middle with his instincts and tackling ability. The secondary, featuring ball-hawking safety Kamren Kinchens and cornerback Daryl Porter Jr., has been opportunistic, forcing turnovers at key moments and limiting opposing quarterbacks to under 55% completion. Against Stanford, Miami’s defense will look to dominate early by shutting down the Cardinal’s running game and pressuring quarterback Ashton Daniels into hurried throws. Special teams also give Miami an edge, with kicker Andres Borregales continuing to be dependable and punter Dylan Joyce helping the Hurricanes control field position. From a betting standpoint, Miami enters with a mixed record against the spread—dominant statistically but inconsistent in large-favorite situations—so the key for them will be maintaining focus and intensity throughout. Historically, the Hurricanes have occasionally allowed inferior opponents to linger due to turnovers or lapses in execution, something Cristobal has stressed eliminating as they push toward a top-10 ranking. The formula for success is straightforward: establish the run, protect the ball, and let Ward dictate tempo while the defense suffocates Stanford’s one-dimensional offense. If Miami avoids complacency and continues playing to its strengths, this game has all the makings of a convincing home victory that reinforces their status as one of the ACC’s most complete and dangerous teams. Expect Miami to overwhelm Stanford with superior speed, depth, and physicality, using their home crowd to fuel another dominant defensive effort and a balanced offensive showcase that could keep the Hurricanes rolling into November with championship momentum.
Miami Hurricanes Football | Postgame Press Conference | 10.17.25 https://t.co/iaOV6sx1wH
— Miami Hurricanes Football (@CanesFootball) October 18, 2025
Stanford vs Miami Prop Picks (AI)
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through mountains of stats on each line. In fact, anytime the Cardinal and Hurricanes play there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at Hard Rock Stadium in Oct rarely follow normal, predictable patterns.
Stanford vs Miami Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports algorithm, has been pouring over exorbitant amounts of data from every simulation between the Cardinal and Hurricanes and using recursive machine learning and industry leading AI to crunch the data to a single cover probability.
Interestingly enough, the data has been most focused on the growing weight human bettors regularly put on coaching factors between a Cardinal team going up against a possibly improved Hurricanes team. It appears the true game analytics might reflect a strong lean against one Vegas line in particular.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CFB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI Stanford vs Miami picks, computer picks Cardinal vs Hurricanes, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW | ||||||
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CFB schedule.
Stanford Betting Trends
Stanford has struggled this season, and while a precise ATS cover rate isn’t readily available, their record (2-4) and performance metrics suggest they have covered less frequently than average.
Miami Betting Trends
Miami, though dominant in many respects, has shown vulnerability in covering as heavy favorites—despite strong on-field stats, recent losses and turnovers have impacted their ATS trend.
Cardinal vs. Hurricanes Matchup Trends
Stanford’s weak on-field performance and likely poor ATS cover rate make them a potential value underdog, while Miami, although favored heavily, has recent ATS misfires that create caution about expecting a blowout. The big spread anticipated for this game suggests the market is expecting dominance by Miami; if Stanford plays with discipline, limits mistakes, and forces Miami into discomfort, the value might lie in the underdog or in a tighter-than-expected finish. Conversely, if Miami executes cleanly and plays to its metrics (strong offense, efficient passing, solid red-zone performance), they should win—and perhaps cover—comfortably. The key for bettors will be toggling between Stanford’s upside as a rebound spot and Miami’s track record of covering when they’re efficient.
Stanford vs. Miami Game Info
Stanford vs Miami starts on October 25, 2025 at 7:00 PM EST.
Venue: Hard Rock Stadium.
Spread: Miami -30.5
Moneyline: Stanford +2400, Miami -10000
Over/Under: 48.5
Stanford: (3-4) | Miami: (5-1)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: B. Gulbranson over 138.5 Passing Yards.. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
Stanford’s weak on-field performance and likely poor ATS cover rate make them a potential value underdog, while Miami, although favored heavily, has recent ATS misfires that create caution about expecting a blowout. The big spread anticipated for this game suggests the market is expecting dominance by Miami; if Stanford plays with discipline, limits mistakes, and forces Miami into discomfort, the value might lie in the underdog or in a tighter-than-expected finish. Conversely, if Miami executes cleanly and plays to its metrics (strong offense, efficient passing, solid red-zone performance), they should win—and perhaps cover—comfortably. The key for bettors will be toggling between Stanford’s upside as a rebound spot and Miami’s track record of covering when they’re efficient.
STNFRD trend: Stanford has struggled this season, and while a precise ATS cover rate isn’t readily available, their record (2-4) and performance metrics suggest they have covered less frequently than average.
MIAMI trend: Miami, though dominant in many respects, has shown vulnerability in covering as heavy favorites—despite strong on-field stats, recent losses and turnovers have impacted their ATS trend.
See our latest CFB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
Stanford vs. Miami Odds
Remi is pouring through tons of stats on each line. In fact, anytime the Stanford vs Miami trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing observations to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme hostile environments can often follow normal, predictable patterns.
| STNFRD Moneyline | +2400 |
|---|---|
| MIAMI Moneyline | -10000 |
| STNFRD Spread | +30.5 |
| MIAMI Spread | -30.5 |
| Over / Under | 48.5 |
Stanford vs Miami Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dec 5, 2025 7:00PM EST
Troy Trojans
James Madison Dukes
12/5/25 7PM
TROY
JMAD
|
–
–
|
+1000
-2500
|
+23.5 (-110)
-23.5 (-110)
|
O 46.5 (-110)
U 46.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2025 7:00PM EST
Kennesaw State Owls
Jacksonville State Gamecocks
12/5/25 7PM
KENSAW
JAXST
|
–
–
|
-135
+115
|
-2.5 (-110)
+2.5 (-110)
|
O 60.5 (-110)
U 60.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2025 8:00PM EST
North Texas Mean Green
Tulane Green Wave
12/5/25 8PM
NOTEX
TULANE
|
–
–
|
-135
+115
|
-2.5 (-110)
+2.5 (-110)
|
O 66.5 (-105)
U 66.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2025 8:01PM EST
UNLV Rebels
Boise State Broncos
12/5/25 8:01PM
UNLV
BOISE
|
–
–
|
+180
-220
|
+5 (-110)
-5 (-110)
|
O 59 (-110)
U 59 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 12:00PM EST
Miami Ohio Redhawks
Western Michigan Broncos
12/6/25 12PM
MIAOH
WMICH
|
–
–
|
-125
|
-1.5 (-110)
|
O 43.5 (-105)
U 43.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 12:00PM EST
BYU Cougars
Texas Tech Red Raiders
12/6/25 12PM
BYU
TXTECH
|
–
–
|
+390
-550
|
+12.5 (-110)
-12.5 (-110)
|
O 49.5 (-110)
U 49.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 4:00PM EST
Georgia Bulldogs
Alabama Crimson Tide
12/6/25 4PM
UGA
BAMA
|
–
–
|
-135
+115
|
-2.5 (-110)
+2.5 (-110)
|
O 48 (-110)
U 48 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 8:00PM EST
Duke Blue Devils
Virginia Cavaliers
12/6/25 8PM
DUKE
UVA
|
–
–
|
+155
-180
|
+4 (-110)
-4 (-110)
|
O 58 (-110)
U 58 (-110)
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2025 8:01PM EST
Indiana Hoosiers
Ohio State Buckeyes
12/6/25 8:01PM
IND
OHIOST
|
–
–
|
+160
-185
|
+4 (-110)
-4 (-110)
|
O 47.5 (-115)
U 47.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Dec 13, 2025 3:00PM EST
Army Black Knights
Navy Midshipmen
12/13/25 3PM
ARMY
NAVY
|
–
–
|
+165
-195
|
+4.5 (-110)
-4.5 (-110)
|
O 38 (-110)
U 38 (-110)
|
CFB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers Stanford Cardinal vs. Miami Hurricanes on October 25, 2025 at Hard Rock Stadium.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CFB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
| LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLO@KSTATE | COLO +17.5 | 54.0% | 4 | WIN |
| PSU@RUT | RUT +14 | 52.8% | 1 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | MICH +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| VATECH@UVA | VATECH +8 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| NWEST@ILL | LUKE ALTMYER UNDER 19.5 PASS COMP | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| ORE@WAS | DEMOND WILLIAMS JR UNDER 43.5 RUSH YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| MIAMI@VATECH | VATECH +18.5 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| GAST@TROY | TROY -9.5 | 55.7% | 5 | WIN |
| DEL@WAKE | DEL +18 | 56.7% | 6 | LOSS |
| NMEX@AF | NMEX -3.5 | 56.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WASHST@JMAD | WASHST +14.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| ILL@WISC | WISC +9 | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WKY@LSU | WKY +23.5 | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| WASH@UCLA | DEMOND WILLIAMS UNDER 27.5 PASS ATT | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| TCU@HOU | AMARE THOMAS OVER 69.5 RECV YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| TEX@UGA | NATE FRAZIER UNDER 65.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 55.5% | 5 | WIN |
| PUR@WASH | ANTONIO HARRIS UNDER 73.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 54.1% | 4 | WIN |
| OKLA@BAMA | UNDER 46 | 52.4% | 2 | WIN |
| UVA@DUKE | DUKE -3.5 | 54.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| OKLA@BAMA | BAMA -6 | 54.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| OREGST@TULSA | OREGST -120 | 55.6% | 5 | LOSS |
| UTEP@MIZZST | MIZZST -5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| COLOST@NMEX | NMEX -14 | 57.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| PSU@MICHST | MICHST +7.5 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
| MISSST@MIZZOU | MISSST +7.5 | 57.2% | 7 | LOSS |
| FAU@TULANE | FAU +17.5 | 56.0% | 6 | WIN |
| NCST@MIAMI | NCST +15.5 | 57.1% | 7 | LOSS |
| KENTST@AKRON | AKRON -6.5 | 55.4% | 5 | LOSS |
| JAXST@UTEP | JAXST -105 | 57.0% | 7 | WIN |
| FSU@CLEM | CLEM -118 | 57.1% | 5 | WIN |
| UNLV@COLOST | UNLV -4 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@IOWA | IOWA +6.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |
| NEB@UCLA | NEB +1.5 | 55.8% | 5 | WIN |
| KENSAW@NMEXST | NMEXST +10 | 56.5% | 6 | WIN |
| STNFRD@UNC | STNFRD +7.5 | 53.8% | 3 | WIN |
| DUKE@UCONN | UCONN +8.5 | 57.9% | 7 | WIN |
| NEVADA@UTAHST | NEVADA +9.5 | 55.9% | 5 | LOSS |
| SAMST@OREGST | SAMST +21 | 57.7% | 7 | WIN |
| NEB@UCLA | NICO IAMALEAVA UNDER 180.5 PASS YDS | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| HOU@UCF | HOU -112 | 58.0% | 6 | WIN |
| GASTHRN@APPST | GASTHRN +180 | 36.5% | 2 | WIN |
| KENTST@BALLST | BALLST -2.5 | 54.5% | 4 | WIN |
| WAKE@FSU | WAKE +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| WYO@SDGST | SDGST -10.5 | 56.7% | 7 | WIN |
| OKLA@TENN | TENN -130 | 58.3% | 5 | LOSS |
| GATECH@NCST | GATECH -5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| MIAMI@SMU | MIAMI -10 | 54.3% | 4 | LOSS |
| IND@MD | MD +21.5 | 54.6% | 4 | LOSS |
| CINCY@UTAH | CINCY +11 | 57.6% | 7 | LOSS |
| OLDDOM@LAMON | LAMON +17 | 58.4% | 8 | LOSS |
| VANDY@TEXAS | OVER 46.5 | 53.7% | 2 | WIN |