Must Bet CFB Week 9 AI Picks, Predictions & Hidden Market Mistakes
Updated: 2025-10-19T08:00:00-06:00By Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
Our Week 9 CFB computer picks combine play-by-play data, simulations, and market moves to surface ATS, moneyline, over/under, and player prop edges. Below you’ll find AI predictions with confidence ratings, plus best bets and buy-to numbers.
Pro tip: prices move. Refresh before kickoff to catch new edges and verify current odds.
Best Week 9
CFB AI Player Prop
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: J. Mateer over 249.5 Passing Yards.
WEEK 9 CFB Computer Picks (ATS, ML, O/U)
WEEK 9 CFB Odds
WEEK 9 CFB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
499-406
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+859.3
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$85,925
VS. SPREAD
2088-1776
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+517.1
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$51,705
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Week 9 of the 2025 college football season arrives with playoff implications tightening and conference title races heating up across the country, setting the stage for one of the most pivotal slates of the year. Programs like Georgia, Ohio State, and Texas find themselves in high-stakes showdowns that could redefine the CFP hierarchy, while under-the-radar teams such as Oregon State and Kansas State look to keep their Cinderella runs alive against blue-blood opponents. The SEC and Big Ten are center stage this week, with Georgia facing a trap spot against a resurgent Kentucky squad and Penn State colliding with Michigan in what could be a de facto elimination game for the conference crown. Meanwhile, USC and Washington headline a late-night Pac-12 duel that might not just decide the conference’s last-ever title race but also shape Heisman ballots as Caleb Williams and Michael Penix Jr. battle to stay atop national leaderboards.
It’s also a defining weekend for analytics-driven bettors and fans who follow EPA/play and success rate trends, as several matchups showcase clear schematic contrasts—Oklahoma’s high-tempo passing attack versus Iowa State’s disciplined 3-3-5 defense, or Alabama’s run-heavy resurgence clashing with LSU’s explosive vertical game. The margins are thinner, the atmospheres louder, and the stakes higher than ever as Week 9 marks the stretch run where contenders become true CFP threats—or fade under pressure. Expect chaos, signature moments, and another round of program-defining performances that will send ripple effects across the college football landscape.
Week 9 of the 2025 college football season, kicking off on October 12, brings a slate loaded with playoff-defining matchups and late-season drama that will separate true contenders from hopeful pretenders. As the crisp October air rolls in, powerhouse programs like Georgia, Michigan, and Texas find themselves under intense scrutiny with razor-thin margins for error. Georgia looks to maintain its SEC dominance behind quarterback Carson Beck and running back Roderick Robinson, but a dangerous Florida team with an emerging dual-threat QB could disrupt the Bulldogs’ rhythm. In the Big Ten, J.J. McCarthy and the Wolverines face a physical Wisconsin squad that’s rediscovered its ground identity, while Penn State continues to rise with Drew Allar spreading the field and a defense that thrives on havoc plays. Out west, Oregon and Washington are set for another offensive masterpiece, with Dillon Gabriel and Michael Penix Jr. leading the nation’s most efficient passing attacks in a matchup that could very well determine the Pac-12’s playoff hopes.
Elsewhere, the ACC and Big 12 races are tightening as Miami and Clemson battle for supremacy, while Oklahoma State and Kansas State continue to play spoiler roles against ranked opponents. Week 9 also spotlights a handful of dark-horse teams like Ole Miss and Utah, both quietly building resumes with elite efficiency metrics and balanced rosters that match up well against higher-ranked opponents. With several top-10 clashes, emotional rivalry games, and statistical mismatches ripe for betting insights, this week is tailor-made for sharp bettors and fans tracking AI-driven predictions. Every possession, red-zone trip, and third-down conversion carries heightened meaning now, and by the end of this weekend, the College Football Playoff picture will look very different—some dreams strengthened, others shattered under the bright lights of October football.
— Oklahoma Football (@OU_Football) October 19, 2025
Live AI CFB Picks — Week 9
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, weather, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full NCAAF Schedule.
Below is our current AI CFB picks Week 9, CFB computer picks Week 9, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW | ||||||
Week 9 Storylines & Angles
Offense vs. Defense Mismatches
Week 9 of the 2025 college football season features several fascinating offense-versus-defense mismatches that analytics fans and bettors alike will be watching closely, especially when it comes to metrics like EPA/play, success rate, and red-zone touchdown efficiency. Oregon once again sits atop the national leaderboard in offensive EPA/play, powered by quarterback Dillon Gabriel’s pinpoint accuracy and a deep receiving corps that averages nearly 9.1 yards per play on early downs. Their explosive tempo and precision in the red zone—converting at over 74%—will test an Arizona State defense that’s improved against the run but remains vulnerable to vertical shots. On the other side of the country, Michigan’s ground-and-pound identity continues to pay dividends, ranking top five in success rate thanks to Blake Corum’s consistency and an offensive line that leads the nation in adjusted line yards. They’ll face a Penn State front seven that ranks in the top 10 in havoc rate and sack percentage, making this matchup a true trench war between pace and pressure.
In the SEC, Alabama’s offensive resurgence under new coordinator Tommy Rees has been marked by improved pass protection and a renewed focus on explosive plays—averaging 13.4 yards per completion—while LSU’s defense, led by linebacker Harold Perkins Jr., continues to thrive on pressure but struggles in the red zone, allowing touchdowns on 68% of opposing trips. Expect that game’s EPA/play battle to swing on whether Alabama’s offensive line can hold up long enough for deep-developing routes. Meanwhile, in the ACC, Miami’s offense continues to climb analytically with Cam Ward leading a balanced unit that ranks among the top 15 in pace and first downs per drive. They’ll be tested by Clemson’s defensive front, which remains elite in limiting success rate on early downs. Across the board, Week 9’s data-driven storylines revolve around which offenses can stay efficient under duress and which defenses can bend without breaking—because in October football, the teams that dominate the margins in EPA, red-zone execution, and explosive plays are the ones that end up shaping the playoff picture.
Quarterback & Scheme Trends
Week 9 of the 2025 college football season spotlights a series of quarterback performances and schematic wrinkles that could define playoff trajectories and betting angles alike. Several signal-callers are peaking at just the right time—none more so than Oregon’s Dillon Gabriel, who enters the week leading the nation in EPA per dropback while maintaining one of the lowest pressure-to-sack rates in college football. His calm under duress and efficiency against blitz-heavy defenses have made the Ducks nearly impossible to fluster, especially with their heavy use of motion to create free releases for receivers. Similarly, Texas quarterback Arch Manning continues to mature in Steve Sarkisian’s offense, blending quick-game precision with timely vertical shots off play-action. The Longhorns’ under-center rate has quietly climbed in recent weeks, giving their offense a more balanced rhythm that keeps defenses guessing and enhances their success in short-yardage situations.
In the Big Ten, J.J. McCarthy’s command of Michigan’s offense has been a masterclass in situational play-calling. His ability to diagnose pressure and make throws off-platform has allowed the Wolverines to maintain efficiency against some of the conference’s most aggressive blitz packages. On the other hand, Penn State’s Drew Allar faces growing pressure to elevate his play against ranked opponents—his splits under blitz pressure have dipped below national averages, exposing the Nittany Lions’ occasional overreliance on predictable early-down play-calling. Meanwhile, USC’s Miller Moss and Washington’s Michael Penix Jr. continue to thrive in motion-heavy, tempo-based systems that rely on isolating mismatches pre-snap. Expect both to be tested by defenses that disguise coverage and send simulated pressure. As Week 9 unfolds, the focus isn’t just on arm strength or athleticism—it’s on processing speed, adaptability, and how effectively quarterbacks operate within evolving offensive architectures designed to counter increasingly exotic defensive fronts.
Travel, Rest & Situational Spots
Week 9 of the 2025 college football season sets up several key situational angles that bettors and analysts will be watching closely, especially regarding travel, rest, and emotional momentum. A handful of programs are navigating short weeks or tricky scheduling spots that could shape outcomes beyond raw talent. For instance, Oregon faces a potential letdown scenario after back-to-back high-intensity matchups, traveling across time zones to face an early kickoff against Colorado—never an easy spot given Boulder’s altitude and unpredictable October weather. Similarly, ACC contenders Miami and Clemson enter Week 9 in contrasting body-clock situations: Miami travels north for a chilly noon kickoff following a night game, while Clemson enjoys extra rest and home-field comfort. That contrast could be pivotal in a conference race already decided by razor-thin margins. The Mountain West slate also highlights how travel and elevation intersect—teams like San Diego State heading into Laramie or Air Force games consistently struggle to match tempo late, with conditioning and thin air becoming hidden variables that analytics don’t fully capture.
Conference and rivalry dynamics add another layer of volatility to Week 9. The SEC slate, including matchups like Ole Miss vs. LSU and Georgia vs. Florida, is ripe for emotional swings—classic look-ahead or let-down spots where intensity and motivation often trump data. The Red River aftermath also lingers for Texas, as the Longhorns face a disciplined Kansas State team that historically thrives as an underdog in emotional hangover weeks. Out West, Utah’s trip to Washington comes with a classic “body-clock disadvantage” for a team that’s been grinding through physical Pac-12 battles, while Big Ten programs like Iowa and Wisconsin find themselves in scheduling traps between heavyweight opponents. These subtle situational angles—rest advantage, altitude, travel distance, and rivalry energy—can often tilt efficiency metrics and betting outcomes more than expected. As Week 9 unfolds, sharp bettors will keep an eye not just on talent mismatches, but on fatigue, focus, and geography—the invisible edges that separate winners from cautionary tales.
Weather & Late-Breaking Injuries
Week 9 of the 2025 college football season brings a handful of weather variables that could quietly dictate totals and game scripts, especially in the Midwest and Mountain regions. Early forecasts point to potential wind and rain across Big Ten and MAC country, where sustained winds above 15 mph and gusts nearing 25 can drastically reduce deep passing efficiency and alter play-calling tendencies. Historically, once wind speeds exceed 18 mph, passing success rate drops nearly 10%, while totals tend to fall an average of 4–6 points from openers. Games like Iowa vs. Northwestern and Penn State vs. Wisconsin could see that dynamic in play, with both teams already leaning heavily on ground-based attacks. In Boulder, Colorado’s home matchup against Oregon could feature swirling winds and light rain—conditions that may slow tempo and limit explosive plays for two of the nation’s most aggressive passing offenses. Meanwhile, in Laramie and Salt Lake City, cool air and high elevation could combine with intermittent snow flurries to test kicking games and tilt value toward unders.
Player availability also looms large for Week 9. Michigan star running back Blake Corum is reportedly nursing a minor ankle issue that could reduce his workload, potentially opening the door for Donovan Edwards to see an uptick in touches. USC wideout Zachariah Branch, who’s been limited by a lingering hamstring strain, remains a true game-time decision—a major factor for prop bettors and those eyeing the Trojans’ total against Washington. At Texas A&M, quarterback Conner Weigman is still trending toward questionable with a shoulder injury, which could impact tempo and explosiveness if backup Marcel Reed starts. On defense, LSU linebacker Harold Perkins Jr. and Clemson corner Nate Wiggins are both expected to play but may see snap count management after recent knocks. Bettors and DFS players should monitor late injury reports closely, as even small changes in usage for top skill players can swing efficiency metrics and total projections in weather-affected environments. Week 9’s perfect storm of questionable stars and shifting skies makes adaptability the name of the game for anyone handicapping totals or player performance props.
Check up to the minute weather forecasts here.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
CFB Week 9 Best Bets & AI Prop Picks
Week 9 CFB Best Bet – Pro Tips
Note Price sensitivity: We crunch numbers, not teams. If the market moves beyond our
buy-to number, expected value decays and the edge can disappear. Respect the price.
Unit sizing (1–10): Our unit scale reflects model signal strength, injury/variance risk,
and current line availability. Higher units = stronger conviction, not permission to over-expose.
Staking & correlation: Default stake scales with edge and volatility. Avoid stacking too many
correlated outcomes (same game, same player ladder) unless you deliberately size down.
Closing-Line Value (CLV): Beating the close consistently is a quality signal—even across small samples.
Track your entry vs. close; it’s the most reliable feedback loop for long-term profitability.
Week 9 Line Movement
Every pick includes a playable to line or price (e.g., -2.5, Over 44.5, +115). If you can’t get that number or better, consider passing or reducing stake. Lines move—check back for live updates in our Live AI Picks stream and see quick notes in Odds & Line Movement.
Note – all of our data is for informational purposes only and not a recommendation as to whether or how to wager.
Week 9 pic.twitter.com/19cvJSzmCm
— Ole Miss Football (@OleMissFB) October 19, 2025
Line Movement Tracker — Week 9
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Aug 29, 2026 12:00PM EDT
NC State Wolfpack
Virginia Cavaliers
8/29/26 12PM
NCST
UVA
|
–
–
|
+108
-130
|
+2.5 (-110)
-2.5 (-110)
|
O 54.5 (-105)
U 54.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Aug 29, 2026 12:00PM EDT
North Carolina Tar Heels
TCU Horned Frogs
8/29/26 12PM
UNC
TCU
|
–
–
|
+210
-260
|
+6.5 (-102)
-6.5 (-120)
|
O 50.5 (-105)
U 50.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Clemson Tigers
LSU Tigers
9/5/26 12PM
CLEM
LSU
|
–
–
|
+365
-490
|
+11.5 (-110)
-11.5 (-110)
|
O 50.5 (-110)
U 50.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
UCLA Bruins
California Golden Bears
9/5/26 12PM
UCLA
CAL
|
–
–
|
+102
-122
|
+1.5 (-110)
-1.5 (-110)
|
O 53.5 (-110)
U 53.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Baylor Bears
Auburn Tigers
9/5/26 12PM
BAYLOR
AUBURN
|
–
–
|
+250
-315
|
+7.5 (-110)
-7.5 (-110)
|
O 58.5 (-110)
U 58.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Louisville Cardinals
Ole Miss Rebels
9/5/26 12PM
LVILLE
OLEMISS
|
–
–
|
+230
-285
|
+7.5 (-120)
-7.5 (-102)
|
O 52.5 (-115)
U 52.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 6, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Wisconsin Badgers
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
9/6/26 12PM
WISC
ND
|
–
–
|
+920
-1800
|
+19.5 (-110)
-19.5 (-110)
|
O 46.5 (-115)
U 46.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 6, 2026 7:30PM EDT
Louisville Cardinals
Ole Miss Rebels
9/6/26 7:30PM
LVILLE
OLEMISS
|
–
–
|
+235
-290
|
+7 (-108)
-7 (-112)
|
O 53.5 (-112)
U 53.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Sep 7, 2026 12:00PM EDT
SMU Mustangs
Florida State Seminoles
9/7/26 12PM
SMU
FSU
|
–
–
|
-142
+120
|
-2.5 (-112)
+2.5 (-108)
|
O 52.5 (-112)
U 52.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Sep 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Ohio State Buckeyes
Texas Longhorns
9/12/26 12PM
OHIOST
TEXAS
|
–
–
|
+104
-125
|
+1.5 (-108)
-1.5 (-112)
|
O 47.5 (-115)
U 47.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Oklahoma Sooners
Michigan Wolverines
9/12/26 12PM
OKLA
MICH
|
–
–
|
+122
-146
|
+2.5 (-104)
-2.5 (-118)
|
O 45.5 (-110)
U 45.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 18, 2026 7:00PM EDT
Houston Cougars
Texas Tech Red Raiders
9/18/26 7PM
HOU
TXTECH
|
–
–
|
+400
-550
|
+12.5 (-105)
-12.5 (-115)
|
O 53.5 (-110)
U 53.5 (-110)
|
How Our AI Picks Work
Our CFB model blends play-by-play efficiency, drive-level simulations, and market-aware priors. We incorporate injury reports, rest/travel effects, and weather to adjust team strength and total expectations. Each game is simulated thousands of times to produce fair prices; the displayed Model Edge % is the gap between our fair price and the current market.
Market-aware: incorporates liquidity windows and closing-line efficiency.
Context-adjusted: rest days, travel, altitude, tempo, and scheme tendencies.
Transparency: we show confidence, edges, and track CLV and ROI.
Remi, our AI sports genius, has been pouring over millions of data from every facet across CFB week 9 using recursive machine learning to cutting-edge AI to examine the data to a single cover probability.
Interestingly enough, the data has been most keyed in on the unproportionally assigned emphasis human bettors tend to put on coaching factors between a visitors team going up against a possibly rested home teams. In reality, the true game analytics might reflect a strong lean against one Vegas line in particular.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CFB AI picks for FREE now.
FAQ — Week 9 CFB AI Picks
Where can I see Week 9 CFB AI picks by bet type?
Right on this page. We publish Week 9 CFB computer picks organized by Against the Spread (ATS), Moneyline, Totals (Over/Under), and Player Props so you can jump straight to the markets you bet most.
What are the “best bets” for Week 9 according to the model?
“Best bets” are our highest-confidence Week 9 CFB AI picks based on fair price vs. current odds. Look for larger Model Edge % and higher confidence stars; those signal stronger value at widely available prices.
How are your Week 9 CFB computer picks generated?
We combine play-by-play data, drive-level simulations, and market-aware priors. The model produces a fair price for each side/total/prop, then compares it to live odds to surface Week 9 edges worth betting.
How often do you update Week 9 CFB AI picks?
Throughout the week and up to kickoff. As injuries, weather, and prices move, our projections refresh—so check back closer to game time for the most accurate read on Week 9 value.
Do your Week 9 picks include player props like anytime TD or yardage?
Yes. Our Week 9 CFB AI picks include props such as anytime touchdown, rushing/receiving yards, passing yards, attempts, and more when markets are liquid and pricing shows an edge.
Do you post same-game parlay (SGP) ideas for Week 9?
When correlations and prices justify it, we highlight SGP concepts tied to our Week 9 AI edges—think side/total anchored to complementary player props. We only list combos when expected value remains positive.
What do Model Edge % and units mean?
Model Edge % is the gap between our fair price and the current line/price. Units (1–10) summarize signal quality, volatility, and line availability for Week 9 CFB AI picks.
What are “buy-to” numbers, and what if the line moves?
“Buy-to” is the furthest playable number before expected value disappears. If the market pushes past that level, the Week 9 pick may no longer qualify—wait for a better price or skip the bet.
Do you track closing-line value (CLV) and ROI for Week 9?
Yes. We grade results against widely available prices at publish time and monitor CLV to gauge process quality. You’ll also find recent record and ROI to keep Week 9 performance transparent.
How should I size bets on Week 9 CFB AI picks?
Scale stake size with edge and volatility. Larger Model Edge % and higher confidence typically merit slightly larger positions, but avoid over-exposure to correlated outcomes within the same game.
Are teasers viable for Week 9?
Sometimes. Teasers can make sense around key numbers when totals and pricing conditions are favorable. If our Week 9 read flags teaser value, we’ll note the recommended legs and limits.
How do injuries, weather, and travel impact Week 9 CFB picks?
Materially. The model adjusts team strength, pace, and totals for late scratches, snap-count news, wind/rain/cold thresholds, altitude, rest, and travel. Those inputs can change edges close to kickoff.
Where can I compare Week 9 CFB odds to shop the best number?
Use your preferred odds screen or our odds links from this page. Shopping lines is essential—Model Edge % is calculated against available prices, and the best number often determines long-term ROI.
Can I get alerts when new Week 9 CFB AI picks post or when lines move to buy-to?
Yes. Enable notifications or subscribe for alerts so you catch new Week 9 AI picks, notable line moves, and updates to buy-to ranges before the market fully adjusts.
Past CFB AI Picks
|
|
|
|
RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OLEMISS@GEORGIA | KEWAN LACY ANYTIME TD | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
| BAMA@IND | FERNANDO MENDOZA UNDER 26.5 PASS ATT | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@TXTECH | OREG -126 | 58.9% | 6 | WIN |
| NEB@UTAH | DEVON DAMPIER UNDER 185.5 PASS YDS | 53.4% | 3 | LOSS |
| NOTEX@SDGST | NOTEX -7 | 54.2% | 4 | LOSS |
| BAMA@OKLA | ISAIAH SATEGNA III ANYTIME TD | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| BYU@TTU | PARKER KINGSTON OVER 20.5 LONGEST RECEPTION | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| UNLV@BOISE | BOISE -4.5 | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
| ECU@FAU | FAU +7 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| OREG@WASH | WASH +7 | 54.9% | 4 | LOSS |
| WYO@HAWAII | WYO +7.5 | 55.1% | 5 | LOSS |
| COLO@KSTATE | COLO +17.5 | 54.0% | 4 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | MICH +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| VATECH@UVA | VATECH +8 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| NWEST@ILL | LUKE ALTMYER UNDER 19.5 PASS COMP | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| ORE@WAS | DEMOND WILLIAMS JR UNDER 43.5 RUSH YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| MIAMI@VATECH | VATECH +18.5 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| GAST@TROY | TROY -9.5 | 55.7% | 5 | WIN |
| DEL@WAKE | DEL +18 | 56.7% | 6 | LOSS |
| NMEX@AF | NMEX -3.5 | 56.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WASHST@JMAD | WASHST +14.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| ILL@WISC | WISC +9 | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WKY@LSU | WKY +23.5 | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| WASH@UCLA | DEMOND WILLIAMS UNDER 27.5 PASS ATT | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| TCU@HOU | AMARE THOMAS OVER 69.5 RECV YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| TEX@UGA | NATE FRAZIER UNDER 65.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 55.5% | 5 | WIN |
| PUR@WASH | ANTONIO HARRIS UNDER 73.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 54.1% | 4 | WIN |
| UVA@DUKE | DUKE -3.5 | 54.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| OKLA@BAMA | BAMA -6 | 54.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| OREGST@TULSA | OREGST -120 | 55.6% | 5 | LOSS |
| UTEP@MIZZST | MIZZST -5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| COLOST@NMEX | NMEX -14 | 57.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| PSU@MICHST | MICHST +7.5 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
| MISSST@MIZZOU | MISSST +7.5 | 57.2% | 7 | LOSS |
| FAU@TULANE | FAU +17.5 | 56.0% | 6 | WIN |
| NCST@MIAMI | NCST +15.5 | 57.1% | 7 | LOSS |
| KENTST@AKRON | AKRON -6.5 | 55.4% | 5 | LOSS |
| JAXST@UTEP | JAXST -105 | 57.0% | 7 | WIN |
| FSU@CLEM | CLEM -118 | 57.1% | 5 | WIN |
| UNLV@COLOST | UNLV -4 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@IOWA | IOWA +6.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |
| NEB@UCLA | NEB +1.5 | 55.8% | 5 | WIN |
| KENSAW@NMEXST | NMEXST +10 | 56.5% | 6 | WIN |
| STNFRD@UNC | STNFRD +7.5 | 53.8% | 3 | WIN |
| DUKE@UCONN | UCONN +8.5 | 57.9% | 7 | WIN |
| NEVADA@UTAHST | NEVADA +9.5 | 55.9% | 5 | LOSS |
| SAMST@OREGST | SAMST +21 | 57.7% | 7 | WIN |
| NEB@UCLA | NICO IAMALEAVA UNDER 180.5 PASS YDS | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| HOU@UCF | HOU -112 | 58.0% | 6 | WIN |
| KENTST@BALLST | BALLST -2.5 | 54.5% | 4 | WIN |
| WAKE@FSU | WAKE +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |