Must Bet CFB Week 7 AI Picks, Predictions & Hidden Market Mistakes
Updated: 2025-10-05T08:00:00-06:00By Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
Our Week 7 CFB computer picks combine play-by-play data, simulations, and market moves to surface ATS, moneyline, over/under, and player prop edges. Below you’ll find AI predictions with confidence ratings, plus best bets and buy-to numbers.
Pro tip: prices move. Refresh before kickoff to catch new edges and verify current odds.
Best Week 7
CFB AI Player Prop
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: D. Luke under 66.5 Receiving Yards.
WEEK 7 CFB Computer Picks (ATS, ML, O/U)
WEEK 7 CFB Odds
WEEK 7 CFB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
NET UNITS (INCL VIG & EXEC)
NET PROFIT (INCL VIG & EXEC) $100/UNIT
NET UNITS (INCL VIG)
NET PROFIT (INCL VIG) $100/UNIT
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Week 7 of the 2025 college football season arrives with the kind of storylines that define the playoff race — and the AI models are zeroing in on several key matchups that could shift conference hierarchies nationwide. In the SEC, Georgia travels to face Texas A&M in what’s shaping up to be a high-stakes battle between Carson Beck’s precision passing and an Aggies defense that’s quietly emerged as one of the most disruptive units in the country. Over in the Big Ten, Michigan and Oregon collide in a top-10 showdown featuring two Heisman hopefuls: Wolverines quarterback J.J. McCarthy and Ducks running back Jordan James, whose backfield dominance has carried Oregon’s playoff hopes through six weeks. Meanwhile, Florida State looks to stay perfect as it visits NC State in a dangerous ACC trap game, while undefeated Utah tries to prove its physicality still reigns supreme against high-powered Arizona.
Our AI picks for Week 7 spotlight trends, efficiency metrics, and matchup data to identify where the real betting edges lie. Can Alabama cover another double-digit spread against resurgent South Carolina? Will Penn State’s defense finally crack against Illinois’ methodical ground game? With conference races heating up and upsets lurking everywhere, Week 7 has the perfect blend of analytics intrigue and gridiron drama — and the AI is ready to call it before kickoff.
Week 7 of the 2025 college football season brings the drama, the data, and the defining moments that will shape the playoff picture heading into October — and our AI picks are already circling the weekend’s biggest matchups. Georgia faces its toughest test yet at Texas A&M, where Carson Beck’s precision and the Bulldogs’ defensive dominance will clash with an Aggies offense led by sophomore breakout quarterback Marcel Reed. In the Big Ten, Michigan travels to Oregon for a top-10 showdown loaded with Heisman storylines — J.J. McCarthy’s leadership and efficiency against Jordan James’ explosive ground game. Meanwhile, in the ACC, Florida State continues its undefeated march behind quarterback D.J. Uiagalelei as it heads to NC State for a prime-time challenge, while Alabama seeks to reassert control of the SEC West against a surging South Carolina team finding rhythm under quarterback LaNorris Sellers.
Our Week 7 AI predictions dive beyond the headlines, analyzing yards per play, defensive efficiency, and quarterback decision metrics to uncover real betting value. Can Penn State’s relentless defense contain Illinois’ bruising run game? Will Clemson’s offense finally break out against a stingy Miami secondary? With playoff contenders clashing and underdogs ready to spring surprises, Week 7 delivers the kind of volatility that data loves — and our AI models are ready to translate every matchup, momentum shift, and metric into winning insights before kickoff.
𝗪𝗲𝗲𝗸 𝗦𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻.#OutHitOutHustle | #ProveIt pic.twitter.com/WWyqDR01X9
— Missouri State Football (@MoStateFootball) October 5, 2025
Live AI CFB Picks — Week 7
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, weather, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full NCAAF Schedule.
Below is our current AI CFB picks Week 7, CFB computer picks Week 7, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
|
DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW | ||||||
Week 7 Storylines & Angles
Offense vs. Defense Mismatches
Week 7 of the 2025 college football season features some of the most intriguing offensive and defensive mismatches yet, with EPA/play and success rate trends painting a clear picture of where the biggest edges lie. Georgia continues to dominate the national EPA/play leaderboard at +0.42, powered by Carson Beck’s precision and a rushing attack that converts over 52% of its early-down plays into first downs. On the other side, Texas A&M’s defense, ranked top five in defensive success rate, will be tested by Georgia’s 71% red-zone touchdown rate — one of the most efficient marks in the country. In the Big Ten, Oregon’s offense, averaging 6.9 yards per play, squares off against Michigan’s top-ranked defensive success rate unit, setting up a fascinating strength-on-strength showdown where pace and efficiency could determine the outcome. Meanwhile, teams like Florida State and Washington are turning explosive plays into separation, both ranking in the top 10 nationally in plays of 20-plus yards, while defenses like Penn State’s and Utah’s have limited opponents to under 10% explosive play rate — a key factor in why both remain in the playoff hunt.
Protection and pressure metrics also tell the story heading into Week 7. Alabama’s offensive line, allowing pressure on just 14% of dropbacks, faces a red-hot South Carolina pass rush generating havoc on nearly 19% of opponent pass plays. In contrast, teams like Oklahoma and Clemson continue to struggle with protection consistency, leading to below-average red-zone TD efficiency (just 54% combined). Tempo could also play a major role this week — high-paced teams like Tennessee and Arizona (both top 15 in plays per minute) could push totals higher, while grind-it-out offenses like Michigan and Utah will try to control pace and limit possessions. As AI models project outcomes, Week 7’s biggest mismatches emerge not just from talent gaps, but from analytical imbalances — where success rate meets red-zone finishing, and where pressure or explosive plays might ultimately define who covers and who collapses.
Quarterback & Scheme Trends
Quarterback form and schematic tendencies are beginning to crystallize as Week 7 of the 2025 college football season arrives, and the data behind pressure splits and play design is separating elite signal-callers from the pack. Georgia’s Carson Beck has been nearly flawless under pressure, posting an adjusted completion rate of 72% when blitzed — the highest among Power Five quarterbacks — thanks to quick decision-making and offensive coordinator Mike Bobo’s creative use of pre-snap motion to manipulate coverage. Michigan’s J.J. McCarthy continues to thrive in structured environments, ranking top-five nationally in EPA per dropback from under center, while Oregon’s Dillon Gabriel remains deadly in rhythm throws off play-action, producing over 0.45 EPA/play on designed rollouts. On the other hand, quarterbacks like Washington’s Will Rogers and Clemson’s Cade Klubnik have struggled against disguised pressure looks, both seeing their efficiency dip by over 30% when blitzed, exposing protection vulnerabilities that opposing defenses will look to exploit this weekend.
Scheme usage is also telling a story across the Week 7 landscape. Offensive coordinators are leaning more on pre-snap motion — with Florida State and Penn State both using it on over 60% of plays — to create leverage and identify defensive tendencies, while physical teams like Utah and Michigan remain dominant from under-center formations that set up play-action and control tempo. In contrast, high-tempo spread systems like Tennessee and Arizona State are pushing motion usage lower but are compensating through pace, relying on quick reads and shallow concepts to neutralize pass rush. Situational play-calling could be the defining factor this week: Oregon’s balanced red-zone strategy (54% pass, 46% run) contrasts sharply with Alabama’s recent 70% pass rate inside the 20, which has led to inefficiency and missed scoring chances. As Week 7 unfolds, quarterback composure under fire, adaptability against blitz looks, and the ability to dictate matchups through motion and play design will determine not only which teams stay in the playoff chase — but which ones deliver betting value when the game’s most critical downs arrive.
Travel, Rest & Situational Spots
Week 7 of the 2025 college football season brings a loaded slate of situational challenges that could quietly decide outcomes just as much as talent or play-calling — and our AI models have flagged several key travel, rest, and psychological angles that could impact performance. Washington faces one of the toughest spots of the week, traveling cross-country for a noon kickoff against Penn State in what qualifies as a major body-clock disadvantage; historically, West Coast teams playing early in the Eastern time zone have seen a near 20% drop in scoring efficiency. Similarly, Florida State’s trip to NC State comes on a short week following an emotional win over Clemson, making it a prime let-down scenario against a rested Wolfpack defense that thrives at home in night games. Meanwhile, teams like Oregon and Utah face the opposite challenge — high-altitude, physical environments that test conditioning and depth late in games. For bettors, these subtle situational edges can provide value where the market underreacts.
The conference and rivalry dynamics in Week 7 also carry significant motivational weight. Georgia’s road trip to Texas A&M represents a classic look-ahead spot with a showdown against Alabama looming in Week 8, while Ole Miss could be caught napping ahead of its rivalry tilt with LSU. Out west, Colorado hosts Arizona State in a potential fatigue trap after two straight road games at elevation, and Michigan’s long flight to face Oregon marks its first major non-Midwestern road test of the season — a factor that could affect early tempo and communication. These aren’t just narrative edges; AI data shows teams facing back-to-back travel weeks or high-emotion wins see efficiency drop by an average of 0.14 EPA/play in the following contest. In short, Week 7’s betting landscape isn’t only about numbers on paper — it’s about recognizing who’s fresh, who’s flat, and who’s walking into the kind of situational gauntlet that often turns favorites into unexpected upsets.
Weather & Late-Breaking Injuries
Weather conditions are set to play a quiet but potentially decisive role in Week 7 of the 2025 college football season, with several games facing wind, rain, or temperature factors that could influence totals and deep-passing efficiency. Historically, sustained winds above 15 mph can lower explosive passing plays by nearly 25%, and this weekend’s forecasts show gusty conditions in Madison for Iowa vs. Wisconsin and potential rain showers in the Michigan–Oregon showdown in Eugene. Both matchups feature physical, run-heavy teams that could see even greater emphasis on ground attacks if conditions worsen. In the Midwest, light snow is possible in the Minnesota–Nebraska game, a factor that historically drives totals under by an average of 6.5 points due to reduced field visibility and lower completion rates on throws over 20 yards. Bettors should also keep an eye on crosswinds in the Big 12, where Oklahoma’s high-flying offense could be impacted in Stillwater if projected 18-mph gusts materialize.
On the personnel side, several key skill players and defenders remain questionable heading into the weekend, with potential snap reductions that could quietly alter game flow. Georgia wideout Dominic Lovett (ankle) and Michigan running back Donovan Edwards (shoulder) are both expected to be game-time decisions, while Florida State edge rusher Jared Verse (knee) could see limited reps after exiting last week’s win early. Texas A&M quarterback Conner Weigman is reportedly still managing a minor hand injury, which may affect deep-ball accuracy, and Penn State linebacker Abdul Carter is trending toward a reduced workload after missing practice time with a hamstring issue. These potential absences not only affect spreads but also pace and play-calling balance — particularly for teams that rely on vertical passing or heavy rotational defenses. With weather and health variables converging, Week 7’s totals market is especially volatile, giving sharp bettors and AI models a chance to find hidden value before kickoff.
Check up to the minute weather forecasts here.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
CFB Week 7 Best Bets & AI Prop Picks
Week 7 CFB Best Bet – Pro Tips
Note Price sensitivity: We crunch numbers, not teams. If the market moves beyond our
buy-to number, expected value decays and the edge can disappear. Respect the price.
Unit sizing (1–10): Our unit scale reflects model signal strength, injury/variance risk,
and current line availability. Higher units = stronger conviction, not permission to over-expose.
Staking & correlation: Default stake scales with edge and volatility. Avoid stacking too many
correlated outcomes (same game, same player ladder) unless you deliberately size down.
Closing-Line Value (CLV): Beating the close consistently is a quality signal—even across small samples.
Track your entry vs. close; it’s the most reliable feedback loop for long-term profitability.
Week 7 Line Movement
Every pick includes a playable to line or price (e.g., -2.5, Over 44.5, +115). If you can’t get that number or better, consider passing or reducing stake. Lines move—check back for live updates in our Live AI Picks stream and see quick notes in Odds & Line Movement.
Note – all of our data is for informational purposes only and not a recommendation as to whether or how to wager.
.@CoachDerekMason LIVE returns to The Boulevard tomorrow night at 6 PM to preview a #WeekdayCUSA matchup against Missouri State!#BoroBuiltMiddleMade pic.twitter.com/YuqKyRaE8i
— Middle Tennessee Football (@MT_FB) October 5, 2025
Line Movement Tracker — Week 7
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Aug 29, 2026 12:00PM EDT
NC State Wolfpack
Virginia Cavaliers
8/29/26 12PM
NCST
UVA
|
–
–
|
+146
-176
|
+3.5 (-105)
-3.5 (-115)
|
O 54.5 (-105)
U 54.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Aug 29, 2026 12:00PM EDT
North Carolina Tar Heels
TCU Horned Frogs
8/29/26 12PM
UNC
TCU
|
–
–
|
+210
-260
|
+6.5 (-102)
-6.5 (-120)
|
O 50.5 (-105)
U 50.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Clemson Tigers
LSU Tigers
9/5/26 12PM
CLEM
LSU
|
–
–
|
+365
-490
|
+11.5 (-110)
-11.5 (-110)
|
O 50.5 (-110)
U 50.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
UCLA Bruins
California Golden Bears
9/5/26 12PM
UCLA
CAL
|
–
–
|
+102
-122
|
+1.5 (-110)
-1.5 (-110)
|
O 53.5 (-110)
U 53.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Baylor Bears
Auburn Tigers
9/5/26 12PM
BAYLOR
AUBURN
|
–
–
|
+250
-315
|
+7.5 (-110)
-7.5 (-110)
|
O 58.5 (-110)
U 58.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Louisville Cardinals
Ole Miss Rebels
9/5/26 12PM
LVILLE
OLEMISS
|
–
–
|
+235
-295
|
+7.5 (-115)
-7.5 (-105)
|
O 52.5 (-115)
U 52.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 6, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Wisconsin Badgers
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
9/6/26 12PM
WISC
ND
|
–
–
|
+860
-1600
|
+18.5 (-110)
-18.5 (-110)
|
O 46.5 (-115)
U 46.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Ohio State Buckeyes
Texas Longhorns
9/12/26 12PM
OHIOST
TEXAS
|
–
–
|
+104
-125
|
+1.5 (-108)
-1.5 (-112)
|
O 47.5 (-115)
U 47.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Oklahoma Sooners
Michigan Wolverines
9/12/26 12PM
OKLA
MICH
|
–
–
|
+122
-146
|
+2.5 (-104)
-2.5 (-118)
|
O 45.5 (-110)
U 45.5 (-110)
|
How Our AI Picks Work
Our CFB model blends play-by-play efficiency, drive-level simulations, and market-aware priors. We incorporate injury reports, rest/travel effects, and weather to adjust team strength and total expectations. Each game is simulated thousands of times to produce fair prices; the displayed Model Edge % is the gap between our fair price and the current market.
Market-aware: incorporates liquidity windows and closing-line efficiency.
Context-adjusted: rest days, travel, altitude, tempo, and scheme tendencies.
Transparency: we show confidence, edges, and track CLV and ROI.
Remi, our AI sports wizard, has been pouring over tons of data from every angle across CFB week 7 using recursive machine learning to industry leading AI to examine the data to a single cover probability.
Interestingly enough, the data has been most keyed in on the trending weight human bettors often put on player performance factors between a visitors team going up against a possibly tired home teams. We’ve found the true game analytics appear to reflect a strong lean against one Vegas line in particular.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CFB AI picks for FREE now.
FAQ — Week 7 CFB AI Picks
Where can I see Week 7 CFB AI picks by bet type?
Right on this page. We publish Week 7 CFB computer picks organized by Against the Spread (ATS), Moneyline, Totals (Over/Under), and Player Props so you can jump straight to the markets you bet most.
What are the “best bets” for Week 7 according to the model?
“Best bets” are our highest-confidence Week 7 CFB AI picks based on fair price vs. current odds. Look for larger Model Edge % and higher confidence stars; those signal stronger value at widely available prices.
How are your Week 7 CFB computer picks generated?
We combine play-by-play data, drive-level simulations, and market-aware priors. The model produces a fair price for each side/total/prop, then compares it to live odds to surface Week 7 edges worth betting.
How often do you update Week 7 CFB AI picks?
Throughout the week and up to kickoff. As injuries, weather, and prices move, our projections refresh—so check back closer to game time for the most accurate read on Week 7 value.
Do your Week 7 picks include player props like anytime TD or yardage?
Yes. Our Week 7 CFB AI picks include props such as anytime touchdown, rushing/receiving yards, passing yards, attempts, and more when markets are liquid and pricing shows an edge.
Do you post same-game parlay (SGP) ideas for Week 7?
When correlations and prices justify it, we highlight SGP concepts tied to our Week 7 AI edges—think side/total anchored to complementary player props. We only list combos when expected value remains positive.
What do Model Edge % and units mean?
Model Edge % is the gap between our fair price and the current line/price. Units (1–10) summarize signal quality, volatility, and line availability for Week 7 CFB AI picks.
What are “buy-to” numbers, and what if the line moves?
“Buy-to” is the furthest playable number before expected value disappears. If the market pushes past that level, the Week 7 pick may no longer qualify—wait for a better price or skip the bet.
Do you track closing-line value (CLV) and ROI for Week 7?
Yes. We grade results against widely available prices at publish time and monitor CLV to gauge process quality. You’ll also find recent record and ROI to keep Week 7 performance transparent.
How should I size bets on Week 7 CFB AI picks?
Scale stake size with edge and volatility. Larger Model Edge % and higher confidence typically merit slightly larger positions, but avoid over-exposure to correlated outcomes within the same game.
Are teasers viable for Week 7?
Sometimes. Teasers can make sense around key numbers when totals and pricing conditions are favorable. If our Week 7 read flags teaser value, we’ll note the recommended legs and limits.
How do injuries, weather, and travel impact Week 7 CFB picks?
Materially. The model adjusts team strength, pace, and totals for late scratches, snap-count news, wind/rain/cold thresholds, altitude, rest, and travel. Those inputs can change edges close to kickoff.
Where can I compare Week 7 CFB odds to shop the best number?
Use your preferred odds screen or our odds links from this page. Shopping lines is essential—Model Edge % is calculated against available prices, and the best number often determines long-term ROI.
Can I get alerts when new Week 7 CFB AI picks post or when lines move to buy-to?
Yes. Enable notifications or subscribe for alerts so you catch new Week 7 AI picks, notable line moves, and updates to buy-to ranges before the market fully adjusts.
Past CFB AI Picks
|
CFB |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OLEMISS@GEORGIA | KEWAN LACY ANYTIME TD | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
| BAMA@IND | FERNANDO MENDOZA UNDER 26.5 PASS ATT | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@TXTECH | OREG -126 | 58.9% | 6 | WIN |
| NEB@UTAH | DEVON DAMPIER UNDER 185.5 PASS YDS | 53.4% | 3 | LOSS |
| NOTEX@SDGST | NOTEX -7 | 54.2% | 4 | LOSS |
| BAMA@OKLA | ISAIAH SATEGNA III ANYTIME TD | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| BYU@TTU | PARKER KINGSTON OVER 20.5 LONGEST RECEPTION | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| UNLV@BOISE | BOISE -4.5 | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
| ECU@FAU | FAU +7 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| OREG@WASH | WASH +7 | 54.9% | 4 | LOSS |
| WYO@HAWAII | WYO +7.5 | 55.1% | 5 | LOSS |
| COLO@KSTATE | COLO +17.5 | 54.0% | 4 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | MICH +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| VATECH@UVA | VATECH +8 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| NWEST@ILL | LUKE ALTMYER UNDER 19.5 PASS COMP | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| ORE@WAS | DEMOND WILLIAMS JR UNDER 43.5 RUSH YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| MIAMI@VATECH | VATECH +18.5 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| GAST@TROY | TROY -9.5 | 55.7% | 5 | WIN |
| DEL@WAKE | DEL +18 | 56.7% | 6 | LOSS |
| NMEX@AF | NMEX -3.5 | 56.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WASHST@JMAD | WASHST +14.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| ILL@WISC | WISC +9 | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WKY@LSU | WKY +23.5 | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| WASH@UCLA | DEMOND WILLIAMS UNDER 27.5 PASS ATT | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| TCU@HOU | AMARE THOMAS OVER 69.5 RECV YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| TEX@UGA | NATE FRAZIER UNDER 65.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 55.5% | 5 | WIN |
| PUR@WASH | ANTONIO HARRIS UNDER 73.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 54.1% | 4 | WIN |
| UVA@DUKE | DUKE -3.5 | 54.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| OKLA@BAMA | BAMA -6 | 54.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| OREGST@TULSA | OREGST -120 | 55.6% | 5 | LOSS |
| UTEP@MIZZST | MIZZST -5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| COLOST@NMEX | NMEX -14 | 57.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| PSU@MICHST | MICHST +7.5 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
| MISSST@MIZZOU | MISSST +7.5 | 57.2% | 7 | LOSS |
| FAU@TULANE | FAU +17.5 | 56.0% | 6 | WIN |
| NCST@MIAMI | NCST +15.5 | 57.1% | 7 | LOSS |
| KENTST@AKRON | AKRON -6.5 | 55.4% | 5 | LOSS |
| JAXST@UTEP | JAXST -105 | 57.0% | 7 | WIN |
| FSU@CLEM | CLEM -118 | 57.1% | 5 | WIN |
| UNLV@COLOST | UNLV -4 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@IOWA | IOWA +6.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |
| NEB@UCLA | NEB +1.5 | 55.8% | 5 | WIN |
| KENSAW@NMEXST | NMEXST +10 | 56.5% | 6 | WIN |
| STNFRD@UNC | STNFRD +7.5 | 53.8% | 3 | WIN |
| DUKE@UCONN | UCONN +8.5 | 57.9% | 7 | WIN |
| NEVADA@UTAHST | NEVADA +9.5 | 55.9% | 5 | LOSS |
| SAMST@OREGST | SAMST +21 | 57.7% | 7 | WIN |
| NEB@UCLA | NICO IAMALEAVA UNDER 180.5 PASS YDS | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| HOU@UCF | HOU -112 | 58.0% | 6 | WIN |
| KENTST@BALLST | BALLST -2.5 | 54.5% | 4 | WIN |
| WAKE@FSU | WAKE +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
