SMU vs Louisville Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CBB Lines & Props (Jan 31)
Updated: 2026-01-29T03:31:50.923562ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The SMU Mustangs (15‑5, 4‑3 ACC) visit the Louisville Cardinals (14‑6, 4‑4 ACC) on January 31, 2026 at the KFC Yum! Center in a key ACC battle with postseason implications and seeding consequences. Louisville is favored by about 8.5 points, but SMU’s high‑octane offense and recent strong road performances set up an intriguing clash between two of the conference’s better scoring teams.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Jan 31, 2026
Start Time: 3:00 PM EST
Venue: KFC Yum! Center
Cardinals Record: (14-6)
Mustangs Record: (9-4)
OPENING ODDS
SMU Moneyline: +353
LVILLE Moneyline: -469
SMU Spread: +9.5
LVILLE Spread: -9.5
Over/Under: 161.5
SMU
Betting Trends
- SMU holds a 9‑11‑0 ATS record this season, and as an underdog around +8.5 they’ve been 1‑1 ATS in similar spots, showing they can occasionally cover even when expected to trail by double digits.
LVILLE
Betting Trends
- Louisville’s ATS profile sits at 11‑9‑0, and as a favorite of 8.5 points or more they’ve covered the spread 8‑4, particularly at home where they’ve been more reliable in beating expectations.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- The projected total is around 161.5–163.5 points, reflecting the fact that both teams rank among the higher scoring offenses in the ACC with SMU averaging over 87 points per game and Louisville near 86, making the OVER/UNDER market especially compelling in this matchup.
SMU vs. LVILLE
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: B.J. Edwards over 1.5 Steals.
LIVE CBB ODDS
CBB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
470-392
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+878.5
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$87,853
VS. SPREAD
2037-1651
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+610.7
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$61,067
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
SMU vs Louisville Prediction & Odds:
Free CBB Betting Insights for 1/31/26
The January 31, 2026 matchup between the SMU Mustangs and Louisville Cardinals is one of the most intriguing ACC regular‑season games on the college basketball calendar, matching two offensively gifted squads with postseason ambitions. SMU enters at 15‑5 overall and 4‑3 in ACC play, coming off a solid 83‑80 win over Florida State where they showed poise late and clutch execution in a tight affair, cementing their reputation as a team that performs well in close games away from home. The Mustangs average 87.3 points per game, ranking among the nation’s top scoring units, and their balanced attack features senior guard Boopie Miller at about 19.4 points and 6.7 assists per contest, along with high‑volume scoring from Jaron Pierre Jr. and defensive disruption from B.J. Edwards. SMU’s offensive rhythm is powered by efficient perimeter shooting and transition opportunities, though their defense concedes roughly 77 points per game, which ranks lower defensively, making this an exciting, high‑tempo contest when two potent offenses collide. Louisville, at 14‑6 (4‑4 ACC), counters with its own offensive threats, averaging around 86 points per game while allowing about 70 points, and is anchored by precision scoring from Ryan Conwell (around 19.4 PPG) and contributions from key role players like Sananda Fru and Aly Khalifa.
The Cardinals also excel on the glass, averaging over 38 rebounds per game, giving them an edge in second‑chance points and possession control, a crucial factor against SMU’s scoring machine. Louisville’s home performance has been stronger than its road play, and under second‑year coach Pat Kelsey the Cardinals are fighting to rebound from a lopsided loss at Duke while solidifying their resume. This matchup also has historical context: Louisville leads the all‑time series and has prevailed in its recent meeting, and both teams know that a win here could be pivotal for ACC tournament positioning. With spreads near Louisville ‑8.5 and totals north of 161 points, this game projects to be fast‑paced with numerous scoring runs, and the outcome may hinge on which team can get stops at critical junctures late in the second half while converting efficiently in transition and in half‑court sets.
Get live CBB odds and precise AI CBB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
Boopie Ball ✌️ pic.twitter.com/Pryp5Umw6b
— SMU Basketball (@SMUBasketball) January 29, 2026
SMU Mustangs CBB Preview
The SMU Mustangs enter their January 31 ACC road test against Louisville as one of the more dynamic offensive teams in college basketball, riding a 15‑5 overall record (4‑3 ACC) and bringing a potent scoring profile into a challenging hostile environment. SMU averages about 87.3 points per game, ranking among the top scoring teams nationally, and its attack is led by senior guard Boopie Miller, who averages approximately 19.4 points and 6.7 assists per game, making him both a scoring threat and a playmaking fulcrum. Additional scoring support comes from Jaron Pierre Jr., who averages around 17.5 PPG, and B.J. Edwards, a defensive catalyst and steals leader whose ability to create turnovers fuels SMU’s transition scoring. SMU’s offense thrives on quick possessions, ball movement, and three‑point shooting, though their defense concedes roughly 77 points per game, a figure that ranks lower nationally and suggests that their success often requires outscoring opponents in high‑tempo games rather than suffocating them defensively. SMU’s rebound game is solid — averaging 34.8 boards per contest — and while they don’t dominate the glass as emphatically as Louisville, they use extra possessions to generate transition opportunities that fuel their offensive rhythm.
As an underdog with a 9‑11‑0 ATS record this season, SMU has shown resilience in covering the spread in select situations, particularly in road underdog spots where they’ve gone 3‑1 ATS when facing quality competition, indicating they can keep games within striking distance even when expectations tilt against them. Coming off impressive road victories at Wake Forest and Florida State, SMU has demonstrated it can win in hostile environments and thrive late in close games thanks to experienced backcourt play and clutch free‑throw shooting. To compete against Louisville, SMU will need to maintain offensive efficiency while tightening defensive rotations and rebounding, especially on the road where tempo control and minimizing turnovers are key. If Miller and Pierre can impose their scoring will and SMU can limit Louisville’s second‑chance points, the Mustangs have every opportunity to keep this game competitive deep into the second half — and possibly pull off a road upset or valuable ATS cover.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Louisville Cardinals CBB Preview
The Louisville Cardinals approach their January 31 ACC battle with the SMU Mustangs as a team looking to bounce back from a heavy loss and reassert itself among the upper half of the league standings. Louisville, at 14‑6 overall and 4‑4 in ACC play, has shown it can be both efficient offensively and steady on defense when executing its game plan, averaging around 86 points per game while holding opponents to roughly 70, giving them a positive scoring differential that mirrors their competitive win‑loss record. Leading the Cardinals offensively is Ryan Conwell, a 19.4 PPG scorer who serves as the engine of Louisville’s attack, capable of generating points from multiple levels — inside, mid‑range and beyond the arc — and drawing defensive attention that creates opportunities for teammates. Louisville also boasts strong rebounding fundamentals, averaging 38.1 rebounds per game, which ranks among the better totals nationally and helps them control possessions and limit second‑chance opportunities for opponents — a key advantage against a high‑scoring SMU offense. Sananda Fru’s rebounding and defensive presence, along with Aly Khalifa’s assist distribution, gives Louisville balanced contributions beyond its top scorer and helps the Cardinals maintain offensive fluidity, particularly at home in the KFC Yum! Center where they’re more comfortable and consistent.
Louisville’s ATS performance (11‑9‑0) reflects relative consistency in covering at home, especially as significant favorites like ‑8.5 in this matchup, and underscores their capacity to outperform expectations when controlling tempo. However, recent struggles — including a decisive defeat at the hands of Duke where Louisville shot under 30 % and was dominated on the boards — highlight defensive lapses that must be corrected if they want to contain a potent SMU scoring attack. Coach Kelsey’s team must improve defensive rotations, limit fouls, and secure rebounds early to set up transition defense — particularly against SMU’s guards — while taking advantage of home court to dictate pace. Successfully balancing offensive aggression with disciplined defense will be critical for Louisville both in this contest and as they seek deeper postseason positioning in the ACC.
Vintage Vibes#GoCards pic.twitter.com/eVwk3hotmV
— Louisville Men's Basketball (@LouisvilleMBB) January 30, 2026
SMU vs Louisville Prop Picks (AI)
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through loads of datapoints on each line. In fact, anytime the Mustangs and Cardinals play there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at KFC Yum! Center in Jan seemingly never follow normal, predictable patterns.
SMU vs Louisville Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports wizard, has been pouring over tons of data from every facet between the Mustangs and Cardinals and using recursive machine learning and industry leading AI to crunch the data to a single cover probability.
The Algorithm has been most focused on the unproportionally assigned emphasis human bettors regularly put on Louisville’s strength factors between a Mustangs team going up against a possibly strong Cardinals team. It appears the true game analytics might reflect a slight lean against one Vegas line in particular.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CBB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI SMU vs Louisville picks, computer picks Mustangs vs Cardinals, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBB | 3/12 | XAVIER@UCONN | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 3/12 | MTSU@LATECH | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 1 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/12 | LOYCHI@DAVID | GET FREE PICK NOW | 2 | – | |
| CBB | 3/12 | TCU@KANSAS | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/12 | LOYCHI@DAVID | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/12 | SCARST@NORFLK | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/12 | OLEMISS@GEORGIA | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CBB schedule.
SMU Betting Trends
SMU holds a 9‑11‑0 ATS record this season, and as an underdog around +8.5 they’ve been 1‑1 ATS in similar spots, showing they can occasionally cover even when expected to trail by double digits.
Louisville Betting Trends
Louisville’s ATS profile sits at 11‑9‑0, and as a favorite of 8.5 points or more they’ve covered the spread 8‑4, particularly at home where they’ve been more reliable in beating expectations.
Mustangs vs. Cardinals Matchup Trends
The projected total is around 161.5–163.5 points, reflecting the fact that both teams rank among the higher scoring offenses in the ACC with SMU averaging over 87 points per game and Louisville near 86, making the OVER/UNDER market especially compelling in this matchup.
SMU vs. Louisville Game Info
SMU vs Louisville starts on January 31, 2026 at 3:00 PM EST.
Venue: KFC Yum! Center.
Spread: Louisville -9.5
Moneyline: SMU +353, Louisville -469
Over/Under: 161.5
SMU: (9-4) | Louisville: (14-6)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: B.J. Edwards over 1.5 Steals.. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
The projected total is around 161.5–163.5 points, reflecting the fact that both teams rank among the higher scoring offenses in the ACC with SMU averaging over 87 points per game and Louisville near 86, making the OVER/UNDER market especially compelling in this matchup.
SMU trend: SMU holds a 9‑11‑0 ATS record this season, and as an underdog around +8.5 they’ve been 1‑1 ATS in similar spots, showing they can occasionally cover even when expected to trail by double digits.
LVILLE trend: Louisville’s ATS profile sits at 11‑9‑0, and as a favorite of 8.5 points or more they’ve covered the spread 8‑4, particularly at home where they’ve been more reliable in beating expectations.
See our latest CBB picks and odds pages for 2026 to compare prices before you bet.
SMU vs. Louisville Odds
Remi is pouring through tons of data on each player. In fact, anytime the SMU vs Louisville trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme travel distance seemingly never follow normal, predictable betting trends.
| SMU Moneyline | +353 |
|---|---|
| LVILLE Moneyline | -469 |
| SMU Spread | +9.5 |
| LVILLE Spread | -9.5 |
| Over / Under | 161.5 |
SMU vs Louisville Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
In Progress
BYU Cougars
Houston Cougars
In Progress
BYU
HOU
|
12
13
|
+350
-560
|
+9.5 (-129)
-9.5 (-112)
|
O 143.5 (-121)
U 143.5 (-118)
|
|
|
In Progress
Florida State Seminoles
Duke Blue Devils
In Progress
FSU
DUKE
|
17
15
|
-1250
|
-12.5 (-127)
|
O 153.5 (-121)
U 153.5 (-118)
|
|
|
In Progress
Nevada Wolf Pack
Grand Canyon Antelopes
In Progress
NEVADA
GCU
|
42
42
|
+135
-195
|
+2.5 (-112)
-2.5 (-130)
|
O 146.5 (-122)
U 146.5 (-120)
|
|
|
In Progress
South Carolina State Bulldogs
Norfolk State Spartans
In Progress
SCST
NORFLK
|
50
41
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 148.5 (-125)
U 148.5 (-117)
|
|
|
In Progress
MTSU Blue Raiders
Louisiana Tech Bulldogs
In Progress
MTSU
LATECH
|
25
39
|
-1000
|
-9.5 (-112)
|
O 135.5 (-115)
U 135.5 (-124)
|
|
|
In Progress
Northwestern Wildcats
Purdue Boilermakers
In Progress
NWEST
PURDUE
|
21
45
|
+575
-1000
|
+26.5 (-115)
-26.5 (-124)
|
O 141.5 (-120)
U 141.5 (-120)
|
|
|
In Progress
Ohio Bobcats
Kent State Golden Flashes
In Progress
OHIO
KENT
|
26
28
|
+135
-200
|
+3.5 (-122)
-3.5 (-120)
|
O 160.5 (-122)
U 160.5 (-120)
|
|
|
In Progress
Tulane Green Wave
Charlotte 49ers
In Progress
TULANE
CHARLO
|
14
11
|
-155
+112
|
-2.5 (-115)
+2.5 (-124)
|
O 136.5 (-124)
U 136.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
Ole Miss Rebels
Georgia Bulldogs
In Progress
OLEMISS
UGA
|
14
8
|
+130
-177
|
+3.5 (-120)
-3.5 (-120)
|
O 150.5 (-120)
U 150.5 (-120)
|
|
|
In Progress
Xavier Musketeers
UConn Huskies
In Progress
XAVIER
UCONN
|
10
22
|
+1400
-5000
|
+22.5 (-117)
-22.5 (-122)
|
O 155.5 (-118)
U 155.5 (-121)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 7:43PM EDT
Loyola Chicago Ramblers
Davidson Wildcats
3/12/26 7:43PM
LOYCHI
DAVID
|
–
–
|
-265
|
-5.5 (-112)
|
O 132.5 (-112)
U 132.5 (-112)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 8:30PM EDT
Arkansas Pine Bluff Golden Lions
Southern Jaguars
3/12/26 8:30PM
ARKPB
STHRN
|
–
–
|
-220
|
-5.5 (-107)
|
O 151.5 (-115)
U 151.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 8:30PM EDT
Maryland Eastern Shore Hawks
North Carolina Central Eagles
3/12/26 8:30PM
UMES
NCCENT
|
–
–
|
+100
|
+1.5 (-114)
|
O 132.5 (-115)
U 132.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 9:00PM EDT
Southern Utah Thunderbirds
UT Arlington Mavericks
3/12/26 9PM
SUTAH
UTARL
|
–
–
|
+180
|
+5.5 (-115)
|
O 141.5 (-114)
U 141.5 (-109)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 9:00PM EDT
Kennesaw State Owls
Western Kentucky Hilltoppers
3/12/26 9PM
KENSAW
WKY
|
–
–
|
-130
|
-1.5 (-117)
|
O 159.5 (-109)
U 159.5 (-114)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 9:00PM EDT
Rutgers Scarlet Knights
UCLA Bruins
3/12/26 9PM
RUT
UCLA
|
–
–
|
+380
-560
|
+10.5 (-117)
-10.5 (-107)
|
O 141.5 (-114)
U 141.5 (-109)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 9:00PM EDT
UC San Diego Tritons
CSU Northridge Matadors
3/12/26 9PM
UCSD
CSUN
|
–
–
|
-130
+100
|
-1.5 (-110)
+1.5 (-113)
|
O 154.5 (-109)
U 154.5 (-114)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 9:00PM EDT
Colorado State Rams
San Diego State Aztecs
3/12/26 9PM
COLOST
SDGST
|
–
–
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 142.5 (-113)
U 142.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 9:30PM EDT
Florida Atlantic Owls
North Texas Mean Green
3/12/26 9:30PM
FAU
NOTEX
|
–
–
|
-105
-120
|
pk
pk
|
O 136.5 (-115)
U 136.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 9:30PM EDT
TCU Horned Frogs
Kansas Jayhawks
3/12/26 9:30PM
TCU
KANSAS
|
–
–
|
+170
-215
|
+4.5 (-105)
-4.5 (-120)
|
O 146.5 (-113)
U 146.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 9:30PM EDT
Georgetown Hoyas
Villanova Wildcats
3/12/26 9:30PM
GTOWN
NOVA
|
–
–
|
+230
-305
|
+6.5 (-108)
-6.5 (-115)
|
O 140.5 (-114)
U 140.5 (-109)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 9:30PM EDT
Clemson Tigers
North Carolina Tar Heels
3/12/26 9:30PM
CLEM
UNC
|
–
–
|
-121
-104
|
-1.5 (-106)
+1.5 (-118)
|
O 140.5 (-112)
U 140.5 (-112)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 9:30PM EDT
Oklahoma Sooners
Texas A&M Aggies
3/12/26 9:30PM
OKLA
TEXAM
|
–
–
|
+102
-130
|
+1.5 (-110)
-1.5 (-113)
|
O 162.5 (-109)
U 162.5 (-114)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 11:30PM EDT
UC Davis Aggies
CSU Fullerton Titans
3/12/26 11:30PM
UCDAV
CSFULL
|
–
–
|
-106
-118
|
pk
pk
|
O 155.5 (-108)
U 155.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 11:30PM EDT
Abilene Christian Wildcats
Utah Tech Trailblazers
3/12/26 11:30PM
ABIL
UTTECH
|
–
–
|
+100
-130
|
+1.5 (-109)
-1.5 (-114)
|
O 142.5 (-107)
U 142.5 (-117)
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2026 11:30PM EDT
San Jose State Spartans
New Mexico Lobos
3/12/26 11:30PM
SJST
NMEX
|
–
–
|
-1430
|
-15.5 (-112)
|
O 155.5 (-109)
U 155.5 (-114)
|
|
|
Mar 13, 2026 11:30AM EDT
GW Revolutionaries
Saint Louis Billikens
3/13/26 11:30AM
GWASH
STLOU
|
–
–
|
+200
-265
|
+6.5 (-114)
-6.5 (-109)
|
O 161.5 (-109)
U 161.5 (-114)
|
|
|
Mar 13, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Ohio State Buckeyes
Michigan Wolverines
3/13/26 12PM
OHIOST
MICH
|
–
–
|
+540
-910
|
+13.5 (-117)
-13.5 (-107)
|
O 153.5 (-110)
U 153.5 (-113)
|
|
|
Mar 13, 2026 1:00PM EDT
Kentucky Wildcats
Florida Gators
3/13/26 1PM
UK
FLA
|
–
–
|
+390
-625
|
+10.5 (-107)
-10.5 (-117)
|
O 160.5 (-109)
U 160.5 (-114)
|
|
|
Mar 13, 2026 2:00PM EDT
St. Bonaventure Bonnies
Dayton Flyers
3/13/26 2PM
STBON
DAYTON
|
–
–
|
+230
-295
|
+6.5 (-105)
-6.5 (-115)
|
O 140.5 (-105)
U 140.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Mar 13, 2026 2:00PM EDT
Prairie View A&M Panthers
Alabama A&M Bulldogs
3/13/26 2PM
PVAM
ALA&M
|
–
–
|
+100
|
+1.5 (-118)
|
O 142.5 (-115)
U 142.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Mar 13, 2026 2:30PM EDT
Wisconsin Badgers
Illinois Fighting Illini
3/13/26 2:30PM
WISC
ILL
|
–
–
|
+310
-395
|
+8.5 (-115)
-8.5 (-105)
|
O 155 (-110)
U 155 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 13, 2026 3:30PM EDT
Tennessee Volunteers
Vanderbilt Commodores
3/13/26 3:30PM
TENN
VANDY
|
–
–
|
-113
-110
|
pk
pk
|
O 147.5 (-114)
U 147.5 (-109)
|
|
|
Mar 13, 2026 5:00PM EDT
Umass Minutemen
Toledo Rockets
3/13/26 5PM
UMASS
TOLEDO
|
–
–
|
-152
|
-3 (-115)
|
O 158.5 (-110)
U 158.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 13, 2026 5:00PM EDT
Duquesne Dukes
VCU Rams
3/13/26 5PM
DUQ
VCU
|
–
–
|
+425
-575
|
+9.5 (-110)
-9.5 (-110)
|
O 151.5 (-110)
U 151.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 13, 2026 5:30PM EDT
Seton Hall Pirates
St. John's Red Storm
3/13/26 5:30PM
SETON
STJOHN
|
–
–
|
+260
-325
|
+7.5 (-110)
-7.5 (-110)
|
O 131.5 (-115)
U 131.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Mar 13, 2026 7:00PM EDT
Miami Hurricanes
Virginia Cavaliers
3/13/26 7PM
MIAMI
UVA
|
–
–
|
+154
-185
|
+4.5 (-105)
-4.5 (-115)
|
O 143.5 (-112)
U 143.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 13, 2026 7:00PM EDT
Iowa State Cyclones
Arizona Wildcats
3/13/26 7PM
IOWAST
ARIZ
|
–
–
|
+170
-205
|
+4.5 (-115)
-4.5 (-105)
|
O 142.5 (-110)
U 142.5 (-110)
|
CBB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers SMU Mustangs vs. Louisville Cardinals on January 31, 2026 at KFC Yum! Center.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CBB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
|
|
|
|
RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NKY@WISCGB | NKY -2.5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| NIOWA@UIC | NIOWA -3.5 | 54.5% | 4 | WIN |
| ARK@MIZZOU | ARK +130 | 45.7% | 1 | WIN |
| SMU@FSU | SMU +110 | 46.9% | 1 | LOSS |
| LVILLE@MIAMI | LVILLE +114 | 49.2% | 1 | WIN |
| TXTECH@BYU | BYU -125 | 55.6% | 3 | WIN |
| UNC@DUKE | UNDER 147.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |
| VANDY@TENN | TENN -3.5 | 53.3% | 3 | LOSS |
| NDAK@STTOM-MN | NDAK +12.5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| GWASH@LOYCHI | LOYCHI +10.5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| ALBANY@UMASSLO | UMASSLO -2.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| PORT@SANFRAN | PORT +7.5 | 53.6% | 3 | LOSS |
| UNC@DUKE | DUKE -17 | 57.3% | 7 | LOSS |
| NIOWA@BRAD | NIOWA -4.5 | 56.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| QUEENS@PEAY | QUEENS +1.5 | 56.5% | 6 | WIN |
| CLMBIA@HARV | CLMBIA +4.5 | 53.3% | 3 | LOSS |
| LONGWD@NCASH | LONGWD -1 | 53.2% | 3 | LOSS |
| VMI@NCGRN | NCGRN -7.5 | 52.7% | 2 | WIN |
| LATECH@LIB | LATECH +9.5 | 54.1% | 4 | WIN |
| MVSU@JACKST | MVSU +10.5 | 56.1% | 6 | WIN |
| STETSON@EKTY | EKTY -4 | 55.7% | 5 | LOSS |
| DUQ@RI | RI -2 | 53.7% | 2 | WIN |
| OREG@ILL | ILL -18 | 53.8% | 3 | WIN |
| BRYANT@NH | BRYANT +1 | 57.3% | 7 | LOSS |
| MISSST@FLA | FLA -21.5 | 53.9% | 3 | WIN |
| LAMAR@HOUBP | LAMAR -114 | 55.1% | 4 | LOSS |
| IOWAST@ARIZ | ARIZ -7 | 53.1% | 1 | WIN |
| RIDER@SIENA | SIENA -15.5 | 53.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| CHARLO@FAU | CHARLO +7.5 | 58.6% | 8 | WIN |
| NOTEX@UAB | UAB -5.5 | 54.8% | 3 | LOSS |
| NIOWA@DRAKE | NIOWA -4 | 54.8% | 4 | WIN |
| SCARST@MDESHORE | SCARST +7.5 | 56.2% | 6 | WIN |
| YALE@CLMBIA | YALE -5.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| SFAUSTIN@HOUBP | SFAUSTIN -8 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| TXTECH@IOWAST | TXTECH +10.5 | 52.3% | 2 | WIN |
| PITT@CAL | PITT +8.5 | 57.3% | 7 | WIN |
| KANSAS@ARIZ | ARIZ -9.5 | 53.6% | 3 | WIN |
| EILL@SIUE | EILL +5.5 | 55.7% | 5 | LOSS |
| UVA@DUKE | DUKE -10 | 53.9% | 3 | WIN |
| BUCK@LEHIGH | BUCK +5.5 | 54.6% | 4 | LOSS |
| IOWA@PSU | IOWA -9.5 | 54.5% | 4 | LOSS |
| ARK@FLA | FLA -10.5 | 54.0% | 3 | WIN |
| CALPOLY@UCSD | CALPOLY +6.5 | 56.2% | 6 | LOSS |
| NAU@EWASH | NAU +9.5 | 57.3% | 7 | LOSS |
| VANDY@UK | UK -0.5 | 53.9% | 3 | WIN |
| DEL@KENSAW | DEL +11.5 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| BAMA@TENN | AMARI ALLEN UNDER 6.5 REB | 54.8% | 4 | WIN |
| GONZAG@MARYCA | PAULIUS MURAUSKAS UNDER 23.5 PTS + REB | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| QUINN@NIAGARA | NIAGARA +9 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| MICH@ILL | ILL +1 | 57.7% | 7 | LOSS |
| BROWN@CLMBIA | BROWN +4.5 | 55.3% | 5 | LOSS |