Wolverines vs. Aggies
Prediction, Odds & Props
Mar 22 | CBB AI Picks
Updated: 2025-03-20T03:31:50.923562ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
On March 22, 2025, the Michigan Wolverines (26-9) will face the Texas A&M Aggies (23-10) in the second round of the NCAA Tournament at Ball Arena in Denver, Colorado, with a spot in the Sweet 16 at stake.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.

GAME INFO
Date: Mar 22, 2025
Start Time: 5:15 PM EST
Venue: Ball Arena
Aggies Record: (23-10)
Wolverines Record: (26-9)
OPENING ODDS
MICH Moneyline: +124
TEXAM Moneyline: -150
MICH Spread: +2.5
TEXAM Spread: -2.5
Over/Under: 141.5
MICH
Betting Trends
- Michigan holds a 17-18 record against the spread (ATS) this season.
TEXAM
Betting Trends
- Texas A&M has a 16-13-3 ATS record this season.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- Texas A&M has opened as a 2.5-point favorite over Michigan, with the over/under set at 140.5 points.
MICH vs. TEXAM
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: Z. Phelps over 15 PTS+REB
LIVE CBB ODDS
CBB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
310-223
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+416.9
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$41,686
VS. SPREAD
1559-1329
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+395.7
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$39,572
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account

Remi Finds New Picks

Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Michigan vs Texas A&M Prediction & Odds:
Free CBB Betting Insights for 3/22/25
A key factor in this matchup will be Michigan’s ability to handle Texas A&M’s defensive pressure, especially considering the Wolverines’ tendency to commit turnovers, averaging 14.1 per game, one of the highest rates among tournament teams. Conversely, Texas A&M excels at forcing turnovers, creating 13.39 per game, which could disrupt Michigan’s offensive rhythm. Additionally, the Aggies’ prowess in offensive rebounding, leading the nation with 16.0 per game, could pose significant challenges for Michigan’s frontcourt. The Wolverines’ recent heavy schedule, playing five games in nine days, may also impact their performance against a well-rested Texas A&M team. Betting lines favor Texas A&M by 2.5 points, reflecting expectations of a closely contested game. The outcome may hinge on which team can assert its style of play—Michigan’s efficient offense or Texas A&M’s disruptive defense. Fans can anticipate a hard-fought battle with both teams striving to secure their place in the Sweet 16.
🔢 Numbers from the win
— Michigan Men's Basketball (@umichbball) March 21, 2025
Round 2 🔜 pic.twitter.com/qAH0n0yjOW
Michigan Wolverines CBB Preview
The Michigan Wolverines enter their second-round NCAA Tournament clash with Texas A&M carrying a 26-9 record and the momentum of a narrow but hard-earned first-round victory over UC-San Diego, as head coach Dusty May looks to continue Michigan’s strong postseason run after leading the team to a Big Ten Tournament title that helped solidify their seeding in the field of 64, despite some midseason inconsistency and injury-related setbacks that tested the depth and cohesion of the roster throughout the year. Michigan has relied on a balanced offensive approach that sees four players averaging double figures, led by standout guard Dug McDaniel, whose explosiveness, playmaking, and shot creation have made him one of the most impactful backcourt players in the conference, regularly drawing double teams and setting the tone with his ability to get downhill or pull up from deep. Alongside McDaniel, transfer forward Olivier Nkamhoua has brought both scoring punch and veteran leadership, averaging 13.2 points and 6.5 rebounds per game while serving as a reliable presence in the mid-post and a secondary rim protector on the defensive end. Freshman sensation Caleb Williams has been a revelation in recent weeks, with his long-range shooting and perimeter defense proving critical in several of Michigan’s late-season victories, while big man Tarris Reed Jr. provides a bruising interior option who can finish around the rim and crash the boards, particularly on the offensive glass where Michigan has improved significantly down the stretch. While the Wolverines average 78.0 points per game and shoot a solid 46.9% from the field, turnovers have been a persistent issue—averaging 14.1 per contest, which ranks among the highest in the tournament field—and will be a key concern against a Texas A&M squad known for applying ball pressure and forcing mistakes that translate directly into transition opportunities.
Michigan’s defense has shown flashes of elite potential, particularly when they can set their half-court schemes and force teams into contested jumpers, but the lack of consistency in rotating and defending second-chance opportunities remains a vulnerability that could be exploited by the Aggies, who lead the country in offensive rebounds per game. In preparation for this matchup, Michigan must emphasize controlling the tempo, protecting the ball, and keeping Texas A&M off the offensive glass—three factors that will determine their ability to stay competitive and potentially pull off the upset. While the Wolverines are just 17-18 against the spread (ATS), their recent performance in the Big Ten Tournament and strong showing in close games indicate a team peaking at the right time. Coach May has been praised for his in-game adjustments and player development, and his ability to deploy strategic defensive looks, including 2-3 zone and matchup switching, has frustrated opponents unfamiliar with Michigan’s varied schemes. The Wolverines’ path to victory likely hinges on a standout performance from McDaniel, timely shooting from Williams and Terrance Williams II, and a collective commitment to team rebounding and ball movement. Playing at altitude in Denver could also test the endurance of both teams, but Michigan’s recent schedule, which included five games in nine days, has provided a crucible of conditioning and grit that may serve them well in high-pressure tournament play. If they can weather Texas A&M’s early intensity, take care of the ball, and control the boards, the Wolverines have both the talent and toughness to punch their ticket to the Sweet 16 and extend what has already been an impressive March campaign.

Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Texas A&M Aggies CBB Preview
The Texas A&M Aggies enter their NCAA Tournament second-round matchup against the Michigan Wolverines with a 23-10 record, reflecting a season characterized by defensive tenacity and dominance on the boards. Under the guidance of head coach Buzz Williams, the Aggies have developed a reputation for their relentless defensive pressure, limiting opponents to an average of 68.0 points per game. A cornerstone of their defense is their ability to force turnovers, averaging 13.39 per game, which ranks them among the nation’s elite in this category. This aggressive defensive approach often leads to easy transition points, allowing the Aggies to capitalize on opponents’ mistakes. Offensively, Texas A&M is not the most prolific scoring team, averaging 74.5 points per game, but they compensate with efficiency and strategic shot selection. A significant aspect of their offensive strategy is their dominance in offensive rebounding, where they lead the nation with an average of 16.0 per game. This strength enables them to extend possessions and create additional scoring opportunities, often demoralizing opposing defenses. The Aggies’ roster is built around versatility and depth, with players capable of contributing in multiple facets of the game. Senior guard Manny Obaseki exemplifies this versatility, providing leadership, defensive prowess, and timely scoring. His ability to read passing lanes and disrupt the opposing team’s offense has been instrumental in the Aggies’ success this season. In the frontcourt, players like Julius Marble and Henry Coleman III have been pivotal, using their physicality to control the paint and secure rebounds.
Their presence not only deters opponents from attacking the rim but also ignites fast-break opportunities following defensive stops. The Aggies’ commitment to a team-oriented approach is evident in their assist numbers, with multiple players capable of facilitating the offense. This unselfish play has fostered a balanced scoring attack, making it challenging for defenses to focus on a single player. As they prepare to face Michigan, the Aggies’ strategy will likely focus on exploiting the Wolverines’ propensity for turnovers. By applying consistent defensive pressure, Texas A&M aims to disrupt Michigan’s offensive flow and create scoring opportunities off turnovers. Additionally, their emphasis on offensive rebounding will be crucial in this matchup, as securing extra possessions could tilt the game in their favor. The Aggies’ depth allows them to maintain high energy levels throughout the game, a factor that could be decisive against a Michigan team that has endured a grueling recent schedule. The altitude of Denver may also play a role, and Texas A&M’s ability to rotate players effectively could mitigate fatigue. In summary, the Aggies’ identity is rooted in defensive excellence, rebounding dominance, and a cohesive team dynamic. These attributes have propelled them to a successful season and position them well for a deep tournament run. Their upcoming game against Michigan will test their ability to impose their will and execute their game plan under the heightened pressure of March Madness.
4️⃣ threw the lob, 2️⃣1️⃣ threw it down!#GigEm pic.twitter.com/s8NqiZYqip
— Texas A&M Basketball (@aggiembk) March 21, 2025
Michigan vs. Texas A&M Prop Picks (AI)
Michigan vs. Texas A&M Prediction (AI)

Remi, our AI sports algorithm, has been pouring over millions of data from every past game between the Wolverines and Aggies and using recursive machine learning and industry leading AI to boil down the data to a single cover probability.
Interestingly enough, the data has been most keyed in on the linear correlation of factor emotional bettors regularly put on Michigan’s strength factors between a Wolverines team going up against a possibly strong Aggies team. We’ve found the true game analytics appear to reflect a slight lean against one Vegas line in particular.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CBB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI Michigan vs Texas A&M picks, computer picks Wolverines vs Aggies, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
![]() |
DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW |
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, weather, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CBB schedule.
Wolverines Betting Trends
Michigan holds a 17-18 record against the spread (ATS) this season.
Aggies Betting Trends
Texas A&M has a 16-13-3 ATS record this season.
Wolverines vs. Aggies Matchup Trends
Texas A&M has opened as a 2.5-point favorite over Michigan, with the over/under set at 140.5 points.
Michigan vs. Texas A&M Game Info
What time does Michigan vs Texas A&M start on March 22, 2025?
Michigan vs Texas A&M starts on March 22, 2025 at 5:15 PM EST.
Where is Michigan vs Texas A&M being played?
Venue: Ball Arena.
What are the opening odds for Michigan vs Texas A&M?
Spread: Texas A&M -2.5
Moneyline: Michigan +124, Texas A&M -150
Over/Under: 141.5
What are the records for Michigan vs Texas A&M?
Michigan: (26-9) | Texas A&M: (23-10)
What is the AI best bet for Michigan vs Texas A&M?
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: Z. Phelps over 15 PTS+REB. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
What are Michigan vs Texas A&M trending bets?
Texas A&M has opened as a 2.5-point favorite over Michigan, with the over/under set at 140.5 points.
What are Michigan trending bets?
MICH trend: Michigan holds a 17-18 record against the spread (ATS) this season.
What are Texas A&M trending bets?
TEXAM trend: Texas A&M has a 16-13-3 ATS record this season.
Where can I find AI Picks for Michigan vs Texas A&M?
See our latest CBB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
Michigan vs. Texas A&M Odds
Remi is pouring through tons of data on each line. In fact, anytime the Michigan vs Texas A&M trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing angles to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme altitude rarely follow normal, predictable patterns.
Michigan vs Texas A&M Opening Odds
MICH Moneyline:
+124 TEXAM Moneyline: -150
MICH Spread: +2.5
TEXAM Spread: -2.5
Over/Under: 141.5
Michigan vs Texas A&M Live Odds
Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U |
---|
CBB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers Michigan Wolverines vs. Texas A&M Aggies on March 22, 2025 at Ball Arena.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CBB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
![]() |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
---|---|---|---|---|
DRAKE@MIZZOU | DRAKE +6.5 | 53.50% | 2 | WIN |
XAVIER@TEXAS | XAVIER -2.5 | 53.40% | 2 | WIN |
UAB@MEMP | MEMP -3.5 | 54.00% | 2 | WIN |
LVILLE@DUKE | LVILLE +6.5 | 53.10% | 2 | LOSS |
ECU@UAB | UAB -5 | 53.60% | 2 | WIN |
PURDUE@MICH | MICH +3 | 54.60% | 3 | WIN |
CLEM@LVILLE | CLEM -120 | 56.10% | 3 | LOSS |
COL@HOU | ANDREJ JAKIMOVSKI PTS + REB + AST - UNDER 15.5 | 53.70% | 2 | LOSS |
FORD@GWASH | FORD +7 | 53.80% | 2 | WIN |
SEATTLE@ABIL | ABIL +6 | 54.50% | 3 | WIN |
BAMAST@TEXSOU | BAMAST -110 | 55.40% | 4 | WIN |
OHIO@TOLEDO | TOLEDO +3 | 56.70% | 4 | WIN |
UVA@GATECH | GATECH +1.5 | 53.70% | 2 | WIN |
COLO@WVU | COLO +7.5 | 53.20% | 2 | WIN |
USC@RUT | USC -115 | 54.00% | 2 | WIN |
TEXAS@VANDY | VANDY -130 | 56.50% | 3 | LOSS |
BUTLER@PROV | BUTLER -115 | 55.20% | 3 | WIN |
IDAHO@MONTANA | MONTANA -6 | 53.50% | 2 | WIN |
TROY@JMAD | TROY -125 | 55.60% | 2 | WIN |
BELMONT@DRAKE | DRAKE -7.5 | 53.50% | 2 | LOSS |
UCSD@UCDAV | UCSD -12.5 | 53.40% | 2 | LOSS |
SIUE@SEMO | SEMO -2.5 | 54.80% | 3 | LOSS |
ALCORN@ARKPB | ARKPB +6.5 | 56.00% | 4 | WIN |
NORFLK@HOWARD | HOWARD +5.5 | 53.70% | 2 | LOSS |
NKY@CLEVST | NKY +4.5 | 54.40% | 3 | LOSS |
STNFRD@ND | STNFRD -125 | 56.40% | 3 | LOSS |
TENN@OLEMISS | OLEMISS +2.5 | 54.30% | 3 | WIN |
LSALLE@GMASON | GMASON -12 | 54.30% | 3 | LOSS |
PITT@NCST | NCST +2.5 | 56.70% | 4 | WIN |
IND@OREG | OREG -6.5 | 53.60% | 2 | WIN |
FSU@UVA | UVA -4 | 54.40% | 3 | LOSS |
ARK@VANDY | ARK +7.5 | 54.40% | 3 | WIN |
SDGST@UNLV | UNLV +2.5 | 54.10% | 3 | WIN |
EKTY@JVILLE | JVILLE -135 | 58.90% | 3 | WIN |
MANHAT@NIAGARA | MANHAT -115 | 54.70% | 3 | WIN |
MEMP@UAB | MEMP -115 | 54.90% | 3 | WIN |
ILL@MICH | MICH -2.5 | 56.00% | 4 | LOSS |
OKLA@OLEMISS | OKLA +7.5 | 54.50% | 3 | WIN |
ARIZST@UTAH | ARIZST +8.5 | 54.60% | 3 | LOSS |
GC@SEATTLE | GC -110 | 55.00% | 3 | WIN |
PENN@CLMBIA | CLMBIA -122 | 57.50% | 4 | LOSS |
IONA@NIAGARA | NIAGARA +1.5 | 54.30% | 3 | LOSS |
MARIST@SACHRT | SACHRT -120 | 55.40% | 3 | WIN |
CLEVST@WRIGHT | CLEVST +1.5 | 54.30% | 3 | LOSS |
NDAK@STTHOM | STTHOM -10 | 54.30% | 3 | WIN |
USD@WASHST | WASHST -12.5 | 55.20% | 4 | LOSS |
CSBAK@LBEACH | CSBAK -130 | 59.70% | 4 | WIN |
BU@LEHIGH | LEHIGH -135 | 57.70% | 3 | LOSS |
DUQ@LSALLE | DUQ -125 | 56.70% | 3 | WIN |
BYU@ARIZST | ARIZST +7.5 | 54.60% | 3 | LOSS |
UTAHST@BOISE | BOISE -4 | 55.50% | 4 | WIN |