Cougars vs. Badgers
Prediction, Odds & Props
Mar 22 | CBB AI Picks

Updated: 2025-03-20T03:31:50.923562ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props

On March 22, 2025, the No. 6 seed BYU Cougars (25-9) will face the No. 3 seed Wisconsin Badgers (27-9) in the second round of the NCAA Tournament. Wisconsin enters the game as a 1.5-point favorite, with the over/under set at 154.5 points.

Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.

AI Sports Betting Algorithm Remi

GAME INFO

Date: Mar 22, 2025

Start Time: 7:45 PM EST​

Venue: Ball Arena​

Badgers Record: (27-9)

Cougars Record: (25-9)

OPENING ODDS

BYU Moneyline: -104

WISC Moneyline: -115

BYU Spread: +1

WISC Spread: -1.0

Over/Under: 155

BYU
Betting Trends

  • BYU has been competitive against top-tier teams, holding a 50% win rate against Top 25 opponents this season.

WISC
Betting Trends

  • Wisconsin has demonstrated resilience in close games, posting a 3-2 record in contests decided by less than four points.

MATCHUP TRENDS

  • Wisconsin’s games have frequently been high-scoring affairs, with the total going over in 12 of their last 15 outings.

BYU vs. WISC
Best Prop Bet

  • Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: N. Winter over 4.5 Rebounds

LIVE CBB ODDS

CBB ODDS COMPARISON

WANT MORE AI PICKS?

VAULT
VS. SPREAD
308-221
VAULT
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+418
VAULT
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$41,803
EXECUTIVE
VS. SPREAD
1554-1329
EXECUTIVE
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+376.6
EXECUTIVE
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$37,661

AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS

Create a Free Account

‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today.

Remi Finds New Picks

Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line.

Remi Works 24/7

Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.

Get Remi's AI Picks

Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.

BYU vs Wisconsin Prediction & Odds:
Free CBB Betting Insights for 3/22/25

The upcoming NCAA Tournament second-round clash between the No. 6 seed BYU Cougars and the No. 3 seed Wisconsin Badgers on March 22, 2025, promises to be a thrilling encounter between two teams with contrasting styles and strengths. BYU enters the game with a 25-9 record, having secured a near wire-to-wire victory over VCU in the first round, showcasing their offensive prowess and ability to control the game’s tempo. Wisconsin, boasting a 27-9 record, advanced after a decisive 85-66 win against Montana, demonstrating their defensive solidity and efficient scoring. A key storyline in this matchup is the battle of offensive strategies. BYU averages 80.9 points per game, leveraging a fast-paced offense that emphasizes perimeter shooting and quick ball movement. Their ability to score in bunches has been a hallmark of their season, with players like Richie Saunders leading the charge. In contrast, Wisconsin scores 79.9 points per game but is renowned for their methodical approach, focusing on half-court sets and exploiting defensive lapses with precise execution. This contrast in offensive philosophies sets the stage for an intriguing tactical battle. Defensively, both teams exhibit distinct approaches. Wisconsin allows an average of 70.3 points per game, employing a disciplined man-to-man defense that forces opponents into difficult shots and minimizes transition opportunities. Their ability to control the defensive boards and limit second-chance points has been pivotal in their success. BYU, on the other hand, concedes 70.9 points per game and relies on a mix of defensive schemes, including zone defenses designed to disrupt rhythm and force turnovers.

Their defensive versatility will be tested against Wisconsin’s structured offense. From a betting perspective, Wisconsin is favored by 1.5 points, with the over/under set at 154.5 points. BYU has demonstrated competitiveness against top-tier teams, holding a 50% win rate against Top 25 opponents this season. Wisconsin has shown resilience in close games, posting a 3-2 record in contests decided by less than four points. Additionally, Wisconsin’s games have frequently been high-scoring affairs, with the total going over in 12 of their last 15 outings. The backcourt battle will be pivotal in this matchup. BYU’s guards have been instrumental in their offensive success, with players like Dallin Hall orchestrating the offense and providing scoring bursts when needed. Wisconsin’s guards, led by John Tonje, who has been a first-team All-Big Ten performer, bring experience and defensive tenacity, capable of disrupting BYU’s rhythm and creating transition opportunities. Coaching strategies will also play a crucial role. Wisconsin’s approach to neutralizing BYU’s perimeter shooting, particularly in the half-court setting, and BYU’s plan to counter Wisconsin’s disciplined defense will be tactical battles worth observing. Adjustments made during the game could swing momentum and ultimately decide which team advances to the Sweet 16. In summary, the BYU vs. Wisconsin matchup is set to be a compelling contest featuring contrasting styles, key individual battles, and strategic coaching decisions. With BYU’s high-powered offense clashing with Wisconsin’s disciplined defense, fans can anticipate an exciting game that may come down to execution in critical moments.

BYU Cougars CBB Preview

The BYU Cougars head into their second-round NCAA Tournament matchup against the Wisconsin Badgers riding a wave of confidence following a dominant first-round performance over VCU, where they controlled the game nearly from start to finish and reinforced the notion that their 25-9 record is a reflection of a deep, versatile, and offensively explosive team that has emerged as one of the more dangerous threats in the West Region, particularly due to their ability to stretch defenses with pace, spacing, and prolific three-point shooting. Under the direction of head coach Mark Pope, BYU has transformed into a modern, analytics-driven program that thrives on volume from beyond the arc, quick offensive sets, and dynamic guard play—averaging an impressive 80.9 points per game while shooting over 36% from three-point range, a combination that has consistently put pressure on opposing defenses all season long. The Cougars’ attack is spearheaded by Richie Saunders, whose high-energy, two-way game has become essential to BYU’s success; Saunders dropped 21 points and added five rebounds against VCU, showcasing not only his scoring versatility but also his ability to defend and contribute in transition.

Complementing Saunders is Dallin Hall, the floor general who controls tempo, distributes efficiently, and knocks down key shots in crunch time, while fellow backcourt mates Trevin Knell and Spencer Johnson stretch the defense with timely three-point shooting and off-ball movement. In the frontcourt, Fousseyni Traore and Noah Waterman bring physicality and mobility, with Traore providing strong rebounding and interior scoring, and Waterman offering a unique pick-and-pop dimension that helps BYU open up the lane. Defensively, the Cougars utilize multiple looks—shifting between man and zone to disrupt rhythm—though their strength lies in converting stops into quick buckets and forcing opponents into uncomfortable matchups by pulling bigs out to the perimeter. Their transition game is one of the most efficient in the country, capitalizing on turnovers and long rebounds, and they excel when allowed to dictate pace and flow, which will be a central goal against a Wisconsin team that prefers to grind games down and control possessions. One of the challenges BYU faces in this matchup is contending with the methodical, possession-based offense of the Badgers, who are adept at forcing teams into low-efficiency sets and slowing tempo, which could limit BYU’s rhythm if not countered with early aggression and assertive shot-making. Still, BYU has proven this season they can win at various paces, even against high-major competition—they’ve earned victories over San Diego State, Kansas State, and Baylor, and are 4-4 against Top 25 teams, demonstrating their ability to compete with elite programs. From a betting standpoint, BYU enters as slight underdogs, yet their offensive profile and ability to hit timely shots make them a strong ATS candidate, especially considering Wisconsin has allowed over 70 points per game and has struggled against dynamic guard-heavy teams. If BYU can force turnovers, stay even on the glass, and knock down their threes early to stretch Wisconsin’s defense, the Cougars will have every opportunity to dictate the pace, neutralize Wisconsin’s physical advantage, and punch their ticket to the Sweet 16 for the first time since 2011 in what promises to be a clash of tempos, styles, and postseason momentum.

On March 22, 2025, the No. 6 seed BYU Cougars (25-9) will face the No. 3 seed Wisconsin Badgers (27-9) in the second round of the NCAA Tournament. Wisconsin enters the game as a 1.5-point favorite, with the over/under set at 154.5 points. BYU vs Wisconsin AI Prediction: Free CBB Betting Insights for Mar 22. Credit USA TODAY/IMAGN

Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN

Wisconsin Badgers CBB Preview

The Wisconsin Badgers, entering the NCAA Tournament as a No. 3 seed with a 27-9 record, have consistently demonstrated a blend of disciplined defense and efficient offense under the guidance of head coach Greg Gard. Their journey to the second round was marked by a commanding 85-66 victory over Montana, where their defensive prowess and offensive execution were on full display. The Badgers have been particularly effective in controlling the pace of games, often dictating a slower tempo that forces opponents to operate in half-court sets, thereby minimizing transition opportunities and capitalizing on their defensive strengths. Offensively, Wisconsin averages 79.9 points per game, employing a methodical approach that emphasizes ball movement, spacing, and high-percentage shots. Their offense is orchestrated by standout guard John Tonje, a first-team All-Big Ten performer, who has been instrumental in clutch situations, particularly evident in their semifinal victory over Michigan State in the Big Ten Tournament. Tonje’s ability to navigate defenses, coupled with his scoring versatility, makes him a focal point of Wisconsin’s offensive strategy. Complementing Tonje is forward Steven Crowl, whose presence in the paint adds a layer of complexity for opposing defenses, as he effectively utilizes his size and footwork to create scoring opportunities. Defensively, the Badgers are known for their structured man-to-man coverage, often switching strategically to close out on shooters and prevent easy perimeter looks, allowing just over 70 points per game while maintaining one of the nation’s lowest foul rates—an advantage that helps keep their core players on the floor and out of early trouble. Wisconsin’s ability to rotate cleanly, communicate on screens, and stay disciplined without overcommitting makes them especially difficult to rattle, and that structure becomes even more valuable in high-pressure tournament settings where erratic play can lead to big momentum shifts.

Another hallmark of this Badgers squad is their consistency in rebounding; they average nearly 36 boards per game and excel in boxing out, with Crowl and Tyler Wahl anchoring the paint while guards like Chucky Hepburn contribute significantly to team rebounding efforts. In terms of depth, Wisconsin has one of the most reliable second units in the tournament, with Max Klesmit and Connor Essegian providing not only scoring punch but also defensive pressure and ball security when Tonje or Hepburn rest. Offensively, they shoot a respectable 36% from beyond the arc and are especially dangerous in late-clock situations due to their calm execution and veteran savvy. They enter their matchup against BYU with confidence not only because of their first-round performance but also due to a season filled with battles against physical, perimeter-oriented teams in the Big Ten—preparing them well for BYU’s high-octane offensive scheme that relies heavily on spacing, ball reversals, and perimeter shot-making. From a coaching perspective, Greg Gard’s postseason experience gives Wisconsin a strategic edge, as he’s consistently demonstrated the ability to make timely adjustments and prepare his teams for different tempos and game scripts, which will be crucial against a BYU squad that can heat up quickly from the outside and go on big runs if left unchecked. The game plan will likely emphasize defending the three-point line, slowing BYU’s guards in transition, and attacking mismatches inside where Crowl and Wahl can operate effectively against smaller defenders. Wisconsin has also been strong at the free throw line this season, converting at nearly 78%, giving them a reliable closing tool in tight games—a potential difference-maker if this contest comes down to the wire as many second-round matchups often do. While they are slight favorites in the betting market, the Badgers are well aware of the explosiveness BYU brings and will need to execute with the same level of focus and physicality that carried them through a strong Big Ten schedule. With their combination of experience, balance, defensive integrity, and offensive discipline, Wisconsin is built for deep tournament runs, and if they can impose their methodical pace and force BYU into tough shots early, they’ll be in excellent position to book a trip to the Sweet 16 and continue asserting themselves as one of the tournament’s most composed and complete teams.

BYU vs. Wisconsin Prop Picks (AI)

Remi is pouring through loads of stats on each player. In fact, anytime the Cougars and Badgers play there’s always several intriguing observations to key in on. Not to mention games played at Ball Arena in Mar rarely follow normal, predictable patterns.
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: N. Winter over 4.5 Rebounds

BYU vs. Wisconsin Prediction (AI)

Remi Robot Icon

Remi, our AI sports genius, has been pouring over mountains of data from every past game between the Cougars and Badgers and using recursive machine learning and impressive AI to analyze the data to a single cover probability.

Remi has been most keyed in on the growing weight emotional bettors often put on BYU’s strength factors between a Cougars team going up against a possibly tired Badgers team. Trends look to say the true game analytics might reflect a moderate lean against one Vegas line in particular.

Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CBB AI picks for FREE now.

Below is our current AI BYU vs Wisconsin picks, computer picks Cougars vs Badgers, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.

DATE GAME LEAN %WIN UNITS LEVEL
ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW

These picks update as information changes—injury reports, weather, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CBB schedule.

Cougars Betting Trends

BYU has been competitive against top-tier teams, holding a 50% win rate against Top 25 opponents this season.

Badgers Betting Trends

Wisconsin has demonstrated resilience in close games, posting a 3-2 record in contests decided by less than four points.

Cougars vs. Badgers Matchup Trends

Wisconsin’s games have frequently been high-scoring affairs, with the total going over in 12 of their last 15 outings.

BYU vs. Wisconsin Game Info

BYU vs Wisconsin starts on March 22, 2025 at 7:45 PM EST.

Spread: Wisconsin -1.0
Moneyline: BYU -104, Wisconsin -115
Over/Under: 155

BYU: (25-9)  |  Wisconsin: (27-9)

Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: N. Winter over 4.5 Rebounds. Prices move—always shop for the best number.

Wisconsin’s games have frequently been high-scoring affairs, with the total going over in 12 of their last 15 outings.

BYU trend: BYU has been competitive against top-tier teams, holding a 50% win rate against Top 25 opponents this season.

WISC trend: Wisconsin has demonstrated resilience in close games, posting a 3-2 record in contests decided by less than four points.

See our latest CBB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.

BYU vs. Wisconsin Odds

AI algorithm Remi is pouring through loads of data points on each line. In fact, anytime the BYU vs Wisconsin trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme hostile environments seemingly never follow normal, predictable patterns.

BYU vs Wisconsin Opening Odds

BYU Moneyline: -104
WISC Moneyline: -115
BYU Spread: +1
WISC Spread: -1.0
Over/Under: 155

BYU vs Wisconsin Live Odds

Games PTS ML SPR O/U

CBB Past Picks

Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.

This preview covers BYU Cougars vs. Wisconsin Badgers on March 22, 2025 at Ball Arena.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.

Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CBB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.

    LEAN     %WIN     UNITS RESULT
DRAKE@MIZZOU DRAKE +6.5 53.50% 2 WIN
XAVIER@TEXAS XAVIER -2.5 53.40% 2 WIN
UAB@MEMP MEMP -3.5 54.00% 2 WIN
LVILLE@DUKE LVILLE +6.5 53.10% 2 LOSS
ECU@UAB UAB -5 53.60% 2 WIN
PURDUE@MICH MICH +3 54.60% 3 WIN
CLEM@LVILLE CLEM -120 56.10% 3 LOSS
COL@HOU ANDREJ JAKIMOVSKI PTS + REB + AST - UNDER 15.5 53.70% 2 LOSS
FORD@GWASH FORD +7 53.80% 2 WIN
SEATTLE@ABIL ABIL +6 54.50% 3 WIN
BAMAST@TEXSOU BAMAST -110 55.40% 4 WIN
OHIO@TOLEDO TOLEDO +3 56.70% 4 WIN
UVA@GATECH GATECH +1.5 53.70% 2 WIN
COLO@WVU COLO +7.5 53.20% 2 WIN
USC@RUT USC -115 54.00% 2 WIN
TEXAS@VANDY VANDY -130 56.50% 3 LOSS
BUTLER@PROV BUTLER -115 55.20% 3 WIN
IDAHO@MONTANA MONTANA -6 53.50% 2 WIN
TROY@JMAD TROY -125 55.60% 2 WIN
BELMONT@DRAKE DRAKE -7.5 53.50% 2 LOSS
UCSD@UCDAV UCSD -12.5 53.40% 2 LOSS
SIUE@SEMO SEMO -2.5 54.80% 3 LOSS
ALCORN@ARKPB ARKPB +6.5 56.00% 4 WIN
NORFLK@HOWARD HOWARD +5.5 53.70% 2 LOSS
NKY@CLEVST NKY +4.5 54.40% 3 LOSS
STNFRD@ND STNFRD -125 56.40% 3 LOSS
TENN@OLEMISS OLEMISS +2.5 54.30% 3 WIN
LSALLE@GMASON GMASON -12 54.30% 3 LOSS
PITT@NCST NCST +2.5 56.70% 4 WIN
IND@OREG OREG -6.5 53.60% 2 WIN
FSU@UVA UVA -4 54.40% 3 LOSS
ARK@VANDY ARK +7.5 54.40% 3 WIN
SDGST@UNLV UNLV +2.5 54.10% 3 WIN
EKTY@JVILLE JVILLE -135 58.90% 3 WIN
MANHAT@NIAGARA MANHAT -115 54.70% 3 WIN
MEMP@UAB MEMP -115 54.90% 3 WIN
ILL@MICH MICH -2.5 56.00% 4 LOSS
OKLA@OLEMISS OKLA +7.5 54.50% 3 WIN
ARIZST@UTAH ARIZST +8.5 54.60% 3 LOSS
GC@SEATTLE GC -110 55.00% 3 WIN
PENN@CLMBIA CLMBIA -122 57.50% 4 LOSS
IONA@NIAGARA NIAGARA +1.5 54.30% 3 LOSS
MARIST@SACHRT SACHRT -120 55.40% 3 WIN
CLEVST@WRIGHT CLEVST +1.5 54.30% 3 LOSS
NDAK@STTHOM STTHOM -10 54.30% 3 WIN
USD@WASHST WASHST -12.5 55.20% 4 LOSS
CSBAK@LBEACH CSBAK -130 59.70% 4 WIN
BU@LEHIGH LEHIGH -135 57.70% 3 LOSS
DUQ@LSALLE DUQ -125 56.70% 3 WIN
BYU@ARIZST ARIZST +7.5 54.60% 3 LOSS
UTAHST@BOISE BOISE -4 55.50% 4 WIN