SMU vs Boston College Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CFB Lines & Props (Nov 08)
Updated: 2025-11-01T02:28:40.156150ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The SMU Mustangs visit the Boston College Eagles on November 8, 2025, in a non-conference matchup that sees a rising SMU squad facing a Boston College team trying to rediscover its identity. SMU enters the game with momentum and a balanced attack, while Boston College must shore up defensive issues and try to make the most of its home-field opportunity.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Nov 08, 2025
Start Time: 1:00 PM EST
Venue: Alumni Stadium
Eagles Record: (1-8)
Mustangs Record: (6-3)
OPENING ODDS
SMU Moneyline: -439
BC Moneyline: +333
SMU Spread: -10.5
BC Spread: +10.5
Over/Under: 55.5
SMU
Betting Trends
- SMU has covered in approximately 66.7% of their games this season and boasts a healthy average margin above the spread, though their ATS performance has come with some volatility.
BC
Betting Trends
- Boston College has covered in only about 37.5% of their games this season, ranking near the bottom of the FBS in ATS performance.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- The contrast is stark: SMU has been a reliable cover and appears to be undervalued on the road, while Boston College has struggled to meet expectations even at home. For bettors, this creates a clear angle — SMU appears to offer value both straight-up and ATS, whereas Boston College’s poor cover rate suggests risk, especially if they fall behind early and are forced to abandon their game plan.
SMU vs. BC
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: T. Harden over 37.5 Rushing Yards.
LIVE CFB ODDS
CFB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
444-362
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+854
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$85,396
VS. SPREAD
1929-1583
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+548.4
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$54,843
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
SMU vs Boston College Prediction & Odds:
Free CFB Betting Insights for 11/8/25
The November 8, 2025 matchup between the SMU Mustangs and the Boston College Eagles at Alumni Stadium in Chestnut Hill presents an intriguing clash between a program on the rise and another desperately trying to find stability. SMU enters this late-season non-conference game as one of the more complete Group of Five teams in the nation, boasting a 5–3 record and a reputation for offensive balance, defensive discipline, and reliable execution under head coach Rhett Lashlee. The Mustangs have averaged around 31 points per game while allowing just over 21, establishing themselves as a team that can win shootouts or grind out physical contests. Quarterback Preston Stone has continued his evolution as a poised, accurate passer capable of distributing the ball efficiently across multiple targets, including leading receiver Jake Bailey and deep-threat Jordan Hudson. The SMU passing attack thrives on quick reads, spacing, and yards after the catch—traits that make it difficult for opposing secondaries to keep pace. Complementing that aerial assault is a rejuvenated ground game led by LJ Johnson Jr. and Jaylan Knighton, whose ability to find cutback lanes and sustain drives has allowed the Mustangs to stay unpredictable and control tempo. SMU’s offensive line, one of the most experienced in the AAC, has provided consistent protection and limited negative plays, giving Stone the confidence to push the ball downfield when needed. On the defensive side, coordinator Scott Symons has transformed SMU into a more aggressive, turnover-seeking unit. The Mustangs’ front seven, anchored by Elijah Roberts and Je’lin Samuels, excels at creating pressure without overcommitting, while linebackers Ahmad Walker and Kobe Wilson have provided athleticism and range in the open field. Their defense has particularly shined in third-down situations, ranking among the nation’s best at getting off the field, a stark improvement from their inconsistent 2023 form. Against Boston College, that efficiency will be vital, as the Eagles’ offense—though inconsistent—has shown flashes of life behind dual-threat quarterback Thomas Castellanos. For SMU, the challenge will be containing Castellanos’ improvisation while forcing Boston College into clear passing downs where their protection has often faltered.
The Eagles enter the matchup with a 1–8 record and a frustrating trend of coming close in several games only to fall short late, largely due to turnovers and defensive breakdowns. Their offense averages just under 25 points per game while the defense surrenders over 33, a combination that has placed them near the bottom of the ACC standings. Head coach Bill O’Brien has struggled to spark a consistent rhythm from an offense that leans heavily on the run, featuring tailback Kye Robichaux and the scrambling ability of Castellanos. The issue for Boston College has been execution and depth—both along the offensive line and in the secondary, where injuries have exposed their inability to cover speedy receivers. SMU will likely exploit those weaknesses with tempo, spreading the field and attacking mismatches in man coverage. Defensively, the Eagles’ inability to generate pressure has made them vulnerable against efficient passing teams, and that spells trouble against a polished SMU offense. The Mustangs’ edge in experience, quarterback play, and discipline makes them the clear favorite on paper, and their strong ATS record (covering in about two-thirds of games) suggests they often outperform market expectations. Boston College, conversely, has been one of the least profitable teams in the nation for bettors, covering in fewer than 40% of games due to inflated lines and second-half collapses. For SMU, the formula to victory is straightforward—jump out to an early lead, dictate tempo, and force the Eagles to abandon their run-heavy game plan. For Boston College to stay competitive, they’ll need to establish the run early, convert in the red zone, and find ways to keep SMU’s explosive receivers in check. Ultimately, this game feels like a mismatch of direction and form: SMU’s upward trajectory under Lashlee should continue, while Boston College faces the uphill task of matching their opponent’s speed, efficiency, and balance. Unless turnovers or weather dramatically shift the game’s flow, SMU’s offensive precision and defensive discipline should carry them to a convincing road win and another strong ATS performance.
Get live CFB odds and precise AI CFB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
Party Like It's 1983.
— SMU Football (@SMUFB) November 4, 2025
The Miami Mini-Movie 🎥 pic.twitter.com/vZaaVkN3Qu
SMU Mustangs CFB Preview
The SMU Mustangs travel to Chestnut Hill on November 8, 2025, bringing with them the confidence of a program that has steadily climbed into national relevance under head coach Rhett Lashlee. At 5–3, the Mustangs are in the midst of a season that has showcased their maturity, balance, and growth as a complete football team. Offensively, SMU has developed one of the most efficient and versatile units in the American Athletic Conference, averaging just over 31 points per game while maintaining an impressive level of balance between run and pass. Quarterback Preston Stone has been the heartbeat of the offense, displaying composure, leadership, and strong pocket awareness. Stone’s quick release and precision have allowed him to spread the ball effectively to a deep receiver group that includes Jake Bailey, Jordan Hudson, and Roderick Daniels Jr., each capable of creating separation and turning short completions into explosive gains. Lashlee’s up-tempo system thrives on spacing and timing, allowing SMU to control the rhythm of games and wear down opposing defenses. The ground game has been equally vital, led by running backs LJ Johnson Jr. and Jaylan Knighton, whose one-two punch gives the Mustangs the flexibility to run both power and zone concepts. This versatility has made SMU difficult to predict, keeping defenses guessing and opening up play-action opportunities for Stone. Against a Boston College defense that has surrendered over 33 points per game and struggled with tackling in space, SMU’s offensive efficiency could prove decisive.
The Mustangs’ offensive line has been one of their biggest strengths, giving up minimal sacks and enabling the team to sustain long drives—a key factor against a BC defense that tends to wear down in the second half. Defensively, SMU has undergone a transformation this season, moving away from the high-scoring shootout identity of years past toward a more physical and disciplined approach. Coordinator Scott Symons has instilled an aggressive but structured philosophy centered on controlling the line of scrimmage and forcing turnovers. The defensive front, led by linemen Elijah Roberts and Je’lin Samuels, has been disruptive, combining for numerous pressures and tackles for loss. Linebackers Ahmad Walker and Kobe Wilson add speed and sideline-to-sideline range, giving the unit flexibility against both the run and the short passing game. The secondary, anchored by safety Jonathan McGill, has improved significantly in coverage and communication, ranking among the conference leaders in third-down defense. Against Boston College’s dual-threat quarterback Thomas Castellanos, SMU’s defense will need to maintain gap integrity and avoid overcommitting to scrambles—a challenge given Castellanos’ improvisational skill. Expect the Mustangs to use controlled pressure and spy techniques to limit his running lanes while forcing him to beat them through the air, where Boston College has struggled with accuracy and protection. Special teams also tilt in SMU’s favor, with kicker Collin Rogers providing stability and the return units consistently flipping field position. From a betting perspective, SMU has been one of the more reliable teams in the nation, covering in roughly two-thirds of its games, while Boston College ranks near the bottom of FBS in ATS performance. The Mustangs’ track record on the road, where they’ve played disciplined football and protected leads, bodes well for their chances here. For SMU, the path to victory is clear: start fast, limit turnovers, and impose their offensive rhythm early to prevent Boston College from leaning on the run. If Stone continues his efficient play and the defense maintains its containment discipline, the Mustangs are well-positioned not only to win but to cover comfortably. This matchup gives SMU a prime opportunity to showcase its balance, physicality, and national-level competitiveness as they continue to build toward a strong postseason push.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Boston College Eagles CFB Preview
The Boston College Eagles return to Alumni Stadium on November 8, 2025, hoping to salvage a difficult season and prove that their rebuilding efforts under head coach Bill O’Brien are beginning to take root. Entering the matchup at 1–8, the Eagles have endured a challenging campaign defined by inconsistency, injuries, and defensive breakdowns, but a home game against a fast and talented SMU squad offers them an opportunity to test their resilience and home-field pride. Offensively, Boston College remains anchored by dual-threat quarterback Thomas Castellanos, whose athleticism has been both a blessing and a crutch for an offense that has struggled to find rhythm. Castellanos leads the team in both passing and rushing yards, using his mobility to extend plays and compensate for an offensive line that has struggled to protect him. He’s thrown for over 1,800 yards and added nearly 600 on the ground, but his tendency to hold onto the ball too long has resulted in sacks and costly turnovers. The Eagles’ running game, built around Kye Robichaux and Xavier Coleman, has shown flashes of toughness but lacks explosive consistency, averaging around four yards per carry. Against SMU’s aggressive defensive front, Boston College’s ability to establish the run early will be critical to opening up opportunities for play-action and rollouts that can simplify reads for Castellanos. The receiving corps, featuring Lewis Bond and Dino Tomlin, has been steady but not spectacular, struggling to separate against man coverage and create big plays downfield. To compete with SMU’s high-powered offense, the Eagles will need to find creative ways to generate chunk yardage, perhaps incorporating more motion, quick screens, and tempo shifts to catch the Mustangs off guard. Defensively, Boston College’s struggles have been a key storyline this season. The Eagles are allowing over 33 points per game, with their pass defense ranking among the weakest in the ACC.
Poor tackling and communication breakdowns in the secondary have been recurring problems, and they now face one of the most efficient passing attacks in the country. The front seven, led by Donovan Ezeiruaku and Khris Banks, will have to set the tone early by collapsing the pocket and disrupting SMU quarterback Preston Stone’s timing. Linebackers Vinny DePalma and Kam Arnold will play critical roles in containing SMU’s screen and short passing game, as the Mustangs thrive on quick completions that turn into explosive plays. If Boston College can’t consistently pressure Stone, SMU’s receivers—particularly Jordan Hudson and Jake Bailey—could find space to exploit mismatches all afternoon. Special teams have been one of the few consistent areas of stability for the Eagles this season, with kicker Liam Connor remaining reliable from mid-range and punter Sam Candotti helping control field position. Still, the biggest concern for Boston College will be sustaining energy for four quarters. Too often this season, the Eagles have started strong only to fade late as opposing teams adjust. From a betting perspective, Boston College’s 37.5% ATS mark reflects those struggles—they often play close early but fail to close the gap or hold leads late. To defy that trend, the Eagles must win the turnover battle, play disciplined defense, and rely on home-field energy to stay in the fight. Alumni Stadium has long been a tough venue when the Eagles play inspired football, and the team’s best chance lies in dictating tempo, keeping the game within one score into the fourth quarter, and using Castellanos’ playmaking ability to extend drives. If Boston College can control time of possession and find stability on defense, they could challenge SMU longer than expected. But if the defense breaks down early or the offense stalls under pressure, it could quickly become another long afternoon in what has been a frustrating season. This game will test Boston College’s toughness, discipline, and pride as they try to protect their home field against one of the nation’s most efficient and balanced offenses.
🚨Senior Day game time announcement
— Boston College Football (@BCFootball) November 3, 2025
🆚 Georgia Tech
🏟️ Alumni Stadium
🕰️ Saturday, Nov. 15 | 3:30 pm EST
📺 ACCN pic.twitter.com/fdflZ6HnWE
SMU vs Boston College Prop Picks (AI)
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through loads of stats on each line. In fact, anytime the Mustangs and Eagles play there’s always several intriguing angles to key in on. Not to mention games played at Alumni Stadium in Nov rarely follow normal, predictable patterns.
SMU vs Boston College Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports wizard, has been pouring over millions of data from every past game between the Mustangs and Eagles and using recursive machine learning and kick-ass AI to analyze the data to a single cover probability.
The Algorithm has been most keyed in on the trending weight knucklehead sportsbettors often put on Boston College’s strength factors between a Mustangs team going up against a possibly improved Eagles team. It appears the true game analytics might reflect a moderate lean against one Vegas line specifically.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CFB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI SMU vs Boston College picks, computer picks Mustangs vs Eagles, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW | ||||||
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CFB schedule.
SMU Betting Trends
SMU has covered in approximately 66.7% of their games this season and boasts a healthy average margin above the spread, though their ATS performance has come with some volatility.
Boston College Betting Trends
Boston College has covered in only about 37.5% of their games this season, ranking near the bottom of the FBS in ATS performance.
Mustangs vs. Eagles Matchup Trends
The contrast is stark: SMU has been a reliable cover and appears to be undervalued on the road, while Boston College has struggled to meet expectations even at home. For bettors, this creates a clear angle — SMU appears to offer value both straight-up and ATS, whereas Boston College’s poor cover rate suggests risk, especially if they fall behind early and are forced to abandon their game plan.
SMU vs. Boston College Game Info
SMU vs Boston College starts on November 08, 2025 at 1:00 PM EST.
Venue: Alumni Stadium.
Spread: Boston College +10.5
Moneyline: SMU -439, Boston College +333
Over/Under: 55.5
SMU: (6-3) | Boston College: (1-8)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: T. Harden over 37.5 Rushing Yards.. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
The contrast is stark: SMU has been a reliable cover and appears to be undervalued on the road, while Boston College has struggled to meet expectations even at home. For bettors, this creates a clear angle — SMU appears to offer value both straight-up and ATS, whereas Boston College’s poor cover rate suggests risk, especially if they fall behind early and are forced to abandon their game plan.
SMU trend: SMU has covered in approximately 66.7% of their games this season and boasts a healthy average margin above the spread, though their ATS performance has come with some volatility.
BC trend: Boston College has covered in only about 37.5% of their games this season, ranking near the bottom of the FBS in ATS performance.
See our latest CFB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
SMU vs. Boston College Odds
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through mountains of data points on each player. In fact, anytime the SMU vs Boston College trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme travel distance rarely follow normal, predictable patterns.
| SMU Moneyline | -439 |
|---|---|
| BC Moneyline | +333 |
| SMU Spread | -10.5 |
| BC Spread | +10.5 |
| Over / Under | 55.5 |
SMU vs Boston College Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Aug 29, 2026 12:00PM EDT
NC State Wolfpack
Virginia Cavaliers
8/29/26 12PM
NCST
UVA
|
–
–
|
+134
-162
|
+3.5 (-115)
-3.5 (-105)
|
O 54.5 (-105)
U 54.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Aug 29, 2026 12:00PM EDT
North Carolina Tar Heels
TCU Horned Frogs
8/29/26 12PM
UNC
TCU
|
–
–
|
+255
-320
|
+7.5 (-105)
-7.5 (-115)
|
O 50.5 (-105)
U 50.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Clemson Tigers
LSU Tigers
9/5/26 12PM
CLEM
LSU
|
–
–
|
+350
-465
|
+11.5 (-110)
-11.5 (-110)
|
O 51.5 (-110)
U 51.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
UCLA Bruins
California Golden Bears
9/5/26 12PM
UCLA
CAL
|
–
–
|
+168
-205
|
+5.5 (-112)
-5.5 (-108)
|
O 53.5 (-110)
U 53.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Baylor Bears
Auburn Tigers
9/5/26 12PM
BAYLOR
AUBURN
|
–
–
|
+235
-295
|
+7.5 (-114)
-7.5 (-106)
|
O 58.5 (-110)
U 58.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Louisville Cardinals
Ole Miss Rebels
9/5/26 12PM
LVILLE
OLEMISS
|
–
–
|
+172
-210
|
+5.5 (-110)
-5.5 (-110)
|
O 51.5 (-105)
U 51.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Sep 6, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Wisconsin Badgers
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
9/6/26 12PM
WISC
ND
|
–
–
|
+660
-1050
|
+16.5 (-105)
-16.5 (-115)
|
O 46.5 (-115)
U 46.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Ohio State Buckeyes
Texas Longhorns
9/12/26 12PM
OHIOST
TEXAS
|
–
–
|
+114
-137
|
+2.5 (-105)
-2.5 (-115)
|
O 47.5 (-115)
U 47.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Oklahoma Sooners
Michigan Wolverines
9/12/26 12PM
OKLA
MICH
|
–
–
|
-102
-118
|
+1.5 (-110)
-1.5 (-110)
|
O 45.5 (-110)
U 45.5 (-110)
|
CFB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers SMU Mustangs vs. Boston College Eagles on November 08, 2025 at Alumni Stadium.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CFB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
|
|
|
|
RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OREG@IND | IND -3 | 53.4% | 2 | WIN |
| OLEMISS@GEORGIA | KEWAN LACY ANYTIME TD | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
| BAMA@IND | FERNANDO MENDOZA UNDER 26.5 PASS ATT | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@TXTECH | OREG -126 | 58.9% | 6 | WIN |
| MICH@TEXAS | TEXAS -6 | 53.3% | 1 | WIN |
| MIAMI@OHIOST | UNDER 40.5 | 53.6% | 2 | WIN |
| NEB@UTAH | DEVON DAMPIER UNDER 185.5 PASS YDS | 53.4% | 3 | LOSS |
| IOWA@VANDY | IOWA +4.5 | 53.1% | 2 | WIN |
| NOTEX@SDGST | NOTEX -7 | 54.2% | 4 | LOSS |
| TULANE@OLEMISS | OLEMISS -16.5 | 53.4% | 1 | WIN |
| MIAMI@TEXA&M | TEXA&M -3 | 54.1% | 3 | LOSS |
| BAMA@OKLA | BAMA +1.5 | 52.1% | 1 | WIN |
| BAMA@OKLA | ISAIAH SATEGNA III ANYTIME TD | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| BYU@TTU | PARKER KINGSTON OVER 20.5 LONGEST RECEPTION | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| UNLV@BOISE | BOISE -4.5 | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | UNDER 44 | 52.8% | 2 | WIN |
| ECU@FAU | FAU +7 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| OREG@WASH | WASH +7 | 54.9% | 4 | LOSS |
| WYO@HAWAII | WYO +7.5 | 55.1% | 5 | LOSS |
| COLO@KSTATE | COLO +17.5 | 54.0% | 4 | WIN |
| PSU@RUT | RUT +14 | 52.8% | 1 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | MICH +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| VATECH@UVA | VATECH +8 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| NWEST@ILL | LUKE ALTMYER UNDER 19.5 PASS COMP | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| ORE@WAS | DEMOND WILLIAMS JR UNDER 43.5 RUSH YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| MIAMI@VATECH | VATECH +18.5 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| GAST@TROY | TROY -9.5 | 55.7% | 5 | WIN |
| DEL@WAKE | DEL +18 | 56.7% | 6 | LOSS |
| NMEX@AF | NMEX -3.5 | 56.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WASHST@JMAD | WASHST +14.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| ILL@WISC | WISC +9 | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WKY@LSU | WKY +23.5 | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| WASH@UCLA | DEMOND WILLIAMS UNDER 27.5 PASS ATT | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| TCU@HOU | AMARE THOMAS OVER 69.5 RECV YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| TEX@UGA | NATE FRAZIER UNDER 65.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 55.5% | 5 | WIN |
| PUR@WASH | ANTONIO HARRIS UNDER 73.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 54.1% | 4 | WIN |
| OKLA@BAMA | UNDER 46 | 52.4% | 2 | WIN |
| UVA@DUKE | DUKE -3.5 | 54.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| OKLA@BAMA | BAMA -6 | 54.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| OREGST@TULSA | OREGST -120 | 55.6% | 5 | LOSS |
| UTEP@MIZZST | MIZZST -5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| COLOST@NMEX | NMEX -14 | 57.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| PSU@MICHST | MICHST +7.5 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
| MISSST@MIZZOU | MISSST +7.5 | 57.2% | 7 | LOSS |
| FAU@TULANE | FAU +17.5 | 56.0% | 6 | WIN |
| NCST@MIAMI | NCST +15.5 | 57.1% | 7 | LOSS |
| KENTST@AKRON | AKRON -6.5 | 55.4% | 5 | LOSS |
| JAXST@UTEP | JAXST -105 | 57.0% | 7 | WIN |
| FSU@CLEM | CLEM -118 | 57.1% | 5 | WIN |
| UNLV@COLOST | UNLV -4 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@IOWA | IOWA +6.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |