Purdue vs Michigan Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CFB Lines & Props (Nov 01)
Updated: 2025-10-25T02:28:40.156150ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The Purdue Boilermakers visit the Michigan Wolverines on November 1, 2025, in Ann Arbor, where Michigan enters as the heavy favorite and Purdue arrives still seeking identity after a disappointing rebuild. The matchup pits a Wolverines squad with playoff aspirations and a dominant home presence against a Boilermakers program attempting to reset under new leadership.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Nov 01, 2025
Start Time: 7:00 PM EST
Venue: Michigan Stadium
Wolverines Record: (6-2)
Boilermakers Record: (2-6)
OPENING ODDS
PURDUE Moneyline: +1070
MICH Moneyline: -2128
PURDUE Spread: +21
MICH Spread: -21.0
Over/Under: 51.5
PURDUE
Betting Trends
- Purdue covered the spread just 25 % of the time in 2024, one of the poorest ATS performances in the FBS.
MICH
Betting Trends
- Michigan covered only 46.2 % of spreads in 2024, making them a somewhat unreliable favorite relative to expectations.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- With Michigan heavily favored—odds showing around a 20-point spread against Purdue—bettors face contrasting ATS tendencies: a Boilermakers team that seldom covered, and a Wolverines team that hasn’t covered reliably despite dominance. The low over/under line near 49.5 suggests expectations of a controlled game pace, perhaps favoring first-half value or emergence of the under if Purdue’s offense remains stalled.
PURDUE vs. MICH
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: B. Underwood over 183.5 Passing Yards.
LIVE CFB ODDS
CFB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
468-388
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+911.1
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$91,112
VS. SPREAD
2027-1637
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+630.2
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$63,018
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Purdue vs Michigan Prediction & Odds:
Free CFB Betting Insights for 11/1/25
The November 1, 2025 Big Ten matchup between the Purdue Boilermakers and the Michigan Wolverines at Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor offers a classic contrast between a powerhouse program defending its national relevance and a rebuilding team trying to rediscover its footing. Michigan enters the game ranked among the top 10 in the nation, riding the momentum of a deep 2024 campaign that reinforced its reputation as a program defined by physicality, discipline, and elite defensive play. Under head coach Sherrone Moore, who succeeded Jim Harbaugh seamlessly after his departure to the NFL, the Wolverines have continued to play the brand of football that has become their identity—pounding the rock, controlling the line of scrimmage, and suffocating opponents on defense. Their offensive attack has revolved around a dominant run game led by the powerful one-two punch of Donovan Edwards and Kalel Mullings, both of whom have taken on expanded roles behind an offensive line that remains one of the most technically sound in the country. Quarterback Alex Orji has grown into the role of field general, providing athleticism and situational awareness while limiting mistakes, which has allowed Michigan to stay efficient even without the explosive vertical passing game that characterized some earlier eras. On defense, the Wolverines remain an elite force. Their front seven, led by Mason Graham and Kenneth Grant, consistently collapses pockets and plugs running lanes, while the linebacker corps led by Ernest Hausmann continues to set the tone with speed and physicality. The secondary, anchored by defensive backs Will Johnson and Rod Moore, plays a disciplined brand of coverage that limits yards after the catch and thrives on forcing turnovers in key moments. Michigan’s blueprint in this game will be familiar: dominate time of possession, wear down Purdue with its ground game, and rely on its defense to set up short fields for the offense.
For Purdue, this matchup represents the harsh reality of competing in a conference dominated by bluebloods. After a 1–11 season in 2024, the Boilermakers entered 2025 in full rebuild mode under new head coach Graham Harrell, whose offensive pedigree from his time at North Texas and USC brings a much-needed jolt of creativity to a program that stagnated under its previous regime. Purdue’s offense has shown flashes of improvement behind quarterback Ryan Browne, who possesses a strong arm and growing confidence, but inconsistency remains a major issue, particularly behind an offensive line that has struggled to protect him against top-tier defensive fronts. The Boilermakers’ best offensive weapon continues to be wide receiver Deion Burks, a shifty playmaker capable of stretching the field, though Michigan’s secondary is well-equipped to contain him. Defensively, Purdue is still a work in progress. The front seven, anchored by Nic Scourton, has moments of promise but lacks the depth to sustain pressure for four quarters against a team as deep and physical as Michigan. The Boilermakers’ secondary remains vulnerable, especially in the intermediate zones where Michigan loves to attack with tight ends and running backs. Purdue’s path to competitiveness in this game likely involves taking risks—pressuring Orji early, forcing takeaways, and trying to create momentum with special teams. However, Michigan’s combination of talent, coaching stability, and home-field dominance at the Big House makes that task daunting. From a betting standpoint, Michigan’s 8–5 ATS mark in 2024 suggests they’ve been somewhat inconsistent in covering large spreads, but against an opponent like Purdue, the mismatch in talent and depth tilts heavily in their favor. Purdue, who finished just 3–9 ATS last year, has struggled to stay competitive against ranked teams and has yet to show the offensive efficiency needed to threaten elite defenses. The spread for this matchup will likely hover around 24–26 points, reflecting the wide gulf between the two programs. The total, expected near 48, could lean toward the under if Michigan’s defense controls the tempo and Purdue’s offense continues to sputter. Ultimately, this game feels like a statement opportunity for Michigan—a chance to reinforce its playoff credentials by delivering a complete, dominant performance in front of its home crowd. For Purdue, it’s about progress: limiting mistakes, playing physically for four quarters, and finding incremental improvements against one of the best teams in the nation.
Get live CFB odds and precise AI CFB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
Primetime GK at it again 😤#ProBoilers | @TheGK3 pic.twitter.com/1guakmC7QI
— Purdue Football (@BoilerFootball) October 28, 2025
Purdue Boilermakers CFB Preview
The Purdue Boilermakers head into Ann Arbor for their November 1, 2025 matchup against the Michigan Wolverines with the understanding that this game represents one of their toughest challenges of the season, both physically and mentally. Coming off a turbulent 2024 campaign that saw them finish 1–11 overall and among the nation’s worst in offensive production and defensive consistency, Purdue enters this contest deep in rebuild mode under new head coach Graham Harrell. Known for his offensive creativity and quarterback development, Harrell has spent the offseason overhauling Purdue’s system, infusing tempo, spacing, and spread concepts designed to maximize efficiency with limited personnel. His goal has been clear: modernize a stagnant program and restore competitiveness in a Big Ten landscape dominated by powerhouses like Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State. Quarterback Ryan Browne has been tasked with leading this new-look offense, and while he has shown flashes of potential with his poise and deep-ball accuracy, he remains a young player learning to operate under constant pressure. The offensive line has been a recurring issue for Purdue, allowing far too many sacks last season and failing to create push in the run game, leaving the offense one-dimensional and predictable. Running backs Tyrone Tracy Jr. and Devin Mockobee have provided occasional sparks with their agility and pass-catching versatility, but neither has been able to consistently find running lanes behind a line still finding its chemistry. Wide receiver Deion Burks remains the offense’s most dynamic playmaker, capable of stretching the field vertically and creating separation against press coverage.
However, facing Michigan’s elite secondary led by Will Johnson and Rod Moore, Burks and the passing attack will have to rely on quick-hitting plays and screens to avoid the Wolverines’ relentless pass rush. Harrell’s offensive philosophy—built on timing routes, pre-snap motion, and spacing—will be tested by Michigan’s disciplined defensive front, which has thrived at clogging gaps and forcing quarterbacks into hurried throws. On defense, Purdue remains a work in progress. The front seven, led by defensive end Nic Scourton and linebacker Yanni Karlaftis, has shown flashes of physicality but lacks the depth and endurance to sustain high-level play for four quarters against elite offensive lines. The Boilermakers have been particularly vulnerable against the run, giving up over 180 rushing yards per game last season—a number Michigan’s power run scheme will likely aim to exploit early and often. Purdue’s secondary, though athletic, has struggled with communication lapses and blown coverages, an issue that could be fatal against Michigan’s balanced, methodical offense. The key for the Boilermakers defensively will be red zone discipline and limiting explosive plays, forcing the Wolverines to settle for field goals rather than touchdowns. From a betting perspective, Purdue’s 25% ATS success rate in 2024 speaks to their inability to stay competitive against strong opponents, especially on the road. However, new leadership and a renewed sense of purpose could make them a slightly better covering option in 2025, particularly if Harrell’s offensive tempo disrupts Michigan’s rhythm. Still, the odds remain heavily stacked against them. The Boilermakers will likely enter as 24-to-26-point underdogs, a reflection of both their rebuilding state and Michigan’s home dominance. For Purdue, moral victories matter at this stage: showing improved execution, limiting turnovers, and keeping the score respectable would represent meaningful progress. To achieve that, they’ll need mistake-free football, sustained drives to keep Michigan’s offense off the field, and perhaps a few special teams breaks to generate momentum. While pulling an outright upset in Ann Arbor borders on fantasy, this game offers Harrell’s Boilermakers a valuable measuring stick—one that will reveal just how far they’ve come and how much farther they need to go to climb back into Big Ten contention.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Michigan Wolverines CFB Preview
The Michigan Wolverines enter their November 1, 2025 matchup against the Purdue Boilermakers at Michigan Stadium with clear expectations: dominate the line of scrimmage, execute their game plan with precision, and maintain momentum in their pursuit of another Big Ten title and College Football Playoff berth. Under second-year head coach Sherrone Moore, Michigan has seamlessly transitioned from the Jim Harbaugh era without losing the cultural identity that made it one of the nation’s most consistent programs—physicality, discipline, and elite defense. Moore has kept the Wolverines’ core philosophy intact but added his own wrinkles on offense, focusing on efficiency, creativity in the run game, and situational aggressiveness. The Wolverines’ offense continues to be powered by their trademark ground attack, led by running backs Donovan Edwards and Kalel Mullings, who have evolved into one of the most productive backfield tandems in the country. Edwards’ combination of speed, vision, and pass-catching ability gives Michigan a dynamic weapon in space, while Mullings brings brute force and short-yardage reliability. Their success is made possible by an offensive line that remains among the best in college football, featuring veteran anchors like guards Giovanni El-Hadi and Zak Zinter, who ensure consistent pocket protection and open lanes against even the most physical fronts. Quarterback Alex Orji, now in full command of the offense, has provided stability and explosiveness with his dual-threat skill set. Orji’s ability to make plays with his legs adds a layer of unpredictability to Michigan’s attack, allowing offensive coordinator Kirk Campbell to mix designed quarterback runs with play-action passes that exploit defensive overcommitments. Though Michigan’s aerial game isn’t flashy, it’s ruthlessly efficient—tight end Colston Loveland has become Orji’s security blanket in key situations, while wideouts Tyler Morris and Semaj Morgan stretch defenses vertically and keep safeties honest. On the defensive side, Michigan remains a juggernaut.
Defensive coordinator Jesse Minter’s unit has continued its tradition of suffocating opposing offenses, ranking among the nation’s leaders in scoring defense and turnovers forced. The front seven, led by Mason Graham and Kenneth Grant, is ferocious in the trenches, combining strength with quickness to dominate at the point of attack. Linebackers Ernest Hausmann and Junior Colson bring sideline-to-sideline range, allowing Michigan to contain mobile quarterbacks and shut down perimeter runs. In the secondary, cornerback Will Johnson and safety Rod Moore headline a group that thrives on physical coverage and ball-hawking instincts, making it exceedingly difficult for opposing quarterbacks to find rhythm. Against Purdue, Michigan’s defensive formula will be simple but effective: pressure quarterback Ryan Browne early, shut down the run game before it starts, and force Purdue into long passing situations where the Wolverines’ defensive line can feast. Special teams remain a quiet but critical strength, with kicker James Turner providing consistency and return specialist A.J. Henning always a threat to flip field position. From a betting perspective, Michigan has been a powerhouse at home—though they covered only 46% of their spreads last season, their outright dominance has rarely been in doubt. The Wolverines have won 20 straight home games heading into this contest, and the spread for this matchup—likely hovering around 24 to 26 points—reflects both their superiority and the expectation of a comfortable victory. The total should sit near the mid-40s, with the under appealing if Michigan’s defense dictates tempo and Purdue struggles to score. For the Wolverines, this game is as much about discipline as it is about dominance; they cannot afford lapses or complacency against an inferior opponent, especially with critical matchups looming later in November. Expect Michigan to control this game from start to finish, methodically wearing down the Boilermakers with their rushing attack and suffocating defense. If they execute to their standard, the Wolverines should not only secure another convincing home win but further reinforce their status as one of college football’s most complete and formidable teams.
Under the Big House lights on Saturday night pic.twitter.com/mABgkIsWyq
— Michigan Football (@UMichFootball) October 27, 2025
Purdue vs Michigan Prop Picks (AI)
Remi is pouring through mountains of stats on each line. In fact, anytime the Boilermakers and Wolverines play there’s always several intriguing observations to key in on. Not to mention games played at Michigan Stadium in Nov seemingly never follow normal, predictable betting trends.
Purdue vs Michigan Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports wizard, has been pouring over mountains of data from every facet between the Boilermakers and Wolverines and using recursive machine learning and cutting-edge AI to examine the data to a single cover probability.
Interestingly enough, the data has been most focused on the unproportionally assigned factor knucklehead sportsbettors often put on Purdue’s strength factors between a Boilermakers team going up against a possibly improved Wolverines team. In reality, the true game analytics might reflect a slight lean against one Vegas line in particular.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CFB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI Purdue vs Michigan picks, computer picks Boilermakers vs Wolverines, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW | ||||||
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CFB schedule.
Purdue Betting Trends
Purdue covered the spread just 25 % of the time in 2024, one of the poorest ATS performances in the FBS.
Michigan Betting Trends
Michigan covered only 46.2 % of spreads in 2024, making them a somewhat unreliable favorite relative to expectations.
Boilermakers vs. Wolverines Matchup Trends
With Michigan heavily favored—odds showing around a 20-point spread against Purdue—bettors face contrasting ATS tendencies: a Boilermakers team that seldom covered, and a Wolverines team that hasn’t covered reliably despite dominance. The low over/under line near 49.5 suggests expectations of a controlled game pace, perhaps favoring first-half value or emergence of the under if Purdue’s offense remains stalled.
Purdue vs. Michigan Game Info
Purdue vs Michigan starts on November 01, 2025 at 7:00 PM EST.
Venue: Michigan Stadium.
Spread: Michigan -21.0
Moneyline: Purdue +1070, Michigan -2128
Over/Under: 51.5
Purdue: (2-6) | Michigan: (6-2)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: B. Underwood over 183.5 Passing Yards.. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
With Michigan heavily favored—odds showing around a 20-point spread against Purdue—bettors face contrasting ATS tendencies: a Boilermakers team that seldom covered, and a Wolverines team that hasn’t covered reliably despite dominance. The low over/under line near 49.5 suggests expectations of a controlled game pace, perhaps favoring first-half value or emergence of the under if Purdue’s offense remains stalled.
PURDUE trend: Purdue covered the spread just 25 % of the time in 2024, one of the poorest ATS performances in the FBS.
MICH trend: Michigan covered only 46.2 % of spreads in 2024, making them a somewhat unreliable favorite relative to expectations.
See our latest CFB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
Purdue vs. Michigan Odds
Remi is pouring through mountains of data on each line. In fact, anytime the Purdue vs Michigan trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing angles to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme travel distance almost always follow normal, predictable betting trends.
| PURDUE Moneyline | +1070 |
|---|---|
| MICH Moneyline | -2128 |
| PURDUE Spread | +21 |
| MICH Spread | -21.0 |
| Over / Under | 51.5 |
Purdue vs Michigan Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Aug 29, 2026 12:00PM EDT
NC State Wolfpack
Virginia Cavaliers
8/29/26 12PM
NCST
UVA
|
–
–
|
+146
-176
|
+3.5 (-105)
-3.5 (-115)
|
O 54.5 (-105)
U 54.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Aug 29, 2026 12:00PM EDT
North Carolina Tar Heels
TCU Horned Frogs
8/29/26 12PM
UNC
TCU
|
–
–
|
+245
-310
|
+7.5 (-110)
-7.5 (-110)
|
O 50.5 (-105)
U 50.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Clemson Tigers
LSU Tigers
9/5/26 12PM
CLEM
LSU
|
–
–
|
+350
-465
|
+11.5 (-110)
-11.5 (-110)
|
O 51.5 (-110)
U 51.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
UCLA Bruins
California Golden Bears
9/5/26 12PM
UCLA
CAL
|
–
–
|
+140
-170
|
+3.5 (-112)
-3.5 (-108)
|
O 53.5 (-110)
U 53.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Baylor Bears
Auburn Tigers
9/5/26 12PM
BAYLOR
AUBURN
|
–
–
|
+235
-295
|
+7.5 (-114)
-7.5 (-106)
|
O 58.5 (-110)
U 58.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 6, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Wisconsin Badgers
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
9/6/26 12PM
WISC
ND
|
–
–
|
+660
-1050
|
+16.5 (-105)
-16.5 (-115)
|
O 46.5 (-115)
U 46.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Ohio State Buckeyes
Texas Longhorns
9/12/26 12PM
OHIOST
TEXAS
|
–
–
|
+114
-137
|
+2.5 (-105)
-2.5 (-115)
|
O 47.5 (-115)
U 47.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Oklahoma Sooners
Michigan Wolverines
9/12/26 12PM
OKLA
MICH
|
–
–
|
-102
-118
|
+1.5 (-110)
-1.5 (-110)
|
O 45.5 (-110)
U 45.5 (-110)
|
CFB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers Purdue Boilermakers vs. Michigan Wolverines on November 01, 2025 at Michigan Stadium.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CFB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
|
|
|
|
RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OREG@IND | IND -3 | 53.4% | 2 | WIN |
| OLEMISS@GEORGIA | KEWAN LACY ANYTIME TD | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
| BAMA@IND | FERNANDO MENDOZA UNDER 26.5 PASS ATT | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@TXTECH | OREG -126 | 58.9% | 6 | WIN |
| MICH@TEXAS | TEXAS -6 | 53.3% | 1 | WIN |
| MIAMI@OHIOST | UNDER 40.5 | 53.6% | 2 | WIN |
| NEB@UTAH | DEVON DAMPIER UNDER 185.5 PASS YDS | 53.4% | 3 | LOSS |
| IOWA@VANDY | IOWA +4.5 | 53.1% | 2 | WIN |
| NOTEX@SDGST | NOTEX -7 | 54.2% | 4 | LOSS |
| TULANE@OLEMISS | OLEMISS -16.5 | 53.4% | 1 | WIN |
| MIAMI@TEXA&M | TEXA&M -3 | 54.1% | 3 | LOSS |
| BAMA@OKLA | BAMA +1.5 | 52.1% | 1 | WIN |
| BAMA@OKLA | ISAIAH SATEGNA III ANYTIME TD | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| BYU@TTU | PARKER KINGSTON OVER 20.5 LONGEST RECEPTION | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| UNLV@BOISE | BOISE -4.5 | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | UNDER 44 | 52.8% | 2 | WIN |
| ECU@FAU | FAU +7 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| OREG@WASH | WASH +7 | 54.9% | 4 | LOSS |
| WYO@HAWAII | WYO +7.5 | 55.1% | 5 | LOSS |
| COLO@KSTATE | COLO +17.5 | 54.0% | 4 | WIN |
| PSU@RUT | RUT +14 | 52.8% | 1 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | MICH +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| VATECH@UVA | VATECH +8 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| NWEST@ILL | LUKE ALTMYER UNDER 19.5 PASS COMP | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| ORE@WAS | DEMOND WILLIAMS JR UNDER 43.5 RUSH YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| MIAMI@VATECH | VATECH +18.5 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| GAST@TROY | TROY -9.5 | 55.7% | 5 | WIN |
| DEL@WAKE | DEL +18 | 56.7% | 6 | LOSS |
| NMEX@AF | NMEX -3.5 | 56.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WASHST@JMAD | WASHST +14.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| ILL@WISC | WISC +9 | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WKY@LSU | WKY +23.5 | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| WASH@UCLA | DEMOND WILLIAMS UNDER 27.5 PASS ATT | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| TCU@HOU | AMARE THOMAS OVER 69.5 RECV YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| TEX@UGA | NATE FRAZIER UNDER 65.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 55.5% | 5 | WIN |
| PUR@WASH | ANTONIO HARRIS UNDER 73.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 54.1% | 4 | WIN |
| OKLA@BAMA | UNDER 46 | 52.4% | 2 | WIN |
| UVA@DUKE | DUKE -3.5 | 54.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| OKLA@BAMA | BAMA -6 | 54.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| OREGST@TULSA | OREGST -120 | 55.6% | 5 | LOSS |
| UTEP@MIZZST | MIZZST -5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| COLOST@NMEX | NMEX -14 | 57.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| PSU@MICHST | MICHST +7.5 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
| MISSST@MIZZOU | MISSST +7.5 | 57.2% | 7 | LOSS |
| FAU@TULANE | FAU +17.5 | 56.0% | 6 | WIN |
| NCST@MIAMI | NCST +15.5 | 57.1% | 7 | LOSS |
| KENTST@AKRON | AKRON -6.5 | 55.4% | 5 | LOSS |
| JAXST@UTEP | JAXST -105 | 57.0% | 7 | WIN |
| FSU@CLEM | CLEM -118 | 57.1% | 5 | WIN |
| UNLV@COLOST | UNLV -4 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@IOWA | IOWA +6.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |