Illinois vs Washington Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CFB Lines & Props (Oct 25)
Updated: 2025-10-18T02:28:40.156150ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The Illinois Fighting Illini travel to face the Washington Huskies on October 25, 2025 at Husky Stadium in Seattle, both teams entering with identical 5-2 records and looking to gain traction in the Big Ten. Illinois brings momentum from a pair of quality wins and is seeking its first true road statement of the season, while Washington wants to rebound after a recent loss and re-assert its dominance at home.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Oct 25, 2025
Start Time: 3:30 PM EST
Venue: Alaska Airlines Field at Husky Stadium
Huskies Record: (5-2)
Fighting Illini Record: (5-2)
OPENING ODDS
ILL Moneyline: +178
WASH Moneyline: -214
ILL Spread: +5
WASH Spread: -5.0
Over/Under: 55.5
ILL
Betting Trends
- Illinois has covered the spread in approximately 71.4% of its games so far this season.
WASH
Betting Trends
- Washington’s exact ATS cover percentage is currently unclear, but broader trends suggest the Huskies are closer to a 50% cover rate through their recent stretch.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- Illinois is outperforming expectations against the spread while Washington—despite strong underlying stats—has been less consistent in covering. Illinois’s 71.4% ATS cover rate means they’ve provided value relative to the line more often than not. Meanwhile Washington’s approximate 50% cover rate suggests they win plenty of games but don’t always cover, especially under pressure at home after a loss. Thus, the blend here is a road team hitting its stride ATS-wise against a home team with big upside but less cover reliability. For bettors, the value may lean toward Illinois keeping this close—or even covering—despite being the underdog, provided they play disciplined football and avoid the big errors that Washington can exploit.
ILL vs. WASH
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: K. Feagin over 0.5 Total Touchdowns.
LIVE CFB ODDS
CFB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
448-370
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+834.7
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$83,469
VS. SPREAD
1955-1598
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+555.4
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$55,541
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Illinois vs Washington Prediction & Odds:
Free CFB Betting Insights for 10/25/25
The October 25, 2025 matchup between the Illinois Fighting Illini and the Washington Huskies at Husky Stadium in Seattle promises to be a physical and tactical battle between two teams with similar records but very different identities. Illinois comes into the contest at 5-2, a team defined by gritty defense, improving quarterback play, and a knack for outperforming betting expectations, covering in over 70% of their games this season. Head coach Bret Bielema has once again molded the Illini into a disciplined, fundamentally sound unit that thrives on balance and physicality. Offensively, Illinois has found rhythm after a sluggish start, averaging roughly 34 points per game and moving the ball efficiently through a more confident passing attack led by Luke Altmyer. Altmyer, who has passed for over 1,800 yards and 15 touchdowns, has developed strong chemistry with Isaiah Williams, one of the Big Ten’s most versatile playmakers, who can line up outside, in the slot, or even take jet sweeps to keep defenses honest. The running game, typically Illinois’s calling card under Bielema, hasn’t been as dominant as in past seasons but remains serviceable behind Reggie Love III and Kaden Feagin, who combine for steady production and help set up play-action opportunities. The offensive line, while not as overpowering as the one that anchored last year’s group, remains a strength, ranking among the top half of the Big Ten in sack prevention and short-yardage success. Defensively, Illinois remains tough and opportunistic. They allow about 25 points per game and have been particularly strong on early downs, forcing opponents into uncomfortable third-and-long situations. Defensive tackle Jer’Zhan Newton continues to be one of the most disruptive interior linemen in the nation, consistently commanding double teams and opening up space for edge rushers Gabe Jacas and Seth Coleman. The secondary, led by cornerback Xavier Scott, has shown flashes but must improve communication and prevent deep-ball breakdowns against Washington’s explosive aerial attack.
On the other side, the Washington Huskies enter with the same 5-2 record but a much different style. The Huskies, under head coach Jedd Fisch, still play with an offensive flair reminiscent of their high-octane past, averaging nearly 35 points per game and over 6.8 yards per play. Dual-threat quarterback Demond Williams Jr. has stepped in seamlessly, using his mobility and strong arm to keep defenses off balance. Washington’s offense thrives on explosive plays, particularly through wide receivers Germie Bernard and Jeremy Bernard, who stretch defenses vertically and punish coverage mismatches. The ground game, featuring Dillon Johnson and Will Nixon, has complemented the passing attack well, averaging 4.7 yards per carry and helping the Huskies sustain long drives. Defensively, Washington remains one of the most athletic teams in the Big Ten, allowing just over 20 points per game, with edge rusher Bralen Trice and linebacker Alphonzo Tuputala leading a front seven that generates consistent pressure. However, their secondary has been vulnerable at times, particularly on intermediate routes and play-action concepts—an area Illinois could exploit. From a betting standpoint, Illinois’s strong ATS record compared to Washington’s roughly 50% success rate suggests a potential value edge for the visitors, especially given their ability to keep games close with disciplined play and physicality. The key matchup will be whether Illinois’s defense can contain Washington’s speed and whether Altmyer can stay poised against an aggressive pass rush. Expect the Huskies to look for early tempo to stretch Illinois’s defense horizontally, while the Illini aim to slow the game down with sustained drives and ball control. In the end, Washington’s home-field advantage and offensive explosiveness make them the logical favorite, but Illinois’s resilience and ability to win in the trenches give them a real shot to cover—and perhaps even threaten an upset—if they execute their game plan and win the turnover battle in one of the Big Ten’s most intriguing cross-divisional matchups of the week.
Get live CFB odds and precise AI CFB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
Locked in. Coast to coast. It’s 1-0 every week. pic.twitter.com/uJBYZMXyao
— Illinois Football (@IlliniFootball) October 20, 2025
Illinois Fighting Illini CFB Preview
The Illinois Fighting Illini head to Seattle for their October 25, 2025 showdown against the Washington Huskies carrying confidence, momentum, and one of the better ATS records in the Big Ten this season. At 5-2 overall and covering in roughly 71% of their games, Illinois has established itself as a gritty, disciplined program under head coach Bret Bielema, who continues to lean on physicality, ball control, and sound defensive fundamentals. The Illini have developed an identity built on resilience—winning with efficiency rather than flash—and that formula will be tested in a hostile environment against a Washington team that thrives on tempo and explosive plays. Offensively, Illinois has shown real balance, averaging about 34 points per game while improving its passing attack behind quarterback Luke Altmyer. The junior signal-caller has thrown for over 1,800 yards and 15 touchdowns with improved pocket awareness and decision-making, and his growing chemistry with star wideout Isaiah Williams has given the offense a dynamic element it lacked earlier in the season. Williams, one of the Big Ten’s most dangerous multipurpose players, leads the team in receptions and total yards, using his quickness in space to extend drives and open up the field. Complementing that aerial attack is a sturdy backfield tandem of Reggie Love III and Kaden Feagin, who together average over 120 rushing yards per game and provide Bielema with the downhill, time-consuming ground game that defines his coaching style. The offensive line has been efficient in run blocking and excellent in short-yardage situations, though keeping Altmyer upright against Washington’s fierce edge rush will be critical.
Defensively, Illinois continues to embody the toughness associated with Bielema’s tenure. The front seven is anchored by Jer’Zhan “Johnny” Newton, one of the most dominant defensive tackles in college football, whose ability to disrupt plays in the backfield has made him a likely first-round NFL prospect. Linebackers Gabe Jacas and Seth Coleman bring pressure off the edge, and the Illini’s defense has held opponents to under 26 points per game while ranking among the top 30 nationally in rushing defense. The secondary, while talented, has been inconsistent at times, occasionally giving up big plays on miscommunications—something they can’t afford against a Washington offense that thrives on deep shots and quick tempo. Illinois’s defensive key will be controlling first down, forcing Washington into predictable passing situations, and maintaining gap integrity to contain quarterback Demond Williams Jr.’s scrambling ability. On offense, the Illini must play keep-away—sustaining long, clock-draining drives and keeping the Huskies’ offense off the field. Special teams could also play a role, as kicker Caleb Griffin has been reliable in pressure situations, and field position will be vital in a road environment like Husky Stadium. From a betting standpoint, Illinois’s strong ATS record compared to Washington’s middling home-cover percentage makes them an intriguing underdog play. The Illini have thrived in these underdog situations by staying within striking distance through physical defense and opportunistic scoring. To pull off the upset, they’ll need to avoid turnovers, stay disciplined against motion-heavy looks, and convert in the red zone—areas where they’ve quietly excelled this season. If Altmyer protects the ball and the defense forces a turnover or two, Illinois has the formula to make this a four-quarter fight. While Washington has the advantage in athleticism and home-field energy, Illinois’s experience, balance, and commitment to trench warfare make them a legitimate threat to cover and perhaps even walk out of Seattle with one of their biggest wins of the Bielema era.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Washington Huskies CFB Preview
The Washington Huskies return to the electric atmosphere of Husky Stadium on October 25, 2025, for a crucial Big Ten matchup against the surging Illinois Fighting Illini, eager to reestablish dominance after a midseason setback. At 5-2 overall and roughly 50% against the spread, the Huskies remain one of the conference’s most explosive and balanced teams, blending high-tempo offense with defensive physicality that reflects head coach Jedd Fisch’s aggressive, detail-driven philosophy. Washington’s offense continues to be among the Big Ten’s most productive, averaging nearly 35 points per game and over 6.8 yards per play. Quarterback Demond Williams Jr. has been the driving force of the unit, combining speed, precision, and decision-making well beyond his years. His dual-threat skill set has given defenses fits all season—he’s thrown for over 1,700 yards and 14 touchdowns while adding crucial yardage with his legs in scramble and designed run situations. Williams’ chemistry with receivers Germie Bernard and Jeremy Bernard has become the heart of Washington’s aerial attack; both wideouts possess elite speed and route-running ability that can expose even the most disciplined secondaries. Tight end Jack Westover also remains a vital component of the offense, providing a reliable outlet on third downs and in the red zone. Meanwhile, the running back tandem of Dillon Johnson and Will Nixon has quietly given Washington balance, combining for over 900 yards rushing at 4.7 yards per carry. Their ability to move the chains and keep defenses honest has been key in allowing Williams to dictate tempo and stretch the field. Up front, Washington’s offensive line has held strong despite injuries, consistently giving Williams a clean pocket and opening lanes for the ground game.
Defensively, the Huskies are physical and opportunistic, allowing just over 20 points per game while thriving on pressure created by their front seven. Edge rusher Bralen Trice and defensive tackle Tuli Letuligasenoa headline a unit that can disrupt any rhythm-based offense, and linebacker Alphonzo Tuputala has emerged as one of the most underrated players in the conference, leading the team in tackles and anchoring the middle. The secondary, though occasionally vulnerable against elite receivers, has improved week to week with increased discipline and communication. Safeties Asa Turner and Mishael Powell bring veteran leadership and range, helping Washington contain big plays. Against Illinois, the Huskies’ defensive priority will be controlling the line of scrimmage, limiting explosive plays from Isaiah Williams, and forcing quarterback Luke Altmyer into uncomfortable throwing situations. The Illini’s offensive line is capable but not dominant, so expect Washington to use stunts and edge pressure to collapse pockets quickly and force hurried throws. Offensively, the Huskies will look to establish rhythm early with quick passes and designed quarterback runs, testing Illinois’s linebackers in space. From a betting perspective, Washington’s inconsistent ATS record makes them a bit of a wild card—they’ve often won games comfortably but failed to cover due to late defensive lapses or conservative play-calling with leads. Still, their home-field advantage is among the best in the country, and they’ve been particularly strong under the lights in Seattle, feeding off the energy of one of the loudest stadiums in college football. For Washington to both win and cover, they’ll need a clean, efficient performance—limit penalties, finish drives with touchdowns, and maintain focus for all four quarters. If Williams continues his dual-threat brilliance, the run game stays balanced, and the defense pressures Altmyer consistently, the Huskies should handle business at home. Expect a statement-type performance from Washington, with their blend of physicality and explosiveness allowing them to control tempo, wear down Illinois in the second half, and reassert themselves as one of the Big Ten’s most dangerous and complete teams.
12:30 P.M. kickoff this Saturday 🚨 See you there Husky Nation ‼️ pic.twitter.com/lYzzmu39By
— Washington Football (@UW_Football) October 19, 2025
Illinois vs Washington Prop Picks (AI)
Remi is pouring through tons of datapoints on each team. In fact, anytime the Fighting Illini and Huskies play there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at Alaska Airlines Field at Husky Stadium in Oct almost always follow normal, predictable betting trends.
Illinois vs Washington Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports genius, has been pouring over tons of data from every angle between the Fighting Illini and Huskies and using recursive machine learning and cutting-edge AI to examine the data to a single cover probability.
Oddly enough, we’ve seen the AI has been most fixated on the trending factor human bettors often put on Illinois’s strength factors between a Fighting Illini team going up against a possibly unhealthy Huskies team. We’ve found the true game analytics appear to reflect a moderate lean against one Vegas line in particular.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CFB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI Illinois vs Washington picks, computer picks Fighting Illini vs Huskies, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW | ||||||
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CFB schedule.
Illinois Betting Trends
Illinois has covered the spread in approximately 71.4% of its games so far this season.
Washington Betting Trends
Washington’s exact ATS cover percentage is currently unclear, but broader trends suggest the Huskies are closer to a 50% cover rate through their recent stretch.
Fighting Illini vs. Huskies Matchup Trends
Illinois is outperforming expectations against the spread while Washington—despite strong underlying stats—has been less consistent in covering. Illinois’s 71.4% ATS cover rate means they’ve provided value relative to the line more often than not. Meanwhile Washington’s approximate 50% cover rate suggests they win plenty of games but don’t always cover, especially under pressure at home after a loss. Thus, the blend here is a road team hitting its stride ATS-wise against a home team with big upside but less cover reliability. For bettors, the value may lean toward Illinois keeping this close—or even covering—despite being the underdog, provided they play disciplined football and avoid the big errors that Washington can exploit.
Illinois vs. Washington Game Info
Illinois vs Washington starts on October 25, 2025 at 3:30 PM EST.
Venue: Alaska Airlines Field at Husky Stadium.
Spread: Washington -5.0
Moneyline: Illinois +178, Washington -214
Over/Under: 55.5
Illinois: (5-2) | Washington: (5-2)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: K. Feagin over 0.5 Total Touchdowns.. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
Illinois is outperforming expectations against the spread while Washington—despite strong underlying stats—has been less consistent in covering. Illinois’s 71.4% ATS cover rate means they’ve provided value relative to the line more often than not. Meanwhile Washington’s approximate 50% cover rate suggests they win plenty of games but don’t always cover, especially under pressure at home after a loss. Thus, the blend here is a road team hitting its stride ATS-wise against a home team with big upside but less cover reliability. For bettors, the value may lean toward Illinois keeping this close—or even covering—despite being the underdog, provided they play disciplined football and avoid the big errors that Washington can exploit.
ILL trend: Illinois has covered the spread in approximately 71.4% of its games so far this season.
WASH trend: Washington’s exact ATS cover percentage is currently unclear, but broader trends suggest the Huskies are closer to a 50% cover rate through their recent stretch.
See our latest CFB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
Illinois vs. Washington Odds
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through mountains of stats on each team. In fact, anytime the Illinois vs Washington trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme temps rarely follow normal, predictable betting trends.
| ILL Moneyline | +178 |
|---|---|
| WASH Moneyline | -214 |
| ILL Spread | +5 |
| WASH Spread | -5.0 |
| Over / Under | 55.5 |
Illinois vs Washington Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Aug 29, 2026 12:00PM EDT
NC State Wolfpack
Virginia Cavaliers
8/29/26 12PM
NCST
UVA
|
–
–
|
+134
-162
|
+3.5 (-115)
-3.5 (-105)
|
O 54.5 (-105)
U 54.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Aug 29, 2026 12:00PM EDT
North Carolina Tar Heels
TCU Horned Frogs
8/29/26 12PM
UNC
TCU
|
–
–
|
+245
-310
|
+7.5 (-110)
-7.5 (-110)
|
O 50.5 (-105)
U 50.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Clemson Tigers
LSU Tigers
9/5/26 12PM
CLEM
LSU
|
–
–
|
+350
-465
|
+11.5 (-110)
-11.5 (-110)
|
O 51.5 (-110)
U 51.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
UCLA Bruins
California Golden Bears
9/5/26 12PM
UCLA
CAL
|
–
–
|
+168
-205
|
+5.5 (-112)
-5.5 (-108)
|
O 53.5 (-110)
U 53.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Baylor Bears
Auburn Tigers
9/5/26 12PM
BAYLOR
AUBURN
|
–
–
|
+235
-295
|
+7.5 (-114)
-7.5 (-106)
|
O 58.5 (-110)
U 58.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 6, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Wisconsin Badgers
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
9/6/26 12PM
WISC
ND
|
–
–
|
+660
-1050
|
+16.5 (-105)
-16.5 (-115)
|
O 46.5 (-115)
U 46.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Ohio State Buckeyes
Texas Longhorns
9/12/26 12PM
OHIOST
TEXAS
|
–
–
|
+114
-137
|
+2.5 (-105)
-2.5 (-115)
|
O 47.5 (-115)
U 47.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Oklahoma Sooners
Michigan Wolverines
9/12/26 12PM
OKLA
MICH
|
–
–
|
-102
-118
|
+1.5 (-110)
-1.5 (-110)
|
O 45.5 (-110)
U 45.5 (-110)
|
CFB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers Illinois Fighting Illini vs. Washington Huskies on October 25, 2025 at Alaska Airlines Field at Husky Stadium.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CFB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
|
|
|
|
RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OREG@IND | IND -3 | 53.4% | 2 | WIN |
| OLEMISS@GEORGIA | KEWAN LACY ANYTIME TD | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
| BAMA@IND | FERNANDO MENDOZA UNDER 26.5 PASS ATT | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@TXTECH | OREG -126 | 58.9% | 6 | WIN |
| MICH@TEXAS | TEXAS -6 | 53.3% | 1 | WIN |
| MIAMI@OHIOST | UNDER 40.5 | 53.6% | 2 | WIN |
| NEB@UTAH | DEVON DAMPIER UNDER 185.5 PASS YDS | 53.4% | 3 | LOSS |
| IOWA@VANDY | IOWA +4.5 | 53.1% | 2 | WIN |
| NOTEX@SDGST | NOTEX -7 | 54.2% | 4 | LOSS |
| TULANE@OLEMISS | OLEMISS -16.5 | 53.4% | 1 | WIN |
| MIAMI@TEXA&M | TEXA&M -3 | 54.1% | 3 | LOSS |
| BAMA@OKLA | BAMA +1.5 | 52.1% | 1 | WIN |
| BAMA@OKLA | ISAIAH SATEGNA III ANYTIME TD | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| BYU@TTU | PARKER KINGSTON OVER 20.5 LONGEST RECEPTION | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| UNLV@BOISE | BOISE -4.5 | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | UNDER 44 | 52.8% | 2 | WIN |
| ECU@FAU | FAU +7 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| OREG@WASH | WASH +7 | 54.9% | 4 | LOSS |
| WYO@HAWAII | WYO +7.5 | 55.1% | 5 | LOSS |
| COLO@KSTATE | COLO +17.5 | 54.0% | 4 | WIN |
| PSU@RUT | RUT +14 | 52.8% | 1 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | MICH +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| VATECH@UVA | VATECH +8 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| NWEST@ILL | LUKE ALTMYER UNDER 19.5 PASS COMP | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| ORE@WAS | DEMOND WILLIAMS JR UNDER 43.5 RUSH YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| MIAMI@VATECH | VATECH +18.5 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| GAST@TROY | TROY -9.5 | 55.7% | 5 | WIN |
| DEL@WAKE | DEL +18 | 56.7% | 6 | LOSS |
| NMEX@AF | NMEX -3.5 | 56.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WASHST@JMAD | WASHST +14.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| ILL@WISC | WISC +9 | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WKY@LSU | WKY +23.5 | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| WASH@UCLA | DEMOND WILLIAMS UNDER 27.5 PASS ATT | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| TCU@HOU | AMARE THOMAS OVER 69.5 RECV YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| TEX@UGA | NATE FRAZIER UNDER 65.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 55.5% | 5 | WIN |
| PUR@WASH | ANTONIO HARRIS UNDER 73.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 54.1% | 4 | WIN |
| OKLA@BAMA | UNDER 46 | 52.4% | 2 | WIN |
| UVA@DUKE | DUKE -3.5 | 54.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| OKLA@BAMA | BAMA -6 | 54.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| OREGST@TULSA | OREGST -120 | 55.6% | 5 | LOSS |
| UTEP@MIZZST | MIZZST -5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| COLOST@NMEX | NMEX -14 | 57.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| PSU@MICHST | MICHST +7.5 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
| MISSST@MIZZOU | MISSST +7.5 | 57.2% | 7 | LOSS |
| FAU@TULANE | FAU +17.5 | 56.0% | 6 | WIN |
| NCST@MIAMI | NCST +15.5 | 57.1% | 7 | LOSS |
| KENTST@AKRON | AKRON -6.5 | 55.4% | 5 | LOSS |
| JAXST@UTEP | JAXST -105 | 57.0% | 7 | WIN |
| FSU@CLEM | CLEM -118 | 57.1% | 5 | WIN |
| UNLV@COLOST | UNLV -4 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@IOWA | IOWA +6.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |