Bowling Green vs Kent State Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CFB Lines & Props (Oct 25)
Updated: 2025-10-18T02:28:40.156150ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The Bowling Green Falcons travel to face the Kent State Golden Flashes on October 25, 2025 in a key Mid-American Conference matchup that could influence bowl eligibility and momentum for both programs. Bowling Green enters seeking to bounce back after recent inconsistency, while Kent State—at home—looks to leverage familiarity and home crowd energy to regroup.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Oct 25, 2025
Start Time: 12:00 PM EST
Venue: Dix Stadium
Golden Flashes Record: (2-5)
Falcons Record: (3-4)
OPENING ODDS
BGREEN Moneyline: -326
KENT Moneyline: +258
BGREEN Spread: -8.5
KENT Spread: +8.5
Over/Under: 48.5
BGREEN
Betting Trends
- Bowling Green has shown solid performance against the spread this season, posting a 4-2-0 ATS mark as of their October 18 game.
KENT
Betting Trends
- Kent State has covered the spread in 3 of their first 6 games this season, standing at a 3-3-0 ATS record.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- From a betting perspective, this matchup offers value in the contrast between Bowling Green’s relatively strong ATS record as a road team and Kent State’s middling ATS performance at home despite home-field advantage. If oddsmakers lean toward Kent State heavily given the home setting, the value may actually lie with Bowling Green’s road capability and cover history. Conversely, if the line undervalues Kent State’s home familiarity, they could present value as a home dog. Key indicators for bettors include Bowling Green’s ability to execute improvements on offense (they average 5.01 yards per play this season) and Kent State’s tendency to struggle converting third downs—only a 26.44% rate so far.
BGREEN vs. KENT
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: REMI'S STILL ANALYZING MARKETS
LIVE CFB ODDS
CFB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
468-388
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+911.1
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$91,112
VS. SPREAD
2027-1637
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+630.2
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$63,018
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Bowling Green vs Kent State Prediction & Odds:
Free CFB Betting Insights for 10/25/25
The October 25, 2025 matchup between the Bowling Green Falcons and the Kent State Golden Flashes at Dix Stadium is a classic Mid-American Conference clash between two teams searching for consistency and identity as the regular season hits its home stretch. Bowling Green enters the game with a 3-4 overall record and a 1-2 mark in MAC play under head coach Scot Loeffler, while Kent State sits at 2-5 with a 1-3 conference record in head coach Kenni Burns’ second season. Both programs have shown flashes of progress but remain hampered by offensive inconsistency and defensive lapses that have prevented them from sustaining momentum. For Bowling Green, the story of 2025 has been defined by steady defense and a slowly improving offense that still struggles to convert key opportunities. The Falcons average 20.0 points per game while producing 5.0 yards per play, relying primarily on a balanced approach that features running back Ta’ron Keith and quarterback Camden Orth. Keith has been the offensive focal point, rushing for over 400 yards and contributing as a reliable pass-catcher out of the backfield, while Orth has shown modest improvement, throwing for nearly 1,200 yards with seven touchdowns but suffering from turnovers and missed red-zone opportunities. The offensive line has been serviceable, opening enough lanes for Keith and Terion Stewart to sustain drives, but their third-down conversion rate of 33.6% continues to limit production. On the defensive side, Bowling Green has been competitive, allowing 25.6 points per game and showing strength against the run, anchored by linebacker Darren Anders and defensive lineman Cashius Howell. The secondary has been tested often but has held up relatively well, ranking in the top half of the MAC in pass defense efficiency.
However, the Falcons’ tendency to fade late in games has cost them several winnable contests. Kent State, meanwhile, continues its rebuilding process after a difficult 2024 season and enters this matchup averaging just 19.2 points per game while allowing 37.7. Offensively, the Golden Flashes have been defined by inefficiency, particularly on the ground, where they average just 2.36 yards per carry—a figure that has placed immense pressure on the passing game. Quarterback Tommy Ulatowski has thrown for over 1,100 yards and seven touchdowns but has struggled with turnovers and protection breakdowns. Wide receiver Cade Wolford leads the team with 242 yards and has been the lone consistent target in a passing attack that has lacked explosiveness. The offensive line has failed to provide stability, allowing frequent pressures that have disrupted rhythm and forced quick throws. Defensively, Kent State has endured one of the most porous seasons in the MAC, giving up over 460 yards per game while struggling to contain the run and generate takeaways. Linebacker Marquez Cooper has been a bright spot in an otherwise inconsistent unit, but the team’s inability to get off the field on third down—allowing opponents to convert at nearly 45%—has been their undoing. From a betting perspective, Bowling Green’s 4-2 ATS record suggests they’ve been competitive even in losses, while Kent State’s 3-3 ATS mark shows volatility depending on opponent quality. The game’s likely outcome hinges on Bowling Green’s ability to establish the run early, maintain balance, and avoid turnovers against a Kent State defense that has struggled to stop anything consistently. Kent State’s best chance lies in finding offensive rhythm early and capitalizing on Bowling Green’s occasional defensive lapses, but their poor third-down conversion rate (26.4%) makes that a tall order. Expect a scrappy, grind-it-out affair typical of MAC play, with both teams leaning on defense and field position to stay alive. Bowling Green’s steadier defense, superior efficiency, and veteran presence should give them the edge, likely resulting in a low-scoring road win that keeps their postseason hopes intact while leaving Kent State searching for answers on both sides of the ball.
Get live CFB odds and precise AI CFB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
𝙉𝙚𝙬𝙨 & 𝙉𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙨:
— BGSU Football (@BG_Football) October 19, 2025
LB @EspnGideon is No. 4 in the nation in solo tackles (40) and No. 8 in the nation in tackles (70). He is the only player in the nation with 55+ tackles, 8.0+ TFLs, 1.5+ sacks and 1+ pass defended.#GUTS x #AyZiggy 🟠🟤 pic.twitter.com/5TsPhOUSmJ
Bowling Green Falcons CFB Preview
The Bowling Green Falcons head into their October 25, 2025 road matchup against the Kent State Golden Flashes with a sense of urgency and determination to keep their postseason hopes alive. Under head coach Scot Loeffler, Bowling Green sits at 3-4 overall and 1-2 in the MAC, displaying a mix of competitiveness and inconsistency that has defined their season. The Falcons have been in nearly every game this year thanks to a defense that keeps them within striking distance, but offensive inefficiency—particularly on third downs and in the red zone—continues to plague their ability to finish drives. Bowling Green is averaging just 20.0 points per game while producing around 5.0 yards per play, numbers that reflect modest production but not enough explosiveness to pull away from opponents. Quarterback Camden Orth has provided steady leadership but has struggled with accuracy and decision-making in critical moments, throwing for just under 1,200 yards with seven touchdowns and five interceptions. His chemistry with wideouts Odieu Hiliare and Harold Fannin Jr. has been one of the offense’s bright spots, as both receivers have combined for over 600 yards and five scores, providing playmaking potential when given time to get open. The running game, led by Ta’ron Keith and Terion Stewart, has been the heart of the Falcons’ attack, combining for nearly 800 rushing yards at a respectable clip of about 4.0 yards per carry. Keith,
in particular, has been instrumental as a dual-threat weapon, ranking among the team’s leaders in both rushing and receiving yards. The key for Bowling Green’s offense will be sustaining drives, as their 33.6% third-down conversion rate has consistently cut possessions short. Defensively, the Falcons have held opponents to 25.6 points per game while limiting explosive plays, anchored by linebacker Darren Anders, one of the most experienced and productive players in the MAC. The defensive line, led by Cashius Howell and Khalil Smith, has done well generating pressure, while the secondary, featuring cornerbacks Jalen Huskey and Jordan Oladokun, has proven capable of holding its own against vertical passing attacks. Their ability to force turnovers—already at 10 takeaways on the season—has kept Bowling Green competitive in games where the offense sputtered. On the road, discipline and execution will be paramount, particularly against a Kent State team that struggles offensively but tends to play with extra intensity at home. The Falcons will look to establish the run early, dominate time of possession, and allow their defense to dictate the game’s rhythm. From a betting standpoint, Bowling Green’s 4-2 ATS record shows their ability to outperform expectations even when the scoreboard doesn’t always reflect it, and their balanced attack gives them a statistical edge over a Kent State team averaging fewer than 20 points per game. The path to victory for the Falcons is clear: control the line of scrimmage, win the turnover battle, and avoid giving Kent State confidence early. If they can execute that formula—leaning on their ground game, efficient defense, and special teams consistency—Bowling Green should be well-positioned to secure a much-needed road win and cover the spread against an opponent still deep in rebuilding mode.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Kent State Golden Flashes CFB Preview
The Kent State Golden Flashes return to Dix Stadium on October 25, 2025, looking to capitalize on their home-field advantage and salvage what has been another challenging season under head coach Kenni Burns. Sitting at 2-5 overall and 1-3 in MAC play, the Golden Flashes continue to struggle with offensive execution and defensive lapses, but they remain a team that competes with effort and energy, particularly at home. The offense has been their Achilles’ heel all season, averaging just 19.2 points per game while producing 4.5 yards per play. The lack of a consistent rushing attack has been a major problem, as the team averages only 2.36 yards per carry—a figure that has forced them into one-dimensional play-calling and predictable passing situations. Quarterback Tommy Ulatowski has been at the center of that challenge, showing moments of promise with over 1,100 passing yards and seven touchdowns, but his inexperience and inconsistency under pressure have led to costly mistakes. When protected, Ulatowski has flashed a strong arm and solid mechanics, but his offensive line has allowed far too much pressure, limiting his ability to go through progressions. The receiving corps, led by Cade Wolford and Devontez Walker, has been a bright spot in spurts, with both receivers capable of creating separation and turning short passes into explosive gains. However, the offense’s lack of rhythm and its inability to convert third downs—just 26.4% on the season—have made sustained drives rare. Running back Gavin Garcia has struggled to find space behind an underperforming offensive line, averaging less than 3.0 yards per carry, but his toughness and ball security have at least given the team a dependable back to lean on.
On the defensive side, Kent State’s season-long issues have centered on tackling and gap integrity. The Golden Flashes surrender an alarming 37.7 points per game while allowing 6.3 yards per play, numbers that reflect both schematic and execution shortcomings. The front seven, anchored by linebacker Marquez Cooper and defensive lineman C.J. West, has shown flashes of resilience against the run but too often breaks down in crucial moments, particularly late in games. The secondary, led by cornerback Montre Miller, has had trouble defending the deep ball and often gives up big plays when left on an island. Still, Kent State’s defensive unit plays with effort and physicality, traits that occasionally spark turnovers and short-field opportunities. For the Golden Flashes to compete in this matchup, they’ll need to find offensive balance early, establish a functional running game to take pressure off Ulatowski, and avoid falling behind on the scoreboard. The defense must focus on containing Bowling Green’s ground game, forcing the Falcons into third-and-long situations where quarterback Camden Orth is less effective. Special teams may also play a significant role, as Kent State’s kicker Andrew Glass has been reliable from 45 yards and in, while punter Josh Smith has helped tilt field position battles in tight contests. From a betting perspective, Kent State’s 3-3 ATS record reflects their unpredictability—they’ve shown the ability to cover when underestimated but have faltered as favorites. As a home underdog, they could present value if their offense avoids early turnovers and sustains drives. Ultimately, the formula for Kent State’s success is straightforward: limit Bowling Green’s time of possession, tackle efficiently, and convert red-zone opportunities into touchdowns rather than field goals. If they can play disciplined football and feed off the home crowd’s energy, the Golden Flashes have enough grit to hang around deep into the fourth quarter. However, without marked improvement in the trenches and more consistency from their quarterback, pulling off a full upset may remain out of reach.
Back at home this weekend taking on Bowling Green pic.twitter.com/OK8sZCdmGJ
— Kent State Football (@KentStFootball) October 20, 2025
Bowling Green vs Kent State Prop Picks (AI)
Remi is pouring through loads of datapoints on each team. In fact, anytime the Falcons and Golden Flashes play there’s always several intriguing angles to key in on. Not to mention games played at Dix Stadium in Oct rarely follow normal, predictable betting trends.
Bowling Green vs Kent State Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports algorithm, has been pouring over tons of data from every simulation between the Falcons and Golden Flashes and using recursive machine learning and kick-ass AI to boil down the data to a single cover probability.
The Algorithm has been most focused on the trending weight emotional bettors often put on Bowling Green’s strength factors between a Falcons team going up against a possibly healthy Golden Flashes team. In reality, the true game analytics appear to reflect a moderate lean against one Vegas line specifically.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CFB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI Bowling Green vs Kent State picks, computer picks Falcons vs Golden Flashes, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE PICKS LOCKED - SEE NOW | ||||||
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CFB schedule.
Bowling Green Betting Trends
Bowling Green has shown solid performance against the spread this season, posting a 4-2-0 ATS mark as of their October 18 game.
Kent State Betting Trends
Kent State has covered the spread in 3 of their first 6 games this season, standing at a 3-3-0 ATS record.
Falcons vs. Golden Flashes Matchup Trends
From a betting perspective, this matchup offers value in the contrast between Bowling Green’s relatively strong ATS record as a road team and Kent State’s middling ATS performance at home despite home-field advantage. If oddsmakers lean toward Kent State heavily given the home setting, the value may actually lie with Bowling Green’s road capability and cover history. Conversely, if the line undervalues Kent State’s home familiarity, they could present value as a home dog. Key indicators for bettors include Bowling Green’s ability to execute improvements on offense (they average 5.01 yards per play this season) and Kent State’s tendency to struggle converting third downs—only a 26.44% rate so far.
Bowling Green vs. Kent State Game Info
Bowling Green vs Kent State starts on October 25, 2025 at 12:00 PM EST.
Venue: Dix Stadium.
Spread: Kent State +8.5
Moneyline: Bowling Green -326, Kent State +258
Over/Under: 48.5
Bowling Green: (3-4) | Kent State: (2-5)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: REMI'S STILL ANALYZING MARKETS. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
From a betting perspective, this matchup offers value in the contrast between Bowling Green’s relatively strong ATS record as a road team and Kent State’s middling ATS performance at home despite home-field advantage. If oddsmakers lean toward Kent State heavily given the home setting, the value may actually lie with Bowling Green’s road capability and cover history. Conversely, if the line undervalues Kent State’s home familiarity, they could present value as a home dog. Key indicators for bettors include Bowling Green’s ability to execute improvements on offense (they average 5.01 yards per play this season) and Kent State’s tendency to struggle converting third downs—only a 26.44% rate so far.
BGREEN trend: Bowling Green has shown solid performance against the spread this season, posting a 4-2-0 ATS mark as of their October 18 game.
KENT trend: Kent State has covered the spread in 3 of their first 6 games this season, standing at a 3-3-0 ATS record.
See our latest CFB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
Bowling Green vs. Kent State Odds
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through tons of data on each team. In fact, anytime the Bowling Green vs Kent State trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme travel distance rarely follow normal, predictable betting trends.
| BGREEN Moneyline | -326 |
|---|---|
| KENT Moneyline | +258 |
| BGREEN Spread | -8.5 |
| KENT Spread | +8.5 |
| Over / Under | 48.5 |
Bowling Green vs Kent State Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Aug 29, 2026 12:00PM EDT
NC State Wolfpack
Virginia Cavaliers
8/29/26 12PM
NCST
UVA
|
–
–
|
+145
-175
|
+3.5 (-110)
-3.5 (-110)
|
O 54.5 (-110)
U 54.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Aug 29, 2026 12:00PM EDT
North Carolina Tar Heels
TCU Horned Frogs
8/29/26 12PM
UNC
TCU
|
–
–
|
+245
-310
|
+7.5 (-110)
-7.5 (-110)
|
O 50.5 (-110)
U 50.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Clemson Tigers
LSU Tigers
9/5/26 12PM
CLEM
LSU
|
–
–
|
+355
-475
|
+11.5 (-110)
-11.5 (-110)
|
O 51.5 (-110)
U 51.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
UCLA Bruins
California Golden Bears
9/5/26 12PM
UCLA
CAL
|
–
–
|
+140
-170
|
+3.5 (-110)
-3.5 (-110)
|
O 53.5 (-110)
U 53.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Baylor Bears
Auburn Tigers
9/5/26 12PM
BAYLOR
AUBURN
|
–
–
|
+205
-255
|
+7.5 (-110)
-7.5 (-110)
|
O 58.5 (-110)
U 58.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 6, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Wisconsin Badgers
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
9/6/26 12PM
WISC
ND
|
–
–
|
+660
-1050
|
+16.5 (-105)
-16.5 (-115)
|
O 46.5 (-115)
U 46.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Sep 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Ohio State Buckeyes
Texas Longhorns
9/12/26 12PM
OHIOST
TEXAS
|
–
–
|
+115
-140
|
+2.5 (-105)
-2.5 (-115)
|
O 48 (-110)
U 48 (-110)
|
|
|
Sep 12, 2026 12:00PM EDT
Oklahoma Sooners
Michigan Wolverines
9/12/26 12PM
OKLA
MICH
|
–
–
|
+100
-120
|
+1.5 (-110)
-1.5 (-110)
|
O 45.5 (-110)
U 45.5 (-110)
|
CFB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers Bowling Green Falcons vs. Kent State Golden Flashes on October 25, 2025 at Dix Stadium.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CFB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
|
|
|
|
RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OREG@IND | IND -3 | 53.4% | 2 | WIN |
| OLEMISS@GEORGIA | KEWAN LACY ANYTIME TD | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
| BAMA@IND | FERNANDO MENDOZA UNDER 26.5 PASS ATT | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@TXTECH | OREG -126 | 58.9% | 6 | WIN |
| MICH@TEXAS | TEXAS -6 | 53.3% | 1 | WIN |
| MIAMI@OHIOST | UNDER 40.5 | 53.6% | 2 | WIN |
| NEB@UTAH | DEVON DAMPIER UNDER 185.5 PASS YDS | 53.4% | 3 | LOSS |
| IOWA@VANDY | IOWA +4.5 | 53.1% | 2 | WIN |
| NOTEX@SDGST | NOTEX -7 | 54.2% | 4 | LOSS |
| TULANE@OLEMISS | OLEMISS -16.5 | 53.4% | 1 | WIN |
| MIAMI@TEXA&M | TEXA&M -3 | 54.1% | 3 | LOSS |
| BAMA@OKLA | BAMA +1.5 | 52.1% | 1 | WIN |
| BAMA@OKLA | ISAIAH SATEGNA III ANYTIME TD | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| BYU@TTU | PARKER KINGSTON OVER 20.5 LONGEST RECEPTION | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| UNLV@BOISE | BOISE -4.5 | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | UNDER 44 | 52.8% | 2 | WIN |
| ECU@FAU | FAU +7 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| OREG@WASH | WASH +7 | 54.9% | 4 | LOSS |
| WYO@HAWAII | WYO +7.5 | 55.1% | 5 | LOSS |
| COLO@KSTATE | COLO +17.5 | 54.0% | 4 | WIN |
| PSU@RUT | RUT +14 | 52.8% | 1 | WIN |
| OHIOST@MICH | MICH +10.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| VATECH@UVA | VATECH +8 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| NWEST@ILL | LUKE ALTMYER UNDER 19.5 PASS COMP | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| ORE@WAS | DEMOND WILLIAMS JR UNDER 43.5 RUSH YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| MIAMI@VATECH | VATECH +18.5 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| GAST@TROY | TROY -9.5 | 55.7% | 5 | WIN |
| DEL@WAKE | DEL +18 | 56.7% | 6 | LOSS |
| NMEX@AF | NMEX -3.5 | 56.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WASHST@JMAD | WASHST +14.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| ILL@WISC | WISC +9 | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WKY@LSU | WKY +23.5 | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| WASH@UCLA | DEMOND WILLIAMS UNDER 27.5 PASS ATT | 56.3% | 6 | WIN |
| TCU@HOU | AMARE THOMAS OVER 69.5 RECV YDS | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| TEX@UGA | NATE FRAZIER UNDER 65.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 55.5% | 5 | WIN |
| PUR@WASH | ANTONIO HARRIS UNDER 73.5 RUSH + REC YDS | 54.1% | 4 | WIN |
| OKLA@BAMA | UNDER 46 | 52.4% | 2 | WIN |
| UVA@DUKE | DUKE -3.5 | 54.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| OKLA@BAMA | BAMA -6 | 54.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| OREGST@TULSA | OREGST -120 | 55.6% | 5 | LOSS |
| UTEP@MIZZST | MIZZST -5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| COLOST@NMEX | NMEX -14 | 57.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| PSU@MICHST | MICHST +7.5 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
| MISSST@MIZZOU | MISSST +7.5 | 57.2% | 7 | LOSS |
| FAU@TULANE | FAU +17.5 | 56.0% | 6 | WIN |
| NCST@MIAMI | NCST +15.5 | 57.1% | 7 | LOSS |
| KENTST@AKRON | AKRON -6.5 | 55.4% | 5 | LOSS |
| JAXST@UTEP | JAXST -105 | 57.0% | 7 | WIN |
| FSU@CLEM | CLEM -118 | 57.1% | 5 | WIN |
| UNLV@COLOST | UNLV -4 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| OREG@IOWA | IOWA +6.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |