East Carolina vs North Carolina Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CBB Lines & Props (Dec 22)
Updated: 2025-12-20T03:31:50.923562ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The North Carolina Tar Heels host the East Carolina Pirates in Chapel Hill as two in‑state programs meet with very different season trajectories: UNC enters as one of the nation’s top teams, while ECU has struggled through a challenging non‑conference slate. Carolina’s ACC status and national ranking make them heavy favorites, but East Carolina will look to disrupt that narrative with improved offensive rhythm and competitive grit.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Dec 22, 2025
Start Time: 8:00 PM EST
Venue: Dean E. Smith Center
Tar Heels Record: (11-1)
Pirates Record: (5-7)
OPENING ODDS
ECU Moneyline: ODDS COMING SOON
UNC Moneyline: ODDS COMING SOON
ECU Spread: ODDS COMING SOON
UNC Spread: ODDS COMING SOON
Over/Under: ODDS COMING SOON
ECU
Betting Trends
- East Carolina has struggled against the spread this season, posting a poor ATS mark (around 2‑8) with frequent failures to cover, and trends suggest many of their recent games have not hit the expected spread.
UNC
Betting Trends
- North Carolina has been healthier against the spread with a solid ATS record (approximately 7‑5), indicating that the Tar Heels more often cover when favored, though not overwhelmingly so.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- Across the broader NCAA landscape this season, UNC’s overall 7‑5 ATS trend (≈58 % ATS success) contrasts sharply with East Carolina’s ATS woes, and historical small‑favorite matchups similar to this type of line show teams like ECU generally covering just over half the time — though the specific Pirates trend has been weak.
ECU vs. UNC
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: H. Veesaar under 27.5 PTS+REB.
LIVE CBB ODDS
CBB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
447-366
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+862.5
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$86,247
VS. SPREAD
1942-1588
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+564.7
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$56,465
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
East Carolina vs North Carolina Prediction & Odds:
Free CBB Betting Insights for 12/22/25
The East Carolina Pirates travel to Chapel Hill to take on the No. 12 North Carolina Tar Heels in a quintessential David vs. Goliath non‑conference clash that highlights the contrasting trajectories of these two North Carolina programs this season. Carolina enters the matchup as one of the more formidable teams in the nation, boasting an 11‑1 record and a perfect home mark at the Dean E. Smith Center, while ECU arrives with a 5‑7 record and has struggled away from Greenville, standing 0‑3 on the road with an opportunity to make a statement against one of college basketball’s blue bloods. The statistical divergence between these squads is stark: UNC averages nearly 80 points per game on efficient 47.0 percent shooting and a robust 8.2 made threes per game, while limiting opponents to approximately 64 points and dominating the boards; East Carolina scores around 68 points per contest on 40.7 percent shooting and has been outscored by most of its opposition this year, underscoring the uphill battle it faces against a balanced and deep Tar Heel unit. The matchup provides UNC a chance to fine‑tune before rigorous ACC play begins, while ECU sees it as a rare shot at an upset and a benchmark to measure progress. North Carolina’s strength this season has come from its blend of veteran leadership and emerging stars, most notably forward Caleb Wilson, who is averaging close to 20 points and 10 rebounds, and big man Henri Veesaar, whose inside dominance was on full display in a recent 77‑58 blowout of East Tennessee State where he shot 10‑of‑11 from the floor for a career‑high 26 points. The Tar Heels coupled that with lockdown rebounding and efficient ball movement to control the contest from start to finish, showcasing their ability to impose size and pace against lesser opponents. Carolina’s guard play also received a boost with the return of Seth Trimble from injury, as he played a key role in a tight 71‑70 win over Ohio State in the CBS Sports Classic—something that could pay dividends in maintaining offensive fluidity against a zone or switching defense. The coaching staff under Hubert Davis has emphasized consistency, pushing for full‑40‑minute efforts, especially on the defensive end where UNC ranks among the best in limiting second‑chance and high‑percentage attempts.
This balance of interior strength, perimeter shooting, and defensive discipline has allowed UNC to sustain leads, control possessions, and mitigate the risk of late‑game slippage—an asset against an ECU squad likely to rely on quick bursts of offense to stay competitive. For East Carolina, the narrative centers on resilience and opportunity. The Pirates have shown flashes of offensive talent, led by Jordan Riley’s scoring prowess—he dropped 24 points in a comfortable win over Presbyterian and has been a consistent scoring threat all season. However, ECU’s supporting cast has struggled with consistency, particularly in shooting efficiency and ball security, which played a role in a narrow 82‑78 loss to UNC Greensboro where turnovers and defensive lapses allowed the Spartans to outscore them. Against a disciplined UNC defense that thrives on forcing contested shots and controlling tempo, those offensive deficiencies could be magnified. The Pirates will need to emphasize efficient shot selection, take care of the basketball, and crash the offensive glass to generate second‑chance opportunities if they hope to extend possessions and chip away at Carolina’s advantage. Without a reliable second scoring option behind Riley and trouble containing UNC’s athletic frontcourt, ECU risks seeing any early surge evaporate quickly. This game also carries historical weight, as ECU has never won on the road against an AP‑ranked opponent, making this outing both a significant challenge and a potential turning point for a program seeking to redefine its competitive identity. Ultimately, this matchup shapes up as a demonstrative test of UNC’s depth, balance, and defensive mettle against ECU’s best offensive impulses and tenacity. Carolina’s edge in experience, efficiency, and home environment gives it a substantial advantage, but the Pirates will look to disrupt expectations and perhaps steal some momentum with a bold road performance.
Get live CBB odds and precise AI CBB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
Gametime in 24!🏴☠️#GoPirates pic.twitter.com/4Svmmt9nA9
— East Carolina Men’s Basketball (@ecubasketball) December 22, 2025
East Carolina Pirates CBB Preview
East Carolina enters Chapel Hill as a team still finding its identity this 2025‑26 season, and while the Pirates have shown flashes of spirited play, they have struggled overall to put together consistent results against Division I competition. East Carolina’s current record hovers around 3‑6, and their recent performances reflect a pattern of highs and lows that speak to both potential and unresolved issues on both ends of the floor. The Pirates opened their season with promise, edging past Georgia Southern 92‑89 behind a strong scoring night from star guard Jordan Riley, who led the way with 22 points, eight rebounds, and six steals in the season opener — demonstrating his two‑way capability and importance as ECU’s primary offensive engine. However, that early success has been counterbalanced by tough losses, including an 82‑78 defeat to UNC Greensboro where turnovers (15 for ECU) and defensive lapses allowed the Spartans to capitalize and win down the stretch. The inconsistency in execution is a theme that has followed ECU, as the Pirates have shown the ability to compete but also the tendency to allow close games to slip away. Jordan Riley’s presence is perhaps the clearest indicator of this East Carolina team’s ceiling. The senior guard earned American Conference Preseason All‑Conference First Team honors, reflecting his status as one of the conference’s most impactful players based on his steal rates and scoring ability from last season, where he averaged around 14.5 points and six rebounds per game while ranking high nationally in steals. Riley’s multifaceted contributions — scoring, rebounding, and creating havoc defensively — make him a genuine offensive fulcrum, and his ability to take over stretches keeps ECU competitive even when other players are struggling. But beyond Riley, the Pirates have lacked consistent secondary scoring and defensive cohesion, with several different starting lineups used early in the season, indicating head coach Michael Schwartz’s efforts to discover the best combinations and improve overall chemistry. Defensively and on the glass, ECU has shown moments of grit but lacks the size and athleticism that teams like UNC will bring.
Forward Giovanni Emejuru has made his presence felt inside with strong rebounding and scoring, often serving as a complementary piece to Riley’s offensive creation. Yet the Pirates’ defensive rotations and ability to limit high‑quality shots have been tested, and against a disciplined Tar Heel offense that excels at ball movement and interior presence, East Carolina could be put in difficult spacing and matchup situations. Additionally, ECU’s turnover struggles — evident in games like the loss to UNCG where giveaways translated directly into second‑chance points for the opponent — could be particularly costly against a North Carolina squad adept at converting turnovers into transition offense. The Pirates have shown resilience — evidenced by their competitive margins and ability to battle late into games — and they are 7‑1 in one‑possession games dating back to last season, suggesting an ability to stay close in tight contests when execution clicks. But the challenge at UNC represents a significant escalation in competition level. East Carolina’s last true non‑conference road win dates back over a decade, and that trend underscores the difficulty they historically face in opposing hostile environments. For ECU to succeed in Chapel Hill, they’ll need balanced scoring beyond Riley, improved perimeter shooting, disciplined ball security, and defensive focus that limits UNC’s ability to dominate the paint and take uncontested threes. Otherwise, the Pirates risk falling behind early and being forced to play catch‑up — a task that has been difficult for them to sustain consistently this season. In summary, ECU arrives as a competitive but imperfect unit, led by a dynamic guard in Jordan Riley but ultimately lacking the depth and consistency needed to tackle a top‑tier opponent like North Carolina on the road. Their fight and flashes of talent will make them interesting to watch, but the Tar Heels’ advantages may prove overwhelming unless the Pirates can execute near‑perfect basketball.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
North Carolina Tar Heels CBB Preview
The North Carolina Tar Heels enter this in‑state showdown with the East Carolina Pirates as one of the more compelling teams in the nation this season, carrying a 10‑1 record that underscores both offensive firepower and defensive discipline. Carolina’s success in the early part of the 2025‑26 campaign has been anchored by a dynamic frontcourt duo in freshman Caleb Wilson and senior Henri Veesaar, whose inside presence has transformed UNC into a more physically imposing and efficient team on both ends of the floor. Wilson leads the team with approximately 19.5 points and 10.4 rebounds per game, while Veesaar is a strong second option with around 16.0 points and 9.2 rebounds per game, giving North Carolina a rare combination of size, versatility, and production that many opponents have struggled to contain. These two players often dictate the style of play, scoring efficiently around the rim, dominating the boards, and anchoring a defense that forces teams to earn shots rather than allowing easy baskets. Alongside them, guard Kyan Evans serves as a steady facilitator, averaging over 4 assists per game, and the returning senior Seth Trimble has re‑emerged as a key contributor on both ends — his 17‑point performance in a narrow 71‑70 win over Ohio State demonstrated his ability to impact big games with scoring and defense. UNC’s statistical balance — scoring inside, controlling rebounds, and making high‑percentage shots — has made them a difficult matchup for most opponents so far this season. What differentiates this Tar Heel squad from past years is its frontcourt synergy and depth. The “twin towers” of Wilson and Veesaar have given UNC a distinct advantage in the paint, both offensively and defensively, and they consistently draw double teams that open up perimeter opportunities for shooters like Luka Bogavac, Derek Dixon, and others who can capitalize when defenses collapse. Veesaar’s presence as a 7‑foot rim protector and Wilson’s ability to score from varied angles make North Carolina’s half‑court offense difficult to scheme against, while their rebounding prowess limits opponents’ second‑chance opportunities. The Tar Heels have demonstrated this dominance in several recent outings, including an 81‑61 win over Georgetown where the two big men combined for a plethora of points and rebounds, showing how their strength inside can suffocate mismatched defenses.
Carolina’s home court, the Dean E. Smith Center, adds another layer of advantage, as it remains one of the more intimidating environments in college basketball and often energizes the Heels’ depth players to maintain tempo and physicality throughout all four quarters. Defensively, UNC has been disciplined and opportunistic, ranking well nationally in limiting opponents’ scoring efficiency and protecting the paint. Although they have not always been elite at forcing turnovers, their ability to contest shots and close passing lanes has been evident throughout non‑conference play, holding teams below their average scoring output on multiple occasions. This blend of interior deterrence and perimeter communication allows the Tar Heels to adapt to different offensive looks, which will be crucial against a Pirates team that may try to speed up the game or shoot from deep to compensate for interior mismatches. Head coach Hubert Davis has managed rotations effectively, blending veteran leadership with fresh talent and ensuring that UNC’s pace remains controlled yet explosive when opportunities arise. A key storyline for this home game will be how consistently Carolina can maintain defensive intensity for the full 40 minutes — something they have achieved against quality opponents like Ohio State and Georgetown but will continue to refine as ACC play looms on the horizon. Overall, North Carolina’s combination of elite frontcourt scoring, rebounding dominance, developing perimeter play, and defensive competitiveness makes them strong favorites in this matchup. Their depth and home‑court advantage create an environment where they can assert tempo early and force opponents to play into UNC’s strengths. If the Tar Heels continue to balance offensive efficiency with disciplined defense, they should control this contest from start to finish, setting a tone as they transition into the heart of ACC competition.
Lucas: Steadfast
— Carolina Basketball (@UNC_Basketball) December 21, 2025
🔗 https://t.co/SB8jvcFKhW pic.twitter.com/ce7by8v0Ry
East Carolina vs North Carolina Prop Picks (AI)
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through loads of datapoints on each line. In fact, anytime the Pirates and Tar Heels play there’s always several intriguing observations to key in on. Not to mention games played at Dean E. Smith Center in Dec can often follow normal, predictable betting trends.
East Carolina vs North Carolina Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports algorithm, has been pouring over tons of data from every past game between the Pirates and Tar Heels and using recursive machine learning and cutting-edge AI to analyze the data to a single cover probability.
Remi has been most keyed in on the trending emphasis knucklehead sportsbettors regularly put on player performance factors between a Pirates team going up against a possibly strong Tar Heels team. We’ve found the true game analytics appear to reflect a moderate lean against one Vegas line specifically.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CBB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI East Carolina vs North Carolina picks, computer picks Pirates vs Tar Heels, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBB | 2/14 | COLO@BYU | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 6 |
VAULT v4
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | FURMAN@VMI | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 6 |
VAULT v3
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | MERCER@CITADEL | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 6 |
VAULT v2
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | HIGHPT@GWEBB | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 6 |
VAULT v2
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | HAWAII@CSUN | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 5 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | UCRIV@UCSD | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 5 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | ARMY@AMERCN | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | SC@BAMA | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | NDAKST@NDAK | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | GTOWN@UCONN | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 3 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | NMEXST@JAXST | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 1 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | DUQ@STBONN | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 1 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | BUCK@BU | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | GATECH@ND | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | LVILLE@BAYLOR | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | TEXA&M@VANDY | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | UNF@JVILLE | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | WYO@COLOST | GET FREE PICK NOW | 1 | – | |
| CBB | 2/14 | UK@FLA | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 1 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | TXTECH@ARIZ | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 1 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | KANSAS@IOWAST | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 1 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | CLEM@DUKE | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 0 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | GC@SJST | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 0 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/14 | COLO@BYU | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 0 |
INTEL
|
|
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CBB schedule.
East Carolina Betting Trends
East Carolina has struggled against the spread this season, posting a poor ATS mark (around 2‑8) with frequent failures to cover, and trends suggest many of their recent games have not hit the expected spread.
North Carolina Betting Trends
North Carolina has been healthier against the spread with a solid ATS record (approximately 7‑5), indicating that the Tar Heels more often cover when favored, though not overwhelmingly so.
Pirates vs. Tar Heels Matchup Trends
Across the broader NCAA landscape this season, UNC’s overall 7‑5 ATS trend (≈58 % ATS success) contrasts sharply with East Carolina’s ATS woes, and historical small‑favorite matchups similar to this type of line show teams like ECU generally covering just over half the time — though the specific Pirates trend has been weak.
East Carolina vs. North Carolina Game Info
East Carolina vs North Carolina starts on December 22, 2025 at 8:00 PM EST.
Venue: Dean E. Smith Center.
Spread: North Carolina ODDS COMING SOON
Moneyline: East Carolina ODDS COMING SOON, North Carolina ODDS COMING SOON
Over/Under: ODDS COMING SOON
East Carolina: (5-7) | North Carolina: (11-1)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: H. Veesaar under 27.5 PTS+REB.. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
Across the broader NCAA landscape this season, UNC’s overall 7‑5 ATS trend (≈58 % ATS success) contrasts sharply with East Carolina’s ATS woes, and historical small‑favorite matchups similar to this type of line show teams like ECU generally covering just over half the time — though the specific Pirates trend has been weak.
ECU trend: East Carolina has struggled against the spread this season, posting a poor ATS mark (around 2‑8) with frequent failures to cover, and trends suggest many of their recent games have not hit the expected spread.
UNC trend: North Carolina has been healthier against the spread with a solid ATS record (approximately 7‑5), indicating that the Tar Heels more often cover when favored, though not overwhelmingly so.
See our latest CBB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
East Carolina vs. North Carolina Odds
Remi is pouring through mountains of data on each player. In fact, anytime the East Carolina vs North Carolina trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme hostile environments can often follow normal, predictable patterns.
| ECU Moneyline | ODDS COMING SOON |
|---|---|
| UNC Moneyline | ODDS COMING SOON |
| ECU Spread | ODDS COMING SOON |
| UNC Spread | ODDS COMING SOON |
| Over / Under | ODDS COMING SOON |
East Carolina vs North Carolina Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Feb 15, 2026 12:00PM EST
Maryland Terrapins
Rutgers Scarlet Knights
2/15/26 12PM
MD
RUT
|
–
–
|
+115
-140
|
+2.5 (-116)
-2.5 (+104)
|
O 144.5 (-108)
U 144.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 12:00PM EST
UTSA Roadrunners
Charlotte 49ers
2/15/26 12PM
UTSA
CHARLO
|
–
–
|
+900
-1600
|
+14.5 (-101)
-14.5 (-111)
|
O 147.5 (-103)
U 147.5 (-113)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 12:00PM EST
Utah Utes
Cincinnati Bearcats
2/15/26 12PM
UTAH
CINCY
|
–
–
|
+550
-800
|
+11 (-103)
-11 (-109)
|
O 142 (-108)
U 142 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 1:00PM EST
Manhattan Jaspers
Canisius Golden Griffins
2/15/26 1PM
MANHAT
CAN
|
–
–
|
-125
+105
|
-1 (-101)
+1 (-111)
|
O 141 (-108)
U 141 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 1:00PM EST
Denver Pioneers
Omaha Mavericks
2/15/26 1PM
DENVR
OMAHA
|
–
–
|
+130
-155
|
+3 (-101)
-3 (-111)
|
O 161.5 (-108)
U 161.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 1:00PM EST
Indiana Hoosiers
Illinois Fighting Illini
2/15/26 1PM
IND
ILL
|
–
–
|
+475
-700
|
+10.5 (-106)
-10.5 (-106)
|
O 152 (-108)
U 152 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 1:00PM EST
Youngstown St Penguins
Detroit Mercy Titans
2/15/26 1PM
YOUNG
DETRIOT
|
–
–
|
-145
+120
|
-2 (-122)
+2 (+109)
|
O 151.5 (-108)
U 151.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 1:00PM EST
Holy Cross Crusaders
Loyola Maryland Greyhounds
2/15/26 1PM
HOLY
LOYMD
|
–
–
|
+150
|
+3.5 (-111)
|
O 146 (-108)
U 146 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Siena Saints
Marist Red Foxes
2/15/26 2PM
SIENA
MARIST
|
–
–
|
+110
-130
|
+1.5 (-106)
-1.5 (-106)
|
O 133.5 (-108)
U 133.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Merrimack Warriors
Quinnipiac Bobcats
2/15/26 2PM
MERRI
QUINN
|
–
–
|
+105
-125
|
+1.5 (-106)
-1.5 (-106)
|
O 141.5 (-108)
U 141.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Fairfield Stags
Saint Peter's Peacocks
2/15/26 2PM
FAIR
STPETE
|
–
–
|
+150
-180
|
+2.5 (+109)
-2.5 (-122)
|
O 142.5 (-108)
U 142.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Wright State Raiders
Cleveland State Vikings
2/15/26 2PM
WRIGHT
CLEVST
|
–
–
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 159 (-113)
U 159 (-103)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
North Texas Mean Green
Temple Owls
2/15/26 2PM
NOTEX
TEMPLE
|
–
–
|
+125
-150
|
+2.5 (-104)
-2.5 (-108)
|
O 137.5 (-108)
U 137.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Rider Broncs
Sacred Heart Pioneers
2/15/26 2PM
RIDER
SACRED
|
–
–
|
+350
-450
|
+9 (-106)
-9 (-106)
|
O 149 (-108)
U 149 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Tulane Green Wave
UAB Blazers
2/15/26 2PM
TULANE
UAB
|
–
–
|
+230
-285
|
+6 (-101)
-6 (-111)
|
O 152 (-113)
U 152 (-103)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
IUPUI Jaguars
Fort Wayne Mastodons
2/15/26 2PM
IUPUI
IPFW
|
–
–
|
+250
-325
|
+6 (-101)
-6 (-111)
|
O 160.5 (-113)
U 160.5 (-103)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
South Florida Bulls
Florida Atlantic Owls
2/15/26 2PM
SFLA
FAU
|
–
–
|
-210
+175
|
-4.5 (-111)
+4.5 (-101)
|
O 166 (-108)
U 166 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Oakland Golden Grizzlies
Robert Morris Colonials
2/15/26 2PM
OAKLND
ROBERT
|
–
–
|
+105
-125
|
+1 (-103)
-1 (-109)
|
O 156 (-108)
U 156 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Bradley Braves
Southern Illinois Salukis
2/15/26 2PM
BRAD
SOILL
|
–
–
|
+130
-160
|
+3 (-109)
-3 (-103)
|
O 144.5 (-108)
U 144.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Iona Gaels
Niagara Purple Eagles
2/15/26 2PM
IONA
NIAGRA
|
–
–
|
-225
+185
|
-5.5 (-104)
+5.5 (-108)
|
O 133 (-103)
U 133 (-113)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Indiana State Sycamores
Valparaiso Beacons
2/15/26 2PM
INDST
VALPO
|
–
–
|
-225
|
-5 (-101)
|
O 143 (-113)
U 143 (-103)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 3:00PM EST
Green Bay Phoenix
Milwaukee Panthers
2/15/26 3PM
GBAY
MILW
|
–
–
|
+115
-140
|
+1.5 (-101)
-1.5 (-111)
|
O 145.5 (-115)
U 145.5 (-101)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 3:00PM EST
Illinois State Redbirds
UIC Flames
2/15/26 3PM
ILLST
UIC
|
–
–
|
-110
|
-1 (-101)
|
O 139 (-103)
U 139 (-113)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 3:00PM EST
Drake Bulldogs
Northern Iowa Panthers
2/15/26 3PM
DRAKE
NIOWA
|
–
–
|
+400
-550
|
+9.5 (-106)
-9.5 (-106)
|
O 137.5 (-103)
U 137.5 (-113)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 4:00PM EST
Davidson Wildcats
Dayton Flyers
2/15/26 4PM
DAVID
DAYTON
|
–
–
|
+160
-190
|
+4.5 (-111)
-4.5 (-101)
|
O 139 (-108)
U 139 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 4:00PM EST
Eastern Kentucky Colonels
North Alabama Lions
2/15/26 4PM
EKTY
NBAMA
|
–
–
|
-200
+165
|
-4 (-106)
+4 (-106)
|
O 149.5 (-108)
U 149.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 5:00PM EST
Charleston Cougars
Campbell Fighting Camels
2/15/26 5PM
CHARL
CAMP
|
–
–
|
+110
-130
|
+2 (-108)
-2 (-104)
|
O 158.5 (-103)
U 158.5 (-113)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 6:00PM EST
San Francisco Dons
San Diego Toreros
2/15/26 6PM
SANFRN
USD
|
–
–
|
-200
+165
|
-4 (-111)
+4 (-101)
|
O 148.5 (-113)
U 148.5 (-103)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 6:00PM EST
Seton Hall Pirates
Butler Bulldogs
2/15/26 6PM
SETON
BUTLER
|
–
–
|
-140
+115
|
-1.5 (-106)
+1.5 (-106)
|
O 142 (-103)
U 142 (-113)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 6:00PM EST
Belmont Bruins
Murray State Racers
2/15/26 6PM
BELMNT
MURRAY
|
–
–
|
+100
|
+1.5 (-113)
|
O 167 (-106)
U 167 (-110)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 7:00PM EST
Towson Tigers
Monmouth Hawks
2/15/26 7PM
TOWSON
MONMTH
|
–
–
|
+110
-130
|
+1.5 (-106)
-1.5 (-106)
|
O 136 (-103)
U 136 (-113)
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2026 8:00PM EST
Oregon State Beavers
Seattle Redhawks
2/15/26 8PM
OREGST
SEATTLE
|
–
–
|
-285
|
-6 (-108)
|
O 138 (-103)
U 138 (-113)
|
|
|
Feb 16, 2026 9:00PM EST
Houston Cougars
Iowa State Cyclones
2/16/26 9PM
HOU
IOWAST
|
–
–
|
+105
-125
|
+1.5 (-110)
-1.5 (-110)
|
O 133.5 (-110)
U 133.5 (-110)
|
CBB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers East Carolina Pirates vs. North Carolina Tar Heels on December 22, 2025 at Dean E. Smith Center.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CBB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
|
|
|
|
RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMASON@GWASH | GWASH -2 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| MICHST@WISC | WISC +2.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |
| BROWN@HARV | HARV -7.5 | 55.0% | 4 | LOSS |
| CLMBIA@PENN | PENN -2 | 54.7% | 4 | WIN |
| PRESBY@CHARLSO | CHARLSO -1 | 54.7% | 4 | WIN |
| MNMTH@DREX | DREX -1.5 | 55.3% | 5 | LOSS |
| HAWAII@CSBAK | CSBAK +13 | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| VALPO@ILLST | ILLST -8.5 | 53.8% | 3 | WIN |
| WNTHRP@GWEBB | GWEBB +20.5 | 56.8% | 6 | WIN |
| UCDAV@UCSD | UCSD -4.5 | 53.6% | 1 | WIN |
| IOWA@MD | MD +11 | 54.7% | 4 | WIN |
| BUFF@BALLST | BALLST +1.5 | 54.9% | 4 | LOSS |
| VCU@LSALLE | LSALLE +12.5 | 54.0% | 3 | WIN |
| MICH@NWEST | NWEST +15.5 | 56.5% | 6 | WIN |
| VATECH@CLEM | VATECH +8 | 57.8% | 7 | WIN |
| IOWAST@TCU | IOWAST -7 | 56.8% | 6 | LOSS |
| UNC@MIAMI | MIAMI +1.5 | 53.8% | 2 | WIN |
| COLOST@AF | COLOST -16 | 54.9% | 4 | WIN |
| UVA@FSU | UVA -7.5 | 55.3% | 5 | LOSS |
| MARQET@NOVA | NOVA -9.5 | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| EILL@WESTILL | EILL -3.5 | 54.7% | 4 | LOSS |
| BELMONT@BRAD | BELMONT -1 | 56.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| TXAMCC@NEWORL | TXAMCC -102 | 53.8% | 3 | LOSS |
| UIW@SELOU | UIW -105 | 55.5% | 5 | LOSS |
| ARIZ@KANSAS | KANSAS +1.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |
| RICE@UAB | UAB -8 | 54.8% | 4 | LOSS |
| BAYLOR@IOWAST | IOWAST -14.5 | 55.2% | 5 | LOSS |
| MILW@NKY | NKY -6.5 | 55.2% | 5 | LOSS |
| TARL@SUTAH | TARL +1.5 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| VATECH@NCST | NCST -9.5 | 55.3% | 5 | LOSS |
| TENN@UK | TENN +2 | 55.9% | 5 | LOSS |
| UTAH@KANSAS | KANSAS -18.5 | 55.9% | 6 | LOSS |
| SDGST@AF | SDGST -21.5 | 56.5% | 6 | WIN |
| MERIMK@RIDER | MERIMK -8.5 | 57.0% | 6 | WIN |
| PFW@WRIGHT | WRIGHT -7.5 | 57.1% | 7 | LOSS |
| DUKE@UNC | UNDER 152.5 | 52.7% | 1 | WIN |
| ILL@MICHST | MICHST -0.5 | 52.5% | 1 | WIN |
| HOU@BYU | HOU -1 | 53.7% | 2 | WIN |
| MURRAY@SOILL | MURRAY -122 | 56.8% | 5 | WIN |
| UCONN@STJOHN | STJOHN +2 | 52.9% | 1 | WIN |
| ELON@HAMPTON | ELON -120 | 54.8% | 4 | LOSS |
| RIDER@MARIST | RIDER +14.5 | 54.7% | 4 | LOSS |
| UCRIV@CSUF | CSUF -5.5 | 55.9% | 5 | WIN |
| MERCER@CHAT | MERCER -4.5 | 56.5% | 6 | LOSS |
| WOFF@VMI | WOFF -8.5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| NWEST@ILL | ILL -14.5 | 54.4% | 4 | WIN |
| UTSA@SFLA | SFLA -25.5 | 56.4% | 6 | LOSS |
| IND@USC | IND -110 | 55.2% | 5 | LOSS |
| UNLV@FRESNO | FRESNO -120 | 56.5% | 4 | WIN |
| RUT@UCLA | UCLA -13.5 | 54.4% | 4 | WIN |
| DRAKE@BELMONT | BELMONT -9.5 | 54.6% | 4 | WIN |