East Carolina vs North Carolina Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CBB Lines & Props (Dec 22)

Updated: 2025-12-20T03:31:50.923562ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props

The North Carolina Tar Heels host the East Carolina Pirates in Chapel Hill as two in‑state programs meet with very different season trajectories: UNC enters as one of the nation’s top teams, while ECU has struggled through a challenging non‑conference slate. Carolina’s ACC status and national ranking make them heavy favorites, but East Carolina will look to disrupt that narrative with improved offensive rhythm and competitive grit.

Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.

AI Sports Betting Algorithm Remi

GAME INFO

Date: Dec 22, 2025

Start Time: 8:00 PM EST​

Venue: Dean E. Smith Center​

Tar Heels Record: (11-1)

Pirates Record: (5-7)

OPENING ODDS

ECU Moneyline: ODDS COMING SOON

UNC Moneyline: ODDS COMING SOON

ECU Spread: ODDS COMING SOON

UNC Spread: ODDS COMING SOON

Over/Under: ODDS COMING SOON

ECU
Betting Trends

  • East Carolina has struggled against the spread this season, posting a poor ATS mark (around 2‑8) with frequent failures to cover, and trends suggest many of their recent games have not hit the expected spread.

UNC
Betting Trends

  • North Carolina has been healthier against the spread with a solid ATS record (approximately 7‑5), indicating that the Tar Heels more often cover when favored, though not overwhelmingly so.

MATCHUP TRENDS

  • Across the broader NCAA landscape this season, UNC’s overall 7‑5 ATS trend (≈58 % ATS success) contrasts sharply with East Carolina’s ATS woes, and historical small‑favorite matchups similar to this type of line show teams like ECU generally covering just over half the time — though the specific Pirates trend has been weak.

ECU vs. UNC
Best Prop Bet

  • Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: H. Veesaar under 27.5 PTS+REB.

LIVE CBB ODDS

CBB ODDS COMPARISON

WANT MORE AI PICKS?

VAULT
VS. SPREAD
447-366
VAULT
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+862.5
VAULT
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$86,247
EXECUTIVE
VS. SPREAD
1942-1588
EXECUTIVE
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+564.7
EXECUTIVE
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$56,465

AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS

Create a Free Account

‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today.

Remi Finds New Picks

Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line.

Remi Works 24/7

Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.

Get Remi's AI Picks

Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.

East Carolina vs North Carolina Prediction & Odds:
Free CBB Betting Insights for 12/22/25

The East Carolina Pirates travel to Chapel Hill to take on the No. 12 North Carolina Tar Heels in a quintessential David vs. Goliath non‑conference clash that highlights the contrasting trajectories of these two North Carolina programs this season. Carolina enters the matchup as one of the more formidable teams in the nation, boasting an 11‑1 record and a perfect home mark at the Dean E. Smith Center, while ECU arrives with a 5‑7 record and has struggled away from Greenville, standing 0‑3 on the road with an opportunity to make a statement against one of college basketball’s blue bloods. The statistical divergence between these squads is stark: UNC averages nearly 80 points per game on efficient 47.0 percent shooting and a robust 8.2 made threes per game, while limiting opponents to approximately 64 points and dominating the boards; East Carolina scores around 68 points per contest on 40.7 percent shooting and has been outscored by most of its opposition this year, underscoring the uphill battle it faces against a balanced and deep Tar Heel unit. The matchup provides UNC a chance to fine‑tune before rigorous ACC play begins, while ECU sees it as a rare shot at an upset and a benchmark to measure progress. North Carolina’s strength this season has come from its blend of veteran leadership and emerging stars, most notably forward Caleb Wilson, who is averaging close to 20 points and 10 rebounds, and big man Henri Veesaar, whose inside dominance was on full display in a recent 77‑58 blowout of East Tennessee State where he shot 10‑of‑11 from the floor for a career‑high 26 points. The Tar Heels coupled that with lockdown rebounding and efficient ball movement to control the contest from start to finish, showcasing their ability to impose size and pace against lesser opponents. Carolina’s guard play also received a boost with the return of Seth Trimble from injury, as he played a key role in a tight 71‑70 win over Ohio State in the CBS Sports Classic—something that could pay dividends in maintaining offensive fluidity against a zone or switching defense. The coaching staff under Hubert Davis has emphasized consistency, pushing for full‑40‑minute efforts, especially on the defensive end where UNC ranks among the best in limiting second‑chance and high‑percentage attempts.

This balance of interior strength, perimeter shooting, and defensive discipline has allowed UNC to sustain leads, control possessions, and mitigate the risk of late‑game slippage—an asset against an ECU squad likely to rely on quick bursts of offense to stay competitive. For East Carolina, the narrative centers on resilience and opportunity. The Pirates have shown flashes of offensive talent, led by Jordan Riley’s scoring prowess—he dropped 24 points in a comfortable win over Presbyterian and has been a consistent scoring threat all season. However, ECU’s supporting cast has struggled with consistency, particularly in shooting efficiency and ball security, which played a role in a narrow 82‑78 loss to UNC Greensboro where turnovers and defensive lapses allowed the Spartans to outscore them. Against a disciplined UNC defense that thrives on forcing contested shots and controlling tempo, those offensive deficiencies could be magnified. The Pirates will need to emphasize efficient shot selection, take care of the basketball, and crash the offensive glass to generate second‑chance opportunities if they hope to extend possessions and chip away at Carolina’s advantage. Without a reliable second scoring option behind Riley and trouble containing UNC’s athletic frontcourt, ECU risks seeing any early surge evaporate quickly. This game also carries historical weight, as ECU has never won on the road against an AP‑ranked opponent, making this outing both a significant challenge and a potential turning point for a program seeking to redefine its competitive identity. Ultimately, this matchup shapes up as a demonstrative test of UNC’s depth, balance, and defensive mettle against ECU’s best offensive impulses and tenacity. Carolina’s edge in experience, efficiency, and home environment gives it a substantial advantage, but the Pirates will look to disrupt expectations and perhaps steal some momentum with a bold road performance.

Get live CBB odds and precise AI CBB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.

East Carolina Pirates CBB Preview

East Carolina enters Chapel Hill as a team still finding its identity this 2025‑26 season, and while the Pirates have shown flashes of spirited play, they have struggled overall to put together consistent results against Division I competition. East Carolina’s current record hovers around 3‑6, and their recent performances reflect a pattern of highs and lows that speak to both potential and unresolved issues on both ends of the floor. The Pirates opened their season with promise, edging past Georgia Southern 92‑89 behind a strong scoring night from star guard Jordan Riley, who led the way with 22 points, eight rebounds, and six steals in the season opener — demonstrating his two‑way capability and importance as ECU’s primary offensive engine. However, that early success has been counterbalanced by tough losses, including an 82‑78 defeat to UNC Greensboro where turnovers (15 for ECU) and defensive lapses allowed the Spartans to capitalize and win down the stretch. The inconsistency in execution is a theme that has followed ECU, as the Pirates have shown the ability to compete but also the tendency to allow close games to slip away. Jordan Riley’s presence is perhaps the clearest indicator of this East Carolina team’s ceiling. The senior guard earned American Conference Preseason All‑Conference First Team honors, reflecting his status as one of the conference’s most impactful players based on his steal rates and scoring ability from last season, where he averaged around 14.5 points and six rebounds per game while ranking high nationally in steals. Riley’s multifaceted contributions — scoring, rebounding, and creating havoc defensively — make him a genuine offensive fulcrum, and his ability to take over stretches keeps ECU competitive even when other players are struggling. But beyond Riley, the Pirates have lacked consistent secondary scoring and defensive cohesion, with several different starting lineups used early in the season, indicating head coach Michael Schwartz’s efforts to discover the best combinations and improve overall chemistry. Defensively and on the glass, ECU has shown moments of grit but lacks the size and athleticism that teams like UNC will bring.

Forward Giovanni Emejuru has made his presence felt inside with strong rebounding and scoring, often serving as a complementary piece to Riley’s offensive creation. Yet the Pirates’ defensive rotations and ability to limit high‑quality shots have been tested, and against a disciplined Tar Heel offense that excels at ball movement and interior presence, East Carolina could be put in difficult spacing and matchup situations. Additionally, ECU’s turnover struggles — evident in games like the loss to UNCG where giveaways translated directly into second‑chance points for the opponent — could be particularly costly against a North Carolina squad adept at converting turnovers into transition offense. The Pirates have shown resilience — evidenced by their competitive margins and ability to battle late into games — and they are 7‑1 in one‑possession games dating back to last season, suggesting an ability to stay close in tight contests when execution clicks. But the challenge at UNC represents a significant escalation in competition level. East Carolina’s last true non‑conference road win dates back over a decade, and that trend underscores the difficulty they historically face in opposing hostile environments. For ECU to succeed in Chapel Hill, they’ll need balanced scoring beyond Riley, improved perimeter shooting, disciplined ball security, and defensive focus that limits UNC’s ability to dominate the paint and take uncontested threes. Otherwise, the Pirates risk falling behind early and being forced to play catch‑up — a task that has been difficult for them to sustain consistently this season. In summary, ECU arrives as a competitive but imperfect unit, led by a dynamic guard in Jordan Riley but ultimately lacking the depth and consistency needed to tackle a top‑tier opponent like North Carolina on the road. Their fight and flashes of talent will make them interesting to watch, but the Tar Heels’ advantages may prove overwhelming unless the Pirates can execute near‑perfect basketball.

The North Carolina Tar Heels host the East Carolina Pirates in Chapel Hill as two in‑state programs meet with very different season trajectories: UNC enters as one of the nation’s top teams, while ECU has struggled through a challenging non‑conference slate. Carolina’s ACC status and national ranking make them heavy favorites, but East Carolina will look to disrupt that narrative with improved offensive rhythm and competitive grit. East Carolina vs North Carolina AI Prediction: Free CBB Betting Insights for Dec 22. Credit USA TODAY/IMAGN

Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN

North Carolina Tar Heels CBB Preview

The North Carolina Tar Heels enter this in‑state showdown with the East Carolina Pirates as one of the more compelling teams in the nation this season, carrying a 10‑1 record that underscores both offensive firepower and defensive discipline. Carolina’s success in the early part of the 2025‑26 campaign has been anchored by a dynamic frontcourt duo in freshman Caleb Wilson and senior Henri Veesaar, whose inside presence has transformed UNC into a more physically imposing and efficient team on both ends of the floor. Wilson leads the team with approximately 19.5 points and 10.4 rebounds per game, while Veesaar is a strong second option with around 16.0 points and 9.2 rebounds per game, giving North Carolina a rare combination of size, versatility, and production that many opponents have struggled to contain. These two players often dictate the style of play, scoring efficiently around the rim, dominating the boards, and anchoring a defense that forces teams to earn shots rather than allowing easy baskets. Alongside them, guard Kyan Evans serves as a steady facilitator, averaging over 4 assists per game, and the returning senior Seth Trimble has re‑emerged as a key contributor on both ends — his 17‑point performance in a narrow 71‑70 win over Ohio State demonstrated his ability to impact big games with scoring and defense. UNC’s statistical balance — scoring inside, controlling rebounds, and making high‑percentage shots — has made them a difficult matchup for most opponents so far this season. What differentiates this Tar Heel squad from past years is its frontcourt synergy and depth. The “twin towers” of Wilson and Veesaar have given UNC a distinct advantage in the paint, both offensively and defensively, and they consistently draw double teams that open up perimeter opportunities for shooters like Luka Bogavac, Derek Dixon, and others who can capitalize when defenses collapse. Veesaar’s presence as a 7‑foot rim protector and Wilson’s ability to score from varied angles make North Carolina’s half‑court offense difficult to scheme against, while their rebounding prowess limits opponents’ second‑chance opportunities. The Tar Heels have demonstrated this dominance in several recent outings, including an 81‑61 win over Georgetown where the two big men combined for a plethora of points and rebounds, showing how their strength inside can suffocate mismatched defenses.

Carolina’s home court, the Dean E. Smith Center, adds another layer of advantage, as it remains one of the more intimidating environments in college basketball and often energizes the Heels’ depth players to maintain tempo and physicality throughout all four quarters. Defensively, UNC has been disciplined and opportunistic, ranking well nationally in limiting opponents’ scoring efficiency and protecting the paint. Although they have not always been elite at forcing turnovers, their ability to contest shots and close passing lanes has been evident throughout non‑conference play, holding teams below their average scoring output on multiple occasions. This blend of interior deterrence and perimeter communication allows the Tar Heels to adapt to different offensive looks, which will be crucial against a Pirates team that may try to speed up the game or shoot from deep to compensate for interior mismatches. Head coach Hubert Davis has managed rotations effectively, blending veteran leadership with fresh talent and ensuring that UNC’s pace remains controlled yet explosive when opportunities arise. A key storyline for this home game will be how consistently Carolina can maintain defensive intensity for the full 40 minutes — something they have achieved against quality opponents like Ohio State and Georgetown but will continue to refine as ACC play looms on the horizon. Overall, North Carolina’s combination of elite frontcourt scoring, rebounding dominance, developing perimeter play, and defensive competitiveness makes them strong favorites in this matchup. Their depth and home‑court advantage create an environment where they can assert tempo early and force opponents to play into UNC’s strengths. If the Tar Heels continue to balance offensive efficiency with disciplined defense, they should control this contest from start to finish, setting a tone as they transition into the heart of ACC competition.

East Carolina vs North Carolina Prop Picks (AI)

AI algorithm Remi is pouring through loads of datapoints on each line. In fact, anytime the Pirates and Tar Heels play there’s always several intriguing observations to key in on. Not to mention games played at Dean E. Smith Center in Dec can often follow normal, predictable betting trends.

Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: H. Veesaar under 27.5 PTS+REB.

East Carolina vs North Carolina Prediction (AI)

Remi Robot Icon

Remi, our AI sports algorithm, has been pouring over tons of data from every past game between the Pirates and Tar Heels and using recursive machine learning and cutting-edge AI to analyze the data to a single cover probability.

Remi has been most keyed in on the trending emphasis knucklehead sportsbettors regularly put on player performance factors between a Pirates team going up against a possibly strong Tar Heels team. We’ve found the true game analytics appear to reflect a moderate lean against one Vegas line specifically.

Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CBB AI picks for FREE now.

Below is our current AI East Carolina vs North Carolina picks, computer picks Pirates vs Tar Heels, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.

DATE GAME LEAN %WIN UNITS LEVEL
CBB 2/14 COLO@BYU UNLOCK THIS PICK 6 VAULT v4 Locked VAULT v4
CBB 2/14 FURMAN@VMI UNLOCK THIS PICK 6 VAULT v3 Locked VAULT v3
CBB 2/14 MERCER@CITADEL UNLOCK THIS PICK 6 VAULT v2 Locked VAULT v2
CBB 2/14 HIGHPT@GWEBB UNLOCK THIS PICK 6 VAULT v2 Locked VAULT v2
CBB 2/14 HAWAII@CSUN UNLOCK THIS PICK 5 EXECUTIVE Locked EXECUTIVE
CBB 2/14 UCRIV@UCSD UNLOCK THIS PICK 5 EXECUTIVE Locked EXECUTIVE
CBB 2/14 ARMY@AMERCN UNLOCK THIS PICK 4 EXECUTIVE Locked EXECUTIVE
CBB 2/14 SC@BAMA UNLOCK THIS PICK 4 EXECUTIVE Locked EXECUTIVE
CBB 2/14 NDAKST@NDAK UNLOCK THIS PICK 4 EXECUTIVE Locked EXECUTIVE
CBB 2/14 GTOWN@UCONN UNLOCK THIS PICK 3 EXECUTIVE Locked EXECUTIVE
CBB 2/14 NMEXST@JAXST UNLOCK THIS PICK 1 INTEL Locked INTEL
CBB 2/14 DUQ@STBONN UNLOCK THIS PICK 1 INTEL Locked INTEL
CBB 2/14 BUCK@BU UNLOCK THIS PICK 10 INTEL Locked INTEL
CBB 2/14 GATECH@ND UNLOCK THIS PICK 10 INTEL Locked INTEL
CBB 2/14 LVILLE@BAYLOR UNLOCK THIS PICK 10 INTEL Locked INTEL
CBB 2/14 TEXA&M@VANDY UNLOCK THIS PICK 10 INTEL Locked INTEL
CBB 2/14 UNF@JVILLE UNLOCK THIS PICK 10 INTEL Locked INTEL
CBB 2/14 WYO@COLOST GET FREE PICK NOW 1
CBB 2/14 UK@FLA UNLOCK THIS PICK 1 INTEL Locked INTEL
CBB 2/14 TXTECH@ARIZ UNLOCK THIS PICK 1 INTEL Locked INTEL
CBB 2/14 KANSAS@IOWAST UNLOCK THIS PICK 1 INTEL Locked INTEL
CBB 2/14 CLEM@DUKE UNLOCK THIS PICK 0 INTEL Locked INTEL
CBB 2/14 GC@SJST UNLOCK THIS PICK 0 INTEL Locked INTEL
CBB 2/14 COLO@BYU UNLOCK THIS PICK 0 INTEL Locked INTEL

These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CBB schedule.

East Carolina Betting Trends

East Carolina has struggled against the spread this season, posting a poor ATS mark (around 2‑8) with frequent failures to cover, and trends suggest many of their recent games have not hit the expected spread.

North Carolina Betting Trends

North Carolina has been healthier against the spread with a solid ATS record (approximately 7‑5), indicating that the Tar Heels more often cover when favored, though not overwhelmingly so.

Pirates vs. Tar Heels Matchup Trends

Across the broader NCAA landscape this season, UNC’s overall 7‑5 ATS trend (≈58 % ATS success) contrasts sharply with East Carolina’s ATS woes, and historical small‑favorite matchups similar to this type of line show teams like ECU generally covering just over half the time — though the specific Pirates trend has been weak.

East Carolina vs. North Carolina Game Info

December 22, 2025 • 8:00 PM EST • Dean E. Smith Center

East Carolina vs. North Carolina Odds

Remi is pouring through mountains of data on each player. In fact, anytime the East Carolina vs North Carolina trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme hostile environments can often follow normal, predictable patterns.

East Carolina vs North Carolina

East Carolina vs North Carolina Live Odds

Games PTS ML SPR O/U
Feb 15, 2026 12:00PM EST
Maryland Terrapins
Rutgers Scarlet Knights
2/15/26 12PM
MD
RUT
+115
-140
+2.5 (-116)
-2.5 (+104)
O 144.5 (-108)
U 144.5 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 12:00PM EST
UTSA Roadrunners
Charlotte 49ers
2/15/26 12PM
UTSA
CHARLO
+900
-1600
+14.5 (-101)
-14.5 (-111)
O 147.5 (-103)
U 147.5 (-113)
Feb 15, 2026 12:00PM EST
Utah Utes
Cincinnati Bearcats
2/15/26 12PM
UTAH
CINCY
+550
-800
+11 (-103)
-11 (-109)
O 142 (-108)
U 142 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 1:00PM EST
Manhattan Jaspers
Canisius Golden Griffins
2/15/26 1PM
MANHAT
CAN
-125
+105
-1 (-101)
+1 (-111)
O 141 (-108)
U 141 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 1:00PM EST
Denver Pioneers
Omaha Mavericks
2/15/26 1PM
DENVR
OMAHA
+130
-155
+3 (-101)
-3 (-111)
O 161.5 (-108)
U 161.5 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 1:00PM EST
Indiana Hoosiers
Illinois Fighting Illini
2/15/26 1PM
IND
ILL
+475
-700
+10.5 (-106)
-10.5 (-106)
O 152 (-108)
U 152 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 1:00PM EST
Youngstown St Penguins
Detroit Mercy Titans
2/15/26 1PM
YOUNG
DETRIOT
-145
+120
-2 (-122)
+2 (+109)
O 151.5 (-108)
U 151.5 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 1:00PM EST
Holy Cross Crusaders
Loyola Maryland Greyhounds
2/15/26 1PM
HOLY
LOYMD
+150
 
+3.5 (-111)
 
O 146 (-108)
U 146 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Siena Saints
Marist Red Foxes
2/15/26 2PM
SIENA
MARIST
+110
-130
+1.5 (-106)
-1.5 (-106)
O 133.5 (-108)
U 133.5 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Merrimack Warriors
Quinnipiac Bobcats
2/15/26 2PM
MERRI
QUINN
+105
-125
+1.5 (-106)
-1.5 (-106)
O 141.5 (-108)
U 141.5 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Fairfield Stags
Saint Peter's Peacocks
2/15/26 2PM
FAIR
STPETE
+150
-180
+2.5 (+109)
-2.5 (-122)
O 142.5 (-108)
U 142.5 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Wright State Raiders
Cleveland State Vikings
2/15/26 2PM
WRIGHT
CLEVST
 
 
pk
pk
O 159 (-113)
U 159 (-103)
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
North Texas Mean Green
Temple Owls
2/15/26 2PM
NOTEX
TEMPLE
+125
-150
+2.5 (-104)
-2.5 (-108)
O 137.5 (-108)
U 137.5 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Rider Broncs
Sacred Heart Pioneers
2/15/26 2PM
RIDER
SACRED
+350
-450
+9 (-106)
-9 (-106)
O 149 (-108)
U 149 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Tulane Green Wave
UAB Blazers
2/15/26 2PM
TULANE
UAB
+230
-285
+6 (-101)
-6 (-111)
O 152 (-113)
U 152 (-103)
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
IUPUI Jaguars
Fort Wayne Mastodons
2/15/26 2PM
IUPUI
IPFW
+250
-325
+6 (-101)
-6 (-111)
O 160.5 (-113)
U 160.5 (-103)
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
South Florida Bulls
Florida Atlantic Owls
2/15/26 2PM
SFLA
FAU
-210
+175
-4.5 (-111)
+4.5 (-101)
O 166 (-108)
U 166 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Oakland Golden Grizzlies
Robert Morris Colonials
2/15/26 2PM
OAKLND
ROBERT
+105
-125
+1 (-103)
-1 (-109)
O 156 (-108)
U 156 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Bradley Braves
Southern Illinois Salukis
2/15/26 2PM
BRAD
SOILL
+130
-160
+3 (-109)
-3 (-103)
O 144.5 (-108)
U 144.5 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Iona Gaels
Niagara Purple Eagles
2/15/26 2PM
IONA
NIAGRA
-225
+185
-5.5 (-104)
+5.5 (-108)
O 133 (-103)
U 133 (-113)
Feb 15, 2026 2:00PM EST
Indiana State Sycamores
Valparaiso Beacons
2/15/26 2PM
INDST
VALPO
 
-225
 
-5 (-101)
O 143 (-113)
U 143 (-103)
Feb 15, 2026 3:00PM EST
Green Bay Phoenix
Milwaukee Panthers
2/15/26 3PM
GBAY
MILW
+115
-140
+1.5 (-101)
-1.5 (-111)
O 145.5 (-115)
U 145.5 (-101)
Feb 15, 2026 3:00PM EST
Illinois State Redbirds
UIC Flames
2/15/26 3PM
ILLST
UIC
 
-110
 
-1 (-101)
O 139 (-103)
U 139 (-113)
Feb 15, 2026 3:00PM EST
Drake Bulldogs
Northern Iowa Panthers
2/15/26 3PM
DRAKE
NIOWA
+400
-550
+9.5 (-106)
-9.5 (-106)
O 137.5 (-103)
U 137.5 (-113)
Feb 15, 2026 4:00PM EST
Davidson Wildcats
Dayton Flyers
2/15/26 4PM
DAVID
DAYTON
+160
-190
+4.5 (-111)
-4.5 (-101)
O 139 (-108)
U 139 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 4:00PM EST
Eastern Kentucky Colonels
North Alabama Lions
2/15/26 4PM
EKTY
NBAMA
-200
+165
-4 (-106)
+4 (-106)
O 149.5 (-108)
U 149.5 (-108)
Feb 15, 2026 5:00PM EST
Charleston Cougars
Campbell Fighting Camels
2/15/26 5PM
CHARL
CAMP
+110
-130
+2 (-108)
-2 (-104)
O 158.5 (-103)
U 158.5 (-113)
Feb 15, 2026 6:00PM EST
San Francisco Dons
San Diego Toreros
2/15/26 6PM
SANFRN
USD
-200
+165
-4 (-111)
+4 (-101)
O 148.5 (-113)
U 148.5 (-103)
Feb 15, 2026 6:00PM EST
Seton Hall Pirates
Butler Bulldogs
2/15/26 6PM
SETON
BUTLER
-140
+115
-1.5 (-106)
+1.5 (-106)
O 142 (-103)
U 142 (-113)
Feb 15, 2026 6:00PM EST
Belmont Bruins
Murray State Racers
2/15/26 6PM
BELMNT
MURRAY
+100
 
+1.5 (-113)
 
O 167 (-106)
U 167 (-110)
Feb 15, 2026 7:00PM EST
Towson Tigers
Monmouth Hawks
2/15/26 7PM
TOWSON
MONMTH
+110
-130
+1.5 (-106)
-1.5 (-106)
O 136 (-103)
U 136 (-113)
Feb 15, 2026 8:00PM EST
Oregon State Beavers
Seattle Redhawks
2/15/26 8PM
OREGST
SEATTLE
 
-285
 
-6 (-108)
O 138 (-103)
U 138 (-113)
Feb 16, 2026 9:00PM EST
Houston Cougars
Iowa State Cyclones
2/16/26 9PM
HOU
IOWAST
+105
-125
+1.5 (-110)
-1.5 (-110)
O 133.5 (-110)
U 133.5 (-110)

CBB Past Picks

Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.

This preview covers East Carolina Pirates vs. North Carolina Tar Heels on December 22, 2025 at Dean E. Smith Center.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.

Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CBB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.

LEAN %WIN UNITS RESULT
GMASON@GWASH GWASH -2 54.2% 4 WIN
MICHST@WISC WISC +2.5 53.3% 2 WIN
BROWN@HARV HARV -7.5 55.0% 4 LOSS
CLMBIA@PENN PENN -2 54.7% 4 WIN
PRESBY@CHARLSO CHARLSO -1 54.7% 4 WIN
MNMTH@DREX DREX -1.5 55.3% 5 LOSS
HAWAII@CSBAK CSBAK +13 56.6% 6 LOSS
VALPO@ILLST ILLST -8.5 53.8% 3 WIN
WNTHRP@GWEBB GWEBB +20.5 56.8% 6 WIN
UCDAV@UCSD UCSD -4.5 53.6% 1 WIN
IOWA@MD MD +11 54.7% 4 WIN
BUFF@BALLST BALLST +1.5 54.9% 4 LOSS
VCU@LSALLE LSALLE +12.5 54.0% 3 WIN
MICH@NWEST NWEST +15.5 56.5% 6 WIN
VATECH@CLEM VATECH +8 57.8% 7 WIN
IOWAST@TCU IOWAST -7 56.8% 6 LOSS
UNC@MIAMI MIAMI +1.5 53.8% 2 WIN
COLOST@AF COLOST -16 54.9% 4 WIN
UVA@FSU UVA -7.5 55.3% 5 LOSS
MARQET@NOVA NOVA -9.5 56.6% 6 LOSS
EILL@WESTILL EILL -3.5 54.7% 4 LOSS
BELMONT@BRAD BELMONT -1 56.1% 6 LOSS
TXAMCC@NEWORL TXAMCC -102 53.8% 3 LOSS
UIW@SELOU UIW -105 55.5% 5 LOSS
ARIZ@KANSAS KANSAS +1.5 53.3% 2 WIN
RICE@UAB UAB -8 54.8% 4 LOSS
BAYLOR@IOWAST IOWAST -14.5 55.2% 5 LOSS
MILW@NKY NKY -6.5 55.2% 5 LOSS
TARL@SUTAH TARL +1.5 55.2% 5 WIN
VATECH@NCST NCST -9.5 55.3% 5 LOSS
TENN@UK TENN +2 55.9% 5 LOSS
UTAH@KANSAS KANSAS -18.5 55.9% 6 LOSS
SDGST@AF SDGST -21.5 56.5% 6 WIN
MERIMK@RIDER MERIMK -8.5 57.0% 6 WIN
PFW@WRIGHT WRIGHT -7.5 57.1% 7 LOSS
DUKE@UNC UNDER 152.5 52.7% 1 WIN
ILL@MICHST MICHST -0.5 52.5% 1 WIN
HOU@BYU HOU -1 53.7% 2 WIN
MURRAY@SOILL MURRAY -122 56.8% 5 WIN
UCONN@STJOHN STJOHN +2 52.9% 1 WIN
ELON@HAMPTON ELON -120 54.8% 4 LOSS
RIDER@MARIST RIDER +14.5 54.7% 4 LOSS
UCRIV@CSUF CSUF -5.5 55.9% 5 WIN
MERCER@CHAT MERCER -4.5 56.5% 6 LOSS
WOFF@VMI WOFF -8.5 54.3% 4 WIN
NWEST@ILL ILL -14.5 54.4% 4 WIN
UTSA@SFLA SFLA -25.5 56.4% 6 LOSS
IND@USC IND -110 55.2% 5 LOSS
UNLV@FRESNO FRESNO -120 56.5% 4 WIN
RUT@UCLA UCLA -13.5 54.4% 4 WIN
DRAKE@BELMONT BELMONT -9.5 54.6% 4 WIN