Gardner-Webb vs Tennessee Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CBB Lines & Props (Dec 21)
Updated: 2025-12-19T03:31:50.923562ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The Gardner‑Webb Runnin’ Bulldogs (2‑12) travel to Knoxville to take on the No. 20 Tennessee Volunteers (8‑3) on December 21, 2025, in a non‑conference matchup between a struggling Group of Five program and an SEC contender. Tennessee enters off a statement win over No. 11 Louisville, snapping a three‑game slide and reasserting its defensive identity, while Gardner‑Webb seeks its second road win of the season against a far superior opponent.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Dec 21, 2025
Start Time: 3:00 PM EST
Venue: Food City Center
Volunteers Record: (8-3)
Runnin' Bulldogs Record: (2-12)
OPENING ODDS
GWEBB Moneyline: ODDS COMING SOON
TENN Moneyline: ODDS COMING SOON
GWEBB Spread: ODDS COMING SOON
TENN Spread: ODDS COMING SOON
Over/Under: ODDS COMING SOON
GWEBB
Betting Trends
- Gardner‑Webb’s ATS performance has been poor this season, sitting around 2‑9‑0 ATS, reflecting heavy losses and struggles to stay competitive within the spread, especially as underdogs on the road.
TENN
Betting Trends
- Tennessee’s ATS results are mixed at roughly 4‑7‑0, though the Volunteers have been strong at home (6‑0 SU), suggesting they outperform expectations at Thompson‑Boling Arena.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- In their limited head‑to‑head history, Tennessee has dominated Gardner‑Webb, winning both meetings and producing Over results in those games, indicating potential for a high combined score if Gardner‑Webb can stay offensive.
GWEBB vs. TENN
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: REMI'S STILL ANALYZING MARKETS
LIVE CBB ODDS
CBB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
NET UNITS (INCL VIG & EXEC)
NET PROFIT (INCL VIG & EXEC) $100/UNIT
NET UNITS (INCL VIG)
NET PROFIT (INCL VIG) $100/UNIT
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Gardner-Webb vs Tennessee Prediction & Odds:
Free CBB Betting Insights for 12/21/25
The December 21, 2025 matchup between the Gardner‑Webb Runnin’ Bulldogs and the No. 20 Tennessee Volunteers highlights a significant competitive gap — a developing mid‑major team facing a nationally ranked SEC contender with home‑court advantage and momentum. Tennessee enters the contest at 8‑3 overall and an undefeated 6‑0 at Thompson‑Boling Arena, where its size, rebounding, and defensive discipline have been major strengths. In its most recent outing, the Volunteers delivered a commanding 83‑62 win over No. 11 Louisville, with Ja’Kobi Gillespie scoring 23 points and the team dominating on the glass and in transition, showcasing defensive intensity and offensive balance. Tennessee’s rebounding numbers, bolstered by players like Nate Ament averaging over 7 rebounds, help fuel fast breaks and second‑chance points, key components of its successful season to date. Offensively, Tennessee averages about 81 points per game, shooting a strong field goal percentage while maintaining good spacing and ball movement. The Volunteers complement Gillespie’s scoring with contributions from Ament and Jaylen Carey, who provide scoring depth and rebounding support. Tennessee’s ability to score efficiently in half‑court sets and in transition, combined with disciplined shot selection, creates opportunities that can stretch opposing defenses and maintain scoring momentum. Their offensive rebounding rate, ranked among the top in the SEC, allows them to control tempo and limit opponent possessions, an advantage they will look to exploit against Gardner‑Webb’s defense, which allows opponents a field goal percentage in the low‑mid 40s. Gardner‑Webb’s season has been markedly more difficult, with a record around 2–12 that reflects struggles on both ends of the floor. The Runnin’ Bulldogs average roughly 70.8 points per game, with several individual contributors such as Jacob Hogarth (around 11.9 points, 8.3 rebounds) and Spence Sims (notable three‑point shooting) providing offensive spark at times.
However, Gardner‑Webb’s defense has been challenged by athletic offenses, allowing opponents over 84 points per game recently, and turnovers — averaging approximately 13.6 per game — compound their difficulties in controlling possessions against disciplined defensive squads. Additionally, the Bulldogs are winless (0‑7) on the road this season, illustrating how playing in hostile environments against high‑caliber teams has magnified their limitations. Strategically, Tennessee will aim to impose its physical rebounding advantage and defensive pressure early, forcing Gardner‑Webb to take difficult shots and limiting transition opportunities. The Volunteers’ depth allows them to rotate fresh defenders and maintain intensity for all 40 minutes, while their offensive balance makes them difficult to counter schematically. Set plays designed to exploit mismatches — particularly in the paint and from the high post — allow Tennessee to score efficiently while controlling tempo. On the other side, Gardner‑Webb will likely focus on limiting turnovers and trying to generate open perimeter shots, emphasizing ball movement and patience in half‑court offense. However, Tennessee’s length, rebounding superiority, and defensive communication make it extremely difficult for lower‑tier offenses to sustain scoring runs. Tennessee’s home‑court advantage — reflected in an undefeated mark and dominant recent performance — positions them strongly to control this matchup from start to finish. While Gardner‑Webb’s recent win over a lesser opponent shows potential for offensive outbursts, sustaining such performance against a ranked SEC squad in front of a raucous Tennessee crowd is a tall task. Execution in transition, rebounding control, and limiting turnovers will likely be the defining factors, with Tennessee expected to leverage all three to secure a convincing victory.
Get live CBB odds and precise AI CBB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
EDUCATION DAY IN PAUL PORTER! pic.twitter.com/7KLkIr6VGI
— Gardner-Webb Men's Basketball (@GWU_MBK) December 18, 2025
Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs CBB Preview
The Gardner‑Webb Runnin’ Bulldogs enter their December 21, 2025 matchup against the Tennessee Volunteers facing an uphill battle as they travel to Knoxville. Gardner‑Webb’s season has been challenging, with a record of approximately 2‑12, including a 0‑7 mark on the road, highlighting both the team’s youth and ongoing struggles in adjusting to high-level competition. The Runnin’ Bulldogs have experienced difficulty maintaining offensive consistency and defensive intensity, but they possess a few standout performers capable of contributing meaningful minutes. Jacob Hogarth leads the team offensively, averaging around 11.9 points and 8.3 rebounds per game, providing both interior scoring and a physical presence on the glass. Supporting scorers like Spence Sims and Jacob Hudson offer three-point shooting and secondary scoring options, which Gardner‑Webb will rely on to generate spacing and open looks in what is expected to be a high-pressure environment. Offensively, Gardner‑Webb relies on a combination of motion sets, pick-and-roll action, and spot-up shooting to create scoring opportunities. Sims’ ability to convert from beyond the arc is particularly important, as Tennessee’s length and defensive rotations can clog interior lanes and contest drives. Ball movement and patience in half-court sets will be key, with the Bulldogs needing to minimize turnovers — which currently average around 13.6 per game — to prevent easy transition opportunities for the Volunteers. In transition, the Runnin’ Bulldogs aim to push the pace off defensive rebounds and stops, but Tennessee’s defensive discipline and rebounding prowess make generating consistent fast-break points difficult. Execution, shot selection, and offensive patience will be critical for Gardner‑Webb to stay competitive, even if the overall talent gap is substantial. Defensively, Gardner‑Webb faces significant challenges against a team of Tennessee’s caliber. The Bulldogs allow roughly 84 points per game, reflecting struggles with defensive rotations, closing out on shooters, and protecting the paint.
Rebounding deficiencies often result in second-chance points for opponents, a concern against a Volunteers squad that excels in offensive rebounding and finishing at the rim. To mitigate these disadvantages, Gardner‑Webb must emphasize communication, active hands, and help-side rotations, while contesting shots without over-committing and maintaining discipline on defensive assignments. Limiting Tennessee’s transition opportunities through solid defensive positioning will also be essential to prevent early runs that could decide the game. Road games have magnified Gardner‑Webb’s difficulties this season. The Runnin’ Bulldogs have yet to record a victory away from home, often struggling with energy, cohesion, and execution under pressure. Thompson-Boling Arena, a large and energetic environment, presents an additional challenge, where Tennessee’s home-court advantage and fan intensity can swing momentum quickly. Gardner‑Webb will need to focus on fundamentals, controlling possessions, and creating high-percentage shots to maintain competitiveness. While an upset is unlikely given the talent and experience disparity, the game provides an opportunity for growth, resilience, and experience for Gardner‑Webb’s young roster. If the Bulldogs can limit turnovers, contest shots effectively, and convert on select scoring opportunities, they may be able to extend possessions and generate periods of competitiveness, but sustaining that level against a ranked and disciplined SEC opponent remains a formidable task. In summary, Gardner‑Webb’s approach will rely on patience, disciplined execution, and leveraging the skills of key contributors like Hogarth, Sims, and Hudson. Minimizing mistakes, emphasizing defensive fundamentals, and creating scoring opportunities through ball movement and spacing are essential strategies. While the odds favor Tennessee heavily, the game offers a valuable developmental experience for Gardner‑Webb’s roster, highlighting areas of strength and opportunities for growth as the Bulldogs continue their season.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Tennessee Volunteers CBB Preview
The Tennessee Volunteers enter their December 21, 2025 matchup against the Gardner‑Webb Runnin’ Bulldogs with clear momentum and a strong home-court advantage at Thompson‑Boling Arena. Tennessee, ranked No. 20 nationally, holds an 8‑3 record overall and is undefeated at home (6‑0), highlighting its ability to execute effectively in a familiar environment. The Volunteers come off an emphatic 83‑62 win over No. 11 Louisville, where Ja’Kobi Gillespie led the scoring effort with 23 points while shooting a perfect 10-for-10 from the free-throw line. In that contest, Tennessee dominated the glass, created numerous transition opportunities, and benefited from balanced contributions from Nate Ament, Jaylen Carey, and other rotational players, illustrating the depth and versatility that have been hallmarks of their season. The win over Louisville not only snapped a three-game skid but also reaffirmed Tennessee’s defensive identity and offensive efficiency, setting the tone for the upcoming matchup against Gardner‑Webb. Offensively, Tennessee averages approximately 81 points per game, combining inside scoring, perimeter shooting, and effective ball movement to create a dynamic and difficult-to-defend attack. Ja’Kobi Gillespie serves as the team’s primary offensive weapon, able to create shots off the dribble, facilitate for teammates, and attack the basket with efficiency. Supporting scorers such as Ament and Carey provide secondary scoring, rebounding, and defensive intensity, allowing Tennessee to maintain a balanced offensive threat throughout games. The Volunteers’ offensive rebounding is among the nation’s best, providing extra possessions that translate to high-percentage shots and opportunities in transition. Ball movement, pick-and-roll action, and off-ball cutting create spacing that enables shooters to get clean looks and allows the frontcourt to exploit defensive mismatches.
This combination of inside-outside balance and pace control makes Tennessee a particularly formidable opponent, especially in a home setting where the team thrives on energetic crowd support. Defensively, Tennessee has been stout this season, allowing roughly 65.6 points per game. The Volunteers leverage length, athleticism, and disciplined rotations to contest shots effectively, protect the paint, and limit opponents’ second-chance opportunities. Against Louisville, Tennessee forced 16 turnovers and held their opponent to poor three-point shooting, demonstrating a capacity to disrupt even high-level offenses. Defensive rebounding is a critical component of Tennessee’s game plan, as it allows for control of tempo and limits transition opportunities for the opposition. The team’s defensive strategy emphasizes communication, switching, and help-side positioning, which, combined with aggressive on-ball defense, challenges opponents’ decision-making and often forces contested or low-percentage shots. Tennessee’s coaching staff, led by Rick Barnes, has emphasized disciplined execution, adaptability, and player development throughout the season. Rotational depth allows the Volunteers to maintain energy and intensity, while young contributors gain valuable experience alongside seasoned veterans. At home, Tennessee is able to control tempo, impose its defensive schemes, and exploit mismatches effectively. Against Gardner‑Webb, the Volunteers will aim to establish an early lead, dominate the glass, and leverage their depth to maintain pressure throughout the contest. Tennessee’s superior talent, home-court advantage, and recent momentum position them strongly to control the game from start to finish, making them heavy favorites to secure a convincing victory while reinforcing their standing as a top contender in the SEC.
on the ball. on the perimeter. at the rim.
— Tennessee Basketball (@Vol_Hoops) December 20, 2025
few can match what Felix gives us defensively pic.twitter.com/taWz3TuF8n
Gardner-Webb vs Tennessee Prop Picks (AI)
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through mountains of stats on each team. In fact, anytime the Runnin' Bulldogs and Volunteers play there’s always several intriguing observations to key in on. Not to mention games played at Food City Center in Dec rarely follow normal, predictable patterns.
Gardner-Webb vs Tennessee Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports genius, has been pouring over tons of data from every facet between the Runnin' Bulldogs and Volunteers and using recursive machine learning and cutting-edge AI to examine the data to a single cover probability.
Remi has been most watching on the linear correlation of emphasis emotional bettors regularly put on Gardner-Webb’s strength factors between a Runnin' Bulldogs team going up against a possibly strong Volunteers team. In reality, the true game analytics might reflect a slight lean against one Vegas line specifically.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CBB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI Gardner-Webb vs Tennessee picks, computer picks Runnin' Bulldogs vs Volunteers, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
|
DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBB | 3/8 | CHARLO@SFLA | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 7 |
VAULT v4
|
|
| CBB | 3/8 | NIOWA@UIC | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 3/8 | NKY@WISCGB | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 3/8 | MICHST@MICH | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 2 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/8 | IDST@PORTST | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/8 | WNTHRP@HIGHPT | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/8 | IOWA@NEB | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/8 | ILL@MD | GET FREE PICK NOW | 1 | – | |
| CBB | 3/8 | FAIR@SIENA | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 1 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/8 | TOWSON@CHARLS | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 1 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/8 | MICHST@MICH | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 0 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/8 | PACIFC@SNCLRA | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 0 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 3/8 | ECU@UAB | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 0 |
INTEL
|
|
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CBB schedule.
Gardner-Webb Betting Trends
Gardner‑Webb’s ATS performance has been poor this season, sitting around 2‑9‑0 ATS, reflecting heavy losses and struggles to stay competitive within the spread, especially as underdogs on the road.
Tennessee Betting Trends
Tennessee’s ATS results are mixed at roughly 4‑7‑0, though the Volunteers have been strong at home (6‑0 SU), suggesting they outperform expectations at Thompson‑Boling Arena.
Runnin' Bulldogs vs. Volunteers Matchup Trends
In their limited head‑to‑head history, Tennessee has dominated Gardner‑Webb, winning both meetings and producing Over results in those games, indicating potential for a high combined score if Gardner‑Webb can stay offensive.
Gardner-Webb vs. Tennessee Game Info
Gardner-Webb vs Tennessee starts on December 21, 2025 at 3:00 PM EST.
Venue: Food City Center.
Spread: Tennessee ODDS COMING SOON
Moneyline: Gardner-Webb ODDS COMING SOON, Tennessee ODDS COMING SOON
Over/Under: ODDS COMING SOON
Gardner-Webb: (2-12) | Tennessee: (8-3)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: REMI'S STILL ANALYZING MARKETS. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
In their limited head‑to‑head history, Tennessee has dominated Gardner‑Webb, winning both meetings and producing Over results in those games, indicating potential for a high combined score if Gardner‑Webb can stay offensive.
GWEBB trend: Gardner‑Webb’s ATS performance has been poor this season, sitting around 2‑9‑0 ATS, reflecting heavy losses and struggles to stay competitive within the spread, especially as underdogs on the road.
TENN trend: Tennessee’s ATS results are mixed at roughly 4‑7‑0, though the Volunteers have been strong at home (6‑0 SU), suggesting they outperform expectations at Thompson‑Boling Arena.
See our latest CBB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
Gardner-Webb vs. Tennessee Odds
Remi is pouring through tons of data on each player. In fact, anytime the Gardner-Webb vs Tennessee trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme temps rarely follow normal, predictable betting trends.
| GWEBB Moneyline | ODDS COMING SOON |
|---|---|
| TENN Moneyline | ODDS COMING SOON |
| GWEBB Spread | ODDS COMING SOON |
| TENN Spread | ODDS COMING SOON |
| Over / Under | ODDS COMING SOON |
Gardner-Webb vs Tennessee Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
In Progress
Memphis Tigers
Tulane Green Wave
In Progress
MEMP
TULANE
|
67
63
|
-285
+210
|
-3.5 (-130)
+3.5 (+100)
|
O 160.5 (-115)
U 160.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
Charlotte 49ers
South Florida Bulls
In Progress
CHARLO
SFLA
|
48
76
|
+3300
-10000
|
+27.5 (-105)
-27.5 (-125)
|
O 137.5 (-115)
U 137.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
Boston University Terriers
Navy Midshipmen
In Progress
BOSTON
NAVY
|
61
63
|
-285
|
-3.5 (+105)
|
O 140.5 (-105)
U 140.5 (-125)
|
|
|
In Progress
Queens University Royals
Central Arkansas Bears
In Progress
QUEENS
CNTARK
|
73
62
|
-3000
+1200
|
-6.5 (-130)
+6.5 (+100)
|
O 151 (-120)
U 151 (-110)
|
|
|
In Progress
UTSA Roadrunners
Rice Owls
In Progress
UTSA
RICE
|
32
45
|
+2000
-9000
|
+16.5 (-115)
-16.5 (-115)
|
O 158.5 (-105)
U 158.5 (-125)
|
|
|
In Progress
Temple Owls
Tulsa Golden Hurricane
In Progress
TEMPLE
TULSA
|
34
32
|
+250
-350
|
+6.5 (-120)
-6.5 (-110)
|
O 145.5 (-110)
U 145.5 (-120)
|
|
|
In Progress
East Carolina Pirates
UAB Blazers
In Progress
ECAR
UAB
|
44
41
|
+175
-240
|
+4.5 (-120)
-4.5 (-110)
|
O 167.5 (-115)
U 167.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
Drexel Dragons
Monmouth Hawks
In Progress
DREX
MONMTH
|
33
32
|
+110
-140
|
+1.5 (-115)
-1.5 (-115)
|
O 138.5 (-115)
U 138.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
Illinois Fighting Illini
Maryland Terrapins
In Progress
ILL
MD
|
35
32
|
-900
+500
|
-10.5 (-110)
+10.5 (-120)
|
O 144.5 (-105)
U 144.5 (-125)
|
|
|
In Progress
Northern Kentucky Norse
Green Bay Phoenix
In Progress
NKTY
GBAY
|
4
11
|
+115
-150
|
+2.5 (-115)
-2.5 (-115)
|
O 130.5 (-115)
U 130.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
Western Carolina Catamounts
East Tennessee State Buccaneers
In Progress
WCU
ETENN
|
–
–
|
+135
|
+3 (-106)
|
O 146.5 (-105)
U 146.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 4:30PM EDT
Michigan State Spartans
Michigan Wolverines
3/8/26 4:30PM
MICHST
MICH
|
–
–
|
-550
|
-10.5 (-105)
|
O 152.5 (-110)
U 152.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 6:00PM EDT
USM Golden Eagles
Troy Trojans
3/8/26 6PM
USM
TROY
|
–
–
|
-210
|
-4.5 (-115)
|
O 141.5 (-115)
U 141.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 6:00PM EDT
Houston Christian Huskies
New Orleans Privateers
3/8/26 6PM
HOUCHR
NORL
|
–
–
|
+155
-177
|
+4 (-109)
-4 (-103)
|
O 142.5 (-108)
U 142.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 6:00PM EDT
Marist Red Foxes
Merrimack Warriors
3/8/26 6PM
MARIST
MERRI
|
–
–
|
+154
-190
|
+3.5 (-105)
-3.5 (-115)
|
O 129.5 (-105)
U 129.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 6:00PM EDT
Towson Tigers
Charleston Cougars
3/8/26 6PM
TOWSON
CHARL
|
–
–
|
+125
-150
|
+2.5 (-105)
-2.5 (-115)
|
O 138.5 (-110)
U 138.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 6:00PM EDT
Iowa Hawkeyes
Nebraska Cornhuskers
3/8/26 6PM
IOWA
NEB
|
–
–
|
+195
-235
|
+5.5 (-110)
-5.5 (-110)
|
O 136.5 (-110)
U 136.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 6:30PM EDT
UNC Greensboro Spartans
Furman Paladins
3/8/26 6:30PM
NCGRN
FURMAN
|
–
–
|
+220
-275
|
+6.5 (-115)
-6.5 (-105)
|
O 148.5 (-110)
U 148.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 7:30PM EDT
Idaho State Bengals
Portland State Vikings
3/8/26 7:30PM
IDST
PORTST
|
–
–
|
+230
|
+6.5 (-110)
|
O 141.5 (-110)
U 141.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 8:30PM EDT
William & Mary Tribe
Hofstra Pride
3/8/26 8:30PM
WMARY
HOFSTR
|
–
–
|
+135
-160
|
+3.5 (-115)
-3.5 (-105)
|
O 152.5 (-110)
U 152.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 8:30PM EDT
Georgia Southern Eagles
Marshall Thundering Herd
3/8/26 8:30PM
GASO
MARSH
|
–
–
|
+154
-190
|
+3.5 (-102)
-3.5 (-118)
|
O 167.5 (-110)
U 167.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 8:30PM EDT
San Francisco Dons
Oregon State Beavers
3/8/26 8:30PM
SANFRN
OREGST
|
–
–
|
-175
|
-3.5 (-110)
|
O 142.5 (-115)
U 142.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 8:30PM EDT
Northwestern State Demons
Nicholls State Colonels
3/8/26 8:30PM
NWST
NICH
|
–
–
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 138.5 (-110)
U 138.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 8:30PM EDT
Fairfield Stags
Siena Saints
3/8/26 8:30PM
FAIR
SIENA
|
–
–
|
+110
-135
|
+1.5 (-102)
-1.5 (-118)
|
O 137.5 (-115)
U 137.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 9:00PM EDT
North Dakota Fighting Hawks
North Dakota State Bison
3/8/26 9PM
NDAK
NDAKST
|
–
–
|
+375
|
+9.5 (-110)
|
O 145.5 (-105)
U 145.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 10:00PM EDT
Idaho Vandals
Montana State Bobcats
3/8/26 10PM
IDAHO
MONTST
|
–
–
|
+115
|
+1.5 (-105)
|
O 144.5 (-105)
U 144.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2026 11:00PM EDT
Pacific Tigers
Santa Clara Broncos
3/8/26 11PM
PACIFC
SNCLRA
|
–
–
|
+425
-600
|
+10.5 (-115)
-10.5 (-105)
|
O 149.5 (-105)
U 149.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Mar 9, 2026 2:00PM EDT
Alcorn State Braves
Alabama State Hornets
3/9/26 2PM
ALCORN
ALAST
|
–
–
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 143 (-103)
U 143 (-113)
|
|
|
Mar 9, 2026 7:30PM EDT
N Colorado Bears
Montana Grizzlies
3/9/26 7:30PM
NOCOLO
MONT
|
–
–
|
|
-4 (-106)
+4 (-106)
|
O 151 (-108)
U 151 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 9, 2026 8:30PM EDT
Mississippi Valley State Delta Devils
Grambling State Tigers
3/9/26 8:30PM
MVSU
GRAMB
|
–
–
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 135.5 (-108)
U 135.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 9, 2026 9:30PM EDT
Detroit Mercy Titans
Robert Morris Colonials
3/9/26 9:30PM
DETRIOT
ROBERT
|
–
–
|
|
+5 (-106)
-5 (-106)
|
O 147.5 (-108)
U 147.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Mar 9, 2026 10:00PM EDT
Weber State Wildcats
Eastern Washington Eagles
3/9/26 10PM
WEBER
EWASH
|
–
–
|
|
+2.5 (-106)
-2.5 (-106)
|
O 157 (-106)
U 157 (-110)
|
CBB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs vs. Tennessee Volunteers on December 21, 2025 at Food City Center.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CBB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
|
CBB |
LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | RESULT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVILLE@MIAMI | LVILLE +114 | 49.2% | 1 | WIN |
| TXTECH@BYU | BYU -125 | 55.6% | 3 | WIN |
| UNC@DUKE | UNDER 147.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |
| VANDY@TENN | TENN -3.5 | 53.3% | 3 | LOSS |
| NDAK@STTOM-MN | NDAK +12.5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| GWASH@LOYCHI | LOYCHI +10.5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| ALBANY@UMASSLO | UMASSLO -2.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| PORT@SANFRAN | PORT +7.5 | 53.6% | 3 | LOSS |
| UNC@DUKE | DUKE -17 | 57.3% | 7 | LOSS |
| NIOWA@BRAD | NIOWA -4.5 | 56.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| QUEENS@PEAY | QUEENS +1.5 | 56.5% | 6 | WIN |
| CLMBIA@HARV | CLMBIA +4.5 | 53.3% | 3 | LOSS |
| LONGWD@NCASH | LONGWD -1 | 53.2% | 3 | LOSS |
| VMI@NCGRN | NCGRN -7.5 | 52.7% | 2 | WIN |
| LATECH@LIB | LATECH +9.5 | 54.1% | 4 | WIN |
| MVSU@JACKST | MVSU +10.5 | 56.1% | 6 | WIN |
| STETSON@EKTY | EKTY -4 | 55.7% | 5 | LOSS |
| DUQ@RI | RI -2 | 53.7% | 2 | WIN |
| OREG@ILL | ILL -18 | 53.8% | 3 | WIN |
| BRYANT@NH | BRYANT +1 | 57.3% | 7 | LOSS |
| MISSST@FLA | FLA -21.5 | 53.9% | 3 | WIN |
| LAMAR@HOUBP | LAMAR -114 | 55.1% | 4 | LOSS |
| IOWAST@ARIZ | ARIZ -7 | 53.1% | 1 | WIN |
| RIDER@SIENA | SIENA -15.5 | 53.5% | 3 | LOSS |
| CHARLO@FAU | CHARLO +7.5 | 58.6% | 8 | WIN |
| NOTEX@UAB | UAB -5.5 | 54.8% | 3 | LOSS |
| NIOWA@DRAKE | NIOWA -4 | 54.8% | 4 | WIN |
| SCARST@MDESHORE | SCARST +7.5 | 56.2% | 6 | WIN |
| YALE@CLMBIA | YALE -5.5 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |
| SFAUSTIN@HOUBP | SFAUSTIN -8 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| TXTECH@IOWAST | TXTECH +10.5 | 52.3% | 2 | WIN |
| PITT@CAL | PITT +8.5 | 57.3% | 7 | WIN |
| KANSAS@ARIZ | ARIZ -9.5 | 53.6% | 3 | WIN |
| EILL@SIUE | EILL +5.5 | 55.7% | 5 | LOSS |
| UVA@DUKE | DUKE -10 | 53.9% | 3 | WIN |
| BUCK@LEHIGH | BUCK +5.5 | 54.6% | 4 | LOSS |
| IOWA@PSU | IOWA -9.5 | 54.5% | 4 | LOSS |
| ARK@FLA | FLA -10.5 | 54.0% | 3 | WIN |
| CALPOLY@UCSD | CALPOLY +6.5 | 56.2% | 6 | LOSS |
| NAU@EWASH | NAU +9.5 | 57.3% | 7 | LOSS |
| VANDY@UK | UK -0.5 | 53.9% | 3 | WIN |
| DEL@KENSAW | DEL +11.5 | 55.2% | 5 | WIN |
| BAMA@TENN | AMARI ALLEN UNDER 6.5 REB | 54.8% | 4 | WIN |
| GONZAG@MARYCA | PAULIUS MURAUSKAS UNDER 23.5 PTS + REB | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| QUINN@NIAGARA | NIAGARA +9 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| MICH@ILL | ILL +1 | 57.7% | 7 | LOSS |
| BROWN@CLMBIA | BROWN +4.5 | 55.3% | 5 | LOSS |
| COASTAL@JMAD | COASTAL +5.5 | 56.5% | 6 | WIN |
| GASOU@MRSHL | GASOU +6.5 | 55.8% | 5 | WIN |
| NEAST@WMMARY | NEAST +11.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |
| BRYANT@UMBC | BRYANT +10.5 | 56.8% | 6 | LOSS |
