Michigan State vs Penn State Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CBB Lines & Props (Dec 13)
Updated: 2025-12-11T03:31:50.923562ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The Michigan State Spartans (8‑1, 1‑0 Big Ten) travel to University Park, PA to take on the Penn State Nittany Lions (8‑2, 0‑1 Big Ten) on Saturday, December 13, 2025 in a key Big Ten matchup at the Bryce Jordan Center. Michigan State enters as a strong favorite after a successful non‑conference slate and a competitive loss to Duke, while Penn State aims to protect its undefeated home record and rebound from a recent tough loss
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Dec 13, 2025
Start Time: 1:00 PM EST
Venue: Bryce Jordan Center
Nittany Lions Record: (8-2)
Spartans Record: (8-1)
OPENING ODDS
MICHST Moneyline: -820
PSU Moneyline: +552
MICHST Spread: -12.5
PSU Spread: +12.5
Over/Under: 144.5
MICHST
Betting Trends
- Michigan State has gone 5‑4‑0 against the spread this season and is favored in most of its outings, reflecting mixed but respectable performance relative to expectations.
PSU
Betting Trends
- Penn State has struggled ATS, with a 3‑7‑0 record against the spread, indicating the Nittany Lions often underperform relative to betting expectations even when competitive.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- Current line movements and analytics suggest Michigan State as a significant favorite (often ‑11.5 or more) with a total around 144.5, and while the two teams average a combined scoring total above that, recent trends show varied pace and defensive intensity that could keep the game under market projections.
MICHST vs. PSU
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: J. Kohler over 30 Fantasy Score.
LIVE CBB ODDS
CBB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
425-328
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+849
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$84,896
VS. SPREAD
1815-1526
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+436.8
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$43,681
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Michigan State vs Penn State Prediction & Odds:
Free CBB Betting Insights for 12/13/25
The Michigan State Spartans travel to University Park to face the Penn State Nittany Lions in a pivotal Big Ten clash at the Bryce Jordan Center on December 13, 2025. Michigan State enters the contest with an 8‑1 overall record and a 1‑0 mark in conference play, riding momentum from a successful non-conference slate that featured dominating wins and a competitive loss to Duke. The Spartans are known for their disciplined, defense-first approach under Hall of Fame coach Tom Izzo, averaging roughly 76.6 points per game while allowing just 61 points per contest. Michigan State excels on the boards, out-rebounding opponents by nearly 12 per game, and boasts a balanced scoring attack that includes Marcus Walker, Jaxon Kohler, and Elliot Cadeau, who combine to create multiple threats from the perimeter and interior. Their offensive efficiency is complemented by strong ball movement and transition scoring, allowing them to exploit defensive lapses while maintaining control of the pace. Penn State enters with an 8‑2 overall record and a 0‑1 mark in the Big Ten, having shown both promise and inconsistency early in the season. The Nittany Lions have excelled at home, going undefeated in University Park prior to this matchup, and rely on a combination of scoring from senior guard Kayden Mingo and versatile forward Melih Tunca. Complementary scorers such as Freddie Dilione V provide perimeter shooting that can stretch defenses, while role players offer depth and occasional scoring bursts. Despite these assets, Penn State has struggled defensively, surrendering around 75–78 points per game and often allowing opponents to exploit gaps in transition and perimeter rotations. The Lions’ offense averages slightly over 80 points per contest, showing they can generate scoring against most mid-major opponents but may face difficulties against a disciplined Michigan State defense that emphasizes contesting shots, controlling the glass, and limiting second-chance points.
The matchup sets up an intriguing contrast in style. Michigan State favors methodical, efficient basketball with strong defensive principles and high-percentage scoring, while Penn State relies on home-court energy, pace, and opportunistic offense. Controlling the tempo will be crucial: Michigan State aims to dictate the game’s pace, force contested shots, and convert turnovers into transition points, while Penn State must seek to leverage crowd energy, secure defensive rebounds, and find scoring consistency to keep the game competitive. Historically, Michigan State has held the upper hand in the series, including a narrow 90‑85 victory last season that highlighted their depth and ability to win tight matchups. However, Penn State’s home success this season demonstrates that the Lions can capitalize on familiarity and fan support to challenge top-tier opponents. Strategically, Michigan State’s path to victory lies in maintaining disciplined defensive rotations, executing efficiently on offense, and using their depth to wear down Penn State over 40 minutes. The Spartans’ rebounding dominance and balanced scoring allow them to control momentum, while the Lions must focus on limiting turnovers, securing defensive rebounds, and taking high-quality shots to stay within striking distance. Key matchups will likely center on guard play and perimeter shooting, as Michigan State’s length and defensive versatility can neutralize Penn State’s primary scorers if executed properly. While Penn State has the potential to create pressure and generate scoring runs, Michigan State’s combination of experience, discipline, and elite defensive execution gives the Spartans a clear edge on the road. Ultimately, the game promises a blend of tactical adjustments, individual matchups, and strategic execution that will determine whether Michigan State extends its winning streak or Penn State leverages home-court advantage to challenge one of the Big Ten’s top teams.
Get live CBB odds and precise AI CBB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
Bigs have been working 💪 pic.twitter.com/IkW7DO4emu
— Michigan State Men's Basketball (@MSU_Basketball) December 11, 2025
Michigan State Spartans CBB Preview
The Michigan State Spartans travel to University Park to face the Penn State Nittany Lions in a key Big Ten road matchup that will test their ability to maintain consistency and impose their style in a hostile environment. Michigan State enters this game with an 8‑1 overall record and a 1‑0 conference mark, reflecting a team that has excelled through disciplined defense, efficient scoring, and balanced contributions across its roster. Under Hall of Fame coach Tom Izzo, the Spartans have developed a reputation for methodical, team-oriented basketball that emphasizes defensive rotations, rebounding, and high-percentage shot selection. Key contributors include Marcus Walker, Jaxon Kohler, and Elliot Cadeau, whose combined scoring, playmaking, and defensive versatility provide the Spartans with multiple ways to attack opponents while remaining difficult to contain on the road. Michigan State averages roughly 76.6 points per game, while allowing just 61 points, highlighting both offensive efficiency and defensive discipline, which are critical for success in challenging road venues. Offensively, Michigan State thrives by controlling tempo and using a balanced attack that stretches the floor while exploiting defensive lapses. Guards like Cadeau and Walker orchestrate plays, creating open looks for shooters and cutters, while forwards like Kohler secure rebounds and score efficiently in the paint. Transition opportunities remain a key strength, as the Spartans convert turnovers into fast-break points, which can quickly shift momentum and put pressure on home teams. Maintaining ball security is essential, especially against Penn State’s home crowd and defensive schemes, as Michigan State averages approximately 12 turnovers per game, which can lead to easy points for opponents if not controlled. Offensive rebounding also plays a critical role, allowing the Spartans to extend possessions and generate second-chance points that can tilt the game in their favor.
Defensively, Michigan State’s success hinges on communication, discipline, and intensity. The Spartans excel at contesting shots, protecting the paint, and limiting second-chance opportunities, allowing them to dictate the pace of play and force opponents into low-percentage shots. On the road, defensive cohesion is even more critical, as crowd noise can disrupt rotations and create challenges in matchups. Michigan State’s length and athleticism allow them to apply pressure on ball handlers, rotate effectively on screens, and contest perimeter opportunities, while simultaneously controlling the glass to prevent Penn State from generating second-chance points. Effective defensive execution will be essential to contain key Nittany Lions scorers like Kayden Mingo and Melih Tunca, who can stretch defenses and generate points in transition. Historically, Michigan State has held a favorable edge against Penn State, winning the majority of recent meetings, including a hard-fought 90‑85 victory last season that demonstrated their ability to win close matchups on the road. Success in this game will depend on maintaining defensive intensity, limiting turnovers, and executing consistently on offense. Cadeau, Walker, and Kohler will need to lead by example, providing scoring, playmaking, and leadership to navigate a challenging road environment. If the Spartans can impose their methodical style, leverage rebounding dominance, and convert defensive stops into points, they are well-positioned to extend their winning streak and continue their rise in Big Ten standings. However, Penn State’s home-court energy, familiarity, and ability to generate scoring runs make it imperative that Michigan State remains disciplined, focused, and adaptable throughout all 40 minutes.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Penn State Nittany Lions CBB Preview
The Penn State Nittany Lions return home to the Bryce Jordan Center on December 13, 2025 to face the Michigan State Spartans in a critical Big Ten matchup that will test their resilience and ability to compete with one of the conference’s elite programs. Penn State enters the game with an 8‑2 overall record and a 0‑1 Big Ten mark, reflecting a team that has shown scoring potential but also defensive inconsistency against high-level competition. Under the guidance of head coach Mike Rhoades, the Nittany Lions have relied on a blend of experienced players and emerging talent to maintain a competitive edge, particularly at home, where they have been undefeated this season. Senior guard Kayden Mingo and forward Melih Tunca are central to the team’s scoring attack, providing points, leadership, and versatility on both ends of the floor, while complementary scorers like Freddie Dilione V stretch defenses and offer critical perimeter shooting. Penn State’s home-court environment, including crowd energy and familiarity with the court, provides a tangible advantage that can influence momentum and make it challenging for road teams to dictate tempo. Offensively, Penn State averages roughly 80 points per game, using a combination of perimeter shooting, inside scoring, and ball movement to generate high-quality scoring opportunities. Against a disciplined Michigan State defense, the Nittany Lions will need to execute efficiently, prioritize shot selection, and limit turnovers, which can quickly be converted into fast-break points by a team that thrives in transition. Offensive success will depend on finding rhythm early, moving the ball effectively, and creating mismatches in both half-court and transition sets. Guards must maintain composure under pressure to orchestrate plays, while forwards crash the offensive glass to create second-chance points that could swing momentum.
While the Nittany Lions have shown flashes of explosive scoring, sustaining consistency against Michigan State’s defensive discipline will be critical to remaining competitive throughout the contest. Defensively, Penn State will be challenged to contain Michigan State’s balanced offensive attack. The Spartans average around 76 points per game and excel in creating high-percentage opportunities both inside and on the perimeter, using disciplined ball movement and spacing to exploit gaps. To counter this, Penn State must communicate effectively on rotations, contest every shot, and secure defensive rebounds to limit second-chance points. Applying pressure on the ball, switching efficiently on screens, and preventing open perimeter looks will be key strategies to slow Michigan State’s scoring pace. Additionally, Penn State must avoid foul trouble and manage defensive energy to maintain effectiveness throughout all 40 minutes. In summary, Penn State’s success hinges on disciplined execution on both ends of the floor, leveraging home-court energy, and sustaining offensive efficiency. The Nittany Lions must balance scoring from their leaders with contributions from role players, while containing Michigan State’s transition game and interior scoring. If Penn State can impose defensive pressure, convert rebounds into points, and take advantage of momentum swings at the Bryce Jordan Center, they have a chance to keep the game competitive and potentially challenge a top-tier opponent. However, Michigan State’s experience, depth, and defensive discipline present a formidable obstacle, making it critical for Penn State to maximize every possession, maintain focus, and exploit every opportunity to create a close contest on their home floor.
Day by day 🏗️#WeAre pic.twitter.com/QyGmGLRAV1
— Penn State Men’s Basketball (@PennStateMBB) December 12, 2025
Michigan State vs Penn State Prop Picks (AI)
Remi is pouring through mountains of datapoints on each player. In fact, anytime the Spartans and Nittany Lions play there’s always several intriguing angles to key in on. Not to mention games played at Bryce Jordan Center in Dec seemingly never follow normal, predictable betting trends.
Michigan State vs Penn State Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports genius, has been pouring over tons of data from every past game between the Spartans and Nittany Lions and using recursive machine learning and cutting-edge AI to crunch the data to a single cover probability.
Interestingly enough, the data has been most fixated on the trending factor knucklehead sportsbettors often put on Michigan State’s strength factors between a Spartans team going up against a possibly improved Nittany Lions team. We’ve found the true game analytics appear to reflect a strong lean against one Vegas line in particular.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CBB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI Michigan State vs Penn State picks, computer picks Spartans vs Nittany Lions, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBB | 1/15 | UMBC@BRYANT | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 1/15 | ELON@NEAST | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 1/15 | NOCOLO@PORTST | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 1/15 | SOIND@TNTECH | GET FREE PICK NOW | 2 | – | |
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CBB schedule.
Michigan State Betting Trends
Michigan State has gone 5‑4‑0 against the spread this season and is favored in most of its outings, reflecting mixed but respectable performance relative to expectations.
Penn State Betting Trends
Penn State has struggled ATS, with a 3‑7‑0 record against the spread, indicating the Nittany Lions often underperform relative to betting expectations even when competitive.
Spartans vs. Nittany Lions Matchup Trends
Current line movements and analytics suggest Michigan State as a significant favorite (often ‑11.5 or more) with a total around 144.5, and while the two teams average a combined scoring total above that, recent trends show varied pace and defensive intensity that could keep the game under market projections.
Michigan State vs. Penn State Game Info
Michigan State vs Penn State starts on December 13, 2025 at 1:00 PM EST.
Venue: Bryce Jordan Center.
Spread: Penn State +12.5
Moneyline: Michigan State -820, Penn State +552
Over/Under: 144.5
Michigan State: (8-1) | Penn State: (8-2)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: J. Kohler over 30 Fantasy Score.. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
Current line movements and analytics suggest Michigan State as a significant favorite (often ‑11.5 or more) with a total around 144.5, and while the two teams average a combined scoring total above that, recent trends show varied pace and defensive intensity that could keep the game under market projections.
MICHST trend: Michigan State has gone 5‑4‑0 against the spread this season and is favored in most of its outings, reflecting mixed but respectable performance relative to expectations.
PSU trend: Penn State has struggled ATS, with a 3‑7‑0 record against the spread, indicating the Nittany Lions often underperform relative to betting expectations even when competitive.
See our latest CBB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
Michigan State vs. Penn State Odds
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through tons of data on each line. In fact, anytime the Michigan State vs Penn State trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing angles to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme hostile environments can often follow normal, predictable patterns.
| MICHST Moneyline | -820 |
|---|---|
| PSU Moneyline | +552 |
| MICHST Spread | -12.5 |
| PSU Spread | +12.5 |
| Over / Under | 144.5 |
Michigan State vs Penn State Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Jan 16, 2026 6:30PM EST
Creighton Bluejays
Providence Friars
1/16/26 6:30PM
CREIGH
PROV
|
–
–
|
-136
+110
|
-2.5 (-108)
+2.5 (-114)
|
O 162.5 (-105)
U 162.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2026 6:30PM EST
Toledo Rockets
Kent State Golden Flashes
1/16/26 6:30PM
TOLEDO
KENT
|
–
–
|
+180
-230
|
+5.5 (-118)
-5.5 (-105)
|
O 169.5 (-110)
U 169.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2026 8:00PM EST
Baylor Bears
Kansas Jayhawks
1/16/26 8PM
BAYLOR
KANSAS
|
–
–
|
+260
-385
|
+7.5 (-108)
-7.5 (-115)
|
O 155.5 (-110)
U 155.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2026 8:30PM EST
Ohio Bobcats
Ball State Cardinals
1/16/26 8:30PM
OHIO
BALLST
|
–
–
|
-225
+165
|
-5.5 (-104)
+5.5 (-121)
|
O 147.5 (-105)
U 147.5 (-115)
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2026 8:30PM EST
Marquette Golden Eagles
DePaul Blue Demons
1/16/26 8:30PM
MARQ
DEPAUL
|
–
–
|
+145
-195
|
+3.5 (-106)
-3.5 (-118)
|
O 144.5 (-115)
U 144.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2026 8:30PM EST
Loyola Chicago Ramblers
Dayton Flyers
1/16/26 8:30PM
LOYCHI
DAYTON
|
–
–
|
-2500
|
-16.5 (-112)
|
O 142.5 (-115)
U 142.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2026 10:30PM EST
Colorado State Rams
Boise State Broncos
1/16/26 10:30PM
COLOST
BOISE
|
–
–
|
-240
|
-5.5 (-109)
|
O 138.5 (-115)
U 138.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 12:00PM EST
Minnesota Golden Gophers
Illinois Fighting Illini
1/17/26 12PM
MINN
ILL
|
–
–
|
+850
-2000
|
+15.5 (-112)
-15.5 (-114)
|
O 139.5 (-110)
U 139.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 12:00PM EST
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
NC State Wolfpack
1/17/26 12PM
GATECH
NCST
|
–
–
|
+920
-1800
|
+14.5 (-102)
-14.5 (-120)
|
O 155.5 (-110)
U 155.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 12:00PM EST
Kentucky Wildcats
Tennessee Volunteers
1/17/26 12PM
UK
TENN
|
–
–
|
+210
-278
|
+5.5 (-108)
-5.5 (-118)
|
O 145.5 (-110)
U 145.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 12:00PM EST
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Virginia Tech Hokies
1/17/26 12PM
ND
VATECH
|
–
–
|
+188
-230
|
+4.5 (-110)
-4.5 (-110)
|
O 140.5 (-110)
U 140.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 12:00PM EST
Butler Bulldogs
Seton Hall Pirates
1/17/26 12PM
BUTLER
SETON
|
–
–
|
+255
-320
|
+6.5 (-110)
-6.5 (-110)
|
O 142.5 (-110)
U 142.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 12:00PM EST
UConn Huskies
Georgetown Hoyas
1/17/26 12PM
UCONN
GTOWN
|
–
–
|
-1000
+575
|
-12.5 (-115)
+12.5 (-110)
|
O 140.5 (-115)
U 140.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 12:00PM EST
Virginia Cavaliers
SMU Mustangs
1/17/26 12PM
UVA
SMU
|
–
–
|
-127
+100
|
-1.5 (-114)
+1.5 (-112)
|
O 152.5 (-115)
U 152.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 1:00PM EST
Alabama Crimson Tide
Oklahoma Sooners
1/17/26 1PM
BAMA
OKLA
|
–
–
|
-245
+190
|
-5.5 (-115)
+5.5 (-110)
|
O 170.5 (-115)
U 170.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 1:00PM EST
UCLA Bruins
Ohio State Buckeyes
1/17/26 1PM
UCLA
OHIOST
|
–
–
|
+140
-177
|
+3.5 (-113)
-3.5 (-113)
|
O 147.5 (-110)
U 147.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 2:00PM EST
Iowa State Cyclones
Cincinnati Bearcats
1/17/26 2PM
IOWAST
CINCY
|
–
–
|
-315
+235
|
-7.5 (-108)
+7.5 (-118)
|
O 139.5 (-110)
U 139.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 2:00PM EST
Syracuse Orange
Boston College Eagles
1/17/26 2PM
CUSE
BC
|
–
–
|
-330
+260
|
-7.5 (-102)
+7.5 (-120)
|
O 136.5 (-110)
U 136.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 2:00PM EST
Florida Gators
Vanderbilt Commodores
1/17/26 2PM
FLA
VANDY
|
–
–
|
+145
-190
|
+3.5 (-107)
-3.5 (-118)
|
O 160.5 (-110)
U 160.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 2:00PM EST
Rutgers Scarlet Knights
Wisconsin Badgers
1/17/26 2PM
RUT
WISC
|
–
–
|
+810
-1450
|
+13.5 (-102)
-13.5 (-120)
|
O 147.5 (-115)
U 147.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 2:00PM EST
TCU Horned Frogs
Utah Utes
1/17/26 2PM
TCU
UTAH
|
–
–
|
-260
+210
|
-5.5 (-110)
+5.5 (-110)
|
O 151.5 (-115)
U 151.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 2:00PM EST
Iowa Hawkeyes
Indiana Hoosiers
1/17/26 2PM
IOWA
IND
|
–
–
|
+110
-137
|
+1.5 (-107)
-1.5 (-120)
|
O 142.5 (-115)
U 142.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 2:15PM EST
Miami Hurricanes
Clemson Tigers
1/17/26 2:15PM
MIAMI
CLEM
|
–
–
|
+188
-230
|
+4.5 (-110)
-4.5 (-110)
|
O 146.5 (-110)
U 146.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 4:00PM EST
Arizona Wildcats
UCF Knights
1/17/26 4PM
ARIZ
UCF
|
–
–
|
-490
+365
|
-9.5 (-102)
+9.5 (-120)
|
O 163.5 (-115)
U 163.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 4:00PM EST
Arkansas Razorbacks
Georgia Bulldogs
1/17/26 4PM
ARK
UGA
|
–
–
|
-112
-114
|
pk
pk
|
O 179.5 (-110)
U 179.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 6:00PM EST
Michigan State Spartans
Washington Huskies
1/17/26 6PM
MICHST
WASH
|
–
–
|
+150
|
+3.5 (-112)
|
O 140.5 (-110)
U 140.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 6:00PM EST
Duke Blue Devils
Stanford Cardinal
1/17/26 6PM
DUKE
STNFRD
|
–
–
|
-455
+320
|
-8.5 (-114)
+8.5 (-112)
|
O 147.5 (-115)
U 147.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 6:00PM EST
Purdue Boilermakers
USC Trojans
1/17/26 6PM
PURDUE
USC
|
–
–
|
-375
+265
|
-7.5 (-113)
+7.5 (-113)
|
O 154.5 (-110)
U 154.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 8:00PM EST
BYU Cougars
Texas Tech Red Raiders
1/17/26 8PM
BYU
TXTECH
|
–
–
|
+120
-150
|
+2.5 (-109)
-2.5 (-117)
|
O 159.5 (-110)
U 159.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 17, 2026 8:00PM EST
St. John's Red Storm
Villanova Wildcats
1/17/26 8PM
STJOHN
NOVA
|
–
–
|
-105
-121
|
+1.5 (-118)
-1.5 (-108)
|
O 146.5 (-115)
U 146.5 (-105)
|
CBB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers Michigan State Spartans vs. Penn State Nittany Lions on December 13, 2025 at Bryce Jordan Center.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CBB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
|
|
|
|
RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCU@BYU | TCU +13.5 | 56.6% | 6 | WIN |
| ILLST@INDST | INDST +6.5 | 57.1% | 7 | WIN |
| TULSA@CHARLO | TULSA -3.5 | 57.8% | 7 | WIN |
| UVA@LVILLE | UVA +3.5 | 53.7% | 2 | WIN |
| NEWORL@SELOU | SELOU -2.5 | 54.8% | 3 | LOSS |
| SIENA@MOUNT | SIENA -2.5 | 56.6% | 6 | WIN |
| ILL@IOWA | IOWA +1.5 | 54.7% | 4 | LOSS |
| MEMP@FAU | MEMP +2.5 | 55.0% | 4 | LOSS |
| DENVER@SDAK | DENVER -110 | 56.3% | 6 | LOSS |
| SAMFORD@CHAT | CHAT +0.5 | 54.9% | 2 | WIN |
| HOWARD@MDESHORE | HOWARD -2.5 | 54.9% | 4 | LOSS |
| LSU@VANDY | VANDY -15 | 55.2% | 5 | LOSS |
| STNFRD@UVA | STNFRD +12 | 55.4% | 5 | LOSS |
| CHIST@STONEH | STONEH -4.5 | 55.9% | 5 | LOSS |
| UCSD@UCRIV | UCSD -9.5 | 56.0% | 6 | LOSS |
| HOU@BAYLOR | HOU -2.5 | 56.9% | 6 | WIN |
| LOYMD@BUCK | LOYMD +6.5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| LIB@LATECH | LATECH +4.5 | 53.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| WEBER@NAU | NAU +2 | 53.8% | 3 | LOSS |
| STLOU@VCU | VCU -135 | 59.9% | 6 | LOSS |
| VMI@ETNST | VMI +17.5 | 56.4% | 6 | WIN |
| HOLY@LEHIGH | HOLY +125 | 44.6% | 1 | WIN |
| MIAMI@WAKE | MIAMI +100 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| CHARLO@UTSA | CHARLO -4.5 | 54.0% | 3 | WIN |
| ARK@OLEMISS | MISS +4 | 54.3% | 4 | LOSS |
| SOILL@UIC | SOILL -1.5 | 56.8% | 6 | LOSS |
| BGREEN@KENTST | KENTST -1.5 | 56.6% | 6 | WIN |
| EMICH@BALLST | BALLST -118 | 56.6% | 5 | LOSS |
| FRESNO@SJST | SJST -1 | 55.0% | 4 | LOSS |
| DUKE@LVILLE | LVILLE -110 | 54.2% | 4 | LOSS |
| BAMAST@ARKPB | BAMAST -102 | 53.2% | 3 | LOSS |
| NWESTST@NICHOLLS | NWESTST +8.5 | 54.1% | 3 | WIN |
| LIU@CHIST | LIU -7.5 | 53.2% | 1 | WIN |
| STONEH@WAGNER | STONEH +8.5 | 54.6% | 4 | WIN |
| MOUNT@QUINN | MOUNT +9 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| LATECH@WKY | WKY -9 | 54.6% | 4 | LOSS |
| DUKE@FSU | FSU +16 | 54.1% | 2 | WIN |
| BC@GATECH | BC +7 | 54.9% | 4 | LOSS |
| KANSAS@UCF | UCF +5.5 | 54.9% | 4 | WIN |
| BRYANT@MAINE | BRYANT -1 | 55.6% | 5 | WIN |
| MISSST@TEXAS | TEXAS -8.5 | 56.3% | 6 | LOSS |
| UNC@SMU | SMU +1.5 | 56.6% | 6 | WIN |
| WCU@FURMAN | WCU +9.5 | 57.2% | 7 | WIN |
| LONGWD@HIGHPT | LONGWD +17 | 57.7% | 7 | WIN |
| TEXSOU@SOUTHERN | TEXSOU +6.5 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| SJST@UTAHST | UTAHST -20.5 | 58.2% | 8 | LOSS |
| OREGST@PACIFIC | OREGST +4.5 | 56.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| ND@CAL | CAL -4 | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| OREG@MD | OREG -1 | 52.6% | 1 | WIN |
| GASOU@COASTAL | GASOU +1.5 | 57.0% | 6 | WIN |
| TNTECH@ARKLR | ARKLR -109 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |