Alabama vs Illinois Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CBB Lines & Props (Nov 19)
Updated: 2025-11-17T03:31:50.923562ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The Alabama Crimson Tide (away) take on the Illinois Fighting Illini (home) on November 19, 2025, in a high-profile early-season matchup that pits Alabama’s uptempo offense and roster depth against Illinois’s structured efficiency and home-court energy. This game offers critical insight into both programs’ trajectories as the Crimson Tide look to validate their status on the road and the Illini aim to defend home momentum and assert Big Ten strength ahead of conference play.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Nov 19, 2025
Start Time: 10:00 PM EST
Venue: United Center
Fighting Illini Record: (4-0)
Crimson Tide Record: (2-1)
OPENING ODDS
BAMA Moneyline: +146
ILL Moneyline: -175
BAMA Spread: +3.5
ILL Spread: -3.5
Over/Under: 182.5
BAMA
Betting Trends
- Alabama enters with ATS performance showing a moderate cover rate in early games, but has yet to establish a consistently strong spread record on the road this season.
ILL
Betting Trends
- Illinois boasts a perfect home start so far this season, sporting a 4-0 mark at the United Center, but their ATS track record at home is less documented—suggesting the Illini may have value beyond just their win-loss sheet.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- This matchup features intriguing ATS implications: Alabama’s depth, tempo and outside shooting create road value potential, especially given Illinois’s large home favorites status and the pressure that accompanies it. On the other hand, Illinois’s undefeated home start indicates they perform well at the United Center, and if they maintain their efficiency and defensive discipline, they may present strong cover potential. Tempo control, rebound margins and turnover differential may drive ATS outcomes more than reputation, particularly in a matchup where contrasting styles meet and early-season volatility could amplify swings.
BAMA vs. ILL
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: L. Wrightsell under 16.5 PTS+REB+AST.
LIVE CBB ODDS
CBB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
425-328
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+849
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$84,896
VS. SPREAD
1815-1526
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+436.8
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$43,681
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Alabama vs Illinois Prediction & Odds:
Free CBB Betting Insights for 11/19/25
The November 19 matchup between the Alabama Crimson Tide and the Illinois Fighting Illini shapes up as one of the most stylistically intriguing early-season battles, bringing together a fast, high-volume Alabama offense and a structured, physical Illinois team that thrives on controlling tempo and forcing opponents into half-court execution. Alabama arrives with its familiar identity built on pace, spacing, shot volume and guard-led creation, a style that aims to generate rhythm early through transition opportunities, quick-driving actions and perimeter looks that stretch defenses to uncomfortable depths; however, doing so on the road requires elite shot selection, ball security and composure, especially against an Illinois squad that takes pride in dictating the type of game their opponent must play. Illinois counters with a fundamentally different approach centered on physicality, rebounding, interior scoring and defensive discipline, combining size, strength and well-timed help principles to funnel opposing offenses into difficult mid-range attempts rather than clean drives or open threes. The tug-of-war over tempo becomes the heart of this matchup, as Alabama will push to maintain pace, hunt early-clock looks and avoid the grind of late-possession scenarios, while Illinois will try to slow the game, force extended half-court sets and make Alabama’s playmakers navigate physical screens, tight spacing and constant defensive engagement. Rebounding amplifies this clash significantly: Alabama cannot afford to allow Illinois second-chance opportunities that lengthen possessions and feed both the crowd and Illinois’s confidence, while Illinois sees the glass as the primary pressure point that can disrupt Alabama’s preferred rhythm by cutting off transition chances at the source.
Perimeter defense will also shape the complexion of the game, with Illinois needing to maintain clean closeouts, avoid fouling shooters and prevent Alabama from finding those rhythm threes that often spark multi-possession surges, and Alabama needing to withstand Illinois’s physical ball-pressure without losing spacing discipline or reverting to stagnant, self-created shots. Both benches will be tested, as Alabama loves to rotate deep and keep energy high, while Illinois relies on role players to sustain defensive pressure, maintain rebounding presence and provide scoring balance without letting Alabama’s depth dictate the flow. Mentally, Alabama embraces the freedom of playing on the road, aiming to lean into its uptempo identity without getting rattled by Illinois’s physicality or the home crowd, and Illinois must handle the weight of expectation, ensuring that their home floor fuels concentration rather than rushing offensive possessions or overcommitting defensively. The Wildcats’ ability to break Illinois’s defensive structure with pace, spacing and early attack windows will determine whether they can impose their identity, while Illinois’s ability to force longer possessions, win the glass and generate interior scoring will test Alabama’s defensive resilience and commitment. Ultimately, the winner will be the team that enforces its preferred environment more consistently: Alabama thrives if the game becomes fast, fluid and perimeter-driven, while Illinois gains the upper hand if the contest turns into a physical, half-court, possession-by-possession battle that leverages their size, discipline and home-court advantage across forty minutes.
Get live CBB odds and precise AI CBB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
Tomorrow in Chicago.#RollTide | #AlmostGameday pic.twitter.com/PJWy6a909F
— Alabama Men’s Basketball (@AlabamaMBB) November 18, 2025
Alabama Crimson Tide CBB Preview
The Alabama Crimson Tide enter their November 19 road matchup against Illinois with a clear understanding that their success hinges on imposing their signature uptempo, high-spacing, guard-driven identity inside an environment designed to disrupt rhythm, test poise, and punish mistakes, and Alabama knows that their path to controlling the flow of the game depends on harnessing pace, protecting possessions, and generating clean perimeter looks before Illinois can settle into its physical half-court defense. Offensively, the Crimson Tide thrive when their guards are decisive and aggressive, pushing the ball into transition, forcing mismatches early in the clock, and bending defenses with drive-and-kick sequences that create open threes or slashing lanes, and on the road this approach requires heightened discipline because careless passes or forced attempts quickly turn into momentum-swinging opportunities for the home team. Alabama’s spacing becomes even more important against Illinois’s compact, physical style; the Tide must stretch the floor, keep Illinois’s help defenders moving, and prevent them from stacking the paint, all while maintaining sharp off-ball movement and making the extra pass to exploit late rotations. Shot selection remains a defining factor, as road environments demand efficiency and Alabama must balance their trademark green-light confidence with the situational awareness needed to avoid early-clock threes that feed Illinois’s rebounding advantage. Rebounding will be central to Alabama’s ability to sustain tempo, as defensive boards must be secured cleanly to ignite transition before Illinois can establish their half-court shape, and offensive rebounding—while not traditionally Alabama’s strongest emphasis—can serve as an important pressure point if the Tide’s athleticism and length create second-chance possessions that disrupt Illinois’s defensive rhythm.
Defensively, Alabama must demonstrate toughness at the point of attack, defend screens with urgency, and avoid foul trouble that could limit rotations, because Illinois’s half-court sets are designed to exploit defensive lapses through physical drives, smart post play, and inside-out actions that reward patience. The Tide must stay disciplined in closeouts, preventing Illinois from turning kick-out opportunities into rhythm threes, and must rotate crisply to avoid giving up back-cut layups or free catches in the paint that energize the home crowd. Bench depth also plays a vital role, as Alabama relies on energy, athleticism, and scoring from its second unit to maintain pace and pressure, and these players must bring controlled aggression rather than rushed decision-making that can swing momentum. Emotionally, Alabama approaches this game with the confidence of a program accustomed to big stages and high expectations, but they must channel that confidence into execution rather than volatility, staying composed during Illinois scoring runs and relying on their system’s pace and space principles even under crowd and physical pressure. If the Crimson Tide can rebound effectively, control turnovers, maintain spacing, convert open looks, and prevent Illinois from dragging the game into a deliberate, physical grind, they position themselves to dictate style, keep the crowd from becoming a factor, and deliver the type of sharp, road-tested performance that reflects their aspirations for the season.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
Illinois Fighting Illini CBB Preview
The Illinois Fighting Illini enter their November 19 home matchup against the Alabama Crimson Tide with the confidence of a team built on physicality, discipline, and half-court execution, fully aware that their strength lies in controlling tempo, protecting their home floor, and turning Alabama’s fast-paced ambitions into a grind that favors Illinois’s structure and interior presence. Offensively, Illinois thrives when they establish the paint early, using strong post touches, hard screens, and patient ball movement to create high-percentage looks that force Alabama’s defense to collapse, opening opportunities for inside-out rhythm jumpers rather than rushed, contested attempts. Their guards play with deliberate pace, valuing possession quality over speed, and they will be expected to initiate sets calmly, attack closeouts under control, and avoid turnovers that could fuel Alabama’s transition-heavy approach. Illinois’s frontcourt becomes central to their success, as their size and physicality allow them to attack mismatches, draw fouls, and force Alabama’s interior defenders into difficult decisions, while their ability to rebound consistently can tilt the game toward longer possessions that sap momentum from a team that prefers quick scoring bursts. Defensively, the Illini rely on suffocating physicality, structured rotations, and communication to limit Alabama’s spacing advantage, and they must stay disciplined in closeouts to avoid giving the Crimson Tide the open threes that often ignite their offensive runs. Illinois must also prioritize transition defense, sprinting back immediately to prevent Alabama from capitalizing on even momentary lapses, because a single early-clock defensive breakdown can shift the pace entirely.
In the half-court, they will challenge Alabama’s guards at the point of attack, fight through screens, and protect the lane with layered help that forces the Tide into difficult reads rather than allowing free drives or clean kick-out opportunities. Rebounding becomes the backbone of their game plan, because securing defensive boards not only denies Alabama second chances but also allows Illinois to dictate tempo by initiating their slower, more deliberate offensive identity. The Illini bench plays a meaningful role as well, providing defensive intensity, additional size, rebounding support, and opportunistic scoring without sacrificing the physical standard that defines Illinois basketball, and their ability to maintain pressure during rotations will be vital in preventing Alabama’s depth from influencing the momentum. Mentally, Illinois embraces both expectation and responsibility, understanding that home games against fast-paced, national-level opponents require composure more than adrenaline, and the coaching staff will emphasize patience, physicality, and trust in their system rather than engaging in the type of pace that Alabama prefers. If Illinois can impose their tempo, dominate the glass, limit live-ball turnovers, contest perimeter shots with discipline, and use their interior strength to wear down the Crimson Tide possession by possession, they place themselves in position to turn this matchup into a statement of Big Ten toughness and reinforce the home-court identity that has long allowed them to compete with and defeat high-profile opponents.
Set up for a show.
— Illinois Men's Basketball (@IlliniMBB) November 18, 2025
🆚 Alabama
⏰ 8 pm CT
📍 United Center
📺 FS1
🎟️ https://t.co/u8qPUvhRts pic.twitter.com/ATnjtXNINW
Alabama vs Illinois Prop Picks (AI)
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through tons of datapoints on each team. In fact, anytime the Crimson Tide and Fighting Illini play there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at United Center in Nov can often follow normal, predictable patterns.
Alabama vs Illinois Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports wizard, has been pouring over exorbitant amounts of data from every angle between the Crimson Tide and Fighting Illini and using recursive machine learning and industry leading AI to analyze the data to a single cover probability.
Remi has been most keyed in on the trending factor human bettors tend to put on Alabama’s strength factors between a Crimson Tide team going up against a possibly unhealthy Fighting Illini team. In reality, the true game analytics appear to reflect a slight lean against one Vegas line in particular.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CBB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI Alabama vs Illinois picks, computer picks Crimson Tide vs Fighting Illini, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBB | 1/15 | UMBC@BRYANT | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 1/15 | ELON@NEAST | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 1/15 | NOCOLO@PORTST | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 1/15 | SOIND@TNTECH | GET FREE PICK NOW | 2 | – | |
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CBB schedule.
Alabama Betting Trends
Alabama enters with ATS performance showing a moderate cover rate in early games, but has yet to establish a consistently strong spread record on the road this season.
Illinois Betting Trends
Illinois boasts a perfect home start so far this season, sporting a 4-0 mark at the United Center, but their ATS track record at home is less documented—suggesting the Illini may have value beyond just their win-loss sheet.
Crimson Tide vs. Fighting Illini Matchup Trends
This matchup features intriguing ATS implications: Alabama’s depth, tempo and outside shooting create road value potential, especially given Illinois’s large home favorites status and the pressure that accompanies it. On the other hand, Illinois’s undefeated home start indicates they perform well at the United Center, and if they maintain their efficiency and defensive discipline, they may present strong cover potential. Tempo control, rebound margins and turnover differential may drive ATS outcomes more than reputation, particularly in a matchup where contrasting styles meet and early-season volatility could amplify swings.
Alabama vs. Illinois Game Info
Alabama vs Illinois starts on November 19, 2025 at 10:00 PM EST.
Venue: United Center.
Spread: Illinois -3.5
Moneyline: Alabama +146, Illinois -175
Over/Under: 182.5
Alabama: (2-1) | Illinois: (4-0)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup: L. Wrightsell under 16.5 PTS+REB+AST.. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
This matchup features intriguing ATS implications: Alabama’s depth, tempo and outside shooting create road value potential, especially given Illinois’s large home favorites status and the pressure that accompanies it. On the other hand, Illinois’s undefeated home start indicates they perform well at the United Center, and if they maintain their efficiency and defensive discipline, they may present strong cover potential. Tempo control, rebound margins and turnover differential may drive ATS outcomes more than reputation, particularly in a matchup where contrasting styles meet and early-season volatility could amplify swings.
BAMA trend: Alabama enters with ATS performance showing a moderate cover rate in early games, but has yet to establish a consistently strong spread record on the road this season.
ILL trend: Illinois boasts a perfect home start so far this season, sporting a 4-0 mark at the United Center, but their ATS track record at home is less documented—suggesting the Illini may have value beyond just their win-loss sheet.
See our latest CBB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
Alabama vs. Illinois Odds
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through loads of stats on each team. In fact, anytime the Alabama vs Illinois trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing angles to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme travel distance seemingly never follow normal, predictable patterns.
| BAMA Moneyline | +146 |
|---|---|
| ILL Moneyline | -175 |
| BAMA Spread | +3.5 |
| ILL Spread | -3.5 |
| Over / Under | 182.5 |
Alabama vs Illinois Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
In Progress
SIU-Edwardsville Cougars
Tenn-Martin Skyhawks
In Progress
SIUE
TNMART
|
59
64
|
+3300
-10000
|
+5.5 (+105)
-5.5 (-140)
|
O 125.5 (-130)
U 125.5 (+100)
|
|
|
In Progress
Morehead State Eagles
Tennessee State Tigers
In Progress
MOREHD
TENNST
|
88
89
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 196.5 (-114)
U 196.5 (-114)
|
|
|
In Progress
Tarleton State Texans
Southern Utah Thunderbirds
In Progress
TARL
SUTAH
|
105
105
|
+450
-720
|
-1.5 (+333)
+1.5 (-500)
|
O 188.5 (-105)
U 188.5 (-125)
|
|
|
In Progress
Idaho Vandals
Idaho State Bengals
In Progress
IDAHO
IDST
|
63
68
|
-385
+235
|
+6.5 (-108)
-6.5 (-141)
|
O 146.5 (-130)
U 146.5 (+100)
|
|
|
In Progress
UT Arlington Mavericks
Utah Tech Trailblazers
In Progress
UTARL
UTTECH
|
54
52
|
+2000
|
+2.5 (-145)
|
O 107.5 (-180)
U 107.5 (+135)
|
|
|
In Progress
Eastern Washington Eagles
Weber State Wildcats
In Progress
EWASH
WEBER
|
70
84
|
+3300
-10000
|
+12.5 (-124)
-12.5 (-121)
|
O 171.5 (+104)
U 171.5 (-138)
|
|
|
In Progress
CSU Fullerton Titans
UC Davis Aggies
In Progress
CSFULL
UCDAV
|
50
62
|
+390
-770
|
+12.5 (-106)
-12.5 (-139)
|
O 140.5 (-118)
U 140.5 (-110)
|
|
|
In Progress
Lindenwood Lions
SE Missouri State Redhawks
In Progress
LINDEN
SEMO
|
71
52
|
-20000
|
-15.5 (-115)
|
O 156.5 (-110)
U 156.5 (-118)
|
|
|
In Progress
Wichita State Shockers
Florida Atlantic Owls
In Progress
WICHST
FAU
|
47
74
|
-10000
|
-25.5 (-130)
|
O 150.5 (-114)
U 150.5 (-114)
|
|
|
In Progress
Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles
Tennessee Tech Golden Eagles
In Progress
SOIND
TNTECH
|
50
48
|
+108
-155
|
+1.5 (-120)
-1.5 (-122)
|
O 126.5 (-104)
U 126.5 (-125)
|
|
|
In Progress
UC Santa Barbara Gauchos
CSU Bakersfield Roadrunners
In Progress
UCSB
CSBAK
|
46
32
|
-2500
+950
|
-12.5 (-121)
+12.5 (-121)
|
O 143.5 (-115)
U 143.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
Northern Arizona Lumberjacks
Sacramento State Hornets
In Progress
NAU
SACST
|
39
34
|
-225
|
-3.5 (-124)
|
O 151.5 (-114)
U 151.5 (-114)
|
|
|
In Progress
San Diego Toreros
Seattle Redhawks
In Progress
USD
SEATTLE
|
24
33
|
+900
-5000
|
+11.5 (-109)
-11.5 (-134)
|
O 133.5 (-118)
U 133.5 (-112)
|
|
|
In Progress
Hawaii Rainbow Warriors
Cal Poly Mustangs
In Progress
HAWAII
CALPLY
|
41
36
|
+300
|
+6.5 (-113)
|
O 162.5 (-114)
U 162.5 (-114)
|
|
|
In Progress
UC Riverside Highlanders
Long Beach State 49ers
In Progress
UCRIV
LBEACH
|
31
40
|
+1050
|
+12.5 (-117)
|
O 146.5 (-110)
U 146.5 (-120)
|
|
|
In Progress
CSU Northridge Matadors
UC San Diego Tritons
In Progress
CSUN
UCSD
|
39
30
|
-250
+145
|
-4.5 (-110)
+4.5 (-132)
|
O 152.5 (-113)
U 152.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
N Colorado Bears
Portland State Vikings
In Progress
NOCOLO
PORTST
|
33
28
|
-225
|
-3.5 (-124)
|
O 141.5 (-120)
U 141.5 (-110)
|
|
|
In Progress
Gonzaga Bulldogs
Washington State Cougars
In Progress
GONZAG
WASHST
|
30
30
|
-5000
|
-13.5 (-109)
|
O 153.5 (-114)
U 153.5 (-114)
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2026 6:30PM EST
Creighton Bluejays
Providence Friars
1/16/26 6:30PM
CREIGH
PROV
|
–
–
|
-115
-110
|
pk
pk
|
O 163 (-110)
U 163 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2026 6:30PM EST
Toledo Rockets
Kent State Golden Flashes
1/16/26 6:30PM
TOLEDO
KENT
|
–
–
|
+163
-210
|
+4.5 (-115)
-4.5 (-110)
|
O 171.5 (-110)
U 171.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2026 8:00PM EST
Baylor Bears
Kansas Jayhawks
1/16/26 8PM
BAYLOR
KANSAS
|
–
–
|
+290
-400
|
+7.5 (-106)
-7.5 (-120)
|
O 155 (-115)
U 155 (-105)
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2026 8:30PM EST
Ohio Bobcats
Ball State Cardinals
1/16/26 8:30PM
OHIO
BALLST
|
–
–
|
-205
+160
|
-4.5 (-110)
+4.5 (-115)
|
O 146 (-105)
U 146 (-115)
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2026 8:30PM EST
Marquette Golden Eagles
DePaul Blue Demons
1/16/26 8:30PM
MARQ
DEPAUL
|
–
–
|
+143
-180
|
+3.5 (-115)
-3.5 (-110)
|
O 142.5 (-115)
U 142.5 (-105)
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2026 8:30PM EST
Loyola Chicago Ramblers
Dayton Flyers
1/16/26 8:30PM
LOYCHI
DAYTON
|
–
–
|
-3335
|
-18.5 (-107)
|
O 142 (-110)
U 142 (-110)
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2026 10:30PM EST
Colorado State Rams
Boise State Broncos
1/16/26 10:30PM
COLOST
BOISE
|
–
–
|
-275
|
-5.5 (-120)
|
O 141 (-110)
U 141 (-110)
|
CBB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers Alabama Crimson Tide vs. Illinois Fighting Illini on November 19, 2025 at United Center.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CBB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
|
|
|
|
RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCU@BYU | TCU +13.5 | 56.6% | 6 | WIN |
| ILLST@INDST | INDST +6.5 | 57.1% | 7 | WIN |
| TULSA@CHARLO | TULSA -3.5 | 57.8% | 7 | WIN |
| UVA@LVILLE | UVA +3.5 | 53.7% | 2 | WIN |
| NEWORL@SELOU | SELOU -2.5 | 54.8% | 3 | LOSS |
| SIENA@MOUNT | SIENA -2.5 | 56.6% | 6 | WIN |
| ILL@IOWA | IOWA +1.5 | 54.7% | 4 | LOSS |
| MEMP@FAU | MEMP +2.5 | 55.0% | 4 | LOSS |
| DENVER@SDAK | DENVER -110 | 56.3% | 6 | LOSS |
| SAMFORD@CHAT | CHAT +0.5 | 54.9% | 2 | WIN |
| HOWARD@MDESHORE | HOWARD -2.5 | 54.9% | 4 | LOSS |
| LSU@VANDY | VANDY -15 | 55.2% | 5 | LOSS |
| STNFRD@UVA | STNFRD +12 | 55.4% | 5 | LOSS |
| CHIST@STONEH | STONEH -4.5 | 55.9% | 5 | LOSS |
| UCSD@UCRIV | UCSD -9.5 | 56.0% | 6 | LOSS |
| HOU@BAYLOR | HOU -2.5 | 56.9% | 6 | WIN |
| LOYMD@BUCK | LOYMD +6.5 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| LIB@LATECH | LATECH +4.5 | 53.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| WEBER@NAU | NAU +2 | 53.8% | 3 | LOSS |
| STLOU@VCU | VCU -135 | 59.9% | 6 | LOSS |
| VMI@ETNST | VMI +17.5 | 56.4% | 6 | WIN |
| HOLY@LEHIGH | HOLY +125 | 44.6% | 1 | WIN |
| MIAMI@WAKE | MIAMI +100 | 54.3% | 4 | WIN |
| CHARLO@UTSA | CHARLO -4.5 | 54.0% | 3 | WIN |
| ARK@OLEMISS | MISS +4 | 54.3% | 4 | LOSS |
| SOILL@UIC | SOILL -1.5 | 56.8% | 6 | LOSS |
| BGREEN@KENTST | KENTST -1.5 | 56.6% | 6 | WIN |
| EMICH@BALLST | BALLST -118 | 56.6% | 5 | LOSS |
| FRESNO@SJST | SJST -1 | 55.0% | 4 | LOSS |
| DUKE@LVILLE | LVILLE -110 | 54.2% | 4 | LOSS |
| BAMAST@ARKPB | BAMAST -102 | 53.2% | 3 | LOSS |
| NWESTST@NICHOLLS | NWESTST +8.5 | 54.1% | 3 | WIN |
| LIU@CHIST | LIU -7.5 | 53.2% | 1 | WIN |
| STONEH@WAGNER | STONEH +8.5 | 54.6% | 4 | WIN |
| MOUNT@QUINN | MOUNT +9 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| LATECH@WKY | WKY -9 | 54.6% | 4 | LOSS |
| DUKE@FSU | FSU +16 | 54.1% | 2 | WIN |
| BC@GATECH | BC +7 | 54.9% | 4 | LOSS |
| KANSAS@UCF | UCF +5.5 | 54.9% | 4 | WIN |
| BRYANT@MAINE | BRYANT -1 | 55.6% | 5 | WIN |
| MISSST@TEXAS | TEXAS -8.5 | 56.3% | 6 | LOSS |
| UNC@SMU | SMU +1.5 | 56.6% | 6 | WIN |
| WCU@FURMAN | WCU +9.5 | 57.2% | 7 | WIN |
| LONGWD@HIGHPT | LONGWD +17 | 57.7% | 7 | WIN |
| TEXSOU@SOUTHERN | TEXSOU +6.5 | 57.8% | 7 | LOSS |
| SJST@UTAHST | UTAHST -20.5 | 58.2% | 8 | LOSS |
| OREGST@PACIFIC | OREGST +4.5 | 56.1% | 6 | LOSS |
| ND@CAL | CAL -4 | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| OREG@MD | OREG -1 | 52.6% | 1 | WIN |
| GASOU@COASTAL | GASOU +1.5 | 57.0% | 6 | WIN |
| TNTECH@ARKLR | ARKLR -109 | 55.3% | 5 | WIN |