Michigan vs TCU Prediction — AI Finds CAN'T MISS CBB Lines & Props (Nov 14)
Updated: 2025-11-12T03:31:50.923562ZBy Remi at Leans.AI — AI picks for ATS, ML, OU & props
The Michigan Wolverines and the TCU Horned Frogs meet on November 14, 2025 in a non-conference showdown where Michigan’s established Big Ten powerhouse status will be tested by TCU’s evolving roster and athletic upside, making the game a key early indicator of comparative momentum and identity. Michigan enters as the clear structural favorite with veteran continuity, while TCU looks to leverage home-court (if applicable) or game-site advantages to validate its upward trajectory and competitive legitimacy.
Get key insights, betting trends, and AI-powered predictions to help incorporate into your betting strategies.
GAME INFO
Date: Nov 14, 2025
Start Time: 10:00 PM EST
Venue: Ed & Rae Schollmaier Arena
Horned Frogs Record: (6-3)
Wolverines Record: (2-0)
OPENING ODDS
MICH Moneyline: -403
TCU Moneyline: +313
MICH Spread: -8.5
TCU Spread: +8.5
Over/Under: 157.5
MICH
Betting Trends
- The Wolverines’ Betting Data page shows Michigan covering the spread in many of their recent games, indicating a strong ATS performance pattern.
TCU
Betting Trends
- TCU’s ATS data indicate a .500 cover rate prior to the season, suggesting that while their outcomes have been unpredictable, there may be value in their underdog or home-site positioning.
MATCHUP TRENDS
- Given Michigan’s strong ATS profile and TCU’s more volatile cover history, the line on this game may lean toward Michigan covering comfortably. However, if TCU is at home, their unpredictability and athletic mismatch potential could offer value for bettors backing the upset, making this a matchup where the underdog could outperform expectations.
MICH vs. TCU
Best Prop Bet
- Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup, but hasn't found a good Prop Bet yet for this game.
LIVE CBB ODDS
CBB ODDS COMPARISON
WANT MORE AI PICKS?
VS. SPREAD
448-370
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
+834.7
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG & EXEC)
$100/UNIT
$83,469
VS. SPREAD
1955-1598
NET UNITS
(INCL VIG)
+555.4
NET PROFIT
(INCL VIG)
$100/UNIT
$55,541
AI SPORTS PICK PRODUCTS
Create a Free Account
‘Create an Account’ to Get Remi’s Picks Today. Remi Finds New Picks
Remi calculates the probability a team will cover the line. Remi Works 24/7
Remi uses this probability to assign units to each pick.
Get Remi's AI Picks
Get Remi’s Top AI Sports Picks sent direct to your inbox.
Hedge Meaning in Betting | 4 Obvious Times to Hedge
Learn about hedge betting to manage risk and secure profits. Understand...
What is a Push in Betting? | 3 Ways To Use To Your Advantage
Understand what a push in betting means, how it happens in...
What Does the + and – Mean in Sports Betting? | 5 Easy Tips
Learn the basics of sports betting odds, what the plus (+)...
Michigan vs TCU Prediction & Odds:
Free CBB Betting Insights for 11/14/25
The upcoming matchup between the Michigan Wolverines and the TCU Horned Frogs on November 14, 2025 stands as an early-season crossroads for two programs built on distinctly different basketball identities, and the contrast in styles should create a compelling and competitive narrative from opening tip to final whistle as Michigan’s structured physicality collides with TCU’s pace-driven athleticism in a battle likely dictated by execution under pressure. Michigan enters the game carrying the hallmarks of a program that thrives on discipline, systematic offence, interior strength, and veteran cohesion, and the Wolverines will look to impose a controlled tempo anchored in purposeful possessions, strong rebounding, and a defensive posture designed to eliminate transition opportunities and funnel TCU into lower-efficiency half-court sequences. The Wolverines’ approach hinges on patience, timely ball movement, and taking advantage of TCU’s occasional inconsistency in perimeter closeouts, while also establishing a strong interior presence that can stabilize momentum whenever the game risks tilting into the Horned Frogs’ preferred faster rhythm. TCU, conversely, aims to weaponize athleticism, movement, and tempo, taking advantage of home-court energy and momentum swings to produce scoring bursts that can challenge Michigan’s composure; for the Horned Frogs, the key lies in pushing pace after misses, attacking early in the shot clock, utilizing wings who can create mismatches, and applying defensive pressure that disrupts Michigan’s structured sets before they fully unfold.
Much of the outcome may be determined by the battle on the boards—if Michigan controls the defensive glass, TCU’s transition game becomes limited and their scoring efficiency may dip, but if TCU secures offensive rebounds and extends possessions, they can tilt the tempo and force Michigan into an uncomfortably fast game flow. Turnovers form another major strategic hinge: Michigan seeks to minimize live-ball errors that fuel TCU runs, while the Horned Frogs will pressure passing lanes and attempt to force Michigan’s ball-handlers into rushed decisions. The benches also carry unusual influence in this matchup, as TCU relies heavily on rotational energy to sustain defensive intensity and pace, while Michigan depends on depth to maintain structure and avoid fatigue-induced breakdowns, especially during stretches when the Horned Frogs try to accelerate the game. Emotional management will matter deeply, particularly as TCU uses crowd energy to fuel aggression while Michigan must demonstrate composure, absorbing early surges without deviating from its plan; whichever team handles these momentum waves with clarity and patience will gain the upper hand. Shot selection efficiency may be the final determinant—Michigan’s system is built to generate clean looks via discipline, while TCU thrives when rhythm jumpers and transition threes fall early, creating confidence that transforms their performance. Ultimately, the team that best imposes its preferred style will take control: Michigan if the game becomes a physical half-court contest marked by execution and rebounding, and TCU if the matchup evolves into a transition-heavy track meet with mismatches, quick scoring, and emotional surges.
Get live CBB odds and precise AI CBB picks, predictions, and cover probabilities.
Scary hours 😱😱 pic.twitter.com/KKUFEei1bh
— Michigan Men's Basketball (@umichbball) November 14, 2025
Michigan Wolverines CBB Preview
The TCU Horned Frogs enter this matchup against Michigan seeking to assert their signature brand of fast, aggressive, and pressure-driven basketball, and their ability to dictate tempo will likely determine whether they can tilt the game toward their strengths or be pulled into the structured, methodical half-court battle the Wolverines prefer. TCU’s identity centers on dynamic wing play, transition scoring, and defensive pressure that thrives on forcing mistakes, and they will attempt to create a chaotic pace from the opening tip by pushing the ball off every rebound, leak-out opportunity, and defensive stop. Their guards are at their best when attacking downhill early in possessions, collapsing defenses to create kick-outs and rhythm threes, and they will aim to generate scoring runs built on quick bursts rather than slow, grinding possessions. Because Michigan’s system excels at limiting transition chances through discipline and rebounding, TCU’s ability to secure offensive boards becomes a central key: second-chance opportunities not only lead to additional points but also disrupt Michigan’s ability to control tempo, and the Horned Frogs know that an up-tempo game significantly increases their odds. Defensively, TCU will pressure ball-handlers, jump passing lanes, and attempt to disrupt Michigan’s early actions, understanding that if they can push the Wolverines to operate late in the shot clock, their athleticism gives them an advantage in forcing difficult, contested shots.
They may apply alternating defensive looks—occasional traps, hard hedges on ball screens, and selective full-court pressure—to keep Michigan uncomfortable, break offensive rhythm, and create turnovers that fuel fast-break chances. The Horned Frogs also rely heavily on emotional momentum, often feeding off stretches where their defensive energy translates into transition scoring; maintaining these surges without allowing defensive lapses afterward is critical, as Michigan excels at punishing teams that lose discipline after scoring bursts. TCU’s perimeter shooters will play an important role, as hitting early threes could force Michigan to stretch its defense, opening driving lanes and increasing the pace of play, while cold shooting could allow the Wolverines to slow the game and impose their physicality. Depth is another asset for the Horned Frogs, whose bench provides athleticism and the defensive energy needed to maintain their preferred intensity throughout long stretches; they will likely rotate aggressively to keep legs fresh and maintain tempo pressure. Foul management becomes an added layer—TCU’s aggressive defensive style is most effective when key players can remain on the floor, and avoiding early foul trouble is essential to sustaining their identity across forty minutes. Ultimately, TCU’s path to victory relies on disrupting Michigan’s structured approach, turning rebounds and turnovers into immediate offense, generating scoring runs built on pace and pressure, and leveraging athletic mismatches that allow them to dictate the emotional and tactical flow of the game.
Credit: USA TODAY/IMAGN
TCU Horned Frogs CBB Preview
The Michigan Wolverines enter this matchup with a clear understanding that controlling pace, limiting turnovers, and enforcing their half-court structure will be essential against a TCU team that thrives on chaos, tempo, and fast-break momentum, and Michigan’s disciplined approach is built to counter exactly that by slowing the game, maximizing each possession, and forcing the Horned Frogs to operate in a rhythm they traditionally struggle with. Michigan’s offensive identity rests on structured sets, strong ball security, and high-efficiency possession management, and their ability to execute cleanly in the half court will determine how successfully they can neutralize TCU’s pressure-oriented system, particularly because the Wolverines excel when they can dictate matchups, work through their bigs in the post, and generate inside-out scoring opportunities that collapse defenses before locating shooters spaced intelligently on the perimeter. Expect Michigan to focus heavily on rebounding fundamentals on both ends—not simply to win the statistical battle, but to prevent TCU’s potent transition game from getting early leaks, run-outs, or long-rebound fast breaks that swing momentum, as Michigan’s disciplined board work has historically been a stabilizer in games where tempo threatens to tilt against them. Their guards will need to handle ball pressure with poise, particularly against TCU’s extended defensive looks, which often include traps, hard hedges, or opportunistic full-court pressure designed to force hurried decisions; Michigan’s veteran backcourt should respond by using deliberate pace, controlled dribble penetration, and early clock resets to keep the game in their comfort zone. In the post, Michigan’s physicality remains one of their most reliable assets, and using size to attack mismatches, draw contact, and force TCU’s defenders into foul pressure could gradually erode the Horned Frogs’ defensive aggression, especially if Michigan can get to the free-throw line early and repeatedly.
Defensively, expect Michigan to defend ball screens conservatively to prevent straight-line drives, stay strong in help coverage, and avoid the scrambling rotations that TCU’s pace often induces in opponents; by keeping bodies in front and contesting without fouling, Michigan can turn TCU’s preferred fast-paced attack into a series of half-court possessions where the Wolverines’ structured defensive principles have an advantage. Michigan’s perimeter defenders will also be tasked with denying comfortable catch-and-shoot threes, shrinking transition-based spacing, and forcing TCU’s guards to win through difficult mid-range attempts rather than downhill momentum. The Wolverines’ bench, while not always as explosive as TCU’s, brings reliability, discipline, and defensive steadiness, and maintaining composure through TCU’s bursts of energy will require Michigan’s second unit to protect leads and avoid the types of scoring droughts that allow the Horned Frogs to create game-changing runs. Ultimately, Michigan’s formula hinges on controlling tempo, staying physical without getting into foul trouble, maximizing every possession with patience and spacing, and forcing TCU to engage in a slower, more methodical style of basketball where the Wolverines’ strengths in execution, discipline, and interior play give them the upper hand over forty minutes, making this a matchup where the home team’s ability to impose structure becomes the defining battleground.
see punch fly pic.twitter.com/nDL69pJxeL
— TCU Men's Basketball (@TCUBasketball) November 13, 2025
Michigan vs TCU Prop Picks (AI)
AI algorithm Remi is pouring through loads of datapoints on each team. In fact, anytime the Wolverines and Horned Frogs play there’s always several intriguing trends to key in on. Not to mention games played at Ed & Rae Schollmaier Arena in Nov seemingly never follow normal, predictable patterns.
Michigan vs TCU Prediction (AI)
Remi, our AI sports algorithm, has been pouring over exorbitant amounts of data from every simulation between the Wolverines and Horned Frogs and using recursive machine learning and impressive AI to boil down the data to a single cover probability.
Oddly enough, we’ve seen the AI has been most fixated on the trending weight emotional bettors regularly put on coaching factors between a Wolverines team going up against a possibly unhealthy Horned Frogs team. We’ve found the true game analytics appear to reflect a strong lean against one Vegas line in particular.
Unlock this in-depth AI prediction and all of our CBB AI picks for FREE now.
Below is our current AI Michigan vs TCU picks, computer picks Wolverines vs Horned Frogs, best bets, model edges, confidence ratings.
| DATE | GAME | LEAN | %WIN | UNITS | LEVEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBB | 2/18 | CHARLO@TULSA | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 7 |
VAULT v4
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | UIC@EVAN | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 6 |
VAULT v2
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | UVA@GATECH | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 6 |
VAULT v3
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | KANSAS@OKLAST | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 5 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | NCGRN@WCU | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 5 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | RUT@PSU | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | OKLA@TENN | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | BUTLER@GTOWN | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | ARK@BAMA | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 4 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | ILL@USC | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 3 |
EXECUTIVE
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | ARK@BAMA | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 2 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | OLEMISS@TEXA&M | GET FREE PICK NOW | 2 | – | |
| CBB | 2/18 | AUBURN@MISSST | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 10 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | BYU@ARIZ | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 1 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | LSALLE@DUQ | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 0 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | UAB@TEMPLE | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 1 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | PEPPER@PORT | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 0 |
INTEL
|
|
| CBB | 2/18 | BOISE@UTAHST | UNLOCK THIS PICK | 0 |
INTEL
|
|
These picks update as information changes—injury reports, and market movement. Each line shows our model’s fair price, the edge versus the market, and a unit confidence rating (1–10). Odds and availability vary by sportsbook and time. Edges are computed against the listed price; value may change after line moves. Always shop for the best number. See the full CBB schedule.
Michigan Betting Trends
The Wolverines’ Betting Data page shows Michigan covering the spread in many of their recent games, indicating a strong ATS performance pattern.
TCU Betting Trends
TCU’s ATS data indicate a .500 cover rate prior to the season, suggesting that while their outcomes have been unpredictable, there may be value in their underdog or home-site positioning.
Wolverines vs. Horned Frogs Matchup Trends
Given Michigan’s strong ATS profile and TCU’s more volatile cover history, the line on this game may lean toward Michigan covering comfortably. However, if TCU is at home, their unpredictability and athletic mismatch potential could offer value for bettors backing the upset, making this a matchup where the underdog could outperform expectations.
Michigan vs. TCU Game Info
Michigan vs TCU starts on November 14, 2025 at 10:00 PM EST.
Venue: Ed & Rae Schollmaier Arena.
Spread: TCU +8.5
Moneyline: Michigan -403, TCU +313
Over/Under: 157.5
Michigan: (2-0) | TCU: (6-3)
Remi's searched hard and found the best prop for this matchup, but hasn't found a good Prop Bet yet for this game.. Prices move—always shop for the best number.
Given Michigan’s strong ATS profile and TCU’s more volatile cover history, the line on this game may lean toward Michigan covering comfortably. However, if TCU is at home, their unpredictability and athletic mismatch potential could offer value for bettors backing the upset, making this a matchup where the underdog could outperform expectations.
MICH trend: The Wolverines’ Betting Data page shows Michigan covering the spread in many of their recent games, indicating a strong ATS performance pattern.
TCU trend: TCU’s ATS data indicate a .500 cover rate prior to the season, suggesting that while their outcomes have been unpredictable, there may be value in their underdog or home-site positioning.
See our latest CBB picks and odds pages for 2025 to compare prices before you bet.
Michigan vs. TCU Odds
Remi is pouring through tons of data on each line. In fact, anytime the Michigan vs TCU trends are analyzed, there’s always several intriguing observations to key in on. Not to mention games played at extreme altitude almost always follow normal, predictable patterns.
| MICH Moneyline | -403 |
|---|---|
| TCU Moneyline | +313 |
| MICH Spread | -8.5 |
| TCU Spread | +8.5 |
| Over / Under | 157.5 |
Michigan vs TCU Live Odds
| Games | PTS | ML | SPR | O/U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
In Progress
Illinois Fighting Illini
USC Trojans
In Progress
ILL
USC
|
23
8
|
-1430
+575
|
-20.5 (-110)
+20.5 (-120)
|
O 154.5 (-110)
U 154.5 (-120)
|
|
|
In Progress
Kennesaw State Owls
Missouri State Bears
In Progress
KENSAW
MIZZST
|
85
85
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 176.5 (-115)
U 176.5 (-127)
|
|
|
In Progress
North Carolina Central Eagles
South Carolina State Bulldogs
In Progress
NCCENT
SCST
|
63
68
|
+500
|
+5.5 (-110)
|
O 150.5 (-105)
U 150.5 (-125)
|
|
|
In Progress
Utah Utes
West Virginia Mountaineers
In Progress
UTAH
WVU
|
49
44
|
-120
-110
|
-1.5 (+110)
+1.5 (-140)
|
O 122.5 (-115)
U 122.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
Murray State Racers
Illinois State Redbirds
In Progress
MURRAY
ILLST
|
50
67
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 158.5 (-115)
U 158.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
Kansas Jayhawks
Oklahoma State Cowboys
In Progress
KANSAS
OKLAST
|
67
52
|
-10000
|
-14.5 (-105)
|
O 154.5 (-115)
U 154.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
Auburn Tigers
Mississippi State Bulldogs
In Progress
AUBURN
MISSST
|
57
59
|
-254
|
-6 (-110)
|
O 155.5 (-110)
U 155.5 (-110)
|
|
|
In Progress
Virginia Cavaliers
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
In Progress
UVA
GATECH
|
83
47
|
-10000
+3300
|
-37.5 (-110)
+37.5 (-120)
|
O 163.5 (-105)
U 163.5 (-125)
|
|
|
In Progress
BYU Cougars
Arizona Wildcats
In Progress
BYU
ARIZ
|
50
63
|
+800
-2500
|
+14.5 (-125)
-14.5 (-105)
|
O 149.5 (-125)
U 149.5 (-105)
|
|
|
In Progress
Saint Mary's Gaels
Seattle Redhawks
In Progress
STMARY
SEATTLE
|
50
45
|
-750
+470
|
-7.5 (-120)
+7.5 (-110)
|
O 135.5 (-115)
U 135.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
Vanderbilt Commodores
Missouri Tigers
In Progress
VANDY
MIZZOU
|
38
54
|
+1300
-3200
|
+12.5 (-120)
-12.5 (-110)
|
O 141.5 (-115)
U 141.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
St. John's Red Storm
Marquette Golden Eagles
In Progress
STJOHN
MARQ
|
46
49
|
-200
+150
|
-2.5 (-115)
+2.5 (-115)
|
O 155.5 (-115)
U 155.5 (-115)
|
|
|
In Progress
Pacific Tigers
Washington State Cougars
In Progress
PACIFC
WASHST
|
45
53
|
+800
|
+11.5 (-110)
|
O 170.5 (-120)
U 170.5 (-110)
|
|
|
In Progress
Pepperdine Waves
Portland Pilots
In Progress
PEPPER
PORT
|
25
32
|
+230
-315
|
+6.5 (-115)
-6.5 (-115)
|
O 157.5 (-120)
U 157.5 (-110)
|
|
|
In Progress
Boise State Broncos
Utah State Aggies
In Progress
BOISE
UTAHST
|
0
0
|
+400
-525
|
+9 (-101)
-9 (-111)
|
O 152.5 (-119)
U 152.5 (+102)
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2026 11:00PM EST
Colorado State Rams
UNLV Rebels
2/18/26 11PM
COLOST
UNLV
|
–
–
|
-140
|
-2.5 (-103)
|
O 147 (-108)
U 147 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2026 11:00PM EST
Gonzaga Bulldogs
San Francisco Dons
2/18/26 11PM
GONZAG
SANFRN
|
–
–
|
-2000
+1041
|
-15 (-104)
+15 (-108)
|
O 151.5 (-108)
U 151.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 6:00PM EST
FIU Panthers
Liberty Flames
2/19/26 6PM
FIU
LIB
|
–
–
|
-650
|
-11 (-111)
|
O 152 (-113)
U 152 (-103)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 6:00PM EST
Binghamton Bearcats
Bryant Bulldogs
2/19/26 6PM
BING
BRYANT
|
–
–
|
+180
-220
|
+5.5 (-106)
-5.5 (-106)
|
O 138 (-108)
U 138 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 6:00PM EST
Vermont Catamounts
UMBC Retrievers
2/19/26 6PM
VRMNT
UMBC
|
–
–
|
-110
-115
|
-1.5 (-101)
+1.5 (-111)
|
O 141.5 (-108)
U 141.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 6:00PM EST
New Hampshire Wildcats
UMass Lowell River Hawks
2/19/26 6PM
NH
MASLOW
|
–
–
|
+170
-210
|
+5 (-106)
-5 (-106)
|
O 149 (-108)
U 149 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 6:30PM EST
South Carolina Upstate Spartans
Winthrop Eagles
2/19/26 6:30PM
USCUP
WNTHRP
|
–
–
|
+650
-1100
|
+13.5 (-106)
-13.5 (-106)
|
O 154.5 (-108)
U 154.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 6:30PM EST
Marshall Thundering Herd
App State Mountaineers
2/19/26 6:30PM
MARSH
APPST
|
–
–
|
+125
|
+3 (-106)
|
O 144 (-113)
U 144 (-103)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
IUPUI Jaguars
Wright State Raiders
2/19/26 7PM
IUPUI
WRIGHT
|
–
–
|
+575
|
+12.5 (-101)
|
O 162.5 (-108)
U 162.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
Chattanooga Mocs
Mercer Bears
2/19/26 7PM
CHAT
MERCER
|
–
–
|
+450
-625
|
+10.5 (-101)
-10.5 (-111)
|
O 152.5 (-113)
U 152.5 (-103)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
Wagner Seahawks
Mercyhurst Lakers
2/19/26 7PM
WAGNER
MERCY
|
–
–
|
+185
-225
|
+5 (-110)
-5 (-110)
|
O 133 (-110)
U 133 (-110)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
UNC Asheville Bulldogs
High Point Panthers
2/19/26 7PM
NCASH
HIGHPT
|
–
–
|
+700
-1100
|
+14 (-110)
-14 (-110)
|
O 152 (-110)
U 152 (-110)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
Longwood Lancers
Presbyterian College Blue Hose
2/19/26 7PM
LWOOD
PRESBY
|
–
–
|
+110
|
+2 (-110)
|
O 139 (-110)
U 139 (-110)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
LIU Sharks
St. Francis (PA) Red Flash
2/19/26 7PM
LIU
SFRAN
|
–
–
|
-450
+333
|
-9 (-110)
+9 (-110)
|
O 148.5 (-110)
U 148.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
Gardner-Webb Runnin Bulldogs
Radford Highlanders
2/19/26 7PM
GWEBB
RAD
|
–
–
|
-3000
|
-19.5 (-110)
|
O 162 (-110)
U 162 (-110)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
Monmouth Hawks
UNC Wilmington Seahawks
2/19/26 7PM
MONMTH
NCWILM
|
–
–
|
+260
-325
|
+7.5 (-106)
-7.5 (-106)
|
O 141 (-103)
U 141 (-113)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
Charleston Cougars
North Carolina A&T Aggies
2/19/26 7PM
CHARL
NCAT
|
–
–
|
-210
+170
|
-5 (-111)
+5 (-101)
|
O 147 (-113)
U 147 (-103)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
Albany Great Danes
NJIT Highlanders
2/19/26 7PM
ALBANY
NJIT
|
–
–
|
+135
-160
|
+3.5 (-110)
-3.5 (-110)
|
O 143.5 (-110)
U 143.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
Drexel Dragons
Northeastern Huskies
2/19/26 7PM
DREX
NEAST
|
–
–
|
-110
-110
|
pk
pk
|
O 144 (-108)
U 144 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
Fairleigh Dickinson Knights
Chicago State Cougars
2/19/26 7PM
FDU
CHIST
|
–
–
|
-125
|
-1.5 (-110)
|
O 135.5 (-110)
U 135.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
William & Mary Tribe
Campbell Fighting Camels
2/19/26 7PM
WMARY
CAMP
|
–
–
|
-102
-118
|
+1 (-106)
-1 (-106)
|
O 168 (-103)
U 168 (-113)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
Alabama State Hornets
Bethune-Cookman Wildcats
2/19/26 7PM
ALAST
BCOOK
|
–
–
|
-235
|
-6 (-110)
|
O 145 (-110)
U 145 (-110)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
Memphis Tigers
South Florida Bulls
2/19/26 7PM
MEMP
SFLA
|
–
–
|
+300
-400
|
+8.5 (-101)
-8.5 (-111)
|
O 159 (-108)
U 159 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
Samford Bulldogs
Citadel Bulldogs
2/19/26 7PM
SAMFRD
CIT
|
–
–
|
-600
|
-10 (-111)
|
O 140.5 (-113)
U 140.5 (-103)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
Le Moyne Dolphins
Central Connecticut Blue Devils
2/19/26 7PM
LMOYNE
CCONN
|
–
–
|
+155
|
+4.5 (-106)
|
O 147 (-108)
U 147 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 7:00PM EST
Austin Peay Governors
North Florida Ospreys
2/19/26 7PM
PEAY
NFLA
|
–
–
|
-600
+425
|
-11 (-110)
+11 (-110)
|
O 162.5 (-110)
U 162.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:00PM EST
Hampton Pirates
Hofstra Pride
2/19/26 8PM
HAMPT
HOFSTR
|
–
–
|
+525
-750
|
+11.5 (-106)
-11.5 (-106)
|
O 136 (-108)
U 136 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:00PM EST
Texas State Bobcats
South Alabama Jaguars
2/19/26 8PM
TEXST
SBAMA
|
–
–
|
+150
-185
|
+3.5 (-101)
-3.5 (-111)
|
O 137.5 (-108)
U 137.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:00PM EST
Utah Tech Trailblazers
UT Arlington Mavericks
2/19/26 8PM
UTTECH
UTARL
|
–
–
|
+155
|
+4.5 (-106)
|
O 141 (-108)
U 141 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:00PM EST
UMKC Kangaroos
North Dakota Fighting Hawks
2/19/26 8PM
UMKC
NDAK
|
–
–
|
+475
-650
|
+11 (-101)
-11 (-111)
|
O 150 (-108)
U 150 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:00PM EST
Southern Utah Thunderbirds
Tarleton State Texans
2/19/26 8PM
SUTAH
TARL
|
–
–
|
+195
-235
|
+5.5 (-101)
-5.5 (-111)
|
O 145.5 (-108)
U 145.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:00PM EST
Tenn-Martin Skyhawks
Arkansas Little Rock Trojans
2/19/26 8PM
TNMART
ARKLR
|
–
–
|
-145
|
-2.5 (-111)
|
O 135 (-108)
U 135 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:00PM EST
Central Arkansas Bears
Stetson Hatters
2/19/26 8PM
CNTARK
STETSN
|
–
–
|
-350
+275
|
-8 (-110)
+8 (-110)
|
O 149 (-110)
U 149 (-110)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:00PM EST
Georgia Southern Eagles
Georgia State Panthers
2/19/26 8PM
GASO
GAST
|
–
–
|
-110
|
pk
pk
|
O 154 (-108)
U 154 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:00PM EST
Arkansas State Red Wolves
Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
2/19/26 8PM
ARKST
UL
|
–
–
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 146 (-108)
U 146 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:00PM EST
Cal Baptist Lancers
Utah Valley Wolverines
2/19/26 8PM
CALBAP
UTVAL
|
–
–
|
+260
-325
|
+8 (-111)
-8 (-101)
|
O 142.5 (-108)
U 142.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:30PM EST
Alabama A&M Bulldogs
Florida A&M Rattlers
2/19/26 8:30PM
ALA&M
FLAAM
|
–
–
|
+100
-120
|
+1 (-110)
-1 (-110)
|
O 138.5 (-110)
U 138.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:30PM EST
Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles
Western Illinois Leathernecks
2/19/26 8:30PM
SOIND
WILL
|
–
–
|
-145
+118
|
-2.5 (-101)
+2.5 (-111)
|
O 138.5 (-113)
U 138.5 (-103)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:30PM EST
Lindenwood Lions
Tennessee State Tigers
2/19/26 8:30PM
LINDEN
TENNST
|
–
–
|
+135
|
+3.5 (-106)
|
O 163.5 (-108)
U 163.5 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:30PM EST
Prairie View A&M Panthers
Mississippi Valley State Delta Devils
2/19/26 8:30PM
PVAM
MVSU
|
–
–
|
|
pk
pk
|
O 153.5 (-110)
U 153.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:30PM EST
SIU-Edwardsville Cougars
Tennessee Tech Golden Eagles
2/19/26 8:30PM
SIUE
TNTECH
|
–
–
|
-135
+110
|
-2 (-101)
+2 (-111)
|
O 136 (-113)
U 136 (-103)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:30PM EST
Texas Southern Tigers
Arkansas Pine Bluff Golden Lions
2/19/26 8:30PM
TEXSO
ARKPB
|
–
–
|
+118
|
+2.5 (-110)
|
O 150.5 (-110)
U 150.5 (-110)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 8:30PM EST
Morehead State Eagles
Eastern Illinois Panthers
2/19/26 8:30PM
MOREHD
EILL
|
–
–
|
+110
|
+2 (-101)
|
O 138 (-103)
U 138 (-113)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 9:00PM EST
CSU Northridge Matadors
UC Santa Barbara Gauchos
2/19/26 9PM
CSUN
UCSB
|
–
–
|
+140
-170
|
+4 (-106)
-4 (-106)
|
O 158 (-108)
U 158 (-108)
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2026 9:00PM EST
Tulane Green Wave
North Texas Mean Green
2/19/26 9PM
TULANE
NOTEX
|
–
–
|
+230
-285
|
+6.5 (-101)
-6.5 (-111)
|
O 138 (-108)
U 138 (-108)
|
CBB Past Picks
Remi—our in-house AI—prices every game and prop using multi-season priors, tempo/efficiency, injury/usage signals, and market movement.
We publish fair prices, recommended “buy-to” numbers, and confidence so you can bet prices, not teams.
This preview covers Michigan Wolverines vs. TCU Horned Frogs on November 14, 2025 at Ed & Rae Schollmaier Arena.
Odds shown reflect widely available numbers and may update closer to kickoff.
Want more? Check live edges, player props, and line moves on our CBB odds pages, and compare prices before you place a bet.
|
|
|
|
RESULT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEB@IOWA | PRYCE SANDFORT UNDER 20.5 PTS + REB | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| WISC@OHIOST | OHIOST -110 | 53.3% | 3 | WIN |
| TCU@UCF | TCU +2 | 54.6% | 4 | LOSS |
| AF@NMEX | NMEX -27.5 | 55.0% | 4 | WIN |
| NEB@IOWA | NEB +1.5 | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| UL@OLDDOM | UL +6 | 54.4% | 4 | LOSS |
| COLGATE@BU | BU +126 | 40.1% | 0 | WIN |
| HOWARD@DELST | HOWARD -12.5 | 54.5% | 4 | WIN |
| ABIL@TARL | TARL -1 | 53.2% | 1 | WIN |
| CUSE@DUKE | NATE KINGZ UNDER 3.5 REB | 53.4% | 3 | WIN |
| SANFRAN@USD | ASSANE DIOP OVER 5.5 REBOUNDS | 55.1% | 5 | LOSS |
| MERIMK@QUINN | QUINN -110 | 54.7% | 4 | LOSS |
| SIENA@MARIST | MARIST +0.5 | 56.9% | 6 | LOSS |
| YOUNG@DETROIT | DETROIT +3.5 | 54.4% | 4 | WIN |
| IND@ILL | IND +10.5 | 55.3% | 5 | LOSS |
| SETON@BUTLER | MICHAEL AJAYI UNDER 29.5 POINTS + REBOUNDS + ASSTS | 54.2% | 4 | LOSS |
| GTOWN@UCONN | KJ LEWIS UNDER 13.5 POINTS | 53.7% | 3 | LOSS |
| WYO@COLOST | COLOST -4.5 | 53.2% | 1 | WIN |
| HIGHPT@GWEBB | GWEBB +25.5 | 56.7% | 6 | WIN |
| NMEXST@JAXST | NMEXST +116 | 47.7% | 1 | WIN |
| DUQ@STBONN | DUQ +122 | 51.3% | 1 | WIN |
| MERCER@CITADEL | CITADEL +10.5 | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| NDAKST@NDAK | NDAK +5.5 | 54.6% | 4 | LOSS |
| SC@BAMA | BAMA -17.5 | 54.8% | 4 | LOSS |
| UCRIV@UCSD | UCSD -9.5 | 54.9% | 5 | LOSS |
| HAWAII@CSUN | CSUN +3.5 | 55.1% | 5 | WIN |
| FURMAN@VMI | VMI +13.5 | 56.3% | 6 | LOSS |
| ARMY@AMERCN | AMERCN -9.5 | 54.6% | 4 | WIN |
| STLOU@LOYCHI | LOYCHI +19 | 57.5% | 7 | LOSS |
| GMASON@GWASH | GWASH -2 | 54.2% | 4 | WIN |
| MICHST@WISC | WISC +2.5 | 53.3% | 2 | WIN |
| BROWN@HARV | HARV -7.5 | 55.0% | 4 | LOSS |
| CLMBIA@PENN | PENN -2 | 54.7% | 4 | WIN |
| PRESBY@CHARLSO | CHARLSO -1 | 54.7% | 4 | WIN |
| MNMTH@DREX | DREX -1.5 | 55.3% | 5 | LOSS |
| HAWAII@CSBAK | CSBAK +13 | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| VALPO@ILLST | ILLST -8.5 | 53.8% | 3 | WIN |
| WNTHRP@GWEBB | GWEBB +20.5 | 56.8% | 6 | WIN |
| UCDAV@UCSD | UCSD -4.5 | 53.6% | 1 | WIN |
| IOWA@MD | MD +11 | 54.7% | 4 | WIN |
| BUFF@BALLST | BALLST +1.5 | 54.9% | 4 | LOSS |
| VCU@LSALLE | LSALLE +12.5 | 54.0% | 3 | WIN |
| MICH@NWEST | NWEST +15.5 | 56.5% | 6 | WIN |
| VATECH@CLEM | VATECH +8 | 57.8% | 7 | WIN |
| IOWAST@TCU | IOWAST -7 | 56.8% | 6 | LOSS |
| UNC@MIAMI | MIAMI +1.5 | 53.8% | 2 | WIN |
| COLOST@AF | COLOST -16 | 54.9% | 4 | WIN |
| UVA@FSU | UVA -7.5 | 55.3% | 5 | LOSS |
| MARQET@NOVA | NOVA -9.5 | 56.6% | 6 | LOSS |
| EILL@WESTILL | EILL -3.5 | 54.7% | 4 | LOSS |
| BELMONT@BRAD | BELMONT -1 | 56.1% | 6 | LOSS |